05.03.2015 Views

Thrombophilia in Pregnancy - Skin & Allergy News

Thrombophilia in Pregnancy - Skin & Allergy News

Thrombophilia in Pregnancy - Skin & Allergy News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Have a different op<strong>in</strong>ion? Concurr<strong>in</strong>g comments?<br />

Email a Letter to the Editor at carol.saunders@QHC.com.<br />

VIEWPOINT<br />

A Professional Op<strong>in</strong>ion Article<br />

<strong>Thrombophilia</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pregnancy</strong>:<br />

Stop Overscreen<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Overtreat<strong>in</strong>g!<br />

Graham Gaylord Ashmead, MD<br />

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and<br />

adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) are<br />

potential complications of pregnancy.<br />

The risk of VTE <strong>in</strong> pregnancy is 1.8%<br />

and with recurrent VTE can be 11.1%. 1,2 Normal<br />

pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state evolved to<br />

protect from hemorrhage at delivery. <strong>Thrombophilia</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy are associated with VTE<br />

(20% to 40%) and APO, 2 but rout<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

not the answer.<br />

<strong>Thrombophilia</strong>s are too common and costly<br />

to screen asymptomatic patients. The most<br />

common <strong>in</strong>herited thrombophilias <strong>in</strong> white<br />

women <strong>in</strong> the United States are factor V Leiden<br />

(8%) and prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A mutation<br />

(3%). Less frequent are deficiencies of anticoagulants<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> C, prote<strong>in</strong> S, and antithromb<strong>in</strong><br />

III. <strong>Thrombophilia</strong> charges can be more<br />

than those for a delivery; however, what about<br />

positive test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 10% of the population?<br />

What about treatment risks? What about<br />

patient and physician anxiety?<br />

First trimester pregnancy loss does not benefit<br />

from thrombophilia screen<strong>in</strong>g. Second or<br />

third trimester loss does not differ <strong>in</strong> patients<br />

with factor V Leiden deficiency. Late fetal loss is<br />

associated with homozygosity for mutation of<br />

methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR)<br />

gene but only <strong>in</strong> the absence of folic acid supplementation.<br />

Known thrombophilias are not<br />

associated with 75% of isolated and 50% of<br />

familial thrombosis. 3<br />

For some thrombophilias, there is no need to<br />

screen everyone as most are be<strong>in</strong>g treated.<br />

Hyperhomocyste<strong>in</strong>emia or MTHFR mutations<br />

occur <strong>in</strong> 10% of the healthy US population. Therapy<br />

is folate (4 mg/day), vitam<strong>in</strong> B 12<br />

(250 mcg/day),<br />

Graham Gaylord Ashmead, MD, is Vice Chair and Chief,<br />

Division of Maternal Fetal Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Department of Obstetrics<br />

and Gynecology, W<strong>in</strong>throp University Hospital, M<strong>in</strong>eola, NY.<br />

and vitam<strong>in</strong> B 6<br />

(25 mg/day) supplementation.<br />

Folate <strong>in</strong> cereals and prenatal vitam<strong>in</strong>s makes<br />

pregnancy screen<strong>in</strong>g unnecessary.<br />

Indiscrim<strong>in</strong>ate pregnancy screen<strong>in</strong>g can<br />

cause problems. I saw an asymptomatic patient<br />

on baby aspir<strong>in</strong> expect<strong>in</strong>g hepar<strong>in</strong> because of a<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> S deficiency. Prote<strong>in</strong> S deficiency has an<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidence of 0.5%. 4 The risk of pregnant patients<br />

with known prote<strong>in</strong> S deficiency hav<strong>in</strong>g a VTE<br />

TABLE 1. A simplified treatment list for recurrent VTE<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy with thrombophilia with suggested<br />

adjusted dose therapy prophylaxis <strong>in</strong>tensity. 1<br />

Disorder<br />

Compound heterozygote of factor V Leiden<br />

and Prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A<br />

Factor V Leiden homozygote<br />

Antithromb<strong>in</strong> III deficiency<br />

Prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A homozygote<br />

Antiphospholipid antibodies<br />

Risk of VTE<br />

150-fold<br />

49- to 80-fold<br />

25- to 50-fold<br />

16-fold<br />

5.3-fold<br />

TABLE 2. A simplified treatment list for recurrent VTE<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy with thrombophilia with suggested<br />

low-dose therapy prophylaxis <strong>in</strong>tensity. 1<br />

Disorder<br />

Prote<strong>in</strong> C deficiency<br />

Factor V Leiden heterozygote<br />

Prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A heterozygote<br />

Prote<strong>in</strong> S deficiency<br />

Hyperhomocyste<strong>in</strong>emia<br />

Risk of VTE<br />

3- to 15-fold<br />

3- to 9-fold<br />

2- to 9-fold<br />

2-fold<br />

2.5- to 4-fold<br />

The Female Patient | VOL 33 AUGUST 2008 31


VIEWPOINT<br />

<strong>Thrombophilia</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pregnancy</strong><br />

TABLE 3. How can we stop overscreen<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

thrombophilia?<br />

• Asymptomatic patients should not be rout<strong>in</strong>ely screened.<br />

• Screen patients with:<br />

• A history of VTE<br />

• Unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed fetal loss greater than 12 weeks<br />

• Severe preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome, especially preterm<br />

• Severe fetal growth restriction, especially preterm<br />

• Family history of thrombosis<br />

• Start with a limited screen<strong>in</strong>g for:<br />

• Factor V Leiden mutation<br />

• Prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A mutation<br />

• Functional prote<strong>in</strong> S and C deficiencies (lower S levels <strong>in</strong><br />

pregnancy)<br />

• AT-III deficiency<br />

• Lupus anticoagulant<br />

• Homocyste<strong>in</strong>e level (if not on folate)<br />

• Anticardiolip<strong>in</strong> antibodies<br />

• Most asymptomatic pregnant patients with thrombophilia (no VTE or<br />

APO) do not require treatment.<br />

• Asymptomatic patients can benefit from UFH or LMWH throughout<br />

pregnancy when the patient presents:<br />

• AT-III deficiency<br />

• Homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for the factor V Leiden<br />

or prothromb<strong>in</strong> G20210A mutations<br />

• For asymptomatic pregnant thrombophilia patients, use short-term<br />

UFH or LMWH for risk factors (ie, multiple family members with VTE).<br />

• Treat appropriately, us<strong>in</strong>g the consensus report. 1<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy is 22%, but as prote<strong>in</strong> S activity<br />

normally falls dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy, the ‘cutoff’ is<br />

lower (20% to 35% 2 ): the patient was normal.<br />

Treatments for thrombophilia have risks,<br />

whether it is aspir<strong>in</strong> (bleed<strong>in</strong>g) or hepar<strong>in</strong> (bruis<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

bleed<strong>in</strong>g, thrombocytopenia, hepar<strong>in</strong><br />

allergy and rash, osteopenia, <strong>in</strong>ability to receive<br />

regional anesthesia at delivery, and bleed<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

delivery). 1-4 Such risks are unnecessary.<br />

Patients with a history of VTE and thrombophilia<br />

should receive prophylaxis with low<br />

molecular weight hepar<strong>in</strong> (LMWH) or unfractionated<br />

hepar<strong>in</strong> (UFH), specific to the risk of<br />

VTE (Tables 1 and 2). Prophylaxis with LMWH<br />

or UFH may be considered antepartum and<br />

six weeks postpartum. Pregestational full<br />

anticoagulation should be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pregnancy.<br />

Antifactor-Xa levels can be monitored by<br />

LMWH with a peak target range (drawn 3 to 4<br />

hours after subcutaneous adm<strong>in</strong>istration) of<br />

0.5 to 1.0 IU/mL <strong>in</strong> therapeutic sett<strong>in</strong>gs, twice<br />

daily. Trough levels (12 hours) should be 0.2 to<br />

0.4 IU/mL for therapeutic LMWH.<br />

Substitute LMWH with UFH at 36 week’s gestation<br />

or prior to delivery. Anticoagulation<br />

problems with delivery or regional anesthesia<br />

are unlikely to occur 12 hours from prophylactic<br />

or 24 hours from therapeutic LMWH. Discont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />

UFH <strong>in</strong> labor or 6 to 8 hours prior to<br />

cesarean delivery (skip morn<strong>in</strong>g dose for AM<br />

cesarean), and restart anticoagulation 12 hours<br />

after delivery or remov<strong>in</strong>g epidural catheter.<br />

One LMWH regimen for VTE is enoxapar<strong>in</strong><br />

sodium 40 mg (4000 IU) QD for prophylaxis and<br />

1 mg/kg (100 IU) BID for therapy. Prophylactic<br />

UFH can be 5000, 7500 or 10,000 units subcutaneously<br />

BID <strong>in</strong> the first, second, and third trimesters.<br />

Because LMWH and UFH do not cross<br />

the placenta, they are safe for breast feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Consider calcium (1200 mg/day) and Vitam<strong>in</strong> D<br />

(800 IU) and check platelet counts. Treatment<br />

regimens are <strong>in</strong> a 2007 consensus report. 1<br />

Elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g superfluous screen<strong>in</strong>g, while<br />

treat<strong>in</strong>g appropriately, should restore balance<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy thrombophilia management<br />

(Table 3).<br />

The author reports no actual or potential conflicts<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> relation to this article.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Duhl AJ, Paidas MJ, Ural SH, et al. Antithrombotic therapy<br />

and pregnancy: consensus report and recommendations<br />

for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism<br />

and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol.<br />

2007;197(5):457.e1-21.<br />

2. James AH, Grotequt CA, Brancazio LR, Brown H. Thromboembolism<br />

<strong>in</strong> pregnancy: recurrence and its prevention.<br />

Sem<strong>in</strong> Per<strong>in</strong>atol. 2007;31(3):167-175.<br />

3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.<br />

ACOG Practice Bullet<strong>in</strong>. Management of recurrent early<br />

pregnancy loss. Number 24, February 2001. Int J Gynaecol<br />

Obstet. 2002;78(2):179-190.<br />

4. Auerbach RD, Lockwood CJ. Clott<strong>in</strong>g Disorders. In: James<br />

DK, Steer PJ, We<strong>in</strong>er CP, Gonik B, eds. High Risk <strong>Pregnancy</strong>:<br />

Management Options. 3 rd ed. London: Saunders; 2006:<br />

925-937.<br />

32 The Female Patient | VOL 33 AUGUST 2008 www.femalepatient.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!