Thesis-Anne-Vos-Masters-SBR-and-EU-Law-3

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Prechal & De Leeuw (2008) S. Prechal & M.E. de Leeuw, 'Transparency: A General Principle of EU Law?', in: U. Bernitz, J. Nergelius & C. Cardner (eds), General Principles of EC Law in a Process of Development, Kluwer Law International B.V., 2008. • Tridimas (2006) T. Tridimas, The General Principles of EU Law, 2 nd edition, Oxford EC Law Library, 2006. • Trouwborst (2002) A. Trouwborst, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law, International Environmental Law and Policy Series, Vol. 62, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002. 8.2 Articles • Addink (2012) G.H. Addink, 'Het concept van “goed bestuur” in het bestuursrecht en de praktische consequenties', Ars Aequi april 2012, pp. 266-275. • Brans & Van den Brink (2014) M.C. Brans & K.M. van den Brink, 'Schaliegas in publiekrechtelijk kader', Milieu en Recht 2014/32. • Buchan (2013) D. Buchan, 'Can shale gas transform Europe's energy landscape?', Centre for European Reform, July 2013. • Buijze (2011) A.W.G.J. Buijze, 'Waarom het transparantiebeginsel maar niet transparant wil worden', Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2011, nr. 7, pp. 240-248. • Dhondt (2005) N. Dhondt, 'Integration of environmental Protection into the EC Energy Policy', Yearbook of European Environmental Law 2005, volume 4, pp. 247-302. • Douma (2014) W.Th. Douma, 'Enige Europeesrechtelijke aspecten van schaliegaswinning', Nederlands tijdschrift voor Energierecht 2014, no. 01. • Van der Feltz (2014) G.C.W. van der Feltz, 'Europese aanbeveling en richtsnoer met betrekking tot fraccen. Soft law?', Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Energierecht 2014, nr. 1 • Fleming (2013) R. Fleming, 'Shale Gas – a Comparison of European Moratoria', European Energy and Environmental Law Review, February 2013. • De Gier (2012) A.A.J. de Gier, Het decentralisatie-beginsel als mantra in het ruimtelijk bestuursrecht, Tijdschrift voor Bouwrecht 2012, jaargang 5, nr. 4, pp. 362- 366. • Groothuijse & Korsse (2011) F.A.G. Groothuijse & D. Korsse, 'De ontheffingsbevoegdheid in provinciale ruimtelijke verordeningen in het licht van de wijzigingswet Wro', Tijdschrift voor Omgevingsrecht 2011, nr. 3, pp. 82-92. • Van Hees (2014) S.R.W. van Hees, 'Sustainable Development in the EU: Redefining and Operationalizing the Concept', Utrecht Law Review 2014, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 60-76. • Jans (2006) J.H. Jans, 'Doorbreking van het specialiteitsbeginsel door het Europees recht?', published in: Op tegenspraak (Damen-bundel), 2006. 104
• Roggenkamp & Boekholt (2014) M.M. Roggenkamp & H.D. Boekholt, 'Schaliegas: hoeveel houvast biedt de Aanbeveling van de Europese Commissie voor effectieve gezondheids- en milieubescherming en de ontwikkeling van onconventioneel gas?', Milieu & Recht 2014/66. • Schoukens (2014) H. Schoukens, 'Mitigation and Compensation under EU Nature Conservation Law in the Flemish Region: Beyond the Deadlock for Development Projects?' Utrecht Law Review 2014, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 194-215. • Woldendorp (2012), part 1 H.E. Woldendorp, ‘Ondergrondse regelingen opgediept (deel 1)’, Bouwrecht 2012/91. • Woldendorp (2012), part 2 H.E. Woldendorp, ‘Ondergrondse regelingen opgediept (deel 2)’, Bouwrecht 2012/112. 8.3 European official publications European Commission • Commission Communication on the precautionary principle (2000) Communication from the Commission of 2 February 2000 on the precautionary principle, COM(2000) 1 final - Not published in the Official Journal. • 2050 Energy roadmap 2050 Energy roadmap, COM(2011) 885. • Legal Assessment (2012) Legal Assessment of the European Commission, Ref.Ares(2012) 91850, 26 January 2012 • European Commission, Guidance on the Application of the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure for Large-scale Trans boundary Projects, 16 May 2013. • Public consultation report (2013) European Commission DG Environment, Final report: Analysis and presentation of the results of the public consultation "Unconventional fossil fuels (e.g. shale gas) in Europe", 3 October 2013. • Commission Recommendation (2014) Commission Recommendation of 22 January 2014 on minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing (2014/70/EU). • Commission Staff Working Document Executive Summary (2014) Commission Staff Working Document, Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment (COM(2014) 23 final). • Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment (2014), part 1/4 - part 4/4. Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment, accompanying the Communication from the Commission on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high volume hydraulic fracturing in the EU, COM(2014) 23 final, 22 January 2014, part 1/4 - part 4/4. • Commission Communication (2014) Communication from the Commission on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high volume hydraulic fracturing in the EU, COM(2014) 23 final/2, 17 March 2014. • Citizens' summary (2014) European Commission, Citizens' summary on fracking in the EU to extract shale gas and other hydrocarbons, 2014. 105
Page 1:
Shale gas extraction: In line with
Page 4 and 5:
Index 1 Introduction p. 7 1.1 Shale
Page 6 and 7:
7 Conclusions and Recommendations p
Page 8 and 9:
to spread in the European Union. It
Page 10 and 11:
2 Context In this chapter some back
Page 12 and 13:
the EU could produce more gas itsel
Page 14 and 15:
minor tremors and community disrupt
Page 16 and 17:
2.3.1.3 Seismicity The risk of seis
Page 18 and 19:
3 Current European legislation on s
Page 20 and 21:
As mentioned, Article 191(2) TFEU s
Page 22 and 23:
the EIA Directive comes into play.
Page 24 and 25:
project might have significant effe
Page 26 and 27:
difficult to assess later on what p
Page 28 and 29:
facilities used to receive such was
Page 30 and 31:
Commission of the compensatory meas
Page 32 and 33:
Operators carrying out any occupati
Page 34 and 35:
On 18 September 2013, a day before
Page 36 and 37:
once, by a maximum of 6 months. A d
Page 38 and 39:
can occur is the infiltration of wa
Page 40 and 41:
location near a sensitive area, suc
Page 42 and 43:
establish an inpassingsplan. This i
Page 44 and 45:
4.6.2 Water As noted in Chapter 2,
Page 46 and 47:
4.7 Extraction permit The procedure
Page 48 and 49:
4.9 Overview problems From the anal
Page 50 and 51:
5 General (environmental) principle
Page 52 and 53:
as a ground for invalidation). 211
Page 54 and 55: scale or effects of the proposed ac
Page 56 and 57: orders. Here, unilateral actions by
Page 58 and 59: 5.3 General principle: transparency
Page 60 and 61: emarkable that the CJEU also someti
Page 62 and 63: An important Dutch law which focuss
Page 64 and 65: follows after the subject is raised
Page 66 and 67: alance conflicting policies; the me
Page 68 and 69: prevailing social and political val
Page 70 and 71: It should be kept in mind, accordin
Page 72 and 73: concerning energy projects, in whic
Page 74 and 75: practice this distinction is less v
Page 76 and 77: national legal system, such as the
Page 78 and 79: application for sustainable develop
Page 80 and 81: 6 Application of principles to shal
Page 82 and 83: The second justification concerns t
Page 84 and 85: Finally, it could also be questione
Page 86 and 87: Hence, these principles are really
Page 88 and 89: As set out in Chapter 5, the princi
Page 90 and 91: On the other hand, it should be rea
Page 92 and 93: this zone is made available. Also,
Page 94 and 95: With regard to the second part of t
Page 96 and 97: 7.1 Conclusions Some remarks can be
Page 98 and 99: Gas is currently in development. In
Page 100 and 101: national interest and an imperative
Page 102 and 103: safeguarding of the drinking water,
Page 106 and 107: • Q&A on the shale gas initiative
Page 108 and 109: • Case C-117/02 Commission v Port
Page 110: Websites • http://www.eia.gov •
show all

Thesis-Anne-Vos-Masters-SBR-and-EU-Law-3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?