15.11.2012 Views

Effects of straw mulch on soil nitrate dynamics

Effects of straw mulch on soil nitrate dynamics

Effects of straw mulch on soil nitrate dynamics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

305<br />

306<br />

307<br />

308<br />

309<br />

310<br />

311<br />

312<br />

313<br />

314<br />

315<br />

316<br />

317<br />

318<br />

319<br />

320<br />

DTD 5<br />

6<br />

3.2. Soil <strong>nitrate</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong><br />

At emergence and immediately before harvest,<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly small and n<strong>on</strong>-significant differences in <strong>soil</strong><br />

<strong>nitrate</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed and un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed plots were<br />

found (Table 4). Nitrogen mineralizati<strong>on</strong> after the<br />

harvest process lead to a post-harvest increase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>nitrate</strong> in the <strong>soil</strong> (62 and 51 kg NO3–N ha 1 in the<br />

un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed <strong>soil</strong>, experiments 4 and 11, respectively).<br />

The post-harvest amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>nitrate</strong> was greater in the<br />

un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed than in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed plots with a total<br />

difference <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 33.8 kg NO 3–N ha 1 in experiment 4<br />

(not significant) and 17.6 kg NO3–N ha 1 in experiment<br />

11 (significant at p = 0.035; Table 4).<br />

The reas<strong>on</strong> for this is seen in an immobilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

nitrogen after incorporati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the (partially decayed)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> into the <strong>soil</strong> due to the high C/N-ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

T.F. Döring et al. / Field Crops Research xxx (2005) xxx–xxx<br />

Table 3<br />

Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g> in potatoes <strong>on</strong> <strong>soil</strong> moisture shortly before harvest (wt%): means S.E.<br />

Soil moisture pre-harvest Experiment 1 (2001, n = 8) Experiment 4 (2002, n = 4) Experiment 11 (2003, n =4)<br />

0–30 cm 30–60 cm 0–30 cm 30–60 cm 0–30 cm 30–60 cm<br />

Un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed 17.7 0.5 19.0 1.1 21.1 2.8 20.2 2.3 8.8 0.3 11.7 0.2<br />

Mulched 18.9 0.8 18.0 0.6 21.1 2.3 20.6 3.1 9.3 0.3 11.8 0.2<br />

L.S.D. 5% (untransformed) 1.6 ns 2.0 ns 2.6 ns 1.7 ns 1.6 ns 1.1 ns<br />

ns: difference not significant (both for untransformed and angle-transformed data).<br />

(Cheshire et al., 1999). The C/N-ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> in<br />

experiment 4 was determined as 76.7; this value is<br />

well below the l<strong>on</strong>g-time average C/N-ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 100 for<br />

winter wheat <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> presented by Boguslawski and<br />

Debruck (1977). Per t<strong>on</strong>ne <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> applied, ca. 6.8 and<br />

7.0 kg N (experiments 4 and 11, respectively) were<br />

immobilized; this immobilizati<strong>on</strong> rate is at the upper<br />

end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the range (1–7 kgNt 1 ) summarized by<br />

Christensen and Olesen (1998).<br />

3.3. Parameters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant nutriti<strong>on</strong>al status and plant<br />

growth<br />

Hydro N-Tester values, as a measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

nutriti<strong>on</strong>al status <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the plant, were significantly<br />

reduced by <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g> applicati<strong>on</strong> in experiment 1<br />

(Fig. 1). Plant height was slightly but significantly<br />

Table 4<br />

Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>straw</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g> applied to potatoes (var. Christa) <strong>on</strong> <strong>soil</strong> <strong>nitrate</strong>-N (kg ha 1 ) in two experiments a : means S.E., n =4<br />

Soil <strong>nitrate</strong> a<br />

Experiment 4 (2002) Experiment 11 (2003)<br />

0–30 cm<br />

At emergence (before <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing)<br />

30–60 cm Sum (0–60 cm) 0–30 cm 30–60 cm Sum (0–60 cm)<br />

b<br />

Un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed 70.2 12.5 40.4 11.4 110.6 23.6 40.1 4.1 14.3 2.7 54.4 6.7<br />

Mulched 74.3 7.3 39.4 10.2 113.7 17.4 36.2 3.9 14.0 3.5 50.2 7.3<br />

Pre-harvest (after haulm death) b<br />

Un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed 25.3 4.8 22.7 5.2 48.0 9.7 20.7 1.1 3.2 0.2 23.9 1.0<br />

Mulched<br />

Post-harvest<br />

24.4 2.6 21.8 5.8 46.2 8.3 20.6 2.1 4.5 1.1 25.1 1.6<br />

Un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed 69.4 16.2 40.6 11.7 110.0 27.8 61.1 8.1 13.8 4.7 74.9 11.1<br />

Mulched<br />

Post-harvest difference<br />

46.4 10.2 29.8 7.2 76.2 17.2 48.7 6.7 8.7 1.3 57.3 8.0<br />

Un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed-Mulched 23.0 11.7 10.8 7.2 33.8 18.8 12.5 2.6 5.1 4.1 17.6 4.8<br />

LSD (5%) 37.1 ns 23.0 ns 59.8 ns 8.3 *<br />

13.2 ns 15.2 *<br />

ns: not significant.<br />

a<br />

For details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> experimental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s see Table 2; for sampling dates see text (Secti<strong>on</strong> 2.2).<br />

b<br />

There were no significant differences between <str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed and un<str<strong>on</strong>g>mulch</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed treatments c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>soil</strong> <strong>nitrate</strong> at emergence and pre-harvest.<br />

* p < 0.05.<br />

UNCORRECTED PROOF<br />

FIELD 4474 1–12<br />

321<br />

322<br />

323<br />

324<br />

325<br />

326<br />

327<br />

328<br />

329<br />

330<br />

331<br />

332<br />

333<br />

334<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!