26.03.2015 Views

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radiology<br />

tive ID, respectively, during the 14-day<br />

follow-up for each irrigation frequency.<br />

Three to 14 days after catheter insertion,<br />

the intracatheter pressure was significantly<br />

lower in catheters with higher irrigation<br />

frequencies than in those with<br />

lower irrigation frequencies. Table 2 summarizes<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> statistical analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> intracatheter pressure differences at<br />

each irrigation frequency for each observation<br />

during 14-day follow-up.<br />

Microscopic examination <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />

after they were withdrawn showed<br />

multifocal plugging <strong>of</strong> the side holes <strong>and</strong><br />

catheter lumen with white jellylike<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> tissue debris <strong>of</strong> various sizes <strong>and</strong><br />

frequencies. Results <strong>of</strong> histopathologic<br />

examination revealed that this tissue debris<br />

was inflammatory exudate that consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils,<br />

<strong>and</strong> some eosinophils among a<br />

background <strong>of</strong> delicate fibrillary collagenous<br />

material. Results <strong>of</strong> scanning electron<br />

microscopic examination revealed<br />

that this tissue debris had irregular surfaces<br />

(Fig 5), but the catheter surfaces<br />

remained smooth in other areas without<br />

debris.<br />

Figure 2. Graphs show results <strong>of</strong> the in vitro experiment <strong>and</strong> theoretic curves. (a, b) Relationship<br />

between ID <strong>of</strong> a catheter <strong>and</strong> intracatheter pressure (P). Colors <strong>of</strong> the plots <strong>and</strong> curves<br />

indicate a specific preset infusion rate. In a, red 0.1 mL/sec, blue 1.0 mL/sec, orange 2.0<br />

mL/sec, <strong>and</strong> black 3.0 mL/sec. In b, red 0.5 mL/sec, blue 1.5 mL/sec, <strong>and</strong> black 2.5<br />

mL/sec. Data are plotted separately in a <strong>and</strong> b to avoid crowding. Plots indicate the pressures<br />

measured in 48 combinations <strong>of</strong> catheter IDs <strong>and</strong> infusion rates. Solid curves were generated by<br />

fitting Equation (4) derived from the data (plots), <strong>and</strong> the dotted curves represent the ideal curves<br />

generated by the Poiseuille equation (Eq [2]). Note agreement between the data, fitting curves,<br />

<strong>and</strong> ideal curves. A log 10 scale was used to plot P on the y axis.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In this study, we evaluated a method<br />

with application <strong>of</strong> the Poiseuille law for<br />

the quantitative <strong>and</strong> longitudinal assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging during percutaneous<br />

drainage procedures. We verified<br />

the validity <strong>of</strong> this method in two ways:<br />

(a) by performing an in vitro experiment,<br />

in which a series <strong>of</strong> catheters with different<br />

IDs were used to simulate various degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> obstruction <strong>and</strong> (b) by observing<br />

the results in an in vivo experiment, in<br />

which the degree <strong>of</strong> clogging was graded<br />

according to the irrigation frequency.<br />

Furthermore, our results show that the<br />

effective ID <strong>of</strong> a drainage catheter can be<br />

estimated in vivo by means <strong>of</strong> the mathematically<br />

based approach used in our<br />

study.<br />

To our knowledge, no method has<br />

been reported for evaluating the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> drainage procedures <strong>and</strong> the<br />

catheters used in such procedures. Our<br />

efforts to develop anticlogging drainage<br />

catheters in recent years have demonstrated<br />

to us that there is a need for an<br />

objective method <strong>of</strong> quantifying catheter<br />

clogging.<br />

We previously determined the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging in animal models by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> catheter<br />

weight changes, microscopic morphologic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> side holes <strong>and</strong> luminal<br />

Figure 3. Graphs show intracatheter pressure changes in 12 rabbits during the 14-day follow-up.<br />

Pressure was measured during the infusion <strong>of</strong> sterile saline at rates <strong>of</strong> (a) 0.1 <strong>and</strong> (b) 0.5 mL/sec.<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging was graded on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different frequencies <strong>of</strong> manual<br />

irrigation: zero, Πone, two, <strong>and</strong> three times per day. Plots indicate means, <strong>and</strong><br />

error bars represent the st<strong>and</strong>ard errors <strong>of</strong> means. In b, pressures exceeding the measurable limit<br />

(350 mm Hg) <strong>of</strong> the pressure-monitoring device were regarded as 350 mm Hg. Note that degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging were discriminated by means <strong>of</strong> the pressure measurement system illustrated<br />

in Figure 1. A log 10 scale was used to plot pressure on the y axis.<br />

surfaces, scanning electron microscopy,<br />

or measurement <strong>of</strong> the infusion rate<br />

through a catheter after it was withdrawn.<br />

In our experience, morphologic<br />

analysis is not an effective method because<br />

it is labor intensive <strong>and</strong> tends to<br />

836 Radiology June 2003 Lee et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!