Organisation-of-the-Organisationless

Organisation of the Organisationless
networks of individuals, infrastructure, keywords etc. While
social media offers us the most readily available network
visualisations, owing to the relative ease with which the
relevant data-sets can be obtained, it constitutes, as we
shall see, only one layer among several. It is equally taken
for granted that no single layer can map perfectly onto any
other: the network of people on Twitter is different from
the network of people on the streets, even if the variance
between one and the other may itself vary according to
internet access, platform diffusion and technopolitical
appropriation. It is the case, however, that all the layers
have the same kind of topology; they are not identical, but
are isomorphic.
13 The Free Association ‘What Is the Movement?’, Moments of
Excess: Movements, Protest and Everyday Life, Oakland: PM
Press, p.28.
14 On why to speak of ‘moment’ rather than ‘movement’, see
Rodrigo Nunes, ‘The Global Moment’, Radical Philosophy 159,
2010, pp.2-7.
15 Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, p.103.
16 Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Commonwealth, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 2009, p.169. This issue can
be thought in relation to another criticism often levelled at
Hardt and Negri’s work: even if ‘not homogenous or identical
with itself’, treating the multitude as singular risks obscuring
the very real and politically significant phenomena of class
stratification inside it.
17 For example: ‘When human power appears immediately as an
autonomous cooperating collective force, capitalist prehistory
comes to an end.’ Hardt and Negri, Empire, p.366.
18 For example, the ‘affirmation of immanence is not based
on any faith in the immediate or spontaneous capacity
of society’; ‘the organization of singularities required for
political action and decision making is not immediate or
spontaneous’; ‘economic capacities are not immediately
expressed as political capacities.’ Hardt and Negri,
Commonwealth, p.15, p.175, p.365. This, it should be noted,
does not come with a reevaluation of mediation; despite the
new emphasis on the instituent dimension of constituent
power, ‘mediation’ is still understood as external to the
47