16.03.2015 Views

Towards Safer Radiotherapy

Towards Safer Radiotherapy

Towards Safer Radiotherapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: Nature and frequency of<br />

human errors in radiotherapy<br />

In any system errors are inevitable but, by understanding why they occur, systems can be put into<br />

place to minimise their frequency and maximise detection before harm can be done. The actions<br />

and failures of individual people play a central role, but their thinking and behaviour is strongly<br />

influenced and constrained by their working environment and by wider organisational processes. 20<br />

Major incidents almost always evolve over time, involve a number of people and a number of<br />

broader contributory factors. For example, a change in a radiotherapy planning system without<br />

matching changes to other procedures may unexpectedly result in an error being made when a<br />

number of events converge many months later. 5 This scenario has been most clearly delineated in<br />

Reason’s model of organisational accidents which provides the basis for a practical approach to<br />

incident analysis (Figure 2.1). 21<br />

Figure 2.1 Reason’s model of organisational accident<br />

8<br />

Organisation and<br />

culture<br />

Contributory<br />

factors<br />

Delivery<br />

problems<br />

Detection<br />

systems<br />

Management<br />

decisions and<br />

organisational<br />

processes<br />

Work environment<br />

Team factors<br />

Unsafe acts<br />

✹<br />

Individual factors<br />

Task factors<br />

Patient factors<br />

Errors<br />

Violations<br />

Incident<br />

Latent failures<br />

Learning<br />

Reproduced with the kind permission of BMJ Publishing<br />

There is extensive literature on errors and their causes and it is not possible to cover all the issues<br />

within this report. For a fuller account, the reader is referred to the Further Reading section on<br />

page 77. When analysing incidents we can distinguish three key steps. First, one has to consider the<br />

chain of events leading up to the incident, the narrative of events and problems. Second, one<br />

examines this narrative to identify specific errors and problems that occurred during the process.<br />

This report provides a template list of possible errors to aid this process. Third, one looks for the<br />

causes of these errors that, in the terms of the framework, are referred to as contributory factors.<br />

The identification of the process problems and contributory factors shows the vulnerabilities of the<br />

system and provides the basis for safety enhancement and quality improvement initiatives discussed<br />

later in the report.<br />

<strong>Towards</strong> <strong>Safer</strong> <strong>Radiotherapy</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!