The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - take II - Perimeter Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

— grammar as pregroups – Lambek ’99 — For noun type “n”, verb type is “ −1 n · s · n −1 ”, so: n · −1 n · s · n −1 · n = s Diagrammatic typing: n n s -1 n-1 n
— from gammer to meaning — For noun type “n” and verb type “ −1 n · s · n −1 ”: n · −1 n · s · n −1 · n = s Diagrammatic meaning: flow flow n verb n
Page 1 and 2:
The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - ta
Page 3 and 4:
— genesis — [von Neumann 1932]
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
— the mathematics of it — Hilbe
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
— the physics of it —
Page 17 and 18:
— the physics of it — von Neuma
Page 19 and 20:
— the physics of it — von Neuma
Page 21 and 22:
— the game plan — Task 0. Solve
Page 23 and 24:
— the game plan — Task 0. Solve
Page 25 and 26:
Outcome 1a: “Sheer ratio of resul
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Outcome 2a:
Page 33 and 34:
— the logic of it —
Page 35 and 36:
— the logic of it — WHAT IS “
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46: — the data of tensor logic — Bo
Page 47 and 48: — the data of tensor logic — Bo
Page 49 and 50: — the connectives of tensor logic
Page 51 and 52: — merely a new notation? —
Page 53 and 54: — merely a new notation? — (g
Page 55 and 56: — merely a new notation? — (g
Page 57 and 58: — topological connectedness as a
Page 59 and 60: — topological connectedness as a
Page 61 and 62: A MINIMAL LANGUAGE FOR QUANTUM REAS
Page 63 and 64: — graphical notation for states a
Page 73 and 74: — adjoint — f † : B → A A f
Page 75 and 76: = = — asserting (pure) entangleme
Page 77 and 78: — quantum-like — =
Page 79 and 80: classical data flow? f f f f =
Page 81 and 82: classical data flow? f f =
Page 83 and 84: — symbolically: dagger compact ca
Page 89 and 90: — the from-words-to-a-sentence pr
Page 91 and 92: — the from-words-to-a-sentence pr
Page 93 and 94: = — the from-words-to-a-sentence
Page 95: — grammar as pregroups - Lambek
Page 99 and 100: — −−−→ Alice ⊗ −−
Page 101 and 102: — −−−→ Alice ⊗ −−
Page 103 and 104: — experiment: word disambiguation
Page 105 and 106: — analogy: “non-local” info-f
Page 107 and 108: THE EXTENDED LANGUAGE: BASES AND CO
Page 109 and 110: — commutative Frobenius algebras
Page 113 and 114: commutative monoid cocommutative co
Page 115 and 116: commutative monoid cocommutative co
Page 119 and 120: — bases in tensor logic — The n
Page 121 and 122: such that, for k > 0: — spiders
Page 123 and 124: such that, for k > 0: — spiders
Page 125 and 126: — complementary bases —
Page 127 and 128: — quantum gates — Z-spin: δ Z
Page 129 and 130: — quantum gates — ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ 1
Page 131 and 132: — quantum gates —
Page 133 and 134: — quantum gates —
Page 135 and 136: — classical communication and con
Page 141 and 142: qubit 1 the leftmost, and qubit 4 i
Page 143 and 144: — automated theory exploration
Page 145 and 146: Defn. Special CFA (SCFA): =
Page 147 and 148:
= = Defn. Special CFA (SCFA): Lem.
Page 149 and 150:
— C(F)As ←→ tripartite states
Page 151 and 152:
= = Theorem. If a CFA on C 2 is spe
Page 153 and 154:
— W algebra — ( 1 0 0 0 ) ( 1 0
Page 155 and 156:
— W “exploding spiders” — D
Page 157 and 158:
— GHZ-W interaction —
Page 159 and 160:
Informatics information flow vs no
Page 161 and 162:
( ) (( ) ( )) 1 0 0 0 1 1 ⊗ 0 0 0
Page 163 and 164:
( ) (( ) ( )) ( ) 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 ⊗
Page 165:
Posters on this line of work: • A
show all

The Logic of Quantum Mechanics - take II - Perimeter Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?