Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...
Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...
Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
<strong>Substance</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> Outcome Workgroup<br />
December 2007
Executive Summary<br />
In 2006, the <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health received funding from the federal<br />
Department of Health and Human Services, <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse and Mental Health<br />
Administration’s Center for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention, for a State <strong>Epidemiological</strong><br />
Outcome Workgroup (Workgroup) to develop a state epidemiological profile. The<br />
Workgroup included representatives from agencies directly involved with preventing<br />
substance abuse in the state. In 2007 funding was continued; one of the deliverables was<br />
to produce a community level epidemiological profile. The Workgroup defined<br />
“community” as a county in <strong>Iowa</strong>. After a review of data, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was one of the<br />
counties selected for the community profiles.<br />
The following criteria were developed during the writing of the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>, and were adapted to guide the data selection process for the<br />
2007 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>:<br />
• Data available at the local (<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>) level;<br />
• Sample covers age range;<br />
• Data collected at least every two years;<br />
• Measures directly related or strongly associated with ATOD use;<br />
• Data pertain to consumption or consequence; and<br />
• Data sets have adequate sample size.<br />
Approximately forty indicators were included in the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>,<br />
most of which were also included in the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>. Key indicator findings<br />
include:<br />
• Alcohol is the most cited substance of use by individuals entering substance abuse<br />
treatment in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />
• More than two-thirds of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> adults consumed alcohol in the past month,<br />
which is significantly higher than the <strong>Iowa</strong> and national rates.<br />
• The adult binge drinking rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate; both of<br />
which are significantly higher than the national rate.<br />
• Among youth, the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate of current alcohol use is similar to the state<br />
rate.<br />
• While there is a downward trend in alcohol use by youth over the last few years,<br />
more than 15 percent of all students surveyed in 2005 reported using alcohol<br />
before turning 13. For every five 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, two drank alcohol<br />
within the past month.<br />
• The rate of convictions for alcohol-related offenses in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is about onethird<br />
the state rate.<br />
• There were 426 Operating While Intoxicated arrests per 100,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns in<br />
2005, the highest rate in three years.<br />
• The average rate of alcohol-related suspensions and expulsions in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
was similar to the state rate. The average rate of drug-related suspensions and<br />
expulsions was approximately 35 percent higher than the state average.<br />
i
• Juvenile adjudications due to alcohol are on the rise in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, more than<br />
doubling from 2004 to 2006. The rate of juvenile adjudications due to alcohol in<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate for fiscal year 2006.<br />
• Approximately 800,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns over the age of 12 use tobacco, the majority of<br />
which is cigarette use.<br />
• The reported rate of mothers using tobacco during pregnancy in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has<br />
been between 18-22 percent of all pregnancies since 2002, which is about 3<br />
percent higher than the state rate.<br />
• Youth tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be on the decline, as evidenced by<br />
the number of youth reporting first use of cigarettes before the age of 13, past 30-<br />
day use, and perceived risk of cigarette use. However, these rates are higher in<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />
• More than 200 tobacco compliance checks were completed each fiscal year in<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with an average compliance rate of 86 percent from FY02-FY07.<br />
The success rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the statewide success rate of tobacco<br />
compliance checks.<br />
• Marijuana use by 6 th -, 8 th -, and 11 th -graders is significantly higher in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> than across the state.<br />
• The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to<br />
the state rate.<br />
Regardless of substance, most consumption indicators for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are higher<br />
than for <strong>Iowa</strong> or the nation, but a similar effect is not evident in most consequence<br />
indicators. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s geographical position, bordering Illinois, may influence<br />
consumption and consequence data, and may account for the observed difference<br />
between consumption and consequence data.<br />
ii
Table of Contents<br />
Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... i<br />
Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................iii<br />
Table of Figures............................................................................................................................ iv<br />
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................vi<br />
Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1<br />
Background ................................................................................................................................... 1<br />
Results ............................................................................................................................................ 3<br />
Alcohol.........................................................................................................................................3<br />
Adult Consumption Patterns....................................................................................................4<br />
Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................11<br />
Alcohol Consequences...........................................................................................................17<br />
Tobacco......................................................................................................................................24<br />
Adult Consumption Patterns..................................................................................................24<br />
Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................27<br />
Tobacco Consequences..........................................................................................................32<br />
Illicit Drugs ...............................................................................................................................33<br />
Adult Consumption Patterns..................................................................................................33<br />
Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................34<br />
Illicit Drug Consequences......................................................................................................38<br />
Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 41<br />
General Comments....................................................................................................................41<br />
Consumption Patterns of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>..........41<br />
Alcohol...................................................................................................................................41<br />
Tobacco..................................................................................................................................42<br />
Illicit Drugs ............................................................................................................................42<br />
Consequences of <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>......................................................42<br />
Alcohol...................................................................................................................................42<br />
Tobacco..................................................................................................................................42<br />
Illicit Drugs ............................................................................................................................43<br />
Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................43<br />
Appendices................................................................................................................................... 44<br />
Appendix 1................................................................................................................................45<br />
Appendix 2................................................................................................................................47<br />
Appendix 3................................................................................................................................48<br />
iii
Table of Figures<br />
Figure 1: Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment.................... 3<br />
Figure 2: Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales......................................................................... 5<br />
Figure 3: Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> in Past 30 Days............................................................................... 6<br />
Figure 4: Percent of Adults Binge Drinking in Past Month ............................................... 7<br />
Figure 5: Percent of Adults Heavy Drinking in Past Month............................................... 8<br />
Figure 6: Percent of Adults Reporting Having Driven After Having Perhaps Too Much<br />
To Drink in the Past Month ........................................................................................ 9<br />
Figure 7: Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment 10<br />
Figure 8: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> during<br />
Pregnancy – All Ages ............................................................................................... 10<br />
Figure 9: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol before Age<br />
13............................................................................................................................... 12<br />
Figure 10: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol 13<br />
Figure 11: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Binge Drinking – Past 30 Days<br />
................................................................................................................................... 14<br />
Figure 12: Percent of 11 th -Graders Reporting Driving after Using Any Amount of<br />
Alcohol or Other Drugs ............................................................................................ 15<br />
Figure 13: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate or<br />
Great Risk ................................................................................................................. 16<br />
Figure 14: Rate of Drunkenness and Liquor Law Arrests per 100,000............................ 19<br />
Figure 15: Rate of Convictions for Alcohol-Related Offenses......................................... 19<br />
Figure 16: Rate of Operating While Intoxicated Arrests per 100,000 People.................. 20<br />
Figure 17: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students – Total Due to<br />
Alcohol or Drugs....................................................................................................... 21<br />
Figure 18: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students Due to Alcohol or<br />
Drugs......................................................................................................................... 22<br />
Figure 19: Juvenile Adjudications due to Alcohol ........................................................... 23<br />
Figure 20: Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths per 100,000 ......................................................... 23<br />
Figure 21: Suicides per 100,000 ....................................................................................... 24<br />
Figure 22: Percent of Adults Who Are Current Smokers................................................ 25<br />
Figure 23: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> during<br />
Pregnancy – All Ages ............................................................................................... 26<br />
Figure 24: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes before<br />
Age 13....................................................................................................................... 28<br />
Figure 25: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> .. 29<br />
Figure 26: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />
or Great Risk............................................................................................................. 30<br />
Figure 27: Tobacco Compliance Check – Percent Compliant.......................................... 31<br />
Figure 28: Lung Cancer Deaths per 100,000.................................................................... 32<br />
Figure 29: Marijuana, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />
Reported upon Entry into Treatment ........................................................................ 33<br />
Figure 30: Heroin and Other Opiates/Synthetics as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported<br />
upon Entry into Treatment........................................................................................ 34<br />
Figure 31: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong>. 36<br />
iv
Figure 32: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />
or Great Risk............................................................................................................. 37<br />
Figure 33: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana before<br />
Age 13....................................................................................................................... 38<br />
Figure 34: Juvenile Adjudications due to Illicit Drugs..................................................... 39<br />
Figure 35: Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />
of Illegal Drugs in a Child’s Body............................................................................ 40<br />
Figure 36: Number of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving<br />
Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor ................................ 40<br />
v
List of Tables<br />
Table 1: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> by Gender ......... 16<br />
Table 2: Alcohol Involvement in Domestic Abuse Incidents........................................... 24<br />
Table 3: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> by Gender ....... 30<br />
Table 4: Percent of Youth Reporting Current Drug <strong>Use</strong> - 2005....................................... 35<br />
Table 5: Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> by Gender....................... 37<br />
vi
Introduction<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is geographically nestled in the bend of the Mississippi River and is situated<br />
in the southeastern corner of <strong>Iowa</strong>. It encompasses both a major urban center and rural<br />
areas, with the population majority urban and the land agricultural. Davenport and<br />
Bettendorf, <strong>Iowa</strong> join Moline and Rock Island, Illinois to form the Quad Cities; a large<br />
metropolitan area with a population of 360,000. Towns such as Buffalo, Eldridge,<br />
Princeton, Pleasant Valley, Park View, LeClaire, and McCausland each with a population<br />
less than 5,000, serve as hubs for the rural areas. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is geographically situated<br />
midway between Minneapolis on the north and St. Louis on the south, Chicago on the<br />
east and Des Moines on the west, and is bisected by U.S. Interstate 80. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s<br />
population is 158,668 according to the 2000 Census. Estimates based on the 2000 U.S.<br />
Census predict that approximately 46,000 young people (ages 19 and under) lived in<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2006, which comprised about 28 percent of the total population (versus<br />
26% statewide).<br />
Background<br />
In 2006, the <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health (IDPH) received funding from the federal<br />
Department of Health and Human Services, <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse and Mental Health<br />
Administration’s Center for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention, for a State <strong>Epidemiological</strong><br />
Outcome Workgroup (SEOW). IDPH’s Division of Behavioral Health is the Single State<br />
Authority for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention and Treatment. IDPH administers the funding<br />
and activities of the SEOW. The first year of the SEOW process involved forming an<br />
epidemiological team to assess, analyze, interpret, and communicate data about <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
substance consumption patterns and consequences. The two major products resulting<br />
from the first year of the SEOW were the state epidemiological profile (State <strong>Profile</strong>) and<br />
plans for a system to accommodate the ongoing collection of data for monitoring<br />
prevention outcomes. The State <strong>Profile</strong> and a shorter version of Key Findings can be<br />
found on the IDPH Web site www.idph.state.ia.us. In the second year of the project, the<br />
group was charged with developing a community level epidemiological profile. The<br />
Workgroup defined “community” as a county in <strong>Iowa</strong>. After a review of data, Hardin and<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> counties were selected for the county profiles.<br />
The following criteria were developed during the writing of the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>, and were adapted to guide the data selection process for the<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>:<br />
• Data available at the local (<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>) level;<br />
• Sample covers age range;<br />
• Data collected at least every two years;<br />
• Measures directly related or strongly associated with ATOD use;<br />
• Data pertain to consumption or consequence; and<br />
• Data sets have adequate sample size.<br />
1
Additional criteria were applied where similar indicators existed:<br />
• Historical data available;<br />
• Data available at the national level;<br />
• Limited redundancy between indicators (some redundancy is acceptable); and<br />
• Closeness to consequence (where applicable).<br />
SEOW staff met with <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> representatives on October 26, 2007 in Davenport.<br />
Seventeen people representing the following sectors of the county attended the meeting:<br />
law enforcement, treatment and prevention, healthcare, juvenile court services, education,<br />
religious organizations, and social services. The meeting was organized by the Center for<br />
Alcohol and Drug Services, Inc. An overview of the State <strong>Profile</strong> was presented, along<br />
with sample figures for the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>. Feedback about data used, alternative<br />
data sources, and profile format was offered by the attendees and has been incorporated<br />
in the profile whenever applicable. The same group members were included in the<br />
profile review process.<br />
2
Results<br />
Alcohol<br />
Alcohol is the substance most frequently used by adults and youth in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />
across <strong>Iowa</strong>, and across the United States. Alcohol is the most cited substance of use by<br />
individuals from <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> on admission to substance abuse treatment services,<br />
reinforcing alcohol as the primary substance of use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Cocaine and<br />
marijuana are the next most cited substances (Figure 1). These data only reflect the<br />
primary substance at admission so additional substance use is not reported.<br />
Figure 1: Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
1400<br />
Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />
Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Alcohol 1097.6 1229.4 1079.7 1030.8 1154.0 1008.6 976.1<br />
Cocaine 234.5 237.2 327.6 330.8 409.5 415.4 437.9<br />
Marijuana 311.9 403.6 356.4 333.2 415.1 385.5 376.6<br />
Heroin 41.9 40.2 40.0 58.3 68.3 33.0 36.6<br />
Other Opiates/Synthetics 19.3 34.6 24.8 22.4 49.2 31.5 40.6<br />
Methamphetamine 8.1 20.9 28.0 32.8 31.7 36.2 17.5<br />
.<br />
Source: <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Reporting System (SARS)<br />
3
Adult Consumption Patterns<br />
Alcohol sales in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (measured as per capita gallon sales) have grown from 2.1<br />
gallons in fiscal year 2003 to 2.5 gallons in fiscal year 2006, which mirrors an increase in<br />
alcohol sales for <strong>Iowa</strong>. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> alcohol sales are approximately one-third higher<br />
than the state rate (Figure 2). This may be due in part to the fact that there are<br />
differences in alcohol taxes between Illinois and <strong>Iowa</strong> – taxes on wine are lower in<br />
Illinois whereas taxes on beer are lower in <strong>Iowa</strong>, the tax rate on hard liquor in <strong>Iowa</strong> is not<br />
readily available. So alcohol users may cross into or out of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> to purchase and<br />
consume alcohol.<br />
In 2006, more than two-thirds of adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> had consumed alcohol in the past<br />
month as reported in the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Past 30-<br />
day alcohol use by adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is significantly higher than the state and<br />
national rates (Figure 3). Gender and age group differences were not assessed due to<br />
inadequate sample size at the county level.<br />
Binge drinking, defined by BRFSS as consumption of five or more drinks on one<br />
occasion, is significantly higher in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in <strong>Iowa</strong>, than in the United States.<br />
Nearly 25 percent of the adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> engage in binge drinking according to the<br />
2006 BRFSS (Figure 4). Heavy drinking is defined in the BRFSS as the consumption of<br />
more than 2 drinks per day by adult men and more than one drink per day by adult<br />
women. There was no real difference between the heavy drinking rate for adults in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>, and the U.S. (Figure 5). There was also no real difference between the<br />
self-reported drinking and driving rate for adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>, and the U.S.<br />
(Figure 6). It should be noted that many participants in the BRFSS refused to answer the<br />
question about drinking and driving.<br />
The per capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported alcohol as their primary<br />
substance of abuse is much higher than the rate for the state as a whole (Figure 7). These<br />
data only reflect the primary substance of choice at admission, so additional substance<br />
use is not reported.<br />
Women who use alcohol during pregnancy increase the risk of adverse health effects for<br />
their babies. In <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, 0.7 percent of pregnant women who gave birth in 2006<br />
reported they used alcohol. Since 2000, the percent of pregnant women who reported<br />
alcohol use during pregnancy in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has tended to be higher than the percent for<br />
the state, but was similar in 2006 (Figure 8). This information was collected and reported<br />
on birth certificates. This reporting method does not include women who did not have<br />
live births because of termination of pregnancy. As a result, the real effect of alcohol on<br />
pregnancies cannot be estimated. Some mothers may hesitate to report using alcohol<br />
while pregnant because of potential legal or social ramifications, making alcohol usage<br />
underreported.<br />
4
Figure 2: Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales<br />
4.0<br />
3.5<br />
Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Alcohol Sales - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8<br />
Alcohol Sales - <strong>Scott</strong> 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.5<br />
Fiscal Year<br />
Source: State of <strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division<br />
5
Figure 3: Percent of Adults Using Alcohol in Past 30 Days<br />
75<br />
Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
45<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 63.3 65.1 54.6 67.5<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> 60.0 56.9 55.5 56.4<br />
U.S. 55.7 53.9 53.4 51.8<br />
Year<br />
Source: BRFSS<br />
Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />
6
Figure 4: Percent of Adults Binge Drinking in Past Month<br />
35<br />
Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 17.9 20.9 19.6 23.6<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> 19.3 18.8 18.4 20.0<br />
U.S. 15.6 14.6 14.1 14.5<br />
Year<br />
Source: BRFSS<br />
Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />
7
Figure 5: Percent of Adults Heavy Drinking in Past Month<br />
35<br />
Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 9.9 9.0 6.6 5.7<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> 5.9 5.5 5.5 5.5<br />
U.S. 5.6 5.0 5.0 4.8<br />
Year<br />
Source: BRFSS<br />
Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />
8
Figure 6: Percent of Adults Reporting Having Driven After Having Perhaps Too Much<br />
To Drink in the Past Month<br />
20<br />
Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />
16<br />
12<br />
8<br />
4<br />
0<br />
2002 2004 2006<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 7.8 1.5 8.7<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> 6.9 5.5 8.1<br />
U.S. 4.2 3.8 5.0<br />
Year<br />
Source: BRFSS<br />
Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />
9
Figure 7: Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
1400<br />
Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />
Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Alcohol - <strong>Iowa</strong> 604.5 657.1 605.1 570.4 599.2 595.7 607.6<br />
Alcohol - <strong>Scott</strong> 1097.6 1229.4 1079.7 1030.8 1154.0 1008.6 976.1<br />
Year<br />
Source: SARS<br />
Figure 8: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> during<br />
Pregnancy – All Ages<br />
Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that<br />
Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> During Pregnancy<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Births - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6<br />
Births - <strong>Scott</strong> 4.3 3.7 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.3 0.7<br />
Source: Vital Records<br />
10
Youth Consumption Patterns<br />
The <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey (IYS) is a triennial census assessment of <strong>Iowa</strong>’s 6 th -, 8 th -, and<br />
11 th -grade students’ attitudes toward substance use and actual usage. The IYS was last<br />
completed in 2005 by a total of 5,463 students from all public school districts in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> and 98,246 <strong>Iowa</strong> students from 390 school districts. <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey data are<br />
reported at the state and county levels, as well as several other sub-state levels. The IYS<br />
is used to report youth consumption patterns in this profile because it is much more<br />
reflective of <strong>Iowa</strong> and individual counties in <strong>Iowa</strong> than the national surveys, which<br />
represent <strong>Iowa</strong> with very small sample sizes, collapse data from multiple years to<br />
generate reports, or use data from “similar” states to generate <strong>Iowa</strong> reports, and do not<br />
produce county-level results.<br />
The reported rate of alcohol use before age 13 has fallen from 1999 to 2005 in <strong>Iowa</strong> and<br />
in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (Figure 9). However, over 15 percent of all students surveyed in 2005<br />
reported using alcohol before turning 13. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates of alcohol use before the<br />
age of 13 are similar to the state rate. Past 30-day use of alcohol has also fallen for each<br />
grade reported in the IYS since 1999 in <strong>Iowa</strong> and <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (Figure 10). The<br />
downward trend is positive, but the overall number of youth reporting past 30-day use is<br />
still alarming. Eleventh graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> report a higher rate of past 30-day<br />
alcohol use than 11 th graders across <strong>Iowa</strong>. For every five 11 th graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />
two drank alcohol in the past month.<br />
Binge drinking by 6 th , 8 th , and 11 th graders over the past 30 days as reported on the IYS<br />
has decreased since 1999 in both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong> (Figure 11). Both 8 th and 11 th<br />
graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> reported higher counts of binge drinking than the state totals.<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> reports a significantly higher binge drinking rate among youth than the national<br />
rate. According to the 2004 National Survey on Drug <strong>Use</strong> and Health (NSDUH), 14.08<br />
percent of 12-to 17-year-old <strong>Iowa</strong>ns versus 10.86 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds<br />
nationally had at least one episode of binge drinking in the past 30 days. So <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
teenagers, who report higher drinking rates than <strong>Iowa</strong> teenagers, are also more likely to<br />
binge drink than teenagers from across the country.<br />
The IYS asks youth if they drove a motor vehicle after using any amount of alcohol or<br />
other drugs in the past 30 days. The reported percent encompasses youth who reported<br />
driving whether or not they had a legal driver’s license. IYS data do not differentiate<br />
between types of substances or between consumption levels of drug use. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
11 th graders reported similar results between 1999 and 2005, and the 2005 rate is similar<br />
to the state rate (Figure 12). Approximately 14 percent of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth place their<br />
lives at risk by driving after using alcohol or other drugs.<br />
The IYS perceived risk of alcohol use question reads as follows: “How much do you<br />
think you risk harming yourself if you drink 3 or more drinks of alcohol nearly every<br />
day?” The majority of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in <strong>Iowa</strong> feel there is<br />
great or moderate risk associated with drinking a considerable amount of alcohol on a<br />
regular basis (Figure 13). The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates are lower than their state counterparts,<br />
11
suggesting that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> teenagers feel that drinking is less of a risk. Female<br />
respondents perceived greater risk of alcohol use than males (Table 1). In comparison to<br />
state rates, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> females perceived less risk of alcohol use than females across<br />
the state, whereas <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males perceived more risk of alcohol use than males<br />
across the state.<br />
Figure 9: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol before<br />
Age 13<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
Percent<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 19 19 14<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 19 16<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 29 25 20<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 35 32 18<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 19 16 13<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 15 16<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
12
Figure 10: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
Percent<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 49 44 41<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 48 47 44<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 22 18 14<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 28 25 14<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 7 6 4<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 8 5 4<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
13
Figure 11: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Binge Drinking – Past 30<br />
Days<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
Percent<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 40 36 32<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 39 38 35<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 14 12 8<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 19 16 9<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 3 3 2<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 5 3 2<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
14
Figure 12: Percent of 11 th -Graders Reporting Driving after Using Any Amount of<br />
Alcohol or Other Drugs<br />
30<br />
25<br />
Percent<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 18 15 14<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 15 14 14<br />
Year<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
15
Figure 13: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate or<br />
Great Risk<br />
85<br />
80<br />
75<br />
Percent<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 71 69 73<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 69 68 72<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 76 76 79<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 73 73 79<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 77 78 78<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 77 76 75<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
Table 1: Percent of Youth Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />
Year<br />
Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 67 69 71<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 70 71 74<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 77 76 79<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 76 74 77<br />
Source: IYS<br />
16
Alcohol Consequences<br />
The number of liquor law arrests in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased from 2003 to 2005; the<br />
number of drunkenness arrests has increased by approximately the same number as liquor<br />
law arrests have fallen. The liquor law arrest and drunkenness arrest rates in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> have consistently been lower than the <strong>Iowa</strong> rates (Figure 14). Drunkenness is<br />
defined as, “To drink alcoholic beverages to the extent that one’s mental faculties and<br />
physical coordination are substantially impaired.” Drunkenness does not include driving<br />
under the influence offenses. A liquor law violation is defined as, “The violation of laws<br />
or ordinances prohibiting the manufacture, sale, purchase, transportation, possession, or<br />
use of alcoholic beverages.” Liquor law violations do not include driving under the<br />
influence or drunkenness offenses.<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a rate of convictions for alcohol-related offenses about one-third the<br />
rate for the state of <strong>Iowa</strong>. This difference holds true for total alcohol-related convictions,<br />
total consumption convictions, and alcohol sales and providing alcohol to minors<br />
convictions. This difference may be due to the fact that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is a border county,<br />
so some offenses may be occurring in Illinois. It also may be influenced by enforcement<br />
or prosecution differences between <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the state as a whole. The rate of<br />
convictions for alcohol-related offenses in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and across <strong>Iowa</strong> remained<br />
relatively stable between 2003 and 2005, with an uptick in 2006. This uptick may be due<br />
to a 2006 change in the <strong>Iowa</strong> Code, with underage drinking becoming a scheduled<br />
violation (similar to a speeding ticket) rather than a simple misdemeanor (Figure 15).<br />
There were 685 Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) arrests in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2005,<br />
corresponding to a rate of 426 OWI arrests per 100,000 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents, the<br />
highest rate since 2002 (Figure 16). The terms OWI and DUI (Driving Under the<br />
Influence) are often used interchangeably. Jurisdictions across the country use one term<br />
or the other. The definition of DUI found in the FBI Uniform Crime Reports is, “Driving<br />
or operating a motor vehicle or common carrier while mentally or physically impaired as<br />
the result of consuming an alcoholic beverage or using a drug or narcotic.” In <strong>Iowa</strong>, the<br />
method used to assess impairment is to test the blood alcohol content (BAC). As of July<br />
1, 2003, the “legal limit” in <strong>Iowa</strong> is .08 BAC, lowered from .10 BAC. The change in the<br />
legal BAC limit may be responsible for the notable increase in the OWI arrest rate per<br />
100,000 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents from 2003 to 2005. Other possible reasons for the<br />
increase could be improved law enforcement or zero tolerance policies toward motor<br />
vehicle related alcohol offenses.<br />
More than 26,000 youth were enrolled in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> public schools for the 2005-2006<br />
and 2006-2007 school years (Project EASIER). The alcohol or drug related expulsion<br />
and suspension rate for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was higher than the <strong>Iowa</strong> rate in both the 2005-2006<br />
and 2006-2007 school years (Figure 17). The average rate of alcohol-related suspensions<br />
and expulsions in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was similar to the state rate. The average rate of drugrelated<br />
suspensions and expulsions was approximately 35 percent higher than the state<br />
average (Figure 18).<br />
17
Juvenile adjudications due to alcohol are on the rise in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, more than doubling<br />
from 2004 to 2006, whereas the state rate is trending downward. The rate of alcoholrelated<br />
juvenile adjudications in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate for fiscal year<br />
2006 (Figure 19).<br />
An average of five <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> deaths per year are caused by alcoholic cirrhosis<br />
(International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 code K70), for a death rate similar to<br />
the state rate, hovering around 3 per 100,000 from 2003-2006 (Figure 20). This rate is<br />
quite low compared with the lung cancer death rate of approximately 59 per 100,000<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents from 2003-2006. Alcoholic cirrhosis is not manifested for<br />
decades after excessive drinking. Today’s alcohol usage might not be reflected in<br />
alcoholic cirrhosis death rates for 20 or more years, making it difficult to use the rates to<br />
implement and evaluate policies and practices that impact alcoholic cirrhosis.<br />
A recent study found that, of suicide victims who were tested for alcohol or drugs,<br />
approximately 33.3 percent were positive for alcohol and 16.4 percent were positive for<br />
opiates (Centers 2006). The number of suicides in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> remained steady from<br />
2000-2006, averaging approximately 19 suicides per year during that period. The suicide<br />
rate per 100,000 people for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong> were similar (Figure 21).<br />
The number of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> domestic violence cases where alcohol was present has<br />
remained stable from 2003-2005 (Table 2). The number of domestic violence cases with<br />
alcohol involvement averaged 16 percent of the total number of domestic violence cases,<br />
which is similar to the state average.<br />
18
Figure 14: Rate of Drunkenness and Liquor Law Arrests per 100,000<br />
Rate Per 100,000 People<br />
675<br />
600<br />
525<br />
450<br />
375<br />
300<br />
225<br />
150<br />
Liquor Law Arrests - <strong>Iowa</strong> 449.9 386.8 374.0<br />
Liquor Law Arrests -<br />
<strong>Scott</strong><br />
Drunkenness Arrests -<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Drunkenness Arrests -<br />
<strong>Scott</strong><br />
2003 2004 2005<br />
429.8 348.2 335.9<br />
269.6 307.6 299.9<br />
164.5 198.6 227.0<br />
Year<br />
Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />
Figure 15: Rate of Convictions for Alcohol-Related Offenses<br />
800<br />
Convictions Per 100,000<br />
Population<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Total Alcohol-Related<br />
Convictions - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Total Alcohol-Related<br />
Convictions - <strong>Scott</strong><br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
611 592 599 668<br />
204 176 235 256<br />
Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />
19
Figure 16: Rate of Operating While Intoxicated Arrests per 100,000 People<br />
600<br />
550<br />
Rate Per 100,000 People<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
OWI Arrests - <strong>Iowa</strong> 458.3 428.7 465.5 445.8 492.7 490.8<br />
OWI Arrests - <strong>Scott</strong> 452.6 427.8 425.2 350.3 374.3 426.0<br />
Year<br />
Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />
Note: As of July 1, 2003, the “legal limit” in <strong>Iowa</strong> is .08 BAC, lowered from .10 BAC.<br />
20
Figure 17: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students – Total Due to<br />
Alcohol or Drugs<br />
600<br />
<strong>Substance</strong> Related Suspensions and<br />
Expulsions Per 100,000 Students<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
2005-2006 2006-2007 Average<br />
Total - <strong>Iowa</strong> 291.6 360.3 326.0<br />
Total - <strong>Scott</strong> 496.3 420.6 458.5<br />
School Year<br />
Source: Project EASIER<br />
21
Figure 18: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students Due to Alcohol or<br />
Drugs<br />
Suspensions and Expulsions .<br />
Per 100,000 Students<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
2005-2006 2006-2007 Average<br />
Alcohol - <strong>Iowa</strong> 94.6 127.0 110.8<br />
Alcohol - <strong>Scott</strong> 170.5 83.4 126.9<br />
Drug - <strong>Iowa</strong> 208.1 251.0 230.6<br />
Drug - <strong>Scott</strong> 325.8 337.3 313.9<br />
School Year<br />
Source: Project EASIER<br />
22
Figure 19: Juvenile Adjudications due to Alcohol<br />
300<br />
Rate Per 100,000 Youth Ages 10-17<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Alcohol Adjudications -<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Alcohol Adjudications -<br />
<strong>Scott</strong><br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006<br />
114.7 118.8 98.1<br />
51.3 77.0 128.3<br />
Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />
Figure 20: Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths per 100,000<br />
12<br />
Rate Per 100,000 Population<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Alcohol Cirrhosis Deaths<br />
- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Alcohol Cirrhosis Deaths<br />
- <strong>Scott</strong><br />
0<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
3.94 3.49 4.48 3.69<br />
3.77 1.25 3.72 3.10<br />
Year<br />
Source: Vital Records<br />
23
Figure 21: Suicides per 100,000<br />
30<br />
Suicides Per 100,000 Population<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total - <strong>Iowa</strong> 9.8 10.4 10.7 12.0 11.5 11.3 11.2<br />
Total - <strong>Scott</strong> 14.5 10.7 12.6 10.7 11.2 9.9 16.6<br />
Year<br />
Source: Vital Records<br />
Table 2: Alcohol Involvement in Domestic Abuse Incidents<br />
2003 2004 2005<br />
Number of Cases - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1,219 1,230 1,191<br />
Number of Cases - <strong>Scott</strong> 177 182 191<br />
Percent of Total Cases - <strong>Iowa</strong> 15 18 16<br />
Percent of Total Cases - <strong>Scott</strong> 15 16 17<br />
Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />
Tobacco<br />
Adult Consumption Patterns<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, state, and national rates of current cigarette use did not differ significantly,<br />
nor is there significant difference from 2003-2006 in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates (Figure 22).<br />
The rate of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> mothers reporting tobacco use during pregnancy has been stable<br />
since 2002, hovering between 18-22 percent of all pregnancies. The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate of<br />
tobacco use during pregnancy has been consistently higher than the state rate, averaging 3<br />
percent higher per year (Figure 23). This information was collected and reported on birth<br />
24
certificates, and does not include women who did not have live births. This reporting<br />
method may under-report tobacco usage, since mothers may hesitate to report using<br />
tobacco while pregnant due to potential legal or social ramifications. The rate of tobacco<br />
use during pregnancy is approximately 20 times higher than the rate of alcohol use.<br />
Figure 22: Percent of Adults Who Are Current Smokers<br />
35<br />
Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 23.3 22.9 22.5 19.0<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> 21.6 20.8 20.3 21.3<br />
U.S. 22.1 20.7 20.4 19.5<br />
Year<br />
Source: BRFSS<br />
Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />
25
Figure 23: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> during<br />
Pregnancy – All Ages<br />
Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that<br />
Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> During Pregnancy<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Births - <strong>Iowa</strong> 17.2 17.4 16.5 15.7 16.1 16.2 15.9<br />
Births - <strong>Scott</strong> 21.9 20.7 18.9 19.8 18.3 19.4 18.8<br />
Source: Vital Records<br />
26
Youth Consumption Patterns<br />
Youth tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be on the decline, as evidenced by the<br />
number of youth reporting first use of cigarettes before age 13 and past 30-day cigarette<br />
use.<br />
The percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -graders who first used cigarettes before age 13 has<br />
decreased each time the IYS has been administered since 1999. However, the percent of<br />
11 th graders reporting the use of cigarettes before the age of 13 in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is higher<br />
than the state rate (Figure 24). Reported past 30-day cigarette use for the same<br />
populations has also decreased on each IYS, with the exception that 29 percent of 11 th<br />
graders reported cigarette use in both 2002 and 2005. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth report higher<br />
rates of past 30-day cigarette use in comparison to the state rates, with the largest<br />
difference being 8 percent for 11 th graders (Figure 25). Sixth, 8 th- , and 11 th -grade<br />
students responded similarly when asked, “How much do you think you risk harming<br />
yourself if you smoke cigarettes every day?” “Great Risk” and “Moderate Risk”<br />
response options were combined for Figure 26. As with measurements of use, responses<br />
to the perceived risk question show that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth are more likely to use<br />
cigarettes than the state rates. Perceived risk of cigarette use does not appear to differ by<br />
gender among middle- and high-school youth, although <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males and females<br />
respond that it is less risky to smoke cigarettes than their statewide counterparts (Table<br />
3).<br />
Tobacco compliance check data are compiled by the <strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division.<br />
In the last three fiscal years, there were no significant differences between <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
and state tobacco compliance check data (Figure 27). More than 200 tobacco compliance<br />
checks were completed each fiscal year in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with an average compliance rate<br />
of 86 percent from FY02-FY07.<br />
27
Figure 24: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes before<br />
Age 13<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
Percent<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 22 18 14<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 23 20 16<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 21 14 10<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 28 19 10<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 8 5 3<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 9 5 3<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
28
Figure 25: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Cigarette <strong>Use</strong><br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
Percent<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 33 23 21<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 39 29 29<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 13 9 7<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 13 8<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 3 2 2<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 6 3 2<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
29
Figure 26: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />
or Great Risk<br />
90<br />
85<br />
Percent<br />
80<br />
75<br />
70<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 81 84 85<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 79 82 83<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 82 84 85<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 80 81 84<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 82 84 83<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 81 80 79<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
Table 3: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />
Year<br />
Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 80 82 83<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 79 80 81<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 83 85 85<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 81 82 83<br />
Source: IYS<br />
30
Figure 27: Tobacco Compliance Check – Percent Compliant<br />
100<br />
Percent Compliant<br />
96<br />
92<br />
88<br />
84<br />
80<br />
Tobacco Compliance<br />
Checks - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Tobacco Compliance<br />
Checks - <strong>Scott</strong><br />
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07<br />
88 89 89 90 88 89<br />
89 84 82 87 86 87<br />
Fiscal Year<br />
Source: Alcohol Beverages Division<br />
31
Tobacco Consequences<br />
There is a lack of tobacco consequence data in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, as well as for the state of<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong>. Lung cancer death rate is the only indicator that met all requirements for inclusion<br />
in the profile. The lung cancer death rate has decreased slightly from 2003 to 2006 in<br />
both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong>, with the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate tending to be lower than the state<br />
rate (Figure 28).<br />
Figure 28: Lung Cancer Deaths per 100,000<br />
130<br />
Rate Per 100,000 Population<br />
115<br />
100<br />
85<br />
70<br />
55<br />
40<br />
Lung Cancer Deaths -<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Lung Cancer Deaths -<br />
<strong>Scott</strong><br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
64.17 65.48 66.03 61.10<br />
62.13 59.34 62.67 53.36<br />
Year<br />
Source: Vital Records<br />
32
Illicit Drugs<br />
National datasets suggest that illicit drug use in <strong>Iowa</strong> appears to be holding steady, and its<br />
prevalence is lower than the national total. Cocaine, marijuana, heroin, other<br />
opiates/synthetics, and methamphetamine follow alcohol as the most cited substances of<br />
use by individuals from <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> on admission to substance abuse treatment services<br />
(Figure 1).<br />
Adult Consumption Patterns<br />
The per capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported marijuana or cocaine as<br />
their primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the state rate as a whole;<br />
whereas the rate for methamphetamine is lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong> (Figure 29).<br />
The rate of people entering treatment who reported cocaine as their primary substance of<br />
use has increased over the past three years for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The per capita rate of<br />
people receiving treatment who reported heroin or other opiates/synthetics as their<br />
primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the state rate as a whole (Figure<br />
30). These data only reflect the primary substance at admission, so additional substance<br />
use is not reported.<br />
Figure 29: Marijuana, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />
Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
Source: SARS<br />
Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />
Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Marijuana - <strong>Iowa</strong> 246.3 285.0 279.8 279.7 290.4 297.7 307.7<br />
Marijuana - <strong>Scott</strong> 311.9 403.6 356.4 333.2 415.1 385.5 376.6<br />
Cocaine - <strong>Iowa</strong> 68.8 73.6 71.6 79.5 85.1 84.5 95.3<br />
Cocaine - <strong>Scott</strong> 234.5 237.2 327.6 330.8 409.5 415.4 437.9<br />
Methamphetamine - <strong>Iowa</strong> 152.6 201.4 222.8 239.3 254.9 265.1 197.7<br />
Methamphetamine - <strong>Scott</strong> 8.1 20.9 28.0 32.8 31.7 36.2 17.5<br />
Year<br />
33
Figure 30: Heroin and Other Opiates/Synthetics as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />
Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />
Per 100,000 People 15 and Older .<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Heroin - <strong>Iowa</strong> 9.8 10.5 11.5 10.4 11.4 8.4 8.1<br />
Heroin - <strong>Scott</strong> 41.9 40.2 40.0 58.3 68.3 33.0 36.6<br />
Other Opiates/Synthetics<br />
- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Other Opiates/Synthetics<br />
- <strong>Scott</strong><br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
7.3 11.9 16.4 12.9 19.6 18.6 21.0<br />
19.3 34.6 24.8 22.4 49.2 31.5 40.6<br />
Source: SARS<br />
Youth Consumption Patterns<br />
The 2003-2004 NSDUH estimated that 21,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns 12-17 years old used illicit drugs<br />
including marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, and prescription<br />
psychotherapeutics in a month. This estimate includes 16,000 12-to 17-year-old<br />
marijuana users. The 2005 IYS shows that marijuana was the most widely used illicit<br />
drug in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with 20 percent of 11 th -graders reporting current use (Table 4).<br />
Marijuana use by 6 th- , 8 th , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased significantly<br />
between 1999 and 2005. However, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> students report a significantly higher<br />
rate of marijuana use than their contemporaries across the state (Figure 31).<br />
The IYS asks the question, “How much do you think you risk harming yourself if you<br />
smoke marijuana once a week?” Seventy-five percent of 6 th –graders, 77 percent of 8 th -<br />
graders, and 52 percent of 11 th -graders responded “Great Risk” or “Moderate Risk” to<br />
this question in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2005. The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results were significantly lower<br />
than the state rates for perceived risk of marijuana use (Figure 32). Female students were<br />
about 4 percent more likely to respond “Great Risk” or “Moderate Risk” than male<br />
students in 2005. The difference in both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males and females in comparison<br />
to the statewide male and female responses is significant (Table 5). The percent of<br />
students reporting first use of marijuana before age 13 decreased for all three grades<br />
34
etween 1999 and 2005, but these rates are higher than the state rates for the same grades<br />
(Figure 33).<br />
Table 4: Percent of Youth Reporting Current Drug <strong>Use</strong> – 2005<br />
Grade<br />
<strong>Substance</strong> Type 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 11 - <strong>Scott</strong><br />
Marijuana 0 1 3 5 13 20<br />
Inhalants 2 2 3 3 2 3<br />
Amphetamines 0 0 1 1 3 4<br />
Cocaine 0 0 1 1 2 3<br />
Methamphetamines 0 0 1 1 2 2<br />
Steroids 0 0 0 0 1 2<br />
Source: IYS, p. 86<br />
Note: Boldfaced county values are higher than the corresponding state values.<br />
35
Figure 31: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong><br />
25<br />
20<br />
Percent<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 17 15 13<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 25 22 20<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 5 3<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 11 8 5<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1 1 0<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 2 1 1<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
36
Figure 32: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />
or Great Risk<br />
85<br />
80<br />
75<br />
Percent<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 70 65 70<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 60 56 52<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 80 79 80<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 75 72 77<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 80 81 80<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 79 77 75<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
Table 5: Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />
Year<br />
Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 73 72 74<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 69 66 70<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 79 77 79<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 74 71 73<br />
Source: IYS<br />
37
Figure 33: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana before<br />
Age 13<br />
15<br />
12<br />
Percent<br />
9<br />
6<br />
3<br />
0<br />
1999 2002 2005<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 7 6<br />
Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 12 11 9<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 6 5<br />
Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 13 9 6<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1 1 0<br />
Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 3 2 1<br />
Source: IYS<br />
Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />
Illicit Drug Consequences<br />
The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the<br />
state rate (Figure 34). In fiscal year 2006, there were 46 juvenile adjudications in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> for illicit drugs.<br />
The percent of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving the presence of illegal<br />
drugs in a child’s body, out of all confirmed or founded child abuse cases, has risen in<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since 2003, but remains lower than the state rate (Figure 35). The number<br />
of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving manufacturing methamphetamine in<br />
the presence of a minor has been virtually nonexistent in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since the end of<br />
2002, with only 4 cases from 2003-2006 (Figure 36). Many circumstances besides a<br />
38
change in the use of illegal substances could influence these numbers, including funding<br />
for law enforcement and the Department of Human Services, detection technology<br />
advances, changes in the <strong>Iowa</strong> code, and public awareness and pressure. The enactment<br />
in May of 2005 of the <strong>Iowa</strong> Pseudoephedrine Control Act, which required selling<br />
pseudoephedrine products from behind the counter rather than on store shelves, probably<br />
helped to decrease the number child abuse cases involving manufacturing<br />
methamphetamine in the presence of a minor.<br />
These numbers included each confirmed type of abuse on each report of abuse for each<br />
child. Each child may be confirmed to have suffered multiple types of abuse on a single<br />
report, and each child may have multiple reports. Presence of an illegal drug is defined<br />
as the presence of an illegal drug in a child’s body as a direct and foreseeable<br />
consequence of the acts or omissions of the person responsible for the child’s care.<br />
Illegal drugs used in this definition include cocaine, heroin, amphetamine,<br />
methamphetamine, marijuana, other illegal drugs, or combinations or derivatives of<br />
illegal drugs not prescribed by a health practitioner. Manufacturing methamphetamine in<br />
the presence of a minor is defined in <strong>Iowa</strong> Code 232.2 subsection 6, paragraph p. It<br />
occurs when the person responsible for the care of a child manufactures a dangerous<br />
substance or has possession of the methamphetamine precursors, ephedrine or<br />
pseudoephedrine, with the intent to use the product as a precursor or intermediary to a<br />
dangerous substance in the presence of a child.<br />
Figure 34: Juvenile Adjudications due to Illicit Drugs<br />
300<br />
Rate Per 100,000 Youth Ages 10-17<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
Illicit Drug Adjudications<br />
- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Illicit Drug Adjudications<br />
- <strong>Scott</strong><br />
0<br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006<br />
187.1 173.7 168.4<br />
169.3 102.6 236.0<br />
Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />
39
Figure 35: Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />
of Illegal Drugs in a Child’s Body<br />
Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child<br />
Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />
of Illegal Drugs in a Child's Body<br />
15<br />
12<br />
9<br />
6<br />
3<br />
0<br />
Presence of Illegal<br />
Drugs - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Presence of Illegal<br />
Drugs - <strong>Scott</strong><br />
CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006<br />
8.33 9.64 8.30 7.25<br />
1.86 3.41 5.83 4.60<br />
Year<br />
Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Human Services<br />
Figure 36: Number of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving<br />
Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor<br />
Confirm ed or Founded Child Abuse Cases<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the<br />
Presence of a Minor - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the<br />
Presence of a Minor - <strong>Scott</strong><br />
0<br />
CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006<br />
400 299 128 107<br />
2 0 2 0<br />
Calendar Year<br />
Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Human Services<br />
Note: The <strong>Iowa</strong> Pseudoephedrine Control Act took effect in May 2005. This Act required that pseudoephedrine products be<br />
sold from behind the counter.<br />
40
Discussion<br />
General Comments<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is unique in that it is one of the few counties in <strong>Iowa</strong> that includes both a<br />
major urban center and rural areas. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> encompasses the <strong>Iowa</strong> side of the Quad<br />
Cities; Bettendorf and Davenport, <strong>Iowa</strong>, along with Moline and Rock Island, Illinois.<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> straddles Interstate 80, midway between Chicago and Des Moines.<br />
According to the U.S. Census, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population was almost 159,000 in 2000.<br />
Estimates based on the 2000 U.S. Census predict that approximately 46,000 young<br />
people (ages 19 and under) lived in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2006.<br />
The burden of substance abuse, as demonstrated by the consequences data presented in<br />
this report, is staggering both financially and in human suffering. The consumption data<br />
are disturbing in that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to <strong>Iowa</strong> when it comes to binge-drinking<br />
rates, which are higher than national rates, and higher than state rates for alcohol and<br />
illicit drug use. It is in the best interest of all citizens of <strong>Iowa</strong> to reduce the burden of<br />
substance abuse and dependence.<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is a border county with close ties to the Illinois Quad-Cities which makes it<br />
more difficult to interpret data and to assess substance use. Both consumption and<br />
consequence data may be skewed, as <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents may travel into Illinois to<br />
purchase and consume alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs. The reverse may be true as well<br />
– Illinois residents may travel into <strong>Iowa</strong> to purchase and consume alcohol, tobacco, or<br />
illicit drugs. Extra caution should be used when reviewing substance use data as it may<br />
include Illinois residents’ consumption and consequences in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> or may exclude<br />
<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents’ consumption and consequences in Illinois. Indicators that are<br />
more likely to be affected by this include, in order as they appear in this profile: per<br />
capita alcohol gallon sales, drunkenness and liquor law arrests, convictions for alcoholrelated<br />
offenses, OWI arrests, juvenile adjudications due to alcohol, suicides, alcohol<br />
involvement in domestic abuse incidents, and juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs.<br />
Consumption Patterns of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Alcohol<br />
Alcohol is the most widely used substance among youth and adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />
Adult alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has increased over the past couple of years, as<br />
evidenced by past 30-day alcohol use. Binge drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and across<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> are significantly higher than the national rate. Heavy drinking and driving after<br />
drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are similar to both the state and national rates.<br />
Underage drinking is a critical issue in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Underage drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> are very similar to state rates. The 2005 IYS showed that 44 percent of <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> 11 th -graders drank alcohol and 35 percent binge drank in the past month. The<br />
41
social culture in many of <strong>Iowa</strong>’s rural areas and college towns accepts underage drinking<br />
as a rite of passage that is part of life activities in small communities. Many community<br />
events and activities center on or include drinking alcohol, glorification of drinking, and<br />
may even promote underage drinking. Many parents view underage drinking as normal<br />
for teenagers. Additionally, some parents provide alcohol to youth in their homes.<br />
Tobacco<br />
Adult tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state and national rates, and was level<br />
from 2003 to 2006. Approximately 800,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns over age 12 use tobacco. Rates of<br />
smoking during pregnancy have been steady at about 19 percent, higher than the state<br />
rate by 2-4 percent each year from 2000-2006. The percent of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 11 th -graders<br />
reporting past 30-day cigarette use is higher than the state rate (29% vs. 21%).<br />
Illicit Drugs<br />
Illicit drug use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than illicit drug use in <strong>Iowa</strong>. The per<br />
capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or<br />
other opiates/synthetics as their primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than<br />
the state rate as a whole; whereas the rate for methamphetamine is lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
than in <strong>Iowa</strong>. Marijuana use by 6 th- , 8 th , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased<br />
significantly between 1999 and 2005, but remains higher than the state rate.<br />
Consequences of <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />
Alcohol<br />
The consequences of alcohol use in <strong>Iowa</strong> are severe and multi-faceted. They include:<br />
loss of life and injury; lost wages and loss of employment; increased insurance rates and<br />
hospitalization charges; costs associated with the legal system; incarceration; and<br />
property damage. Because of the higher level of alcohol consumption compared with<br />
tobacco or illicit drugs, the adverse consequences of alcohol use may outweigh those<br />
associated with tobacco or illicit drugs.<br />
While alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong> in general, measured<br />
alcohol consequences are lower. Legal ramifications of alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are<br />
lower than in <strong>Iowa</strong>, including drunkenness and liquor law arrests, convictions for alcoholrelated<br />
offenses, OWI rate, and juvenile adjudications. Alcohol-related school<br />
suspensions or expulsions are lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than across <strong>Iowa</strong>. The alcoholic<br />
cirrhosis death rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate.<br />
Tobacco<br />
There is a lack of quality tobacco consequence data for both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and for the<br />
state of <strong>Iowa</strong> as a whole. The lung cancer death rate has remained steady in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
for the past four years, and is similar to the state rate. In addition to smoking, lung cancer<br />
42
may be caused by exposure to environmental toxins, a particular concern for a rural state<br />
with a large farming industry.<br />
Illicit Drugs<br />
Although the consumption of illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than<br />
across <strong>Iowa</strong> in general, most indices of illicit drug consequences in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are<br />
similar to or lower than state rates. The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs<br />
and the percent of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving the presence of<br />
illegal drugs in a child’s body, out of all confirmed or founded child abuse cases, in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> is similar to the respective state rates. The number of confirmed or founded child<br />
abuse cases involving manufacturing methamphetamine in the presence of a minor has<br />
been virtually nonexistent in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since the end of 2002. This may be due, in<br />
part, to the fact that <strong>Scott</strong> is one of the more urban counties in <strong>Iowa</strong>. Drug-related school<br />
suspensions or expulsions is the only drug consequence indicator that is higher in <strong>Scott</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> than across <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />
Conclusions<br />
• <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a binge drinking problem; adult and youth binge drinking rates<br />
are higher in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in the state than nationally. However, the rates of<br />
most alcohol consequences are lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />
• Cigarette use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />
• Illicit drug use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong>, but measured<br />
illicit drug consequences are similar or lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />
• Most national datasets are not useful for counties in <strong>Iowa</strong>, due to insufficient<br />
sample sizes.<br />
• The <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey was a particularly useful tool in assessing youth<br />
substance use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and provides for the comparison of data between<br />
various local measurement areas and across the state.<br />
• A couple of indicators used in the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> were not<br />
available at the county-level because of insufficient numbers and confidentiality<br />
regulations.<br />
• Data collected at the county level are difficult to assess for a variety of reasons,<br />
including a lack of historical data, unclear or inconsistent collecting and reporting<br />
procedures, and small sample sizes or incidence rates.<br />
43
Appendices<br />
44
Alcohol Consumption:<br />
Appendix 1<br />
Indicators Included in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />
• 30-Day Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> (both adult and youth)<br />
• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol<br />
• Binge Drinking (both adult and youth)<br />
• Heavy Drinking (adult)<br />
• 30-Day Driving After Drinking Alcohol (both adult and youth)<br />
• Women Reporting the <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol During Pregnancy<br />
• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />
• Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
Tobacco Consumption:<br />
• Current Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> (adult)<br />
• 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> (youth)<br />
• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes<br />
• Women reporting the <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes During Pregnancy<br />
• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />
• Tobacco Compliance Checks<br />
Illicit Drug Consumption:<br />
• 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> (youth)<br />
• 30-Day Illicit Drug <strong>Use</strong><br />
• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana<br />
• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />
• Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />
Alcohol Consequences:<br />
• Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths<br />
• Suicides<br />
• Alcohol-Related Domestic Violence Arrests<br />
• Liquor Law Arrests<br />
• Drunkenness<br />
• DUI Rates<br />
• Alcohol-Related Convictions<br />
• Juvenile Adjudications for Alcohol<br />
45
Tobacco Consequences:<br />
• Lung Cancer Deaths<br />
Illicit Drug Consequences:<br />
• Presence of Illegal Drugs in Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases<br />
• Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor<br />
• Juvenile Adjudications for Illegal Drugs<br />
Other Indicators:<br />
• ATOD-Related Expulsions and Suspensions<br />
• School Enrollment<br />
46
Appendix 2<br />
Indicators Included in <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> but not in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />
These indicators were not included in the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> for a number of reasons.<br />
Some indicators were not collected at the county level, others had insufficient sample<br />
sizes, and others were suppressed to protect confidentiality.<br />
Alcohol Consumption:<br />
• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />
Tobacco Consumption:<br />
• 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Other Tobacco Products<br />
• Heavy Smoking (youth)<br />
• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />
Illicit Drug Consumption:<br />
• 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> (adult)<br />
• 30-Day Any Illicit Drug <strong>Use</strong> Other Than Marijuana<br />
• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />
Alcohol Consequences:<br />
• Alcohol Dependence or Abuse<br />
• Alcohol-Involved Drivers Among All Drivers in Fatal Crashes<br />
Illicit Drug Consequences:<br />
• New AIDS Cases and Annual HIV/AIDS Rates Due to Drug <strong>Use</strong><br />
• Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse<br />
• Drug Possession Arrests<br />
Other Indicators:<br />
• School Attendance<br />
47
Appendix 3<br />
Data Sources<br />
Data Sources<br />
BRFSS (Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System) -<br />
http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.htm<br />
Certified Annual Report – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Certified Annual Report<br />
(School attendance data)<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division – http://www.iowaabd.com/tobacco/index.jsp<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Safety, Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />
http://www.dps.state.ia.us/commis/ucr/index.shtml<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Vital Records<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey -<br />
http://www.state.ia.us/government/dhr/cjjp/iys/YouthSurvey/ythsurvey.html<br />
Project EASIER – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Project EASIER Fall Enrollment File<br />
Project EASIER – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Project EASIER Spring Suspension<br />
and Expulsion File<br />
SARS - Kantzavelos, A., Barber, K., & Arndt, S. (2006). Outcomes Monitoring System,<br />
<strong>Iowa</strong> Project: Year Eight Report (<strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health, Contract No.<br />
5885NA01). <strong>Iowa</strong> City, IA: <strong>Iowa</strong> Consortium for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Research and<br />
Evaluation. http://iconsortium.subst-abuse.uiowa.edu/<br />
Suicides -<br />
http://www.idph.state.ia.us/eh/common/pdf/health_statistics/2004/vital_stats_2004.pdf<br />
48