13.03.2015 Views

The Book Your Church Doesnt Want You to Read

The Book Your Church Doesnt Want You to Read

The Book Your Church Doesnt Want You to Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Tax-Free Ride<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Book</strong><br />

combined their efforts and organized in<strong>to</strong> a powerful voting bloc.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y have tied up so many sena<strong>to</strong>rs and representatives, having<br />

their own religious lobbying groups, that it has been next <strong>to</strong> impossible<br />

<strong>to</strong> enforce any kind of tax laws or tax violations against them,<br />

allowing them <strong>to</strong> continue <strong>to</strong> gain in power with unlimited funds.<br />

One of the clearly defined laws applicable <strong>to</strong> tax-exempt religious<br />

organizations is that churches cannot engage in any political activity<br />

and cannot engage in more than an insignificant amount of lobbying<br />

activities. This is stated in IRS Manual sections 501(c)3 and 170(c)2.<br />

Thus, according <strong>to</strong> law, if a church intervenes in a political campaign<br />

or engages in substantial lobbying, then its tax-exempt status is<br />

jeopardized. So, simply put, section 501(c)3 church organizations are<br />

subject <strong>to</strong> a ban on political activities, period.<br />

..,<br />

According <strong>to</strong> the Overview of Tax Rules Applicable <strong>to</strong> Exempt Organizations<br />

that was prepared for the House Committee on Ways and<br />

Means, it states:<br />

Prohibited political activity involves the participation or intervention,<br />

directly or indirectly, in any political campaign on<br />

behalf of or in opposition <strong>to</strong> any candidate for public office. <strong>The</strong><br />

office involved can be national, state, or local; and it is not<br />

required that the election be contested or involve the participation<br />

of political parties.<br />

<strong>The</strong> critical issue in determining whether an activity constitutes<br />

intervention in a political campaign is whether it reflects<br />

or advances a preference between competing candidates.<br />

A nasty, special Assembly election in California in 1991 provides<br />

us with a model case of typical gross violation of established law<br />

regarding tax-exempt organizations. B.T. Collins, running for the<br />

Fifth Assembly seat, faced the wrath of Rev. Glenn Cole of Capi<strong>to</strong>l<br />

Christian Center in Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, who used his tax-exempt church<br />

property and pulpit <strong>to</strong> endorse Barbara Alby, contrary <strong>to</strong> the law<br />

that prohibits such intervention in a political campaign by a church<br />

enjoying tax-free privileges.<br />

Rev. Cole has freely admitted <strong>to</strong> the media that members of his<br />

flock are readily solicited <strong>to</strong> vote for the candidate of his choice.<br />

Furthermore, Rev. Cole, in violation of the tax-exempt laws, has a<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry of using his sermons <strong>to</strong> support like-minded Republican<br />

candidates. In 1990, Rev. Cole and his church helped Republican<br />

Assemblyman David Knowles, who was a member of his Capi<strong>to</strong>l<br />

Christian Center, defeat veteran Assemblyman Norm Waters, a<br />

Democrat from Plymouth, California.<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!