23.03.2015 Views

Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...

Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...

Scott County Substance Use Epidemiological Profile 2008 - Iowa ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

<strong>Substance</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> Outcome Workgroup<br />

December 2007


Executive Summary<br />

In 2006, the <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health received funding from the federal<br />

Department of Health and Human Services, <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse and Mental Health<br />

Administration’s Center for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention, for a State <strong>Epidemiological</strong><br />

Outcome Workgroup (Workgroup) to develop a state epidemiological profile. The<br />

Workgroup included representatives from agencies directly involved with preventing<br />

substance abuse in the state. In 2007 funding was continued; one of the deliverables was<br />

to produce a community level epidemiological profile. The Workgroup defined<br />

“community” as a county in <strong>Iowa</strong>. After a review of data, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was one of the<br />

counties selected for the community profiles.<br />

The following criteria were developed during the writing of the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>, and were adapted to guide the data selection process for the<br />

2007 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>:<br />

• Data available at the local (<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>) level;<br />

• Sample covers age range;<br />

• Data collected at least every two years;<br />

• Measures directly related or strongly associated with ATOD use;<br />

• Data pertain to consumption or consequence; and<br />

• Data sets have adequate sample size.<br />

Approximately forty indicators were included in the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>,<br />

most of which were also included in the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>. Key indicator findings<br />

include:<br />

• Alcohol is the most cited substance of use by individuals entering substance abuse<br />

treatment in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

• More than two-thirds of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> adults consumed alcohol in the past month,<br />

which is significantly higher than the <strong>Iowa</strong> and national rates.<br />

• The adult binge drinking rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate; both of<br />

which are significantly higher than the national rate.<br />

• Among youth, the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate of current alcohol use is similar to the state<br />

rate.<br />

• While there is a downward trend in alcohol use by youth over the last few years,<br />

more than 15 percent of all students surveyed in 2005 reported using alcohol<br />

before turning 13. For every five 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, two drank alcohol<br />

within the past month.<br />

• The rate of convictions for alcohol-related offenses in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is about onethird<br />

the state rate.<br />

• There were 426 Operating While Intoxicated arrests per 100,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns in<br />

2005, the highest rate in three years.<br />

• The average rate of alcohol-related suspensions and expulsions in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

was similar to the state rate. The average rate of drug-related suspensions and<br />

expulsions was approximately 35 percent higher than the state average.<br />

i


• Juvenile adjudications due to alcohol are on the rise in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, more than<br />

doubling from 2004 to 2006. The rate of juvenile adjudications due to alcohol in<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate for fiscal year 2006.<br />

• Approximately 800,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns over the age of 12 use tobacco, the majority of<br />

which is cigarette use.<br />

• The reported rate of mothers using tobacco during pregnancy in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has<br />

been between 18-22 percent of all pregnancies since 2002, which is about 3<br />

percent higher than the state rate.<br />

• Youth tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be on the decline, as evidenced by<br />

the number of youth reporting first use of cigarettes before the age of 13, past 30-<br />

day use, and perceived risk of cigarette use. However, these rates are higher in<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />

• More than 200 tobacco compliance checks were completed each fiscal year in<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with an average compliance rate of 86 percent from FY02-FY07.<br />

The success rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the statewide success rate of tobacco<br />

compliance checks.<br />

• Marijuana use by 6 th -, 8 th -, and 11 th -graders is significantly higher in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> than across the state.<br />

• The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to<br />

the state rate.<br />

Regardless of substance, most consumption indicators for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are higher<br />

than for <strong>Iowa</strong> or the nation, but a similar effect is not evident in most consequence<br />

indicators. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s geographical position, bordering Illinois, may influence<br />

consumption and consequence data, and may account for the observed difference<br />

between consumption and consequence data.<br />

ii


Table of Contents<br />

Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... i<br />

Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................iii<br />

Table of Figures............................................................................................................................ iv<br />

List of Tables ................................................................................................................................vi<br />

Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

Background ................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

Results ............................................................................................................................................ 3<br />

Alcohol.........................................................................................................................................3<br />

Adult Consumption Patterns....................................................................................................4<br />

Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................11<br />

Alcohol Consequences...........................................................................................................17<br />

Tobacco......................................................................................................................................24<br />

Adult Consumption Patterns..................................................................................................24<br />

Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................27<br />

Tobacco Consequences..........................................................................................................32<br />

Illicit Drugs ...............................................................................................................................33<br />

Adult Consumption Patterns..................................................................................................33<br />

Youth Consumption Patterns .................................................................................................34<br />

Illicit Drug Consequences......................................................................................................38<br />

Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 41<br />

General Comments....................................................................................................................41<br />

Consumption Patterns of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>..........41<br />

Alcohol...................................................................................................................................41<br />

Tobacco..................................................................................................................................42<br />

Illicit Drugs ............................................................................................................................42<br />

Consequences of <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>......................................................42<br />

Alcohol...................................................................................................................................42<br />

Tobacco..................................................................................................................................42<br />

Illicit Drugs ............................................................................................................................43<br />

Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................43<br />

Appendices................................................................................................................................... 44<br />

Appendix 1................................................................................................................................45<br />

Appendix 2................................................................................................................................47<br />

Appendix 3................................................................................................................................48<br />

iii


Table of Figures<br />

Figure 1: Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment.................... 3<br />

Figure 2: Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales......................................................................... 5<br />

Figure 3: Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> in Past 30 Days............................................................................... 6<br />

Figure 4: Percent of Adults Binge Drinking in Past Month ............................................... 7<br />

Figure 5: Percent of Adults Heavy Drinking in Past Month............................................... 8<br />

Figure 6: Percent of Adults Reporting Having Driven After Having Perhaps Too Much<br />

To Drink in the Past Month ........................................................................................ 9<br />

Figure 7: Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment 10<br />

Figure 8: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> during<br />

Pregnancy – All Ages ............................................................................................... 10<br />

Figure 9: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol before Age<br />

13............................................................................................................................... 12<br />

Figure 10: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol 13<br />

Figure 11: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Binge Drinking – Past 30 Days<br />

................................................................................................................................... 14<br />

Figure 12: Percent of 11 th -Graders Reporting Driving after Using Any Amount of<br />

Alcohol or Other Drugs ............................................................................................ 15<br />

Figure 13: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate or<br />

Great Risk ................................................................................................................. 16<br />

Figure 14: Rate of Drunkenness and Liquor Law Arrests per 100,000............................ 19<br />

Figure 15: Rate of Convictions for Alcohol-Related Offenses......................................... 19<br />

Figure 16: Rate of Operating While Intoxicated Arrests per 100,000 People.................. 20<br />

Figure 17: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students – Total Due to<br />

Alcohol or Drugs....................................................................................................... 21<br />

Figure 18: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students Due to Alcohol or<br />

Drugs......................................................................................................................... 22<br />

Figure 19: Juvenile Adjudications due to Alcohol ........................................................... 23<br />

Figure 20: Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths per 100,000 ......................................................... 23<br />

Figure 21: Suicides per 100,000 ....................................................................................... 24<br />

Figure 22: Percent of Adults Who Are Current Smokers................................................ 25<br />

Figure 23: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> during<br />

Pregnancy – All Ages ............................................................................................... 26<br />

Figure 24: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes before<br />

Age 13....................................................................................................................... 28<br />

Figure 25: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> .. 29<br />

Figure 26: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />

or Great Risk............................................................................................................. 30<br />

Figure 27: Tobacco Compliance Check – Percent Compliant.......................................... 31<br />

Figure 28: Lung Cancer Deaths per 100,000.................................................................... 32<br />

Figure 29: Marijuana, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />

Reported upon Entry into Treatment ........................................................................ 33<br />

Figure 30: Heroin and Other Opiates/Synthetics as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported<br />

upon Entry into Treatment........................................................................................ 34<br />

Figure 31: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong>. 36<br />

iv


Figure 32: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />

or Great Risk............................................................................................................. 37<br />

Figure 33: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana before<br />

Age 13....................................................................................................................... 38<br />

Figure 34: Juvenile Adjudications due to Illicit Drugs..................................................... 39<br />

Figure 35: Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />

of Illegal Drugs in a Child’s Body............................................................................ 40<br />

Figure 36: Number of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving<br />

Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor ................................ 40<br />

v


List of Tables<br />

Table 1: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> by Gender ......... 16<br />

Table 2: Alcohol Involvement in Domestic Abuse Incidents........................................... 24<br />

Table 3: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> by Gender ....... 30<br />

Table 4: Percent of Youth Reporting Current Drug <strong>Use</strong> - 2005....................................... 35<br />

Table 5: Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> by Gender....................... 37<br />

vi


Introduction<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is geographically nestled in the bend of the Mississippi River and is situated<br />

in the southeastern corner of <strong>Iowa</strong>. It encompasses both a major urban center and rural<br />

areas, with the population majority urban and the land agricultural. Davenport and<br />

Bettendorf, <strong>Iowa</strong> join Moline and Rock Island, Illinois to form the Quad Cities; a large<br />

metropolitan area with a population of 360,000. Towns such as Buffalo, Eldridge,<br />

Princeton, Pleasant Valley, Park View, LeClaire, and McCausland each with a population<br />

less than 5,000, serve as hubs for the rural areas. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is geographically situated<br />

midway between Minneapolis on the north and St. Louis on the south, Chicago on the<br />

east and Des Moines on the west, and is bisected by U.S. Interstate 80. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s<br />

population is 158,668 according to the 2000 Census. Estimates based on the 2000 U.S.<br />

Census predict that approximately 46,000 young people (ages 19 and under) lived in<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2006, which comprised about 28 percent of the total population (versus<br />

26% statewide).<br />

Background<br />

In 2006, the <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health (IDPH) received funding from the federal<br />

Department of Health and Human Services, <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse and Mental Health<br />

Administration’s Center for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention, for a State <strong>Epidemiological</strong><br />

Outcome Workgroup (SEOW). IDPH’s Division of Behavioral Health is the Single State<br />

Authority for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Prevention and Treatment. IDPH administers the funding<br />

and activities of the SEOW. The first year of the SEOW process involved forming an<br />

epidemiological team to assess, analyze, interpret, and communicate data about <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

substance consumption patterns and consequences. The two major products resulting<br />

from the first year of the SEOW were the state epidemiological profile (State <strong>Profile</strong>) and<br />

plans for a system to accommodate the ongoing collection of data for monitoring<br />

prevention outcomes. The State <strong>Profile</strong> and a shorter version of Key Findings can be<br />

found on the IDPH Web site www.idph.state.ia.us. In the second year of the project, the<br />

group was charged with developing a community level epidemiological profile. The<br />

Workgroup defined “community” as a county in <strong>Iowa</strong>. After a review of data, Hardin and<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> counties were selected for the county profiles.<br />

The following criteria were developed during the writing of the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

<strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>, and were adapted to guide the data selection process for the<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>:<br />

• Data available at the local (<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>) level;<br />

• Sample covers age range;<br />

• Data collected at least every two years;<br />

• Measures directly related or strongly associated with ATOD use;<br />

• Data pertain to consumption or consequence; and<br />

• Data sets have adequate sample size.<br />

1


Additional criteria were applied where similar indicators existed:<br />

• Historical data available;<br />

• Data available at the national level;<br />

• Limited redundancy between indicators (some redundancy is acceptable); and<br />

• Closeness to consequence (where applicable).<br />

SEOW staff met with <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> representatives on October 26, 2007 in Davenport.<br />

Seventeen people representing the following sectors of the county attended the meeting:<br />

law enforcement, treatment and prevention, healthcare, juvenile court services, education,<br />

religious organizations, and social services. The meeting was organized by the Center for<br />

Alcohol and Drug Services, Inc. An overview of the State <strong>Profile</strong> was presented, along<br />

with sample figures for the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>. Feedback about data used, alternative<br />

data sources, and profile format was offered by the attendees and has been incorporated<br />

in the profile whenever applicable. The same group members were included in the<br />

profile review process.<br />

2


Results<br />

Alcohol<br />

Alcohol is the substance most frequently used by adults and youth in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />

across <strong>Iowa</strong>, and across the United States. Alcohol is the most cited substance of use by<br />

individuals from <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> on admission to substance abuse treatment services,<br />

reinforcing alcohol as the primary substance of use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Cocaine and<br />

marijuana are the next most cited substances (Figure 1). These data only reflect the<br />

primary substance at admission so additional substance use is not reported.<br />

Figure 1: Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

1400<br />

Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />

Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Alcohol 1097.6 1229.4 1079.7 1030.8 1154.0 1008.6 976.1<br />

Cocaine 234.5 237.2 327.6 330.8 409.5 415.4 437.9<br />

Marijuana 311.9 403.6 356.4 333.2 415.1 385.5 376.6<br />

Heroin 41.9 40.2 40.0 58.3 68.3 33.0 36.6<br />

Other Opiates/Synthetics 19.3 34.6 24.8 22.4 49.2 31.5 40.6<br />

Methamphetamine 8.1 20.9 28.0 32.8 31.7 36.2 17.5<br />

.<br />

Source: <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Reporting System (SARS)<br />

3


Adult Consumption Patterns<br />

Alcohol sales in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (measured as per capita gallon sales) have grown from 2.1<br />

gallons in fiscal year 2003 to 2.5 gallons in fiscal year 2006, which mirrors an increase in<br />

alcohol sales for <strong>Iowa</strong>. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> alcohol sales are approximately one-third higher<br />

than the state rate (Figure 2). This may be due in part to the fact that there are<br />

differences in alcohol taxes between Illinois and <strong>Iowa</strong> – taxes on wine are lower in<br />

Illinois whereas taxes on beer are lower in <strong>Iowa</strong>, the tax rate on hard liquor in <strong>Iowa</strong> is not<br />

readily available. So alcohol users may cross into or out of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> to purchase and<br />

consume alcohol.<br />

In 2006, more than two-thirds of adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> had consumed alcohol in the past<br />

month as reported in the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Past 30-<br />

day alcohol use by adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is significantly higher than the state and<br />

national rates (Figure 3). Gender and age group differences were not assessed due to<br />

inadequate sample size at the county level.<br />

Binge drinking, defined by BRFSS as consumption of five or more drinks on one<br />

occasion, is significantly higher in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in <strong>Iowa</strong>, than in the United States.<br />

Nearly 25 percent of the adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> engage in binge drinking according to the<br />

2006 BRFSS (Figure 4). Heavy drinking is defined in the BRFSS as the consumption of<br />

more than 2 drinks per day by adult men and more than one drink per day by adult<br />

women. There was no real difference between the heavy drinking rate for adults in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>, and the U.S. (Figure 5). There was also no real difference between the<br />

self-reported drinking and driving rate for adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong>, and the U.S.<br />

(Figure 6). It should be noted that many participants in the BRFSS refused to answer the<br />

question about drinking and driving.<br />

The per capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported alcohol as their primary<br />

substance of abuse is much higher than the rate for the state as a whole (Figure 7). These<br />

data only reflect the primary substance of choice at admission, so additional substance<br />

use is not reported.<br />

Women who use alcohol during pregnancy increase the risk of adverse health effects for<br />

their babies. In <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, 0.7 percent of pregnant women who gave birth in 2006<br />

reported they used alcohol. Since 2000, the percent of pregnant women who reported<br />

alcohol use during pregnancy in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has tended to be higher than the percent for<br />

the state, but was similar in 2006 (Figure 8). This information was collected and reported<br />

on birth certificates. This reporting method does not include women who did not have<br />

live births because of termination of pregnancy. As a result, the real effect of alcohol on<br />

pregnancies cannot be estimated. Some mothers may hesitate to report using alcohol<br />

while pregnant because of potential legal or social ramifications, making alcohol usage<br />

underreported.<br />

4


Figure 2: Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

Per Capita Alcohol Gallon Sales<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Alcohol Sales - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8<br />

Alcohol Sales - <strong>Scott</strong> 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.5<br />

Fiscal Year<br />

Source: State of <strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division<br />

5


Figure 3: Percent of Adults Using Alcohol in Past 30 Days<br />

75<br />

Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 63.3 65.1 54.6 67.5<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> 60.0 56.9 55.5 56.4<br />

U.S. 55.7 53.9 53.4 51.8<br />

Year<br />

Source: BRFSS<br />

Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />

6


Figure 4: Percent of Adults Binge Drinking in Past Month<br />

35<br />

Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 17.9 20.9 19.6 23.6<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> 19.3 18.8 18.4 20.0<br />

U.S. 15.6 14.6 14.1 14.5<br />

Year<br />

Source: BRFSS<br />

Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />

7


Figure 5: Percent of Adults Heavy Drinking in Past Month<br />

35<br />

Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 9.9 9.0 6.6 5.7<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> 5.9 5.5 5.5 5.5<br />

U.S. 5.6 5.0 5.0 4.8<br />

Year<br />

Source: BRFSS<br />

Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />

8


Figure 6: Percent of Adults Reporting Having Driven After Having Perhaps Too Much<br />

To Drink in the Past Month<br />

20<br />

Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

2002 2004 2006<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 7.8 1.5 8.7<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> 6.9 5.5 8.1<br />

U.S. 4.2 3.8 5.0<br />

Year<br />

Source: BRFSS<br />

Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />

9


Figure 7: Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

1400<br />

Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />

Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Alcohol - <strong>Iowa</strong> 604.5 657.1 605.1 570.4 599.2 595.7 607.6<br />

Alcohol - <strong>Scott</strong> 1097.6 1229.4 1079.7 1030.8 1154.0 1008.6 976.1<br />

Year<br />

Source: SARS<br />

Figure 8: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> during<br />

Pregnancy – All Ages<br />

Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that<br />

Reported Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> During Pregnancy<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Births - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6<br />

Births - <strong>Scott</strong> 4.3 3.7 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.3 0.7<br />

Source: Vital Records<br />

10


Youth Consumption Patterns<br />

The <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey (IYS) is a triennial census assessment of <strong>Iowa</strong>’s 6 th -, 8 th -, and<br />

11 th -grade students’ attitudes toward substance use and actual usage. The IYS was last<br />

completed in 2005 by a total of 5,463 students from all public school districts in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> and 98,246 <strong>Iowa</strong> students from 390 school districts. <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey data are<br />

reported at the state and county levels, as well as several other sub-state levels. The IYS<br />

is used to report youth consumption patterns in this profile because it is much more<br />

reflective of <strong>Iowa</strong> and individual counties in <strong>Iowa</strong> than the national surveys, which<br />

represent <strong>Iowa</strong> with very small sample sizes, collapse data from multiple years to<br />

generate reports, or use data from “similar” states to generate <strong>Iowa</strong> reports, and do not<br />

produce county-level results.<br />

The reported rate of alcohol use before age 13 has fallen from 1999 to 2005 in <strong>Iowa</strong> and<br />

in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (Figure 9). However, over 15 percent of all students surveyed in 2005<br />

reported using alcohol before turning 13. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates of alcohol use before the<br />

age of 13 are similar to the state rate. Past 30-day use of alcohol has also fallen for each<br />

grade reported in the IYS since 1999 in <strong>Iowa</strong> and <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> (Figure 10). The<br />

downward trend is positive, but the overall number of youth reporting past 30-day use is<br />

still alarming. Eleventh graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> report a higher rate of past 30-day<br />

alcohol use than 11 th graders across <strong>Iowa</strong>. For every five 11 th graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>,<br />

two drank alcohol in the past month.<br />

Binge drinking by 6 th , 8 th , and 11 th graders over the past 30 days as reported on the IYS<br />

has decreased since 1999 in both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong> (Figure 11). Both 8 th and 11 th<br />

graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> reported higher counts of binge drinking than the state totals.<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> reports a significantly higher binge drinking rate among youth than the national<br />

rate. According to the 2004 National Survey on Drug <strong>Use</strong> and Health (NSDUH), 14.08<br />

percent of 12-to 17-year-old <strong>Iowa</strong>ns versus 10.86 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds<br />

nationally had at least one episode of binge drinking in the past 30 days. So <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

teenagers, who report higher drinking rates than <strong>Iowa</strong> teenagers, are also more likely to<br />

binge drink than teenagers from across the country.<br />

The IYS asks youth if they drove a motor vehicle after using any amount of alcohol or<br />

other drugs in the past 30 days. The reported percent encompasses youth who reported<br />

driving whether or not they had a legal driver’s license. IYS data do not differentiate<br />

between types of substances or between consumption levels of drug use. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

11 th graders reported similar results between 1999 and 2005, and the 2005 rate is similar<br />

to the state rate (Figure 12). Approximately 14 percent of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth place their<br />

lives at risk by driving after using alcohol or other drugs.<br />

The IYS perceived risk of alcohol use question reads as follows: “How much do you<br />

think you risk harming yourself if you drink 3 or more drinks of alcohol nearly every<br />

day?” The majority of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in <strong>Iowa</strong> feel there is<br />

great or moderate risk associated with drinking a considerable amount of alcohol on a<br />

regular basis (Figure 13). The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates are lower than their state counterparts,<br />

11


suggesting that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> teenagers feel that drinking is less of a risk. Female<br />

respondents perceived greater risk of alcohol use than males (Table 1). In comparison to<br />

state rates, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> females perceived less risk of alcohol use than females across<br />

the state, whereas <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males perceived more risk of alcohol use than males<br />

across the state.<br />

Figure 9: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol before<br />

Age 13<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

Percent<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 19 19 14<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 19 16<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 29 25 20<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 35 32 18<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 19 16 13<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 15 16<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

12


Figure 10: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

Percent<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 49 44 41<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 48 47 44<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 22 18 14<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 28 25 14<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 7 6 4<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 8 5 4<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

13


Figure 11: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Binge Drinking – Past 30<br />

Days<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

Percent<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 40 36 32<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 39 38 35<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 14 12 8<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 19 16 9<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 3 3 2<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 5 3 2<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

14


Figure 12: Percent of 11 th -Graders Reporting Driving after Using Any Amount of<br />

Alcohol or Other Drugs<br />

30<br />

25<br />

Percent<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 18 15 14<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 15 14 14<br />

Year<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

15


Figure 13: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate or<br />

Great Risk<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

Percent<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 71 69 73<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 69 68 72<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 76 76 79<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 73 73 79<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 77 78 78<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 77 76 75<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

Table 1: Percent of Youth Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />

Year<br />

Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 67 69 71<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 70 71 74<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 77 76 79<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 76 74 77<br />

Source: IYS<br />

16


Alcohol Consequences<br />

The number of liquor law arrests in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased from 2003 to 2005; the<br />

number of drunkenness arrests has increased by approximately the same number as liquor<br />

law arrests have fallen. The liquor law arrest and drunkenness arrest rates in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> have consistently been lower than the <strong>Iowa</strong> rates (Figure 14). Drunkenness is<br />

defined as, “To drink alcoholic beverages to the extent that one’s mental faculties and<br />

physical coordination are substantially impaired.” Drunkenness does not include driving<br />

under the influence offenses. A liquor law violation is defined as, “The violation of laws<br />

or ordinances prohibiting the manufacture, sale, purchase, transportation, possession, or<br />

use of alcoholic beverages.” Liquor law violations do not include driving under the<br />

influence or drunkenness offenses.<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a rate of convictions for alcohol-related offenses about one-third the<br />

rate for the state of <strong>Iowa</strong>. This difference holds true for total alcohol-related convictions,<br />

total consumption convictions, and alcohol sales and providing alcohol to minors<br />

convictions. This difference may be due to the fact that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is a border county,<br />

so some offenses may be occurring in Illinois. It also may be influenced by enforcement<br />

or prosecution differences between <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and the state as a whole. The rate of<br />

convictions for alcohol-related offenses in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and across <strong>Iowa</strong> remained<br />

relatively stable between 2003 and 2005, with an uptick in 2006. This uptick may be due<br />

to a 2006 change in the <strong>Iowa</strong> Code, with underage drinking becoming a scheduled<br />

violation (similar to a speeding ticket) rather than a simple misdemeanor (Figure 15).<br />

There were 685 Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) arrests in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2005,<br />

corresponding to a rate of 426 OWI arrests per 100,000 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents, the<br />

highest rate since 2002 (Figure 16). The terms OWI and DUI (Driving Under the<br />

Influence) are often used interchangeably. Jurisdictions across the country use one term<br />

or the other. The definition of DUI found in the FBI Uniform Crime Reports is, “Driving<br />

or operating a motor vehicle or common carrier while mentally or physically impaired as<br />

the result of consuming an alcoholic beverage or using a drug or narcotic.” In <strong>Iowa</strong>, the<br />

method used to assess impairment is to test the blood alcohol content (BAC). As of July<br />

1, 2003, the “legal limit” in <strong>Iowa</strong> is .08 BAC, lowered from .10 BAC. The change in the<br />

legal BAC limit may be responsible for the notable increase in the OWI arrest rate per<br />

100,000 <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents from 2003 to 2005. Other possible reasons for the<br />

increase could be improved law enforcement or zero tolerance policies toward motor<br />

vehicle related alcohol offenses.<br />

More than 26,000 youth were enrolled in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> public schools for the 2005-2006<br />

and 2006-2007 school years (Project EASIER). The alcohol or drug related expulsion<br />

and suspension rate for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was higher than the <strong>Iowa</strong> rate in both the 2005-2006<br />

and 2006-2007 school years (Figure 17). The average rate of alcohol-related suspensions<br />

and expulsions in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> was similar to the state rate. The average rate of drugrelated<br />

suspensions and expulsions was approximately 35 percent higher than the state<br />

average (Figure 18).<br />

17


Juvenile adjudications due to alcohol are on the rise in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, more than doubling<br />

from 2004 to 2006, whereas the state rate is trending downward. The rate of alcoholrelated<br />

juvenile adjudications in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate for fiscal year<br />

2006 (Figure 19).<br />

An average of five <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> deaths per year are caused by alcoholic cirrhosis<br />

(International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 code K70), for a death rate similar to<br />

the state rate, hovering around 3 per 100,000 from 2003-2006 (Figure 20). This rate is<br />

quite low compared with the lung cancer death rate of approximately 59 per 100,000<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents from 2003-2006. Alcoholic cirrhosis is not manifested for<br />

decades after excessive drinking. Today’s alcohol usage might not be reflected in<br />

alcoholic cirrhosis death rates for 20 or more years, making it difficult to use the rates to<br />

implement and evaluate policies and practices that impact alcoholic cirrhosis.<br />

A recent study found that, of suicide victims who were tested for alcohol or drugs,<br />

approximately 33.3 percent were positive for alcohol and 16.4 percent were positive for<br />

opiates (Centers 2006). The number of suicides in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> remained steady from<br />

2000-2006, averaging approximately 19 suicides per year during that period. The suicide<br />

rate per 100,000 people for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong> were similar (Figure 21).<br />

The number of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> domestic violence cases where alcohol was present has<br />

remained stable from 2003-2005 (Table 2). The number of domestic violence cases with<br />

alcohol involvement averaged 16 percent of the total number of domestic violence cases,<br />

which is similar to the state average.<br />

18


Figure 14: Rate of Drunkenness and Liquor Law Arrests per 100,000<br />

Rate Per 100,000 People<br />

675<br />

600<br />

525<br />

450<br />

375<br />

300<br />

225<br />

150<br />

Liquor Law Arrests - <strong>Iowa</strong> 449.9 386.8 374.0<br />

Liquor Law Arrests -<br />

<strong>Scott</strong><br />

Drunkenness Arrests -<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Drunkenness Arrests -<br />

<strong>Scott</strong><br />

2003 2004 2005<br />

429.8 348.2 335.9<br />

269.6 307.6 299.9<br />

164.5 198.6 227.0<br />

Year<br />

Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />

Figure 15: Rate of Convictions for Alcohol-Related Offenses<br />

800<br />

Convictions Per 100,000<br />

Population<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Total Alcohol-Related<br />

Convictions - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Total Alcohol-Related<br />

Convictions - <strong>Scott</strong><br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

611 592 599 668<br />

204 176 235 256<br />

Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />

19


Figure 16: Rate of Operating While Intoxicated Arrests per 100,000 People<br />

600<br />

550<br />

Rate Per 100,000 People<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

OWI Arrests - <strong>Iowa</strong> 458.3 428.7 465.5 445.8 492.7 490.8<br />

OWI Arrests - <strong>Scott</strong> 452.6 427.8 425.2 350.3 374.3 426.0<br />

Year<br />

Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />

Note: As of July 1, 2003, the “legal limit” in <strong>Iowa</strong> is .08 BAC, lowered from .10 BAC.<br />

20


Figure 17: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students – Total Due to<br />

Alcohol or Drugs<br />

600<br />

<strong>Substance</strong> Related Suspensions and<br />

Expulsions Per 100,000 Students<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2005-2006 2006-2007 Average<br />

Total - <strong>Iowa</strong> 291.6 360.3 326.0<br />

Total - <strong>Scott</strong> 496.3 420.6 458.5<br />

School Year<br />

Source: Project EASIER<br />

21


Figure 18: School Suspensions and Expulsions per 100,000 Students Due to Alcohol or<br />

Drugs<br />

Suspensions and Expulsions .<br />

Per 100,000 Students<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2005-2006 2006-2007 Average<br />

Alcohol - <strong>Iowa</strong> 94.6 127.0 110.8<br />

Alcohol - <strong>Scott</strong> 170.5 83.4 126.9<br />

Drug - <strong>Iowa</strong> 208.1 251.0 230.6<br />

Drug - <strong>Scott</strong> 325.8 337.3 313.9<br />

School Year<br />

Source: Project EASIER<br />

22


Figure 19: Juvenile Adjudications due to Alcohol<br />

300<br />

Rate Per 100,000 Youth Ages 10-17<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Alcohol Adjudications -<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Alcohol Adjudications -<br />

<strong>Scott</strong><br />

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006<br />

114.7 118.8 98.1<br />

51.3 77.0 128.3<br />

Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />

Figure 20: Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths per 100,000<br />

12<br />

Rate Per 100,000 Population<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Alcohol Cirrhosis Deaths<br />

- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Alcohol Cirrhosis Deaths<br />

- <strong>Scott</strong><br />

0<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

3.94 3.49 4.48 3.69<br />

3.77 1.25 3.72 3.10<br />

Year<br />

Source: Vital Records<br />

23


Figure 21: Suicides per 100,000<br />

30<br />

Suicides Per 100,000 Population<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Total - <strong>Iowa</strong> 9.8 10.4 10.7 12.0 11.5 11.3 11.2<br />

Total - <strong>Scott</strong> 14.5 10.7 12.6 10.7 11.2 9.9 16.6<br />

Year<br />

Source: Vital Records<br />

Table 2: Alcohol Involvement in Domestic Abuse Incidents<br />

2003 2004 2005<br />

Number of Cases - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1,219 1,230 1,191<br />

Number of Cases - <strong>Scott</strong> 177 182 191<br />

Percent of Total Cases - <strong>Iowa</strong> 15 18 16<br />

Percent of Total Cases - <strong>Scott</strong> 15 16 17<br />

Source: Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />

Tobacco<br />

Adult Consumption Patterns<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, state, and national rates of current cigarette use did not differ significantly,<br />

nor is there significant difference from 2003-2006 in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rates (Figure 22).<br />

The rate of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> mothers reporting tobacco use during pregnancy has been stable<br />

since 2002, hovering between 18-22 percent of all pregnancies. The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate of<br />

tobacco use during pregnancy has been consistently higher than the state rate, averaging 3<br />

percent higher per year (Figure 23). This information was collected and reported on birth<br />

24


certificates, and does not include women who did not have live births. This reporting<br />

method may under-report tobacco usage, since mothers may hesitate to report using<br />

tobacco while pregnant due to potential legal or social ramifications. The rate of tobacco<br />

use during pregnancy is approximately 20 times higher than the rate of alcohol use.<br />

Figure 22: Percent of Adults Who Are Current Smokers<br />

35<br />

Percent of Adults 18 or Older<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 23.3 22.9 22.5 19.0<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> 21.6 20.8 20.3 21.3<br />

U.S. 22.1 20.7 20.4 19.5<br />

Year<br />

Source: BRFSS<br />

Note: Confidence intervals allow comparison of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results to <strong>Iowa</strong> and U.S. results.<br />

25


Figure 23: Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> during<br />

Pregnancy – All Ages<br />

Percent of Women Who Had Live Births that<br />

Reported Tobacco <strong>Use</strong> During Pregnancy<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Births - <strong>Iowa</strong> 17.2 17.4 16.5 15.7 16.1 16.2 15.9<br />

Births - <strong>Scott</strong> 21.9 20.7 18.9 19.8 18.3 19.4 18.8<br />

Source: Vital Records<br />

26


Youth Consumption Patterns<br />

Youth tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be on the decline, as evidenced by the<br />

number of youth reporting first use of cigarettes before age 13 and past 30-day cigarette<br />

use.<br />

The percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -graders who first used cigarettes before age 13 has<br />

decreased each time the IYS has been administered since 1999. However, the percent of<br />

11 th graders reporting the use of cigarettes before the age of 13 in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is higher<br />

than the state rate (Figure 24). Reported past 30-day cigarette use for the same<br />

populations has also decreased on each IYS, with the exception that 29 percent of 11 th<br />

graders reported cigarette use in both 2002 and 2005. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth report higher<br />

rates of past 30-day cigarette use in comparison to the state rates, with the largest<br />

difference being 8 percent for 11 th graders (Figure 25). Sixth, 8 th- , and 11 th -grade<br />

students responded similarly when asked, “How much do you think you risk harming<br />

yourself if you smoke cigarettes every day?” “Great Risk” and “Moderate Risk”<br />

response options were combined for Figure 26. As with measurements of use, responses<br />

to the perceived risk question show that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> youth are more likely to use<br />

cigarettes than the state rates. Perceived risk of cigarette use does not appear to differ by<br />

gender among middle- and high-school youth, although <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males and females<br />

respond that it is less risky to smoke cigarettes than their statewide counterparts (Table<br />

3).<br />

Tobacco compliance check data are compiled by the <strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division.<br />

In the last three fiscal years, there were no significant differences between <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

and state tobacco compliance check data (Figure 27). More than 200 tobacco compliance<br />

checks were completed each fiscal year in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with an average compliance rate<br />

of 86 percent from FY02-FY07.<br />

27


Figure 24: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes before<br />

Age 13<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

Percent<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 22 18 14<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 23 20 16<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 21 14 10<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 28 19 10<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 8 5 3<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 9 5 3<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

28


Figure 25: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Cigarette <strong>Use</strong><br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

Percent<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 33 23 21<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 39 29 29<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 13 9 7<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 21 13 8<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 3 2 2<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 6 3 2<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

29


Figure 26: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />

or Great Risk<br />

90<br />

85<br />

Percent<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 81 84 85<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 79 82 83<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 82 84 85<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 80 81 84<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 82 84 83<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 81 80 79<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

Table 3: Percent of Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />

Year<br />

Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 80 82 83<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 79 80 81<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 83 85 85<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 81 82 83<br />

Source: IYS<br />

30


Figure 27: Tobacco Compliance Check – Percent Compliant<br />

100<br />

Percent Compliant<br />

96<br />

92<br />

88<br />

84<br />

80<br />

Tobacco Compliance<br />

Checks - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Tobacco Compliance<br />

Checks - <strong>Scott</strong><br />

FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07<br />

88 89 89 90 88 89<br />

89 84 82 87 86 87<br />

Fiscal Year<br />

Source: Alcohol Beverages Division<br />

31


Tobacco Consequences<br />

There is a lack of tobacco consequence data in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, as well as for the state of<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong>. Lung cancer death rate is the only indicator that met all requirements for inclusion<br />

in the profile. The lung cancer death rate has decreased slightly from 2003 to 2006 in<br />

both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and <strong>Iowa</strong>, with the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> rate tending to be lower than the state<br />

rate (Figure 28).<br />

Figure 28: Lung Cancer Deaths per 100,000<br />

130<br />

Rate Per 100,000 Population<br />

115<br />

100<br />

85<br />

70<br />

55<br />

40<br />

Lung Cancer Deaths -<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Lung Cancer Deaths -<br />

<strong>Scott</strong><br />

2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

64.17 65.48 66.03 61.10<br />

62.13 59.34 62.67 53.36<br />

Year<br />

Source: Vital Records<br />

32


Illicit Drugs<br />

National datasets suggest that illicit drug use in <strong>Iowa</strong> appears to be holding steady, and its<br />

prevalence is lower than the national total. Cocaine, marijuana, heroin, other<br />

opiates/synthetics, and methamphetamine follow alcohol as the most cited substances of<br />

use by individuals from <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> on admission to substance abuse treatment services<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

Adult Consumption Patterns<br />

The per capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported marijuana or cocaine as<br />

their primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the state rate as a whole;<br />

whereas the rate for methamphetamine is lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong> (Figure 29).<br />

The rate of people entering treatment who reported cocaine as their primary substance of<br />

use has increased over the past three years for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The per capita rate of<br />

people receiving treatment who reported heroin or other opiates/synthetics as their<br />

primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than the state rate as a whole (Figure<br />

30). These data only reflect the primary substance at admission, so additional substance<br />

use is not reported.<br />

Figure 29: Marijuana, Cocaine, and Methamphetamine as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />

Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

Source: SARS<br />

Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />

Per 100,000 People 15 and Older<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Marijuana - <strong>Iowa</strong> 246.3 285.0 279.8 279.7 290.4 297.7 307.7<br />

Marijuana - <strong>Scott</strong> 311.9 403.6 356.4 333.2 415.1 385.5 376.6<br />

Cocaine - <strong>Iowa</strong> 68.8 73.6 71.6 79.5 85.1 84.5 95.3<br />

Cocaine - <strong>Scott</strong> 234.5 237.2 327.6 330.8 409.5 415.4 437.9<br />

Methamphetamine - <strong>Iowa</strong> 152.6 201.4 222.8 239.3 254.9 265.1 197.7<br />

Methamphetamine - <strong>Scott</strong> 8.1 20.9 28.0 32.8 31.7 36.2 17.5<br />

Year<br />

33


Figure 30: Heroin and Other Opiates/Synthetics as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as<br />

Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

Per Capita Treatment Admissions<br />

Per 100,000 People 15 and Older .<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Heroin - <strong>Iowa</strong> 9.8 10.5 11.5 10.4 11.4 8.4 8.1<br />

Heroin - <strong>Scott</strong> 41.9 40.2 40.0 58.3 68.3 33.0 36.6<br />

Other Opiates/Synthetics<br />

- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Other Opiates/Synthetics<br />

- <strong>Scott</strong><br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

7.3 11.9 16.4 12.9 19.6 18.6 21.0<br />

19.3 34.6 24.8 22.4 49.2 31.5 40.6<br />

Source: SARS<br />

Youth Consumption Patterns<br />

The 2003-2004 NSDUH estimated that 21,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns 12-17 years old used illicit drugs<br />

including marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, and prescription<br />

psychotherapeutics in a month. This estimate includes 16,000 12-to 17-year-old<br />

marijuana users. The 2005 IYS shows that marijuana was the most widely used illicit<br />

drug in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, with 20 percent of 11 th -graders reporting current use (Table 4).<br />

Marijuana use by 6 th- , 8 th , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased significantly<br />

between 1999 and 2005. However, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> students report a significantly higher<br />

rate of marijuana use than their contemporaries across the state (Figure 31).<br />

The IYS asks the question, “How much do you think you risk harming yourself if you<br />

smoke marijuana once a week?” Seventy-five percent of 6 th –graders, 77 percent of 8 th -<br />

graders, and 52 percent of 11 th -graders responded “Great Risk” or “Moderate Risk” to<br />

this question in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2005. The <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> results were significantly lower<br />

than the state rates for perceived risk of marijuana use (Figure 32). Female students were<br />

about 4 percent more likely to respond “Great Risk” or “Moderate Risk” than male<br />

students in 2005. The difference in both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> males and females in comparison<br />

to the statewide male and female responses is significant (Table 5). The percent of<br />

students reporting first use of marijuana before age 13 decreased for all three grades<br />

34


etween 1999 and 2005, but these rates are higher than the state rates for the same grades<br />

(Figure 33).<br />

Table 4: Percent of Youth Reporting Current Drug <strong>Use</strong> – 2005<br />

Grade<br />

<strong>Substance</strong> Type 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 11 - <strong>Scott</strong><br />

Marijuana 0 1 3 5 13 20<br />

Inhalants 2 2 3 3 2 3<br />

Amphetamines 0 0 1 1 3 4<br />

Cocaine 0 0 1 1 2 3<br />

Methamphetamines 0 0 1 1 2 2<br />

Steroids 0 0 0 0 1 2<br />

Source: IYS, p. 86<br />

Note: Boldfaced county values are higher than the corresponding state values.<br />

35


Figure 31: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting Past 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong><br />

25<br />

20<br />

Percent<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 17 15 13<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 25 22 20<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 5 3<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 11 8 5<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1 1 0<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 2 1 1<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

36


Figure 32: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Perceiving Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> as a Moderate<br />

or Great Risk<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

Percent<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 70 65 70<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 60 56 52<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 80 79 80<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 75 72 77<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 80 81 80<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 79 77 75<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

Table 5: Perceived Moderate or Great Risk of Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> by Gender<br />

Year<br />

Gender 1999 2002 2005<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Males 73 72 74<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Males 69 66 70<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Females 79 77 79<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> Females 74 71 73<br />

Source: IYS<br />

37


Figure 33: Percent of 6 th- , 8 th- , and 11 th -Graders Reporting First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana before<br />

Age 13<br />

15<br />

12<br />

Percent<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

1999 2002 2005<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 7 6<br />

Grade 11 - <strong>Scott</strong> 12 11 9<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 6 6 5<br />

Grade 8 - <strong>Scott</strong> 13 9 6<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Iowa</strong> 1 1 0<br />

Grade 6 - <strong>Scott</strong> 3 2 1<br />

Source: IYS<br />

Note: Error bars are too small to represent and are less than +/- 1%.<br />

Illicit Drug Consequences<br />

The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the<br />

state rate (Figure 34). In fiscal year 2006, there were 46 juvenile adjudications in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> for illicit drugs.<br />

The percent of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving the presence of illegal<br />

drugs in a child’s body, out of all confirmed or founded child abuse cases, has risen in<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since 2003, but remains lower than the state rate (Figure 35). The number<br />

of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving manufacturing methamphetamine in<br />

the presence of a minor has been virtually nonexistent in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since the end of<br />

2002, with only 4 cases from 2003-2006 (Figure 36). Many circumstances besides a<br />

38


change in the use of illegal substances could influence these numbers, including funding<br />

for law enforcement and the Department of Human Services, detection technology<br />

advances, changes in the <strong>Iowa</strong> code, and public awareness and pressure. The enactment<br />

in May of 2005 of the <strong>Iowa</strong> Pseudoephedrine Control Act, which required selling<br />

pseudoephedrine products from behind the counter rather than on store shelves, probably<br />

helped to decrease the number child abuse cases involving manufacturing<br />

methamphetamine in the presence of a minor.<br />

These numbers included each confirmed type of abuse on each report of abuse for each<br />

child. Each child may be confirmed to have suffered multiple types of abuse on a single<br />

report, and each child may have multiple reports. Presence of an illegal drug is defined<br />

as the presence of an illegal drug in a child’s body as a direct and foreseeable<br />

consequence of the acts or omissions of the person responsible for the child’s care.<br />

Illegal drugs used in this definition include cocaine, heroin, amphetamine,<br />

methamphetamine, marijuana, other illegal drugs, or combinations or derivatives of<br />

illegal drugs not prescribed by a health practitioner. Manufacturing methamphetamine in<br />

the presence of a minor is defined in <strong>Iowa</strong> Code 232.2 subsection 6, paragraph p. It<br />

occurs when the person responsible for the care of a child manufactures a dangerous<br />

substance or has possession of the methamphetamine precursors, ephedrine or<br />

pseudoephedrine, with the intent to use the product as a precursor or intermediary to a<br />

dangerous substance in the presence of a child.<br />

Figure 34: Juvenile Adjudications due to Illicit Drugs<br />

300<br />

Rate Per 100,000 Youth Ages 10-17<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Illicit Drug Adjudications<br />

- <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Illicit Drug Adjudications<br />

- <strong>Scott</strong><br />

0<br />

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006<br />

187.1 173.7 168.4<br />

169.3 102.6 236.0<br />

Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />

39


Figure 35: Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />

of Illegal Drugs in a Child’s Body<br />

Percent of Confirmed or Founded Child<br />

Abuse Cases Involving the Presence<br />

of Illegal Drugs in a Child's Body<br />

15<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

Presence of Illegal<br />

Drugs - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Presence of Illegal<br />

Drugs - <strong>Scott</strong><br />

CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006<br />

8.33 9.64 8.30 7.25<br />

1.86 3.41 5.83 4.60<br />

Year<br />

Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Human Services<br />

Figure 36: Number of Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases Involving<br />

Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor<br />

Confirm ed or Founded Child Abuse Cases<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the<br />

Presence of a Minor - <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the<br />

Presence of a Minor - <strong>Scott</strong><br />

0<br />

CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006<br />

400 299 128 107<br />

2 0 2 0<br />

Calendar Year<br />

Source: <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Human Services<br />

Note: The <strong>Iowa</strong> Pseudoephedrine Control Act took effect in May 2005. This Act required that pseudoephedrine products be<br />

sold from behind the counter.<br />

40


Discussion<br />

General Comments<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is unique in that it is one of the few counties in <strong>Iowa</strong> that includes both a<br />

major urban center and rural areas. <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> encompasses the <strong>Iowa</strong> side of the Quad<br />

Cities; Bettendorf and Davenport, <strong>Iowa</strong>, along with Moline and Rock Island, Illinois.<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> straddles Interstate 80, midway between Chicago and Des Moines.<br />

According to the U.S. Census, <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s population was almost 159,000 in 2000.<br />

Estimates based on the 2000 U.S. Census predict that approximately 46,000 young<br />

people (ages 19 and under) lived in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> in 2006.<br />

The burden of substance abuse, as demonstrated by the consequences data presented in<br />

this report, is staggering both financially and in human suffering. The consumption data<br />

are disturbing in that <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to <strong>Iowa</strong> when it comes to binge-drinking<br />

rates, which are higher than national rates, and higher than state rates for alcohol and<br />

illicit drug use. It is in the best interest of all citizens of <strong>Iowa</strong> to reduce the burden of<br />

substance abuse and dependence.<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is a border county with close ties to the Illinois Quad-Cities which makes it<br />

more difficult to interpret data and to assess substance use. Both consumption and<br />

consequence data may be skewed, as <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents may travel into Illinois to<br />

purchase and consume alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs. The reverse may be true as well<br />

– Illinois residents may travel into <strong>Iowa</strong> to purchase and consume alcohol, tobacco, or<br />

illicit drugs. Extra caution should be used when reviewing substance use data as it may<br />

include Illinois residents’ consumption and consequences in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> or may exclude<br />

<strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> residents’ consumption and consequences in Illinois. Indicators that are<br />

more likely to be affected by this include, in order as they appear in this profile: per<br />

capita alcohol gallon sales, drunkenness and liquor law arrests, convictions for alcoholrelated<br />

offenses, OWI arrests, juvenile adjudications due to alcohol, suicides, alcohol<br />

involvement in domestic abuse incidents, and juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs.<br />

Consumption Patterns of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Alcohol<br />

Alcohol is the most widely used substance among youth and adults in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Adult alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has increased over the past couple of years, as<br />

evidenced by past 30-day alcohol use. Binge drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and across<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> are significantly higher than the national rate. Heavy drinking and driving after<br />

drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are similar to both the state and national rates.<br />

Underage drinking is a critical issue in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Underage drinking rates in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> are very similar to state rates. The 2005 IYS showed that 44 percent of <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> 11 th -graders drank alcohol and 35 percent binge drank in the past month. The<br />

41


social culture in many of <strong>Iowa</strong>’s rural areas and college towns accepts underage drinking<br />

as a rite of passage that is part of life activities in small communities. Many community<br />

events and activities center on or include drinking alcohol, glorification of drinking, and<br />

may even promote underage drinking. Many parents view underage drinking as normal<br />

for teenagers. Additionally, some parents provide alcohol to youth in their homes.<br />

Tobacco<br />

Adult tobacco use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state and national rates, and was level<br />

from 2003 to 2006. Approximately 800,000 <strong>Iowa</strong>ns over age 12 use tobacco. Rates of<br />

smoking during pregnancy have been steady at about 19 percent, higher than the state<br />

rate by 2-4 percent each year from 2000-2006. The percent of <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> 11 th -graders<br />

reporting past 30-day cigarette use is higher than the state rate (29% vs. 21%).<br />

Illicit Drugs<br />

Illicit drug use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than illicit drug use in <strong>Iowa</strong>. The per<br />

capita rate of people receiving treatment who reported marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or<br />

other opiates/synthetics as their primary substance of use is higher for <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than<br />

the state rate as a whole; whereas the rate for methamphetamine is lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

than in <strong>Iowa</strong>. Marijuana use by 6 th- , 8 th , and 11 th -graders in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has decreased<br />

significantly between 1999 and 2005, but remains higher than the state rate.<br />

Consequences of <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Iowa</strong><br />

Alcohol<br />

The consequences of alcohol use in <strong>Iowa</strong> are severe and multi-faceted. They include:<br />

loss of life and injury; lost wages and loss of employment; increased insurance rates and<br />

hospitalization charges; costs associated with the legal system; incarceration; and<br />

property damage. Because of the higher level of alcohol consumption compared with<br />

tobacco or illicit drugs, the adverse consequences of alcohol use may outweigh those<br />

associated with tobacco or illicit drugs.<br />

While alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong> in general, measured<br />

alcohol consequences are lower. Legal ramifications of alcohol use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are<br />

lower than in <strong>Iowa</strong>, including drunkenness and liquor law arrests, convictions for alcoholrelated<br />

offenses, OWI rate, and juvenile adjudications. Alcohol-related school<br />

suspensions or expulsions are lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than across <strong>Iowa</strong>. The alcoholic<br />

cirrhosis death rate in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> is similar to the state rate.<br />

Tobacco<br />

There is a lack of quality tobacco consequence data for both <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and for the<br />

state of <strong>Iowa</strong> as a whole. The lung cancer death rate has remained steady in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

for the past four years, and is similar to the state rate. In addition to smoking, lung cancer<br />

42


may be caused by exposure to environmental toxins, a particular concern for a rural state<br />

with a large farming industry.<br />

Illicit Drugs<br />

Although the consumption of illicit drugs in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than<br />

across <strong>Iowa</strong> in general, most indices of illicit drug consequences in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> are<br />

similar to or lower than state rates. The rate of juvenile adjudications due to illicit drugs<br />

and the percent of confirmed or founded child abuse cases involving the presence of<br />

illegal drugs in a child’s body, out of all confirmed or founded child abuse cases, in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> is similar to the respective state rates. The number of confirmed or founded child<br />

abuse cases involving manufacturing methamphetamine in the presence of a minor has<br />

been virtually nonexistent in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> since the end of 2002. This may be due, in<br />

part, to the fact that <strong>Scott</strong> is one of the more urban counties in <strong>Iowa</strong>. Drug-related school<br />

suspensions or expulsions is the only drug consequence indicator that is higher in <strong>Scott</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong> than across <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />

Conclusions<br />

• <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> has a binge drinking problem; adult and youth binge drinking rates<br />

are higher in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> and in the state than nationally. However, the rates of<br />

most alcohol consequences are lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />

• Cigarette use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong>.<br />

• Illicit drug use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> appears to be higher than in <strong>Iowa</strong>, but measured<br />

illicit drug consequences are similar or lower in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

• Most national datasets are not useful for counties in <strong>Iowa</strong>, due to insufficient<br />

sample sizes.<br />

• The <strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey was a particularly useful tool in assessing youth<br />

substance use in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and provides for the comparison of data between<br />

various local measurement areas and across the state.<br />

• A couple of indicators used in the 2006 <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> were not<br />

available at the county-level because of insufficient numbers and confidentiality<br />

regulations.<br />

• Data collected at the county level are difficult to assess for a variety of reasons,<br />

including a lack of historical data, unclear or inconsistent collecting and reporting<br />

procedures, and small sample sizes or incidence rates.<br />

43


Appendices<br />

44


Alcohol Consumption:<br />

Appendix 1<br />

Indicators Included in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />

• 30-Day Alcohol <strong>Use</strong> (both adult and youth)<br />

• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol<br />

• Binge Drinking (both adult and youth)<br />

• Heavy Drinking (adult)<br />

• 30-Day Driving After Drinking Alcohol (both adult and youth)<br />

• Women Reporting the <strong>Use</strong> of Alcohol During Pregnancy<br />

• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />

• Alcohol as Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

Tobacco Consumption:<br />

• Current Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> (adult)<br />

• 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarette <strong>Use</strong> (youth)<br />

• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes<br />

• Women reporting the <strong>Use</strong> of Cigarettes During Pregnancy<br />

• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />

• Tobacco Compliance Checks<br />

Illicit Drug Consumption:<br />

• 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> (youth)<br />

• 30-Day Illicit Drug <strong>Use</strong><br />

• Age of First <strong>Use</strong> of Marijuana<br />

• Perception of Risk (youth)<br />

• Primary <strong>Substance</strong> of <strong>Use</strong> as Reported upon Entry into Treatment<br />

Alcohol Consequences:<br />

• Alcoholic Cirrhosis Deaths<br />

• Suicides<br />

• Alcohol-Related Domestic Violence Arrests<br />

• Liquor Law Arrests<br />

• Drunkenness<br />

• DUI Rates<br />

• Alcohol-Related Convictions<br />

• Juvenile Adjudications for Alcohol<br />

45


Tobacco Consequences:<br />

• Lung Cancer Deaths<br />

Illicit Drug Consequences:<br />

• Presence of Illegal Drugs in Confirmed or Founded Child Abuse Cases<br />

• Manufacturing Methamphetamine in the Presence of a Minor<br />

• Juvenile Adjudications for Illegal Drugs<br />

Other Indicators:<br />

• ATOD-Related Expulsions and Suspensions<br />

• School Enrollment<br />

46


Appendix 2<br />

Indicators Included in <strong>Iowa</strong> <strong>Epidemiological</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> but not in <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />

These indicators were not included in the <strong>Scott</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> for a number of reasons.<br />

Some indicators were not collected at the county level, others had insufficient sample<br />

sizes, and others were suppressed to protect confidentiality.<br />

Alcohol Consumption:<br />

• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />

Tobacco Consumption:<br />

• 30-Day <strong>Use</strong> of Other Tobacco Products<br />

• Heavy Smoking (youth)<br />

• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />

Illicit Drug Consumption:<br />

• 30-Day Marijuana <strong>Use</strong> (adult)<br />

• 30-Day Any Illicit Drug <strong>Use</strong> Other Than Marijuana<br />

• Perception of Risk (adult)<br />

Alcohol Consequences:<br />

• Alcohol Dependence or Abuse<br />

• Alcohol-Involved Drivers Among All Drivers in Fatal Crashes<br />

Illicit Drug Consequences:<br />

• New AIDS Cases and Annual HIV/AIDS Rates Due to Drug <strong>Use</strong><br />

• Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse<br />

• Drug Possession Arrests<br />

Other Indicators:<br />

• School Attendance<br />

47


Appendix 3<br />

Data Sources<br />

Data Sources<br />

BRFSS (Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System) -<br />

http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.htm<br />

Certified Annual Report – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Certified Annual Report<br />

(School attendance data)<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Alcoholic Beverages Division – http://www.iowaabd.com/tobacco/index.jsp<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Court Information System, Justice Data Warehouse<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Safety, Incident Based Uniform Crime Reporting System<br />

http://www.dps.state.ia.us/commis/ucr/index.shtml<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Vital Records<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Youth Survey -<br />

http://www.state.ia.us/government/dhr/cjjp/iys/YouthSurvey/ythsurvey.html<br />

Project EASIER – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Project EASIER Fall Enrollment File<br />

Project EASIER – <strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Education, Project EASIER Spring Suspension<br />

and Expulsion File<br />

SARS - Kantzavelos, A., Barber, K., & Arndt, S. (2006). Outcomes Monitoring System,<br />

<strong>Iowa</strong> Project: Year Eight Report (<strong>Iowa</strong> Department of Public Health, Contract No.<br />

5885NA01). <strong>Iowa</strong> City, IA: <strong>Iowa</strong> Consortium for <strong>Substance</strong> Abuse Research and<br />

Evaluation. http://iconsortium.subst-abuse.uiowa.edu/<br />

Suicides -<br />

http://www.idph.state.ia.us/eh/common/pdf/health_statistics/2004/vital_stats_2004.pdf<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!