26.03.2015 Views

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

Clogging of Drainage Catheters: Quantitative and Longitudinal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radiology<br />

grees <strong>of</strong> catheter clogging between different<br />

catheters.<br />

We found a discrepancy between the<br />

curves generated by the fitting Equation<br />

(4) <strong>and</strong> those generated by the Poiseuille<br />

equation (Eq [2]). Furthermore, intracatheter<br />

pressure was found to be proportional<br />

to the square <strong>of</strong> the infusion rate<br />

<strong>and</strong> not to the infusion rate, as indicated<br />

by fitting Equation (4). This discrepancy<br />

might be attributed to technical factors<br />

or to the fact that the system is not modeled<br />

perfectly by the Poiseuille law. The<br />

reasons for these differences remain unknown,<br />

<strong>and</strong> further study is required.<br />

In summary, we propose a method for<br />

in vivo evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

a drainage catheter, which is based on<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> the Poiseuille law.<br />

With this method, the flow resistance <strong>of</strong><br />

a catheter can be determined quantitatively;<br />

thus, it <strong>of</strong>fers a means <strong>of</strong> quantifying<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> clogging or the anticlogging<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> drainage catheters. This<br />

method can be used for comparative <strong>and</strong><br />

longitudinal studies concerning the evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> drainage procedures or the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> new catheters.<br />

Practical application: By applying the<br />

noninvasive method used in this study,<br />

flow resistance through multiple drainage<br />

catheters can be compared over time<br />

in one animal, which provides quantitative<br />

information about the gradual obstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheters. This information<br />

is critical for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />

procedures or development <strong>of</strong> new catheters<br />

with anticlogging effects, such as<br />

those made with novel biomaterials <strong>and</strong><br />

drug-delivery systems. Furthermore, this<br />

method does not preclude analyses based<br />

Figure 5. Images show internal surfaces <strong>of</strong> drainage catheters after the catheters were withdrawn.<br />

(a) Stereomicroscopic image shows debris that plugs the catheter side holes <strong>and</strong> lumen,<br />

which were irrigated one time per day. (b) Scanning electron microscopic image shows a catheter<br />

that was irrigated two times per day. Note the irregular surface caused by the debris (D). (Original<br />

magnification, 170.)<br />

on weight or morphologic changes after<br />

the catheter is withdrawn.<br />

Acknowledgments: We thank Hyuk Jae<br />

Choi, Myoung Soo Kim, RT, <strong>and</strong> Hyun Jung<br />

Lee, RT, for their technical assistance in animal<br />

preparation. We are grateful to Myoung Jin<br />

Jang, PhD, for her help with the statistical<br />

analysis.<br />

References<br />

1. Haaga JR, Weinstein AJ. CT-guided percutaneous<br />

aspiration <strong>and</strong> drainage <strong>of</strong> abscesses.<br />

Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135:1187–<br />

1194.<br />

2. vanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT<br />

Jr. Percutaneous drainage <strong>of</strong> 250 abdominal<br />

abscesses <strong>and</strong> fluid collections. I. Results,<br />

failures, <strong>and</strong> complications. Radiology<br />

1984; 151:337–341.<br />

3. Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E, Ferrucci JT<br />

Jr. Percutaneous drainage <strong>of</strong> 250 abdominal<br />

abscesses <strong>and</strong> fluid collections. II. Current<br />

procedural concepts. Radiology 1984;<br />

151:343–347.<br />

4. Dawson SL, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr. Mucomyst<br />

for abscesses: a clinical comment.<br />

Radiology 1984; 151:342.<br />

5. Park JK, Kraus FC, Haaga JR. Fluid flow<br />

during percutaneous drainage procedures:<br />

an in vitro study <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> fluid<br />

viscosity, catheter size, <strong>and</strong> adjunctive<br />

urokinase. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:165–<br />

169.<br />

6. Han JK. Percutaneous abdominal abscess<br />

drainage. In: Han MC, Park JH, eds. Interventional<br />

radiology. Seoul, Korea: Ilchokak,<br />

1999; 707–714.<br />

7. Pfitzner J. Poiseuille <strong>and</strong> his law. Anaesthesia<br />

1976; 31:273–275.<br />

8. Frazini JB, Finnemore EJ, eds. Fluid mechanics<br />

with engineering applications. Appendix<br />

A. 9th ed. Boston, Mass: McGraw-<br />

Hill, 1997; 764–765.<br />

9. Moon HT, Lee YK, Han JK, Byun Y. A novel<br />

formulation for controlled release <strong>of</strong> heparin-DOCA<br />

conjugate dispersed as nanoparticles<br />

in polyurethane film. Biomaterials<br />

2001; 22:281–289.<br />

838 Radiology June 2003 Lee et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!