A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Protestant Reformed Theological Journal<br />
personal-structural bond which jo<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> three persons <strong>of</strong> God <strong>in</strong> a<br />
community <strong>of</strong> life, and <strong>in</strong> which man was created to participate.” The<br />
precise nature, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant with Adam was a relationship <strong>of</strong><br />
communion and fellowship with God.<br />
In this covenant, God made a promise <strong>of</strong> life to Adam. Regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that life, which Adam could have atta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> men <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FV men are<br />
clear. Jordan says concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> promise to Adam,<br />
Com<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge, Adam would experience a first k<strong>in</strong>d<br />
<strong>of</strong> death and glorification.... Full glorification with all <strong>the</strong> elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world would await <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Adam, who would<br />
also be <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. 39<br />
Adam without Christ would have atta<strong>in</strong>ed to an <strong>in</strong>itial stage <strong>of</strong> glorification,<br />
and with him <strong>the</strong> entire human race, merely through obedience<br />
to <strong>the</strong> probationary command. However, <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God, Jesus<br />
Christ, would eventually become <strong>in</strong>carnate anyway, apart from s<strong>in</strong> on<br />
<strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> Adam, <strong>in</strong> order to br<strong>in</strong>g Adam and his posterity <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
second stage <strong>of</strong> maturity—<strong>the</strong> glorious heavenly life. Jordan believes<br />
that “<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>carnation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God, who would also be <strong>the</strong> Son<br />
<strong>of</strong> Adam, was planned all along, apart from s<strong>in</strong>.” 40<br />
Lusk states <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>heritance promised to Adam <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> more comprehensive<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />
God would have eventually given him <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
Good and Evil. This Tree would have represented <strong>the</strong> bestowal <strong>of</strong><br />
k<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>of</strong>fice and glory upon Adam. It would have meant a promotion<br />
from earthly dom<strong>in</strong>ion to heavenly (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 15:47; cf.<br />
vs. 44, 45 and Ephesians 2:6). It would have meant <strong>the</strong> dawn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> new age, <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boundary between heaven and earth<br />
(Genesis 1:6–8), <strong>the</strong> jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> heaven and earth (Revelation<br />
21, 22). 41<br />
When Adam had passed his test <strong>of</strong> obedience to God by not eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
39 Wilk<strong>in</strong>s, Federal Vision, 187.<br />
40 Ibid., 185.<br />
41 Beisner, Auburn Avenue Theology, 139.<br />
20<br />
Vol. 44, No. 2