A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
A Critique of the Covenant of Works in Contemporary Controversy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Protestant Reformed Theological Journal<br />
The div<strong>in</strong>e glory and grace revealed <strong>in</strong> Jesus Christ is richer and<br />
higher. It was with a view to <strong>the</strong> manifestation <strong>of</strong> this higher and<br />
richer bless<strong>in</strong>g that God not only foresaw, but orda<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong><br />
Adam from eternity. Even on <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most adamant traditional<br />
Reformed defender <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> works, God decreed that fall<br />
<strong>of</strong> Adam with a view to Jesus Christ. The Reformed have <strong>in</strong>sisted<br />
on this as strongly as <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>in</strong>sisted on anyth<strong>in</strong>g else <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> locus<br />
anthropology. The Reformed <strong>in</strong>sist on that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> Jesus<br />
Christ. They absolutely refused to view <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ as<br />
a mere restoration or repair <strong>of</strong> what Adam lost.<br />
What Reformed man could have a problem with this viewpo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
applied to <strong>the</strong> covenant with Adam? God did not promise to Adam<br />
eternal, heavenly life, and God never <strong>in</strong>tended that Adam would reach<br />
heaven <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first covenant. He never <strong>in</strong>tended anyone to reach<br />
heaven <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first covenant. He determ<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong> covenant would<br />
be breached by <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Adam and <strong>in</strong> him by <strong>the</strong> whole human race,<br />
<strong>in</strong> order to lay that breach as <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> His stupendous work<br />
<strong>of</strong> salvation <strong>in</strong> Jesus Christ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> grace with <strong>the</strong> new elect<br />
human race. The PRC view <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord from heaven to<br />
reveal, establish, and fulfill <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> God as <strong>the</strong> revelation <strong>of</strong><br />
greater riches and bless<strong>in</strong>g. What Christ did, Adam never could have<br />
done, even if he had never s<strong>in</strong>ned and had rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong><br />
perfection for eons. They <strong>in</strong>sist on that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> view<strong>in</strong>g all<br />
<strong>of</strong> salvation from <strong>the</strong> viewpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decrees <strong>of</strong> God and especially<br />
this decree that Jesus Christ is first <strong>in</strong> order that <strong>in</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs He might<br />
have <strong>the</strong> preem<strong>in</strong>ence. He is not an afterthought to mop up Adam’s<br />
mess. Jesus Christ is alpha and omega, <strong>the</strong> first and last: first <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
counsel <strong>of</strong> God, <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs as well, and <strong>in</strong> order that God<br />
might be all <strong>in</strong> all. The doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> works, with its<br />
<strong>in</strong>sistence that Adam could have earned heaven, overturns that whole<br />
viewpo<strong>in</strong>t and does grave <strong>in</strong>justice to <strong>the</strong> uniqueness <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ,<br />
<strong>the</strong> glory <strong>of</strong> His work, and <strong>the</strong> wisdom <strong>of</strong> God.<br />
Not only is <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> works itself a wrong doctr<strong>in</strong>e, but its<br />
implications for <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> grace are also dangerous. In all <strong>of</strong> its<br />
errors <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>of</strong> works negatively affects <strong>the</strong> formulations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
covenant <strong>of</strong> grace, which is <strong>in</strong>evitable. The covenant with Adam was<br />
44<br />
Vol. 44, No. 2