Unit Eight: Principles of Critical Appraisal - Cochrane Public Health ...
Unit Eight: Principles of Critical Appraisal - Cochrane Public Health ...
Unit Eight: Principles of Critical Appraisal - Cochrane Public Health ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2) QUALITATIVE STUDIES<br />
Qualitative research explores the subjective world. It attempts to understand why people behave the<br />
way they do and what meaning experiences have for people. 1<br />
Qualitative research may be included in a review to shed light on whether the intervention is suitable<br />
for a specific target group, whether special circumstances have influenced the intervention, what<br />
factors might have contributed if an intervention did not have the expected effects, what difficulties<br />
must be overcome if the study is to be generalised to other populations. 2 These are all important<br />
questions <strong>of</strong>ten asked by the users <strong>of</strong> systematic reviews.<br />
Reviewers may choose from a number <strong>of</strong> checklists available to assess the quality <strong>of</strong> qualitative<br />
research. Sources <strong>of</strong> information on quality appraisal include:<br />
- CASP appraisal tool for Qualitative Research – included in this manual,<br />
http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/qualitat.htm<br />
- Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for<br />
assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office. Crown Copyright,<br />
2003.<br />
www.strategy.gov.uk/files/pdf/Quality_framework.pdf<br />
- <strong>Health</strong> Care Practice Research and Development <strong>Unit</strong> (HCPRDU), University <strong>of</strong> Salford, UK.<br />
Evaluation Tool for Qualitative Studies,<br />
http://www.fhsc.salford.ac.uk/hcprdu/tools/qualitative.htm<br />
- Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ<br />
1997;315:740‐3.<br />
- Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review <strong>of</strong><br />
qualitative literature in health services research. Qual <strong>Health</strong> Res 1998;8:341‐51.<br />
- Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109‐12.<br />
In relation to the appraisal <strong>of</strong> process evaluations the EPPI‐Centre has developed a 12‐question<br />
checklist, available at:<br />
http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb/home.aspx?page=/hp/reports/phase/phase_process.htm.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Undertaking Systematic Reviews <strong>of</strong> Research on Effectiveness. CRD’s Guidance for those<br />
Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2 nd Edition). NHS Centre for<br />
Reviews and Dissemination, University <strong>of</strong> York. March 2001.<br />
http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm<br />
2. Hedin A, and Kallestal C. Knowledge‐based public health work. Part 2: Handbook for<br />
compilation <strong>of</strong> reviews on interventions in the field <strong>of</strong> public health. National Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong><br />
<strong>Health</strong>. 2004.<br />
http://www.fhi.se/shop/material_pdf/r200410Knowledgebased2.pdf<br />
ADDITIONAL READING<br />
Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ 1995;311:2.<br />
71