10.03.2015 Views

equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints - Convex ...

equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints - Convex ...

equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints - Convex ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Chapter 2 Mathematical Program <strong>with</strong> Equilibrium Constraints<br />

This further implies that for every such x the gradient vectors of the active <strong>constraints</strong><br />

in (2.14) are linearly independent. Hence, NLP-LICQ holds at every<br />

feasible point x ∈ N(¯x).<br />

<br />

Given a feasible point ¯x of Reg(t) (2.13), we define the following index sets of<br />

active <strong>constraints</strong>:<br />

I g (¯x, t) := {i | g i (¯x; a g t) = 0},<br />

I h (¯x, t) := {i | h i (¯x; a h t ) = 0},<br />

I G (¯x, t) := {i | G i (¯x; a G t ) = 0},<br />

(2.16)<br />

I H (¯x, t) := {i | H i (¯x; a H t ) = 0},<br />

I GH (¯x, t) := {i | G i (¯x; a H t )H i (¯x; a H t ) = t}.<br />

Lemma 2.10. If the MPEC-LICQ holds at the feasible point ¯x of the MPEC<br />

(2.10), then there exists a neighborhood N(¯x) and a scalar ¯t > 0 such that for<br />

every t ∈ (0, ¯t ), the NLP-LICQ holds at every feasible point x ∈ N(¯x) of Reg(t)<br />

(2.13).<br />

Proof. This follows from Lemma 2.9 and the following relations on the index sets<br />

of active <strong>constraints</strong>:<br />

I g (x, t) ⊆<br />

I h (x, t) ⊆<br />

I g (¯x),<br />

I h (¯x),<br />

I G (x, t) ∪ I H (x, t) ∪ I GH (x, t) ⊆<br />

I G (x, t) ∩ I GH (x, t) = ∅,<br />

I G (¯x) ∪ I H (¯x),<br />

(2.17)<br />

I H (x, t) ∩ I GH (x, t) = ∅,<br />

which hold for all x in a sufficiently small neighborhood N(¯x) and all t ∈ (0, ¯t)<br />

for sufficiently small ¯t > 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!