26.02.2015 Views

Conference Proceedings - Sustainable Forest Management Network ...

Conference Proceedings - Sustainable Forest Management Network ...

Conference Proceedings - Sustainable Forest Management Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Break-out Group 3<br />

Session 2: How much and where should forests be fully protected in reserves?<br />

We need applied science to answer this question. How much you need depends on the services you are<br />

trying to get from the ecosystem in question; the answer should balance social, economic, and ecological<br />

needs. It is hard to answer this question without determining what values you are trying to maintain<br />

in the forest. This group recognized that these values are probably different around the world. As far as<br />

changing current protected areas status in different regions, it was agreed that different areas of the<br />

boreal have quite different challenges. It is particularly challenging to accomplish this shift in management<br />

focus in areas with many private landowners. How are costs shared and how are protected areas<br />

implemented on the ground?<br />

Session 3: How can management effectively restore/recreate/maintain<br />

biodiversity?<br />

This break-out group generally agreed that researchers have a very good sense of what information we<br />

have and what we are lacking. However, we do not generally know how to change practices on the<br />

ground. Developing practical tools (e.g., the HCVF toolkit) was generally agreed to be an important<br />

method for changing practices. We also do not know the relative effectiveness of these different methods<br />

for maintain/restoring biodiversity.<br />

Possible BorNet research questions<br />

• We need to examine regulatory and legislative barriers to maintaining biodiversity around the<br />

boreal, and use this document to inform policy-makers. What constraints are there in the boreal<br />

to the protection of biodiversity (e.g., the tenure system in British Columbia, Canada)? What<br />

different approaches are being used around the boreal?<br />

• What values should be managed for in the boreal globally, what determines them, and where are<br />

there concentrations of high values?<br />

• Should conservation efforts be only in high conservation value forests or should they occur<br />

outside of these too? We could examine this question through a two step process: first, use<br />

habitat requirements of focal species; second, use maps of HCVF in a micro-scale.<br />

• How do we maintain ecosystem function? What should be measured? How do we maintain<br />

ecological function across scales?<br />

• Within the TRIAD approach, how do we manage biodiversity in the “extensively managed” portion<br />

of our forested land base?<br />

• We also need to promote interdisciplinary studies for places where a lot of the land is privately<br />

owned (i.e., Sweden). Education and public values are integral to any conservation effort, especially<br />

in countries where a lot of harvesting is on private land.<br />

• After listing these research ideas, this breakout group further narrowed possible tasks for BorNet<br />

to the following three questions:<br />

• What values should be managed for in the boreal globally, what determines them, and where are<br />

there concentrations of high values?<br />

• How do we maintain ecosystem function? What should be measured?<br />

• How do the different governance structures meet the three pillars of sustainability?<br />

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS • BorNet International • Uppsala, Sweden • May 27 – 28, 2002 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!