24.02.2015 Views

Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission

Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission

Melbourne Water - Essential Services Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 June 2011<br />

Mr Chris Hutchins<br />

Project Manager- Trade Waste<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Division<br />

<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

Level 2 35 Spring Street<br />

MELBOURNE VIC 3000<br />

Dear Chris<br />

Re: Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code<br />

Thankyou for the opportunity to provide a submission to the <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Services</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> on the Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code.<br />

<strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> has considered the draft code and in general the code is consistent<br />

with the processes and approach that are being developed between <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />

and the Retail <strong>Water</strong> companies. It should be noted however, that the draft code would<br />

not directly apply to <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong>, other than through the referral of applications,<br />

as well as the development and publication of acceptance criteria in combination with<br />

the Retail <strong>Water</strong> Companies. Therefore it is suggested that the code should be modified<br />

to specifically describe MWC’s role, and the applicability of the code to MWC. Further<br />

detail related this point and other general comments on the code are provided in the<br />

Attachment.<br />

If you have any questions concerning any of the comments, please do not hesitate to<br />

contact me on 9235 2142 or email lidia.harvey@melbournewater.com.au.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

LIDIA HARVEY<br />

TEAM LEADER, SEWAGE QUALITY MANAGEMENT<br />

1


Attachment 1<br />

<strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> (MWC) comments on the Trade Waste Customer Service<br />

Code (Draft)<br />

1. The Draft Trade Waste Customer Service Code, Draft Decision document, May 2011<br />

is a useful supporting document to the customer service code. It is unclear if this<br />

document will continue to be a supporting document to the code, as an appendix or<br />

reference document. Such a document (modified as required) that could provide<br />

clarity and explanation of the code would be seen as valuable and worth maintaining<br />

as a reference document in addition to the code.<br />

2. MWC is included in the definition of a <strong>Water</strong> business. This has a number of<br />

implications for MWC particularly given the obligations of a <strong>Water</strong> business in the<br />

customer service code, most of which do not apply to MWC. There may be an<br />

opportunity based on the comment 1 above to provide clarity around which clauses<br />

apply to MWC. However, if there is no guiding document for the customer service<br />

code, then a more specific description of MWC will be required in the code and the<br />

exclusion of clauses related to MWC. Some of the comments that follow relate to the<br />

ambiguity of role of MWC and application of code given MWC does not have any<br />

direct Trade waste customers.<br />

3. Section 1 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />

customers however there may be a need for the Metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses to<br />

refer an application to MWC for consideration. This should be made clear in either<br />

the code or the guiding document. An additional clause such as clause 6.2 (c)<br />

would be a useful addition in for the clarification of MWC’s role in being consulted<br />

and involved in the process for assessing the risk from trade waste to its system<br />

when required.<br />

4. Section 2 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />

customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />

5. Section 3 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />

customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />

Clause 3.2 appears silent on the requirement of the customer to provide a copy of<br />

the Risk Assessment to the <strong>Water</strong> business, or other <strong>Water</strong> businesses (<strong>Melbourne</strong><br />

<strong>Water</strong>) impacted by the risk. Making the requirement of the customer to conduct<br />

and supply the findings to the water business explicit will support the metropolitan<br />

water businesses development of the ISQMS 1 and in particular Protocol 2- Site<br />

Specific Risk Assessments.<br />

6. Section 4 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />

customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />

7. Section 5 does not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade Waste<br />

customers. This should be made clear in either the code or the guiding document.<br />

MWC has Bulk Sewerage Usage Charges- Load, major Trade waste (per tonne)<br />

1 ISQMS- Integrated Sewage Quality Management System independently certified to<br />

ISO 22000.<br />

1


however this is passed on to the Retail water businesses and which in turn may be<br />

passed on to the Trade Waste customer at the RWC’s discretion.<br />

8. Clause 6.1 requires each <strong>Water</strong> business to maintain a current statement of<br />

approved acceptance criteria and be readily available on its website. Based on the<br />

definition of <strong>Water</strong> business, it is also a requirement of <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong> to do this.<br />

MWC does not have any direct Trade waste customers therefore this clause would<br />

not be applicable to MWC. This should be made clear in either the code or the<br />

guiding document.<br />

9. The National Wastewater Source Management Guideline published by the <strong>Water</strong><br />

<strong>Services</strong> Association of Australia, referred in clause 6.2 (b) is currently being<br />

reviewed, and will be renamed to the Australian Wastewater Quality Management<br />

Guidelines later this year.<br />

10. Clause 6.2 (c) relates directly to MWC and is consistent with the process being<br />

developed in the ISQMS by the metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses.<br />

11. MWC will be involved in the process for establishing, replacing or amending<br />

approved acceptance criteria as described in clause 6.3 however given MWC does<br />

not have any direct Trade waste customers therefore this clause does not directly<br />

apply to MWC. This should be made clear in the either the code or the guiding<br />

document.<br />

12. The acceptance criteria is currently located in the Statement of Obligations and<br />

approved by the Minister for <strong>Water</strong>. It is unclear if the commission is approving the<br />

acceptance criteria on behalf of the Minister, or where the ‘official acceptance<br />

criteria master list’ will be stored. This list should be available to any water business<br />

or customer upon request.<br />

13. A technical understanding by the commission to assist in considering an application<br />

under clause 6.3 would be a highly desirable outcome.<br />

14. Clause 6.5 (e) appears ambiguous- does this mean maintaining a register of all<br />

applications, including those rejected?<br />

15. Clause 6.5 (g) (ii) seems to repeat ‘name of customer’ which is already in Clause<br />

6.5 (g) (i).<br />

16. Clause 7.1 (b) refers to clause 3.1 (d). No such clause exists. Additionally, the<br />

mention of clause 3 in this section seems unrelated to the dispute resolution clause.<br />

17. Clause 7.1 and 7.2 may relate to MWC particularly when it is a dispute between<br />

MWC and another water business or in conjunction with another water business as<br />

related to any involvement in any other matter with a customer. This section does<br />

not appear to address the issue regarding dispute between two water businesses.<br />

This should be made clear in the code or the guiding document.<br />

18. Clause 7.2 refers to “the customer’s water business”. This is not defined in the<br />

code.<br />

19. Clause 7.2 should require the customer’s water business to advice customer and the<br />

other water business of the other water business’s involvement.<br />

3


20. Section 8 should consider not just sewerage treatment but the 5 key objectives 2 in<br />

its business planning processes. Additionally, water businesses should plan for total<br />

sewage loads which include trade waste. MWC will need to consult with the<br />

Metropolitan <strong>Water</strong> businesses and vice versa to assist with each others business<br />

planning process.<br />

21. Clause 8 (c) should consider alternatives to just accommodating increases in<br />

capacity such as reducing pollutants at the least community cost.<br />

22. Section 9 and 10 do not apply to MWC as we do not have any direct Trade waste<br />

customers. It should be made clear in the code or the guiding document that MWC<br />

is not required to prepare a customer charter for Trade waste.<br />

23. Part E- definitions should reflect <strong>Melbourne</strong> <strong>Water</strong>’s role as a referral authority<br />

regarding applications, customer-specific acceptance criteria, and it’s role in working<br />

with RWCs regarding approved acceptance criteria and as per comments above.<br />

2 % key objectives include:<br />

1. Ensure safety of workers in the sewerage system,<br />

2. Protection of assets,<br />

3. Protection of treatment plant (including biogas),<br />

4. Protect receiving environment/facilitate licence compliance<br />

5. Recycling: water and Biosolids (by products)<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!