FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT

Marion County, Oregon
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
SECTION TWO
STAFFING ANALYSIS AND NEEDS
Exhibit 2.6: Full-Time Equivalent Positions Forecasts General Government Component
Actual Projections
Total Total % Annual %
Basis
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025 Increase Increase Increase
Population 302,135 323,128 344,443 367,018 388,898 86,763 29% 1.34%
Assessor\Tax Collector 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 - 0% 0.00%
Board of Commissioners 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 1.0 7% 0.36%
Business Services (all less Fac. Mgmt) 40.5 45.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 5.5 14% 0.67%
Business Services - Facilities Management 39.0 43.0 46.0 48.0 49.0 10.0 26% 1.21%
County Clerk 16.5 18.0 19.0 20.0 22.0 5.5 33% 1.53%
Information Technology 57.0 57.9 58.9 59.9 60.9 3.9 7% 0.34%
Tax Title Fund 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 - 0% 0.00%
Treasurer 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 0% 0.00%
Total 236.5 247.4 254.4 258.4 262.4 25.9 11% 0.55%
300
250
200
Recommended Staff Forecast
General Government Functions
500,000
400,000
Comparative Historical Annual Growth Rate (Fy Ending 2005-06): 3.76%
80
70
60
50
Recommended Staff Forecast
General Government Functions By Dept.
150
100
300,000 40
30
200,000
20
50
-
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
Staff
Population
100,000
-
10
-
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
Tax Title Fund
Treasurer
Board of Commissioners
County Clerk
Business Services (less FM)
Bus. Srvc. - Fac. Mgmt.
Information Technology
Assessor\T ax Collector
The ensuing paragraphs provide more detailed alternative departmental projections, the “recommended”
forecast, and supporting discussion.
Assessor/Tax Collector
Applied Actual Projections
Total Total % Annual %
Basis
Rate 2006 2010 2015 2020 2025 Increase Increase Increase
Population 302,135 323,128 344,443 367,018 388,898 86,763 29% 1.34%
Min. Hist. Rate Per 10,000 Pop. 2.18 66.0 70.6 75.2 80.2 85.0 19.0 29% 1.34%
Adj. Avg. Hist. Rate Per 10,000 Pop. 2.29 66.0 73.9 78.8 83.9 89.0 23.0 35% 1.58%
Year 2006 Rate Per 10,000 Population 2.18 66.0 70.6 75.2 80.2 85.0 19.0 29% 1.34%
Regression Analysis Vs. Population 66.0 67.6 68.0 68.5 68.9 2.9 4% 0.23%
Department Generated Projections 66.0 None Provided
- - - - - - -99.94%
Consultant Generated/Recommended 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 - 0% 0.00%
The Assessor believed that the current (year 2006) budgeted department staffing levels are adequate given
existing workload. Assuming continued advancing information technologies, the Assessor thought that the
only increases necessary would be in real-property appraisers, as they must actually work in the field, and
therefore believed that three additional positions would be required for this task, given county growth.
However, County Management believes that continued advances in automation will mitigate office-based
staff needs, thereby affording the department the opportunity to convert office-based staff to field appraisers.
Hence, County Management projects no increase in Assessor/Tax Collector staff, a supposition with which
the Project Team believes to be reasonable.
DSA KMD Section Two - Page 11