Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission
Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission
Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 June 2011<br />
Mr Chris Hutchins<br />
Project Manager- Trade Waste<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Division<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />
Level 2 35 Spring Street<br />
MELBOURNE VIC 3000<br />
Dear Chris<br />
Re: Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code<br />
Thankyou for the opportunity to provide a submission to the <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Services</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong> on the Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code.<br />
<strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> has considered the draft code and in general the code is consistent<br />
with the processes and approach that are being developed between <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
and the Retail <strong>Water</strong> companies. It should be noted however, that the draft code would<br />
not directly apply to <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong>, other than through the referral of applications,<br />
as well as the development and publication of acceptance criteria in combination with<br />
the Retail <strong>Water</strong> Companies. Therefore it is suggested that the code should be modified<br />
to specifically describe MWC’s role, and the applicability of the code to MWC. Further<br />
detail related this point and other general comments on the code are provided in the<br />
Attachment.<br />
If you have any questions concerning any of the comments, please do not hesitate to<br />
contact me on 9235 2142 or email lidia.harvey@melbournewater.com.au.<br />
Yours sincerely<br />
LIDIA HARVEY<br />
TEAM LEADER, SEWAGE QUALITY MANAGEMENT<br />
1
Attachment 1<br />
<strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> (MWC) comments on the Trade Waste Customer Service<br />
Code (Draft)<br />
1. The Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code, Draft Decision document, May 2011<br />
is a useful supporting document to the customer service code. It is unclear if this<br />
document will continue to be a supporting document to the code, as an appendix or<br />
reference document. Such a document (modified as required) that could provide<br />
clarity and explanation of the code would be seen as valuable and worth maintaining<br />
as a reference document in addition to the code.<br />
2. MWC is included in the definition of a <strong>Water</strong> business. This has a number of<br />
implications for MWC particularly given the obligations of a <strong>Water</strong> business in the<br />
customer service code, most of which do not apply to MWC. There may be an<br />
opportunity based on the comment 1 above to provide clarity around which clauses<br />
apply to MWC. However, if there is no guiding document for the customer service<br />
code, then a more specific description of MWC will be required in the code and the<br />
exclusion of clauses related to MWC. Some of the comments that follow relate to the<br />
ambiguity of role of MWC and application of code given MWC does not have any<br />
direct Trade waste customers.<br />
3. Section 1 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />
customers however there may be a need for the Metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses to<br />
refer an application to MWC for consideration. This should be made clear in either<br />
the code or the guiding document. An additional clause such as clause 6.2 (c)<br />
would be a useful addition in for the clarification of MWC’s role in being consulted<br />
and involved in the process for assessing the risk from trade waste to its system<br />
when required.<br />
4. Section 2 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />
customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />
5. Section 3 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />
customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />
Clause 3.2 appears silent on the requirement of the customer to provide a copy of<br />
the Risk Assessment to the <strong>Water</strong> business, or other <strong>Water</strong> businesses (<strong>Melbourne</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong>) impacted by the risk. Making the requirement of the customer to conduct<br />
and supply the findings to the water business explicit will support the metropolitan<br />
water businesses development of the ISQMS 1 and in particular Protocol 2- Site<br />
Specific Risk Assessments.<br />
6. Section 4 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />
customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />
7. Section 5 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />
customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />
MWC has Bulk Sewerage Usage Charges- Load, major Trade waste (per tonne)<br />
1 ISQMS- Integrated Sewage Quality Management System independently certified to<br />
ISO 22000.<br />
1
however this is passed on to the Retail water businesses and which in turn may be<br />
passed on to the Trade Waste customer at the RWC’s discretion.<br />
8. Clause 6.1 requires each <strong>Water</strong> business to maintain a current statement of<br />
approved acceptance criteria and be readily available on its website. Based on the<br />
definition of <strong>Water</strong> business, it is also a requirement of <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> to do this.<br />
MWC does not have any direct Trade waste customers therefore this clause would<br />
not be applicable to MWC. This should be made clear in either the code or the<br />
guiding document.<br />
9. The National Wastewater Source Management Guideline published by the <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Services</strong> Association of Australia, referred in clause 6.2 (b) is currently being<br />
reviewed, and will be renamed to the Australian Wastewater Quality Management<br />
Guidelines later this year.<br />
10. Clause 6.2 (c) relates directly to MWC and is consistent with the process being<br />
developed in the ISQMS by the metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses.<br />
11. MWC will be involved in the process for establishing, replacing or amending<br />
approved acceptance criteria as described in clause 6.3 however given MWC does<br />
not have any direct Trade waste customers therefore this clause does not directly<br />
apply to MWC. This should be made clear in the either the code or the guiding<br />
document.<br />
12. The acceptance criteria is currently located in the Statement of Obligations and<br />
approved by the Minister for <strong>Water</strong>. It is unclear if the commission is approving the<br />
acceptance criteria on behalf of the Minister, or where the ‘official acceptance<br />
criteria master list’ will be stored. This list should be available to any water business<br />
or customer upon request.<br />
13. A technical understanding by the commission to assist in considering an application<br />
under clause 6.3 would be a highly desirable outcome.<br />
14. Clause 6.5 (e) appears ambiguous- does this mean maintaining a register of all<br />
applications, including those rejected?<br />
15. Clause 6.5 (g) (ii) seems to repeat ‘name of customer’ which is already in Clause<br />
6.5 (g) (i).<br />
16. Clause 7.1 (b) refers to clause 3.1 (d). No such clause exists. Additionally, the<br />
mention of clause 3 in this section seems unrelated to the dispute resolution clause.<br />
17. Clause 7.1 and 7.2 may relate to MWC particularly when it is a dispute between<br />
MWC and another water business or in conjunction with another water business as<br />
related to any involvement in any other matter with a customer. This section does<br />
not appear to address the issue regarding dispute between two water businesses.<br />
This should be made clear in the code or the guiding document.<br />
18. Clause 7.2 refers to “the customer’s water business”. This is not defined in the<br />
code.<br />
19. Clause 7.2 should require the customer’s water business to advice customer and the<br />
other water business of the other water business’s involvement.<br />
3
20. Section 8 should consider not just sewerage treatment but the 5 key objectives 2 in<br />
its business planning processes. Additionally, water businesses should plan for total<br />
sewage loads which include trade waste. MWC will need to consult with the<br />
Metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses and vice versa to assist with each others business<br />
planning process.<br />
21. Clause 8 (c) should consider alternatives to just accommodating increases in<br />
capacity such as reducing pollutants at the least community cost.<br />
22. Section 9 and 10 do not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade waste<br />
customers. It should be made clear in the code or the guiding document that MWC<br />
is not required to prepare a customer charter for Trade waste.<br />
23. Part E- definitions should reflect <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong>’s role as a referral authority<br />
regarding applications, customer-specific acceptance criteria, and it’s role in working<br />
with RWCs regarding approved acceptance criteria and as per comments above.<br />
2 % key objectives include:<br />
1. Ensure safety of workers in the sewerage system,<br />
2. Protection of assets,<br />
3. Protection of treatment plant (including biogas),<br />
4. Protect receiving environment/facilitate licence compliance<br />
5. Recycling: water and Biosolids (by products)<br />
4