17.02.2015 Views

AIF - Sprott Resource Corp.

AIF - Sprott Resource Corp.

AIF - Sprott Resource Corp.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lower Oil and Gas Prices Increase the Risk of Write-Downs<br />

Under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), when indicators of impairment exist, the carrying value of the<br />

Exploration and Evaluation (‘‘E&E’’) assets as well as each Cash Generating Unit (‘‘CGU’’), including goodwill attributed to<br />

the CGU, is compared to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is defined as the higher of the fair value less<br />

cost to sell or value in use. A decline in oil and gas prices may be an indicator of CGU impairment and may result in the<br />

estimated recoverable amount of an Energy Subsidiaries’ developed oil and natural gas properties being less than their<br />

carrying value on the balance sheet, resulting in a write-down of the CGU assets. While these write-downs would not<br />

affect cash flow from operations, the charge to earnings may be viewed unfavourably in the market. Impairments to<br />

goodwill and E&E assets are not reversed, however should the conditions that caused the CGU asset impairment reverse<br />

in the future the Company would be required to reverse all, or a portion of the impairment previously recorded.<br />

Unforeseen Title Defects<br />

The Company or the Energy Subsidiaries, as applicable, conduct title reviews in certain circumstances in accordance with<br />

industry practice prior to purchases of assets. However, if conducted, these reviews do not guarantee that an unforeseen<br />

defect in the chain of title will not arise and defeat title to the purchased assets. If this type of defect were to occur, the<br />

Energy Subsidiaries’ entitlement to the production and reserves (and, if applicable, resources) from the purchased assets<br />

could be jeopardized. Furthermore, from time to time, the Energy Subsidiaries may have disputes with industry partners<br />

as to ownership rights of certain properties or resources, including with respect to the validity of oil and gas leases held by<br />

the Energy Subsidiaries. Furthermore, from time to time, the Energy Subsidiaries or their industry partners may owe one<br />

another a contractual or trust related obligation which they may default in satisfying and which may adversely effect the<br />

validity of an oil and gas lease in which the either of the Energy Subsidiaries has an interest. The existence of title defects,<br />

unsatisfied contractual or trust related obligations or the resolution of any disputes with industry partners arising from<br />

same, may have a material adverse effect on the Energy Subsidiaries or their assets and operations and as a result<br />

adversely affect the value of the Company’s common shares.<br />

Risks Relating to the Agriculture Segment – One Earth Farms<br />

Limited Operating History<br />

One Earth Farms has a limited history of operations and is still in the early stage of development. As such, One Earth<br />

Farms is subject to many risks common to such enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations<br />

with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and lack of revenue. There is no assurance that One Earth<br />

Farms will be successful in achieving a return on shareholders’ investment and the likelihood of success must be<br />

considered in light of its early stage of operations.<br />

The Availability of Land for Growth may be Limited<br />

One Earth Farms’ growth strategy may be constrained in the event that it is unable to secure a large amount of acreage.<br />

One Earth Farms’ current strategy is contingent upon securing a significant amount of new acreage each year to drive<br />

economies of scale. One Earth Farms’ business model is reliant on a high degree of lease renewals. It is possible that<br />

certain parties may not wish to renew land lease agreements at the conclusion of the lease term. One Earth Farms may<br />

suffer certain inefficiencies if it has made investments in infrastructure close to leased properties for which leases are not<br />

renewed. In addition, the optimal process for securing leases is through an INAC Permit. While some bands are currently<br />

following this process, other bands are not. Consequently, some of the leases currently under negotiation and/or signed<br />

are contingent on the band pursuing an INAC Permit or land designation process leading to a lease granted by the<br />

Minister and it cannot be guaranteed that such bands will achieve the internal approval for this to occur. Without an INAC<br />

Permit or a lease granted by the Minister, the legal remedies available to One Earth Farms are limited in the event of a<br />

breach of contract.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!