26.03.2015 Views

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radiology<br />

Kyoung Ho Lee, MD<br />

Joon Koo Han, MD<br />

Kwang Gi Kim, PhD<br />

Youngro Byun, PhD<br />

Chang Jin Yoon, MD<br />

Seung Ja Kim, MD<br />

Byung Ihn Choi, MD<br />

Index terms:<br />

Abscess, percutaneous drainage,<br />

70.21<br />

Animals<br />

<strong>Catheters</strong> <strong>and</strong> catheterization,<br />

technology, 70.21<br />

Experimental study, 70.21<br />

Published online before print<br />

10.1148/radiol.2281020245<br />

Radiology 2003; 227:833–838<br />

Abbreviation:<br />

ID internal diameter<br />

1 From the Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiation Medicine, Clinical<br />

Research Institute (K.H.L., J.K.H., C.J.Y.,<br />

S.J.K., B.I.C.) <strong>and</strong> Interdisciplinary Program<br />

in Medical <strong>and</strong> Biological Engineering,<br />

Clinical Research Institute<br />

(K.G.K.), Seoul National University College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Medicine, Seoul National University<br />

Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong,<br />

Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Materials Science<br />

<strong>and</strong> Engineering, Kwangju Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Science <strong>and</strong> Technology, Gwangju,<br />

Korea (Y.B.). Received March 29,<br />

2002; revision requested June 11; final<br />

revision received November 5; accepted<br />

November 19. Supported in<br />

part by Korean Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

<strong>and</strong> Welfare grant HMP-98-G-2-034.<br />

Address correspondence to J.K.H.<br />

(e-mail: hanjk@radcom.snu.ac.kr).<br />

<strong>Clogging</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Catheters</strong>:<br />

<strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Longitudinal</strong><br />

Assessment by Monitoring<br />

Intracatheter Pressure in<br />

<strong>Catheters</strong> <strong>and</strong> Rabbits 1<br />

PURPOSE: To develop a method for the quantitative <strong>and</strong> longitudinal assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

clogging in drainage catheters <strong>and</strong> to confirm the validity <strong>of</strong> the method.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intracatheter pressure was measured during the<br />

infusion <strong>of</strong> saline at a rate <strong>of</strong> 0.1–3.0 mL/sec in nine catheters with different internal<br />

diameters. With the data obtained, a fitting equation between the intracatheter<br />

pressure <strong>and</strong> internal diameter was derived on the basis <strong>of</strong> the Poiseuille law. To<br />

confirm the validity <strong>of</strong> this measurement method, four drainage catheters were<br />

inserted into the peritoneal cavity in each <strong>of</strong> 15 rabbits. Intracatheter pressures at<br />

infusion rates <strong>of</strong> 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 0.5 mL/sec were monitored for 14 days, while the degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging were graded on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different frequencies <strong>of</strong> manual<br />

irrigation: one, two, or three times per day. Repeated measures analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />

was used to determine the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences in pressure between<br />

different irrigation frequencies.<br />

RESULTS: Pressure was measured successfully throughout the experiment except in<br />

three rabbits with dislodged catheters. Three to 14 days after catheter insertion, the<br />

pressures were significantly lower in catheters with higher irrigation frequencies<br />

than in those with lower irrigation frequencies (P .05). The effective internal<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> each catheter could be monitored by means <strong>of</strong> the derived fitting<br />

equation.<br />

CONCLUSION: This method can be used to quantitatively measure the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

clogging <strong>of</strong> a drainage catheter. It can also be used for comparative or longitudinal<br />

in vivo studies concerning the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> drainage procedures or catheter<br />

development.<br />

©<br />

RSNA, 2003<br />

Author contributions:<br />

Guarantor <strong>of</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> entire study,<br />

B.I.C.; study concepts, K.H.L., Y.B.;<br />

study design, K.H.L., J.K.H., K.G.K.,<br />

C.J.Y.; literature research, S.J.K.; experimental<br />

studies, C.T.Y., S.J.K., K.H.L.;<br />

data acquisition, K.H.L., C.J.Y., S.J.K.;<br />

data analysis/interpretation, C.J.Y.,<br />

S.J.K.; manuscript preparation, K.H.L.,<br />

J.K.H., S.J.K.; manuscript definition <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual content, C.J.Y., K.G.K.,<br />

Y.B.; manuscript editing, B.I.C.; manuscript<br />

revision/review <strong>and</strong> final version<br />

approval, B.I.C., J.K.H.<br />

©<br />

RSNA, 2003<br />

In the past decade, computed tomography– <strong>and</strong> sonography-guided percutaneous drainage<br />

<strong>of</strong> abscesses <strong>and</strong> fluid collections has become a widely used, safe, <strong>and</strong> effective<br />

technique. Various factors can hinder or delay the successful drainage <strong>of</strong> abscesses, such as<br />

the location <strong>and</strong> configuration <strong>of</strong> the abscess (1–3), the nature <strong>of</strong> the infecting organism,<br />

host resistance (4), fistulous connections, <strong>and</strong> viscosity <strong>of</strong> the abscess contents (5). Several<br />

procedure-related factors can also influence the patency <strong>of</strong> the drainage tube. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

methods for preventing catheter clogging have been proposed, including the use <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigations <strong>and</strong> large-lumen or sump-type catheters (6). However, catheter clogging is still<br />

encountered frequently during various drainage procedures.<br />

We have been working on the development <strong>of</strong> anticlogging drainage catheters with new<br />

biomaterials <strong>and</strong> drug-delivery technologies in recent years. During this work, we found<br />

that no recognized method has been reported for objective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter drainage. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop a method for the quantitative<br />

<strong>and</strong> longitudinal assessment <strong>of</strong> clogging in drainage catheters <strong>and</strong> to confirm the<br />

validity <strong>of</strong> the method.<br />

833


Radiology<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Principle<br />

The flow <strong>of</strong> fluids, including pus (5),<br />

through a drainage catheter is governed<br />

by the Poiseuille law (7), which describes<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> laminar flow <strong>of</strong> fluid (or gas)<br />

through a cylindric structure. For drainage<br />

catheters, the Poiseuille law is expressed<br />

by the following equation:<br />

Q Prr4<br />

8L , (1)<br />

where Q is the flow rate, Pr is the pressure<br />

gradient between the two ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catheter, r is the radius <strong>of</strong> the catheter, L<br />

is the length <strong>of</strong> the catheter, <strong>and</strong> is the<br />

viscosity <strong>of</strong> the fluid. If the fluid is infused<br />

at a constant rate by using an infusion<br />

pump, the resistance <strong>of</strong> a given catheter<br />

can be expressed as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intracatheter pressure (Pr) because all<br />

other variables remain constant (Fig 1).<br />

Furthermore, the effective internal diameter<br />

(ID) <strong>of</strong> a drainage catheter, which is<br />

influenced by the clogging effect in vivo,<br />

can be calculated if other variables are<br />

known.<br />

With the method used in this study, a<br />

prerequisite is that the infusion pump<br />

(A-50 B-1; Nemoto Kyorindo, Tokyo, Japan)<br />

must maintain a constant infusion<br />

rate when the intracatheter pressure is<br />

high. We confirmed the constant rate in<br />

a separate experiment. The cumulative<br />

volume infused was increased linearly at<br />

a preset infusion rate from 0.1 to 3.0 mL/<br />

sec until the intracatheter pressure exceeded<br />

the measurable limit (350 mm<br />

Hg) <strong>of</strong> the pressure-monitoring device<br />

(Siredoc 60; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen,<br />

Germany), which was a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

patient monitor. In the present study,<br />

laminar flow was presumed for all measurements,<br />

<strong>and</strong> every precaution was<br />

taken to ensure that catheters were<br />

aligned to avoid kinking or distortion <strong>of</strong><br />

the lumen.<br />

In Vitro Experiment<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> unused angiographic <strong>and</strong><br />

drainage catheters with different IDs<br />

were connected to the measurement system,<br />

as illustrated in Figure 1, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

intracatheter pressure was measured during<br />

the infusion <strong>of</strong> saline at a rate from<br />

0.1 to 3.0 mL/sec (C.J.Y., S.J.K.). This in<br />

vitro experiment was performed (a) to<br />

verify that the measurement system discriminated<br />

adequately between catheters<br />

with different IDs, (b) to allow the derivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a st<strong>and</strong>ard curve (or equation)<br />

between the intracatheter pressure <strong>and</strong><br />

the effective ID, <strong>and</strong> (c) to determine the<br />

infusion rate to be used in the animal<br />

experiment. The 48 combinations <strong>of</strong> IDs<br />

<strong>and</strong> infusion rates are summarized in Table<br />

1. If the ID <strong>of</strong> each catheter was not<br />

provided by the manufacturers, it was<br />

measured with image analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(UTHSCSA ImageTool, version 2.03; University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Texas Health Science Center,<br />

San Antonio, Tex), <strong>and</strong> digitally captured<br />

images <strong>of</strong> a magnified cut surface were<br />

obtained by using a stereomicroscope (SZ<br />

11; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan).<br />

We measured the ID <strong>of</strong> each catheter<br />

five times <strong>and</strong> calculated the mean after<br />

discarding the highest <strong>and</strong> lowest values.<br />

All catheters were carefully cut at the<br />

shaft to a fixed length <strong>of</strong> 30 cm. After<br />

infusion was initiated, the intracatheter<br />

pressure gradually increased until it<br />

reached a plateau (determined with consensus<br />

between the two observers) in<br />

5–15 seconds; this plateau indicated that<br />

a steady state had been reached between<br />

inflow from the infusion pump <strong>and</strong> outflow<br />

from the catheter tip. To minimize<br />

measurement error, intracatheter pressure<br />

was measured five times for each<br />

combination. The mean value was calculated<br />

after the highest <strong>and</strong> lowest values<br />

had been discarded. The pressure-monitoring<br />

device was set to zero by opening<br />

the system to air before each measurement.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Equation<br />

For the measurement system used in<br />

this study, the Poiseuille law equation<br />

can be written as follows:<br />

Pr 5.628 1012 Q<br />

<br />

6,000<br />

D 4 , (2)<br />

where Pr (in millimeters <strong>of</strong> mercury) is<br />

intracatheter pressure, Q (in milliliters<br />

per second) is infusion rate, <strong>and</strong> D (in<br />

French) is ID <strong>of</strong> catheter because the<br />

length was fixed to 30 cm <strong>and</strong> the viscosity<br />

<strong>of</strong> water is 1.002 10 3 Ns/m 2 at<br />

20°C (8).<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> Equation (2), a fitting<br />

equation was derived to describe the intracatheter<br />

pressure as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

infusion rate <strong>and</strong> ID. This process included<br />

empirical modification <strong>of</strong> Equation<br />

(2) by trial <strong>and</strong> error (K.G.K.) <strong>and</strong><br />

iterative nonlinear curve fitting (Origin,<br />

version 6.1; OriginLab, Northampton,<br />

Mass) with the in vitro experimental data<br />

for 48 combinations.<br />

The fitting equation was modified as<br />

follows:<br />

Figure 1. Diagram <strong>of</strong> pressure measurement<br />

system. A catheter, a pressure-monitoring device,<br />

<strong>and</strong> an infusion pump are connected<br />

with a three-way stopcock. If the fluid is infused<br />

at a constant mean rate (Q) <strong>of</strong> the infusion<br />

pump, the resistance (R) <strong>of</strong> a given catheter<br />

can be expressed as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intracatheter pressure (P).<br />

Pr k 1 Q 2 10 10 k 2 e Q/k3 k 4 <br />

<br />

6,000<br />

D 4 ,<br />

k 5<br />

(3)<br />

where k 1 , k 2 , k 3 , k 4 , <strong>and</strong> k 5 are coefficients.<br />

The error range <strong>of</strong> this fitting<br />

equation was represented by k 1 . With<br />

this equation, the relationship between<br />

the ID <strong>and</strong> the intracatheter pressure was<br />

plotted at each infusion rate. These<br />

curves were compared with the ideal<br />

curves generated by the Poiseuille equation<br />

(Eq [2]). The fitting equation was<br />

also used to calculate the theoretic effective<br />

IDs <strong>of</strong> catheters in the animal experiment.<br />

Animal Experiment<br />

All animal experimental protocols<br />

were approved by the animal research<br />

committee at our institution <strong>and</strong> were<br />

performed at the Clinical Research Institute.<br />

Fifteen New Zeal<strong>and</strong> White rabbits<br />

(body weight, 2.5–3.0 kg) were used for<br />

the experiment. Animals were sedated<br />

with an intramuscular injection <strong>of</strong> 12-15<br />

mg per kilogram <strong>of</strong> body weight <strong>of</strong> ketamine<br />

hydrochloride (Ketalar; Yuhan<br />

Yanghang, Seoul, Korea) <strong>and</strong> 2 mg/kg <strong>of</strong><br />

xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun 2%;<br />

Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea). After the abdominal<br />

wall was shaved <strong>and</strong> prepared,<br />

four st<strong>and</strong>ard 8-F drainage catheters<br />

(Jungsung) with length <strong>of</strong> 30 cm <strong>and</strong> ID<br />

<strong>of</strong> 5.07 F were inserted into the peritoneal<br />

cavity <strong>of</strong> each rabbit, with the<br />

Seldinger method <strong>and</strong> fluoroscopic guidance<br />

(C.J.Y.). Efforts were made to place<br />

the tips <strong>of</strong> the four catheters in the same<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the peritoneal cavity. During<br />

834 Radiology June 2003 Lee et al


TABLE 1<br />

Catheter <strong>and</strong> Infusion Rates Tested in in Vitro Experiment<br />

Radiology<br />

Catheter Name<br />

Manufacturer<br />

Outer<br />

Diameter<br />

(F)<br />

ID (F)<br />

Infusion Rate (mL/sec)<br />

0.1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />

Micr<strong>of</strong>erret-18 infusion<br />

catheter Cook, Bloomington, Ind 3 1.58 Yes No No No No No No<br />

Tempo angiographic<br />

catheter Cordis, Miami, Fla 4 2.86 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No<br />

Torcon NB Advantage<br />

angiographic catheter Cook 5 3.12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

<strong>Drainage</strong> catheter Jungsung, Seongnam, Korea 7 3.88 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Envoy guiding catheter Cordis 6 4.35 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

<strong>Drainage</strong> catheter Jungsung 8 5.07 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

<strong>Drainage</strong> catheter Jungsung 9 5.38 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

<strong>Drainage</strong> catheter Jungsung 10 6.74 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Simple-Loc Locking<br />

Loop (MSL) Cook 12 7.33 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

the follow-up period, the catheters were<br />

left in place, <strong>and</strong> animals were kept in a<br />

specially designed restraint cage in the<br />

laboratory to prevent the catheters from<br />

being dislodged accidentally. Each day,<br />

200 mg <strong>of</strong> cefazolin sodium (Cefamezin;<br />

Dong-a Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea) <strong>and</strong> 15<br />

mg <strong>of</strong> gentamicin sulfate (Gentamicin;<br />

Korea United Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea)<br />

was administered intramuscularly to prevent<br />

peritonitis.<br />

To grade the degrees <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging,<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the four catheters inserted<br />

into an animal was irrigated manually<br />

with 10 mL <strong>of</strong> sterile saline at a different<br />

frequency (zero, one, two, or three times<br />

per day). With the method described in<br />

the in vitro experiment, intracatheter<br />

pressure was measured for each catheter<br />

at baseline <strong>and</strong> 3, 7, 10, <strong>and</strong> 14 days after<br />

insertion by infusing sterile saline at rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 0.5 mL/sec, consecutively.<br />

These infusion rates were predetermined<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> results in the in vitro<br />

experiment to ensure that the maximum<br />

intracatheter pressure was within the<br />

measurable range <strong>of</strong> the pressure-monitoring<br />

device. Measurement procedures<br />

were conducted together by two radiologists<br />

(C.J.Y., S.J.K.), who were blinded to<br />

the irrigation frequency. Measurements<br />

were obtained from the four catheters in<br />

each animal in r<strong>and</strong>om order. From the<br />

intracatheter pressure, we were able to<br />

calculate the effective ID by using the<br />

fitting equation derived on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

results in the in vitro experiment.<br />

Changes in effective ID during the 14-<br />

day follow-up period were plotted for<br />

each irrigation frequency.<br />

Microscopic Analysis<br />

After the study was completed, the<br />

catheters were removed, <strong>and</strong> the animals<br />

were returned to laboratory cages; there<br />

were no complications. The surface<br />

morphology <strong>of</strong> the catheters after withdrawal<br />

was examined with stereomicroscopy<br />

<strong>and</strong> scanning electron microscopy<br />

(DS130-C; Akashi, Tokyo, Japan)<br />

at an accelerating voltage <strong>of</strong> 20 kV<br />

(K.H.L., C.J.Y.), after the catheters were<br />

prepared in a st<strong>and</strong>ard manner (9). Two<br />

catheters were selected r<strong>and</strong>omly for<br />

each irrigation frequency, <strong>and</strong> representative<br />

segments were prepared for<br />

stereomicroscopic <strong>and</strong> scanning electron<br />

microscopic examinations <strong>of</strong> their<br />

internal surfaces.<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

The data obtained in the animal experiment<br />

were analyzed to determine<br />

whether the intracatheter pressure was<br />

related to the irrigation frequency by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> repeated measures analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

variance. A P value <strong>of</strong> less than .05 was<br />

considered to indicate a statistically significant<br />

difference. Statistical analysis<br />

was not performed with the stereomicroscopic<br />

or scanning electron microscopic<br />

data.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In Vitro Experiment<br />

Intracatheter pressures at each combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> infusion rate <strong>and</strong> ID are summarized<br />

in Figure 2.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Equation<br />

The coefficients k 2 , k 3 , k 4 , <strong>and</strong> k 5 were<br />

determined to be 152.089, 0.1799, 5.372,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 136, respectively, by means <strong>of</strong> iterative<br />

nonlinear curve fitting. The error<br />

range <strong>of</strong> fitting Equation (3), which is<br />

represented by k 1 , was 1.000 0.014<br />

(SD), 0.987 0.061, 1.217 0.045,<br />

1.102 0.034, 1.029 0.022, 0.931 <br />

0.029, <strong>and</strong> 0.730 0.063 at infusion<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, <strong>and</strong> 3.0<br />

mL/sec, respectively. By taking k 1 to be 1,<br />

the fitting equation can be written thus:<br />

Q 2 10 10<br />

152.089 e Q/0.1799 5.372<br />

Pr <br />

6,000<br />

D 4<br />

.<br />

136<br />

(4)<br />

Figure 2 illustrates the theoretic curves<br />

that describe the relationship between ID<br />

<strong>and</strong> intracatheter pressure, according to<br />

fitting Equation (4) <strong>and</strong> the Poiseuille<br />

equation (Eq [2]).<br />

Animal Experiment<br />

In three <strong>of</strong> the 15 rabbits, one or more<br />

catheters became dislodged within 4 days<br />

<strong>of</strong> follow-up, <strong>and</strong> these three rabbits were<br />

excluded from the analysis. When the<br />

infusion rate was 0.5 mL/sec, the absolute<br />

intracatheter pressure could not be<br />

measured in all combinations because it<br />

sometimes exceeded the measurable<br />

limit (350 mm Hg) <strong>of</strong> the pressure-monitoring<br />

device. In these cases, the intracatheter<br />

pressure was regarded as 350<br />

mm Hg for statistical analysis. This out<strong>of</strong>-range<br />

inaccuracy occurred in 16 catheters<br />

from day 7 after insertion: 10 catheters<br />

with an irrigation frequency <strong>of</strong> zero<br />

times per day (four catheters from day 7,<br />

five from day 10, <strong>and</strong> one from day 14),<br />

five catheters with an irrigation frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> one time per day (three catheters<br />

from day 10 <strong>and</strong> two from day 14),<br />

<strong>and</strong> one with an irrigation frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

two times per day (from day 14).<br />

Figures 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 illustrate changes in<br />

the intracatheter pressure <strong>and</strong> the effec-<br />

Volume 227 Number 3 <strong>Clogging</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Catheters</strong>: Assessment <strong>of</strong> Intracatheter Pressure 835


Radiology<br />

tive ID, respectively, during the 14-day<br />

follow-up for each irrigation frequency.<br />

Three to 14 days after catheter insertion,<br />

the intracatheter pressure was significantly<br />

lower in catheters with higher irrigation<br />

frequencies than in those with<br />

lower irrigation frequencies. Table 2 summarizes<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> statistical analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> intracatheter pressure differences at<br />

each irrigation frequency for each observation<br />

during 14-day follow-up.<br />

Microscopic examination <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />

after they were withdrawn showed<br />

multifocal plugging <strong>of</strong> the side holes <strong>and</strong><br />

catheter lumen with white jellylike<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> tissue debris <strong>of</strong> various sizes <strong>and</strong><br />

frequencies. Results <strong>of</strong> histopathologic<br />

examination revealed that this tissue debris<br />

was inflammatory exudate that consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils,<br />

<strong>and</strong> some eosinophils among a<br />

background <strong>of</strong> delicate fibrillary collagenous<br />

material. Results <strong>of</strong> scanning electron<br />

microscopic examination revealed<br />

that this tissue debris had irregular surfaces<br />

(Fig 5), but the catheter surfaces<br />

remained smooth in other areas without<br />

debris.<br />

Figure 2. Graphs show results <strong>of</strong> the in vitro experiment <strong>and</strong> theoretic curves. (a, b) Relationship<br />

between ID <strong>of</strong> a catheter <strong>and</strong> intracatheter pressure (P). Colors <strong>of</strong> the plots <strong>and</strong> curves<br />

indicate a specific preset infusion rate. In a, red 0.1 mL/sec, blue 1.0 mL/sec, orange 2.0<br />

mL/sec, <strong>and</strong> black 3.0 mL/sec. In b, red 0.5 mL/sec, blue 1.5 mL/sec, <strong>and</strong> black 2.5<br />

mL/sec. Data are plotted separately in a <strong>and</strong> b to avoid crowding. Plots indicate the pressures<br />

measured in 48 combinations <strong>of</strong> catheter IDs <strong>and</strong> infusion rates. Solid curves were generated by<br />

fitting Equation (4) derived from the data (plots), <strong>and</strong> the dotted curves represent the ideal curves<br />

generated by the Poiseuille equation (Eq [2]). Note agreement between the data, fitting curves,<br />

<strong>and</strong> ideal curves. A log 10 scale was used to plot P on the y axis.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In this study, we evaluated a method<br />

with application <strong>of</strong> the Poiseuille law for<br />

the quantitative <strong>and</strong> longitudinal assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging during percutaneous<br />

drainage procedures. We verified<br />

the validity <strong>of</strong> this method in two ways:<br />

(a) by performing an in vitro experiment,<br />

in which a series <strong>of</strong> catheters with different<br />

IDs were used to simulate various degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> obstruction <strong>and</strong> (b) by observing<br />

the results in an in vivo experiment, in<br />

which the degree <strong>of</strong> clogging was graded<br />

according to the irrigation frequency.<br />

Furthermore, our results show that the<br />

effective ID <strong>of</strong> a drainage catheter can be<br />

estimated in vivo by means <strong>of</strong> the mathematically<br />

based approach used in our<br />

study.<br />

To our knowledge, no method has<br />

been reported for evaluating the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> drainage procedures <strong>and</strong> the<br />

catheters used in such procedures. Our<br />

efforts to develop anticlogging drainage<br />

catheters in recent years have demonstrated<br />

to us that there is a need for an<br />

objective method <strong>of</strong> quantifying catheter<br />

clogging.<br />

We previously determined the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging in animal models by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> catheter<br />

weight changes, microscopic morphologic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> side holes <strong>and</strong> luminal<br />

Figure 3. Graphs show intracatheter pressure changes in 12 rabbits during the 14-day follow-up.<br />

Pressure was measured during the infusion <strong>of</strong> sterile saline at rates <strong>of</strong> (a) 0.1 <strong>and</strong> (b) 0.5 mL/sec.<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging was graded on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different frequencies <strong>of</strong> manual<br />

irrigation: zero, Πone, two, <strong>and</strong> three times per day. Plots indicate means, <strong>and</strong><br />

error bars represent the st<strong>and</strong>ard errors <strong>of</strong> means. In b, pressures exceeding the measurable limit<br />

(350 mm Hg) <strong>of</strong> the pressure-monitoring device were regarded as 350 mm Hg. Note that degrees<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheter clogging were discriminated by means <strong>of</strong> the pressure measurement system illustrated<br />

in Figure 1. A log 10 scale was used to plot pressure on the y axis.<br />

surfaces, scanning electron microscopy,<br />

or measurement <strong>of</strong> the infusion rate<br />

through a catheter after it was withdrawn.<br />

In our experience, morphologic<br />

analysis is not an effective method because<br />

it is labor intensive <strong>and</strong> tends to<br />

836 Radiology June 2003 Lee et al


Radiology<br />

Figure 4. Graphs show changes in the effective ID <strong>of</strong> drainage catheters in 12 rabbits during the<br />

14-day follow-up. Data were calculated from the pressure measurement (Fig 3) at infusion rates <strong>of</strong><br />

(a) 0.1 <strong>and</strong> (b) 0.5 mL/sec by means <strong>of</strong> fitting Equation (4). Degrees <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging were<br />

graded on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different frequencies <strong>of</strong> manual irrigation: zero, Πone, two,<br />

<strong>and</strong> three times per day. Plots indicate means, <strong>and</strong> error bars represent the st<strong>and</strong>ard errors<br />

<strong>of</strong> means. Note that the degree <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging (effective IDs) is monitored comparatively.<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> Statistical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Differences in Pressures at Each Irrigation<br />

Frequency in 12 Rabbits during 14-day Follow-up<br />

Irrigation<br />

Frequency<br />

(no. <strong>of</strong> times daily)<br />

result in sampling error <strong>and</strong> because it is<br />

practically impossible to prepare the<br />

catheters without losing debris. For these<br />

reasons, we did not statistically analyze<br />

stereomicroscopic <strong>and</strong> scanning electron<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Days after Catheter Insertion<br />

0 3 7 10 14<br />

Saline infusion rate,<br />

0.1 mL/sec<br />

0 vs 1 .964 .101 .011* .001* .001*<br />

0 vs 2 .995 .076 .001* .001* .001*<br />

0 vs 3 .965 .028* .001* .001* .001*<br />

1 vs 2 .960 .894 .392 .103 .042*<br />

1 vs 3 .929 .573 .059 .001* .001*<br />

2 vs 3 .970 .666 .299 .036* .019*<br />

Saline infusion rate,<br />

0.5 mL/sec<br />

0 vs 1 .987 .029* .001* .001* .001*<br />

0 vs 2 .746 .008* .001* .001* .001*<br />

0 vs 3 .813 .002* .001* .001* .001*<br />

1 vs 2 .734 .644 .084 .013* .001*<br />

1 vs 3 .800 .332 .008* .001* .001*<br />

2 vs 3 .931 .611 .340 .013* .001*<br />

Note.—Data are P values obtained by means <strong>of</strong> repeated measures analysis <strong>of</strong> variance.<br />

* P .05.<br />

microscopic data in this study. These<br />

methods to determine the degree <strong>of</strong> catheter<br />

clogging necessitated prolonged experimental<br />

cycles <strong>and</strong> required the use <strong>of</strong><br />

many animals for multiple observation<br />

times; these factors resulted in the unavoidable<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>and</strong> catheters.<br />

With the method we developed for the<br />

current study, however, several catheters<br />

could be followed over time in one animal,<br />

which provided quantitative <strong>and</strong><br />

comparative information about temporal<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the obstruction process<br />

or anticlogging effect. This feature is critical<br />

for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> drainage procedures<br />

or for the development <strong>of</strong> new<br />

drainage catheters with anticlogging effects<br />

(ie, those involving novel biomaterials<br />

or drug-delivery systems). Furthermore,<br />

the method used in this study does<br />

not preclude analyses <strong>of</strong> weight or morphologic<br />

changes after catheter withdrawal.<br />

This method might also be used<br />

in clinical studies because the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

saline injected is small (less than 10 mL<br />

per catheter in this study); that amount is<br />

not enough to significantly increase the<br />

pressure inside the abscess cavity.<br />

However, the method used in this<br />

study has several limitations. (a) Despite<br />

the advantage <strong>of</strong> allowing direct assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> flow through a catheter in vivo,<br />

the direction <strong>of</strong> the infused flow during<br />

the measurement is opposed to the direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural drainage. This might be a<br />

substantial limitation because debris inside<br />

a drainage system can act as a oneway<br />

check valve. (b) The Poiseuille law<br />

can be applied only if an assumption is<br />

made that narrowing <strong>of</strong> the lumen is diffuse<br />

(7), but this assumption does not<br />

reflect the real situation. In cases <strong>of</strong> multifocal<br />

severe obstruction, the flow dynamics<br />

become more complex.<br />

With the Poiseuille law, we derived a<br />

fitting equation from the in vitro experimental<br />

data <strong>and</strong> used the equation to<br />

calculate the effective ID <strong>of</strong> catheters in<br />

the animal experiment. However, this<br />

method also has several limitations. For<br />

example, in the animal experiment, the<br />

ID <strong>of</strong> catheters was 5.07 F, but the ID <strong>of</strong><br />

the same catheters calculated from the<br />

baseline measurement was approximately<br />

3.5 F. This discrepancy might be attributed<br />

to multiple factors. (a) Intracatheter pressure<br />

for a given catheter in vivo can be<br />

variable since it is influenced by many<br />

factors, including the respiratory cycle,<br />

abdominal pressure, <strong>and</strong> locations <strong>of</strong> side<br />

holes relative to adjacent anatomic structures.<br />

(b) <strong>Catheters</strong> used in the in vitro<br />

experiment had only one end hole. (c)<br />

Mechanical properties, such as the compliance<br />

materials, were not considered in<br />

this study. We believe, however, that<br />

these limitations are not important if the<br />

method is used for comparing the de-<br />

Volume 227 Number 3 <strong>Clogging</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Catheters</strong>: Assessment <strong>of</strong> Intracatheter Pressure 837


Radiology<br />

grees <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging between different<br />

catheters.<br />

We found a discrepancy between the<br />

curves generated by the fitting Equation<br />

(4) <strong>and</strong> those generated by the Poiseuille<br />

equation (Eq [2]). Furthermore, intracatheter<br />

pressure was found to be proportional<br />

to the square <strong>of</strong> the infusion rate<br />

<strong>and</strong> not to the infusion rate, as indicated<br />

by fitting Equation (4). This discrepancy<br />

might be attributed to technical factors<br />

or to the fact that the system is not modeled<br />

perfectly by the Poiseuille law. The<br />

reasons for these differences remain unknown,<br />

<strong>and</strong> further study is required.<br />

In summary, we propose a method for<br />

in vivo evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

a drainage catheter, which is based on<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> the Poiseuille law.<br />

With this method, the flow resistance <strong>of</strong><br />

a catheter can be determined quantitatively;<br />

thus, it <strong>of</strong>fers a means <strong>of</strong> quantifying<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> clogging or the anticlogging<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> drainage catheters. This<br />

method can be used for comparative <strong>and</strong><br />

longitudinal studies concerning the evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> drainage procedures or the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> new catheters.<br />

Practical application: By applying the<br />

noninvasive method used in this study,<br />

flow resistance through multiple drainage<br />

catheters can be compared over time<br />

in one animal, which provides quantitative<br />

information about the gradual obstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheters. This information<br />

is critical for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />

procedures or development <strong>of</strong> new catheters<br />

with anticlogging effects, such as<br />

those made with novel biomaterials <strong>and</strong><br />

drug-delivery systems. Furthermore, this<br />

method does not preclude analyses based<br />

Figure 5. Images show internal surfaces <strong>of</strong> drainage catheters after the catheters were withdrawn.<br />

(a) Stereomicroscopic image shows debris that plugs the catheter side holes <strong>and</strong> lumen,<br />

which were irrigated one time per day. (b) Scanning electron microscopic image shows a catheter<br />

that was irrigated two times per day. Note the irregular surface caused by the debris (D). (Original<br />

magnification, 170.)<br />

on weight or morphologic changes after<br />

the catheter is withdrawn.<br />

Acknowledgments: We thank Hyuk Jae<br />

Choi, Myoung Soo Kim, RT, <strong>and</strong> Hyun Jung<br />

Lee, RT, for their technical assistance in animal<br />

preparation. We are grateful to Myoung Jin<br />

Jang, PhD, for her help with the statistical<br />

analysis.<br />

References<br />

1. Haaga JR, Weinstein AJ. CT-guided percutaneous<br />

aspiration <strong>and</strong> drainage <strong>of</strong> abscesses.<br />

Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135:1187–<br />

1194.<br />

2. vanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT<br />

Jr. Percutaneous drainage <strong>of</strong> 250 abdominal<br />

abscesses <strong>and</strong> fluid collections. I. Results,<br />

failures, <strong>and</strong> complications. Radiology<br />

1984; 151:337–341.<br />

3. Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E, Ferrucci JT<br />

Jr. Percutaneous drainage <strong>of</strong> 250 abdominal<br />

abscesses <strong>and</strong> fluid collections. II. Current<br />

procedural concepts. Radiology 1984;<br />

151:343–347.<br />

4. Dawson SL, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr. Mucomyst<br />

for abscesses: a clinical comment.<br />

Radiology 1984; 151:342.<br />

5. Park JK, Kraus FC, Haaga JR. Fluid flow<br />

during percutaneous drainage procedures:<br />

an in vitro study <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> fluid<br />

viscosity, catheter size, <strong>and</strong> adjunctive<br />

urokinase. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:165–<br />

169.<br />

6. Han JK. Percutaneous abdominal abscess<br />

drainage. In: Han MC, Park JH, eds. Interventional<br />

radiology. Seoul, Korea: Ilchokak,<br />

1999; 707–714.<br />

7. Pfitzner J. Poiseuille <strong>and</strong> his law. Anaesthesia<br />

1976; 31:273–275.<br />

8. Frazini JB, Finnemore EJ, eds. Fluid mechanics<br />

with engineering applications. Appendix<br />

A. 9th ed. Boston, Mass: McGraw-<br />

Hill, 1997; 764–765.<br />

9. Moon HT, Lee YK, Han JK, Byun Y. A novel<br />

formulation for controlled release <strong>of</strong> heparin-DOCA<br />

conjugate dispersed as nanoparticles<br />

in polyurethane film. Biomaterials<br />

2001; 22:281–289.<br />

838 Radiology June 2003 Lee et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!