20.02.2015 Views

Women in decision-making: The Norwegian Paradox

Women in decision-making: The Norwegian Paradox

Women in decision-making: The Norwegian Paradox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

In world-wide comparisons on gender equality the Nordic countries are regularly placed on<br />

top of the lists. This is the case when it comes to the number of women <strong>in</strong> political positions<br />

as well as broader aspects of gender equality such as economic opportunities, educational<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>ment, health and well-be<strong>in</strong>g for women and men. 1<br />

This fortunate situation <strong>in</strong> regard to gender equality is largely due to major<br />

transformations <strong>in</strong> gender relations that occurred <strong>in</strong> Norway throughout the 1970s and 1980s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> employment of women <strong>in</strong>creased dramatically and women got access to political <strong>decision</strong><br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g assemblies to almost the same degree as men.<br />

Still it is important to emphasize the ambiguities and paradoxes of the <strong>Norwegian</strong>, as<br />

well as for the rest of the Nordic countries, <strong>in</strong> relation to gender equality. On the one hand,<br />

processes of gender equality are a general trend. Female employment has <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

immensely, from less than half of the female population <strong>in</strong> the early 1970ties to about twothird<br />

today. Recently employment has <strong>in</strong>creased the most among mothers with small children.<br />

However, this is often not full-time employment. Statistics show that 40 % of all employed<br />

women work part-time and 12 % of all employed men. In spite of the gender differences, parttime<br />

work is more common <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Norwegian</strong> labour market, than <strong>in</strong> the rest of Europe. This<br />

is partly a consequence of high employment rates<br />

(http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/00/02/10/ola_kari_en/arbeid_en/). Strong gender<br />

segregation is another important feature of the <strong>Norwegian</strong> labour market. Along the horizontal<br />

dimension, occupations and professions <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Norwegian</strong> labour market are strongly<br />

segregated by gender, and the gender segregated structures co-varies clearly with the<br />

1 Some examples of recent world-wide comparisons on gender equality are the World Economic Forum Gender<br />

Gap (2005) which rank Sweden first and Norway second on the list (http://www.weforum.org) and the United<br />

Nations Human Development Index (2002) which ranks Norway first and Sweden second (http://www.undp.org)<br />

(also when gender aspects are taken <strong>in</strong>to account see the GEM Gender empowerment measure and GDI Gender<br />

Related Development Index). <strong>The</strong> Inter-parliamentary Union provides statistics regard<strong>in</strong>g women <strong>in</strong> national<br />

parliaments (http://www.ipu.org). Currently (2005) Sweden is ranked as number two and Norway number three<br />

on the list.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!