08.03.2015 Views

Conserving Biodiversity in Brigalow Regrowth - School of ...

Conserving Biodiversity in Brigalow Regrowth - School of ...

Conserving Biodiversity in Brigalow Regrowth - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Manag<strong>in</strong>g dense <strong>Brigalow</strong> regrowth:<br />

To th<strong>in</strong> or not to th<strong>in</strong>?<br />

<strong>Brigalow</strong> regrowth is <strong>of</strong>ten very dense (sometimes > 15,000 stems per hectare) because <strong>of</strong> the plentiful root suckers<br />

produced follow<strong>in</strong>g clear<strong>in</strong>g. Very high densities are particularly common after multiple pull<strong>in</strong>g attempts on deep<br />

clay soils with gilgais.<br />

Stems compete <strong>in</strong>tensely with one<br />

another and grow slowly, so slowly<br />

that dense stands are <strong>of</strong>ten described<br />

as “stunted” or “locked up”. Given<br />

enough time, dense brigalow regrowth<br />

will almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly grow <strong>in</strong>to<br />

woodlands ak<strong>in</strong> to virg<strong>in</strong> stands, but is<br />

it possible to speed up the process by<br />

th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g manually? The answer is yes.<br />

An experimental th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g trial <strong>in</strong> dense<br />

27 year old regrowth near Millmerran<br />

showed that th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to 4000 – 6000<br />

stems per hectare produces the best<br />

results for woodland recovery and<br />

wildlife habitat. More severe th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

will open up the canopy and allow<br />

grasses to establish. While this might<br />

seem a positive result for graz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

purposes, it is not so good for wildlife.<br />

High grass cover, particularly buffel<br />

grass, <strong>in</strong>creases the risk <strong>of</strong> fire (see<br />

pgs 10 & 19), which will slow down the<br />

restoration process by kill<strong>in</strong>g trees or<br />

promot<strong>in</strong>g even thicker regrowth.<br />

If the goal is to manage brigalow<br />

regrowth for wildlife habitat, then<br />

canopy cover should be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at<br />

more than 50% (i.e. on average more<br />

than half <strong>of</strong> the ground is shaded by<br />

tree canopy) <strong>in</strong> southern Queensland<br />

and northern New South Wales. In<br />

central and northern brigalow regions<br />

we recommend ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tree cover<br />

at 70% because buffel grass grows<br />

more vigorously <strong>in</strong> these regions.<br />

In younger regrowth (e.g. 10–15 years<br />

old) it will be necessary to reta<strong>in</strong> more<br />

stems <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> adequate<br />

tree cover. In these cases it may be<br />

best to th<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> stages, for example th<strong>in</strong><br />

down to 10,000 stems per ha <strong>in</strong>itially,<br />

then a few years later th<strong>in</strong> down to<br />

6,000 stems per ha.<br />

If provid<strong>in</strong>g habitat for native fauna<br />

is not the primary goal <strong>of</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regrowth, then the manager might<br />

want to encourage the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced pasture grasses and<br />

manage fire risk by graz<strong>in</strong>g. It is<br />

16<br />

important to know that sites that are<br />

managed <strong>in</strong> this way will not support<br />

the same richness <strong>of</strong> fauna that they<br />

would if managed <strong>in</strong> the way we<br />

describe, as wildlife habitat. However,<br />

from a wildlife perspective, some trees<br />

are better than no trees at all, and so<br />

the more common fauna will even use<br />

regrowth areas which are managed for<br />

graz<strong>in</strong>g and stock shelter.<br />

Th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

Obviously r<strong>in</strong>gbark<strong>in</strong>g takes a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

time and effort, and there may be more<br />

efficient methods available. Regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> the method used, secondary<br />

sucker<strong>in</strong>g will occur less if th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

done after good ra<strong>in</strong>. When th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, it<br />

is important to reta<strong>in</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> stem<br />

sizes <strong>in</strong> a “natural” arrangement.<br />

For example, a completely random<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> stems yields very natural<br />

arrangements.<br />

Th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g for carbon<br />

Trees sequester carbon as they grow,<br />

but some species sequester more<br />

carbon than others. <strong>Brigalow</strong> is a<br />

high biomass species, mean<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

it stores a lot <strong>of</strong> carbon compared to<br />

other species from a similar climate.<br />

<strong>Brigalow</strong> regrowth therefore has<br />

considerable potential to be used<br />

as carbon s<strong>in</strong>ks. Although th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

releases some carbon (through the<br />

decay <strong>of</strong> treated stems), th<strong>in</strong>ned<br />

stands will recoup this carbon quickly<br />

and reach their carbon capacity sooner<br />

than unth<strong>in</strong>ned stands. Although<br />

slower, unth<strong>in</strong>ned stands are still likely<br />

to sequester carbon reasonably<br />

quickly.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!