24.03.2015 Views

Tracing a Path Forward: A Study of the Challenges of - Resolve

Tracing a Path Forward: A Study of the Challenges of - Resolve

Tracing a Path Forward: A Study of the Challenges of - Resolve

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 2, 2010<br />

Dear Colleague:<br />

RESOLVE is pleased to announce <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tracing</strong> a <strong>Path</strong> <strong>Forward</strong>: A <strong>Study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supply Chain for Target Metals Used in Electronics. The report was<br />

commissioned by <strong>the</strong> Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) and <strong>the</strong> Electronics Industry<br />

Citizenship Coalition (EICC).<br />

The context for <strong>the</strong> report is that many companies, nongovernmental organizations, and agencies<br />

are working to address environmental, labor rights, health and safety, displacement and<br />

resettlement, and o<strong>the</strong>r social and sustainability issues throughout <strong>the</strong> supply chain for minerals.<br />

One particular area <strong>of</strong> recent focus has been <strong>the</strong> link between mineral extraction and trading and<br />

conflict and human rights abuses, particularly in areas such as <strong>the</strong> Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Congo (DRC) and <strong>the</strong> surrounding Great Lakes region <strong>of</strong> Central Africa.<br />

Minerals originating in conflict regions can end up in electronics and many o<strong>the</strong>r products such<br />

as jewelry, airplanes, and automobiles. Greater awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se issues has prompted leading<br />

companies in <strong>the</strong> electronics sector to investigate <strong>the</strong>ir supply chains to determine steps to<br />

promote responsible sourcing <strong>of</strong> specific minerals. However, <strong>the</strong>se companies face significant<br />

challenges due to lack <strong>of</strong> transparency and <strong>the</strong> complex structure and relationships in parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se supply chains.<br />

Seeking greater understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenges and potential solutions, GeSI and EICC asked<br />

RESOLVE to research <strong>the</strong> supply chain for electronics products starting with three metals: tin,<br />

tantalum, and cobalt.<br />

RESOLVE’s research included an effort to trace <strong>the</strong> supply for <strong>the</strong>se metals beginning with<br />

direct suppliers to GeSI and EICC member companies and <strong>the</strong>n pursuing upstream suppliers (in<br />

<strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mine). The tracing research was expected to be challenging due to <strong>the</strong> nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply chains for <strong>the</strong>se metals. As such, <strong>the</strong> research strategy was to learn from <strong>the</strong><br />

discontinuity in <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> information in each supply chain, in order to inform potential<br />

solutions.<br />

RESOLVE also undertook a desk-based review <strong>of</strong> supply chain initiatives relevant to <strong>the</strong><br />

electronics sector. RESOLVE reviewed initiatives that addressed transparency in <strong>the</strong> supply<br />

chain as well as human rights, social and environmental issues.<br />

We worked from <strong>the</strong> premise that a research project designed with stakeholders was likely to<br />

improve results. Therefore RESOLVE organized and sought input from a Stakeholder Advisory


Group <strong>of</strong> diverse organizations including GeSI and EICC members, international and local<br />

NGOs, mining companies, investors, and trade associations.<br />

Our findings highlight <strong>the</strong> challenges that result from <strong>the</strong> complex nature <strong>of</strong> minerals processing,<br />

<strong>the</strong> informality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector in some instances, and <strong>the</strong> complexity and composition <strong>of</strong> most<br />

electronics products. These products typically contain a variety <strong>of</strong> metals as part <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />

subcomponents. Minerals in each subcomponent can <strong>the</strong>n originate from multiple sources. The<br />

supply chain, as it existed at <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> our research, was not organized to provide any degree <strong>of</strong><br />

assurance as to minerals source, much less <strong>the</strong> conditions at <strong>the</strong> source.<br />

Our research also yielded both cooperation from companies in <strong>the</strong> supply chain and significant<br />

non-cooperation. Interestingly, while we were only able to establish supply chain relationships<br />

through tracing (from product to mine) in four fairly limited cases, <strong>the</strong>re is now a correlation<br />

between those who cooperated in our study and those who are working actively with GeSI and<br />

EICC members, and o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders, to explore and design news systems to enhance supply<br />

chain transparency. This conforms to our finding that alterations in current supply chain<br />

relationships and systems will be needed to promote transparency.<br />

Our research also shows that progress will likely happen in a stepwise fashion and require testing<br />

new approaches, particularly with regard to sources from regions in or near conflict zones. Based<br />

on lessons from this supply chain research and <strong>the</strong> desk study <strong>of</strong> related initiatives, <strong>the</strong> following<br />

is useful guidance:<br />

Explore multi-industry approaches and efficiencies: As many industries share common<br />

metals supply chains and challenges, end-use companies and suppliers from multiple sectors<br />

can achieve efficiencies by working across industry sectors to explore and design solutions.<br />

There is value in multi-stakeholder collaboration: To achieve credible systems and utilize<br />

local information sources and on-<strong>the</strong>-ground capacity (especially in regions <strong>of</strong> conflict),<br />

active engagement and consultation with nongovernmental organizations and international<br />

and local governments from <strong>the</strong> earliest stages <strong>of</strong> design to testing can be beneficial. Through<br />

<strong>the</strong> multi-stakeholder advisory group we are aware <strong>of</strong> this capacity and interest on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous stakeholders.<br />

Tackling complex challenges on multiple levels can yield results. For example, for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

metals a two-track approach <strong>of</strong> smelter-based certification plus in-region pilots could be<br />

beneficial. For both gold and diamonds, we found evidence that both validation systems<br />

targeting supply chain actors and community-based projects supporting source development<br />

are beneficial.<br />

As we complete our work on this report, a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se recommendations are already being<br />

considered, including exploration <strong>of</strong> smelter validation and a trial, or pilot, to identify<br />

responsible, localized sources from commercial and small-scale mining sites in <strong>the</strong> Great Lakes<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Central Africa.<br />

Moving forward, <strong>the</strong>re could be significant value in linking some related initiatives in an effort to<br />

focus and maximize <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> available resources; this research consistently highlighted <strong>the</strong>


need for, and an interest in, a coordinated effort to integrate civil society, government and<br />

industry efforts. RESOLVE is hopeful that this analysis, combined with lessons from research<br />

undertaken by o<strong>the</strong>r organizations, can provide information and impetus for stakeholders to<br />

jointly define activities and identify solutions to conflict and environmental and social issues.<br />

We appreciate that <strong>the</strong> many social, environmental, political, economic, and o<strong>the</strong>r issues <strong>of</strong><br />

interest surrounding <strong>the</strong> metals supply chain continue to evolve, as does our joint understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se factors. This report represents a snapshot <strong>of</strong> what we have learned to date, as well as an<br />

effort to understand and balance <strong>the</strong> many perspectives and observations we have come across in<br />

<strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> our research. The report can be downloaded, along with additional supporting<br />

documents, past interim reports, and o<strong>the</strong>r background information at RESOLVE’s project wiki.<br />

We are also discussing this report online at www.resolvblog.blogspot.com and encourage you to<br />

join <strong>the</strong> conversation.<br />

We welcome your feedback on this report.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Jen Peyser<br />

RESOLVE<br />

ABOUT RESOLVE<br />

RESOLVE builds strong, enduring solutions to environmental, social, and health challenges. We<br />

help community, business, government, and social leaders get results and build lasting<br />

relationships through collaboration. RESOLVE is an independent non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization<br />

founded in 1977, RESOLVE’s services and programs are designed to help parties engage in factfinding,<br />

information sharing, dialogue, decision making, solutions discovery, and action. Jen<br />

Peyser led <strong>the</strong> project for RESOLVE, with support from Steve D’Esposito and Jason<br />

Gershowitz. For more information on RESOLVE, please see www.resolv.org. Jen Peyser can be<br />

reached at jpeyser@resolv.org or +1 202 965 6215.<br />

ABOUT GeSI and EICC<br />

The Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) is a group <strong>of</strong> companies working toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

to create a comprehensive set <strong>of</strong> tools and methods that support credible implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct throughout <strong>the</strong> Electronics and Information and Communications Technology<br />

(ICT) supply chain.<br />

The Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) is a global partnership <strong>of</strong> ICT companies that<br />

promotes technologies for a sustainable development.


The mission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GeSI/EICC Extractives Workgroup is to positively influence <strong>the</strong> social and<br />

environmental conditions in <strong>the</strong> metals extractives supply chain as it connects to <strong>the</strong> EICC/GeSI<br />

member companies by supporting transparency while continuing to investigate additional<br />

opportunities. The EICC (www.eicc.info) and GeSI (www.gesi.org) membership represent a<br />

large proportion <strong>of</strong> companies in <strong>the</strong> electronics sector.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!