The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - take II - Perimeter Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

— ACFA “exploding spiders” — Data: m ⎧⎪ { }} { ⎨ ⎪ ⎩ Rules: .... .... } {{ } n m+m ′ −k(≥2) , , { }} { .... .... .... .... } {{ } n+n ′ −k(≥2) = ∣ n, m ∈ N ⎫⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎭ m+m ′ −k(≥2) { }} { .... .... } {{ } n+n ′ −k(≥2)
— GHZ-W interaction —
Page 1 and 2:
The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - ta
Page 3 and 4:
— genesis — [von Neumann 1932]
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
— the mathematics of it — Hilbe
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
— the physics of it —
Page 17 and 18:
— the physics of it — von Neuma
Page 19 and 20:
— the physics of it — von Neuma
Page 21 and 22:
— the game plan — Task 0. Solve
Page 23 and 24:
— the game plan — Task 0. Solve
Page 25 and 26:
Outcome 1a: “Sheer ratio of resul
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Outcome 2a:
Page 33 and 34:
— the logic of it —
Page 35 and 36:
— the logic of it — WHAT IS “
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
— the data of tensor logic — Bo
Page 47 and 48:
— the data of tensor logic — Bo
Page 49 and 50:
— the connectives of tensor logic
Page 51 and 52:
— merely a new notation? —
Page 53 and 54:
— merely a new notation? — (g
Page 55 and 56:
— merely a new notation? — (g
Page 57 and 58:
— topological connectedness as a
Page 59 and 60:
— topological connectedness as a
Page 61 and 62:
A MINIMAL LANGUAGE FOR QUANTUM REAS
Page 63 and 64:
— graphical notation for states a
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
— adjoint — f † : B → A A f
Page 75 and 76:
= = — asserting (pure) entangleme
Page 77 and 78:
— quantum-like — =
Page 79 and 80:
classical data flow? f f f f =
Page 81 and 82:
classical data flow? f f =
Page 83 and 84:
— symbolically: dagger compact ca
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
— the from-words-to-a-sentence pr
Page 91 and 92:
— the from-words-to-a-sentence pr
Page 93 and 94:
= — the from-words-to-a-sentence
Page 95 and 96:
— grammar as pregroups - Lambek
Page 97 and 98:
— from gammer to meaning — For
Page 99 and 100:
— −−−→ Alice ⊗ −−
Page 101 and 102:
— −−−→ Alice ⊗ −−
Page 103 and 104:
— experiment: word disambiguation
Page 105 and 106: — analogy: “non-local” info-f
Page 107 and 108: THE EXTENDED LANGUAGE: BASES AND CO
Page 109 and 110: — commutative Frobenius algebras
Page 113 and 114: commutative monoid cocommutative co
Page 115 and 116: commutative monoid cocommutative co
Page 119 and 120: — bases in tensor logic — The n
Page 121 and 122: such that, for k > 0: — spiders
Page 123 and 124: such that, for k > 0: — spiders
Page 125 and 126: — complementary bases —
Page 127 and 128: — quantum gates — Z-spin: δ Z
Page 129 and 130: — quantum gates — ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ 1
Page 131 and 132: — quantum gates —
Page 133 and 134: — quantum gates —
Page 135 and 136: — classical communication and con
Page 141 and 142: qubit 1 the leftmost, and qubit 4 i
Page 143 and 144: — automated theory exploration
Page 145 and 146: Defn. Special CFA (SCFA): =
Page 147 and 148: = = Defn. Special CFA (SCFA): Lem.
Page 149 and 150: — C(F)As ←→ tripartite states
Page 151 and 152: = = Theorem. If a CFA on C 2 is spe
Page 153 and 154: — W algebra — ( 1 0 0 0 ) ( 1 0
Page 155: — W “exploding spiders” — D
Page 159 and 160: Informatics information flow vs no
Page 161 and 162: ( ) (( ) ( )) 1 0 0 0 1 1 ⊗ 0 0 0
Page 163 and 164: ( ) (( ) ( )) ( ) 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 ⊗
Page 165: Posters on this line of work: • A
show all

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - take II - Perimeter Institute

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?