2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain
2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain
2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong><br />
No. 101<br />
JUNE <strong>2010</strong>
THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN Registered Charity No. 290185<br />
Officers:<br />
President: Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kim Bard (10)<br />
(Centre for the Study <strong>of</strong> Emotion, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Portsmouth, King Henry<br />
Building, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth,<br />
Hampshire, PO1 2DY)<br />
Hon. Secretary: Dr Sarah Elton (10)<br />
(Functional Morphology and Evolution Unit, Hull York<br />
Medical School, The University <strong>of</strong> York, Heslington,<br />
York, YO10 5DD)<br />
Hon. Treasurer Dr Gillian Brown (09)<br />
(School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews,<br />
St Mary’s College, South Street,<br />
St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9JP, UK)<br />
Membership Secretary: Dr Clare Cunningham (09)<br />
(Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, School <strong>of</strong> Social and<br />
Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Kydd<br />
Building (Level 5), Bell Street, Dundee, DD1 1HG)<br />
e-mail: membership@psgb.org<br />
Council Members:<br />
Ms K. Balolia (University College London) – Student Representative (09)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. H. Buchanan-Smith (Stirling) (08)<br />
Dr H. Chatterjee (University College, London) – Marketing Committee Convenor (09)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. R. Dunbar (Oxford University) (09)<br />
Dr A. Fletcher (University <strong>of</strong> Chester) (09)<br />
Dr R. Kendal (Durham) (10)<br />
Dr S. Koski (Cambridge) (10)<br />
Dr J. Lehmann (Roehampton) (10)<br />
Dr N. Newton-Fisher (Kent) (08)<br />
Dr V. Nijman (Oxford Brookes University) (09)<br />
Dr S. Pika (Manchester) (08)<br />
Dr K. Pullen (Paignton Zoo) – Book Review Editor (09)<br />
Dr C. Schwitzer (Bristol Zoo) (10)<br />
Dr S. Thorpe (Birmingham) (10)<br />
Convenors <strong>of</strong> Working Parties:<br />
Dr C. Harcourt (Dept <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Clinical Science, Leahurst, Chester High Road,<br />
Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK) - Convenor, Conservation Working Party<br />
Dr S. Hill (North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong>, Chester Zoo, Caughall Road,<br />
Upton-by-Chester, Chester, CH2 1LH) - Convenor, Captive Care Working Party<br />
Assistant Members <strong>of</strong> Council:<br />
Dr S. Evans (Du Mond Conservancy, c/o Monkey Jungle Inc., PO Box 246, Miami,<br />
Florida 33170, USA) - for US membership<br />
Dr T.C. Rae (Roehampton) - Editor, <strong>Primate</strong> Eye<br />
Mr C. Rosen MBE (IPPL) - Financial Advisor<br />
Dr A. Smith (Anglia Ruskin) – Meetings Officer<br />
Honorary Auditors: Messrs Morris & Co., Chester<br />
Subscription Rates:<br />
Annual subscription rates (send cheques and sterling drafts to the Treasurer):<br />
Full members and Associate members:<br />
Payment by Banker's Order £25.00<br />
Payment by cheque, postal order, cash, credit card £27.50<br />
Undergraduate and postgraduate student membership £15.00<br />
(Membership <strong>of</strong> P.S.G.B. includes <strong>Primate</strong> Eye and supplements)<br />
Institutions wishing to receive <strong>Primate</strong> Eye and supplements only:<br />
Annual subscription £30.00<br />
Overseas subscriptions may be paid at longer intervals by arrangement with the Treasurer
EDITORIAL<br />
This time last year, I commented on the media hoopla surrounding the<br />
announcement <strong>of</strong> Ida, the now-world-famous ‘missing link’ (or<br />
cercamonine adapid strepsirhine, as I suggested). A scientific response<br />
subsequently appeared; Seiffert et al. (Nature 461: 1118-1121, 2009)<br />
reported the discovery <strong>of</strong> a new African adapid (Afradapis longicristatus)<br />
similar to Darwinius (Ida’s genus); the authors showed convincingly that<br />
both <strong>of</strong> these Eocene genera belong to the strepsirhine side <strong>of</strong> the primate<br />
clade. Not surprisingly, this did not make the front page <strong>of</strong> every daily<br />
newspaper, nor did it generate any television news coverage. Thus, once<br />
again, the non-Nature-reading general public are left with the mental<br />
residue <strong>of</strong> misleading hyperbole without exposure to the more considered,<br />
analysis-driven research.<br />
Sadly, it would appear that the cycle is beginning again. Anderson et al.<br />
(<strong>2010</strong>) sparked a similar media feeding-frenzy with their recent paper<br />
entitled ‘Pan thanatology’.* The authors suggest that the behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />
captive chimpanzees during the period surrounding the death <strong>of</strong> a member<br />
<strong>of</strong> the troop bears similarities to the reactions <strong>of</strong> humans to the death <strong>of</strong> a<br />
relative. The new coverage, on the other hand, went straight to the<br />
conclusion that chimpanzees have a human-like understanding <strong>of</strong> death;<br />
they illustrated the story with an older photo, taken from National<br />
Geographic, showing an unrelated group <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees. As with the Ida<br />
debacle, the journal article raises legitimate scientific issues; the academic<br />
debate has already begun on the Current Biology website<br />
. The public-at-large, however, will<br />
almost necessarily be excluded from these discussions. As a result,<br />
‘conclusions’ reached entirely by the print and online media (‘Chimps<br />
grieve when faced with death’, as reported in the Independent newspaper)<br />
will be accepted as legitimate inferences. And, as with other media<br />
favourites like aquatic ape ‘theory’, it means I’ll have to spend an inordinate<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> my lecturing time have to ‘un-teach’ this to my students.<br />
There may not be a simple solution to this frankly unacceptable state <strong>of</strong><br />
affairs. We are increasingly urged by our institutions and granting agencies<br />
to make our work accessible to the general public. This brings us into<br />
contact with reporters, who are under pressure to deliver content that can be<br />
considered news (derived from the word ‘new’, implying an emphasis on<br />
novelty) and that will generate interest at a glance. There is little room for<br />
caveats, modifiers or conditions – as Ben Goldacre’s Guardian column<br />
continually points out, the media filtering process <strong>of</strong>ten results in<br />
simplifying to the point <strong>of</strong> deception. One colleague <strong>of</strong> mine provided<br />
ample information on a recent journal article to the print media, only to<br />
have the country in which the research took place misreported and to have<br />
his name attached to entirely made-up quotes. Another had hours <strong>of</strong><br />
1
interview videotaped, only for the editors to cut it in such a way as to<br />
suggest he was saying the opposite <strong>of</strong> what he actually said (and meant).<br />
Given these experiences, it is more important than ever to make sure that<br />
our statements to the press are as clear and precise as possible. Even if there<br />
is no guarantee that they will be reported that way.<br />
Complete reference to the original paper: James R. Anderson, Alasdair<br />
Gillies and Louise C. Lock (<strong>2010</strong>) Pan thanatology. Current Biology 20(8):<br />
R349-R351<br />
* I had to look it up, too.<br />
The articles and abstracts included in <strong>Primate</strong> Eye are not for citation or<br />
quotation without permission <strong>of</strong> the authors. The deadline for the next issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Primate</strong> Eye is 15th September <strong>2010</strong>. Items (manuscript or electronic in<br />
any standard format) for future issues should be sent to:<br />
Todd C. Rae<br />
Editor, <strong>Primate</strong> Eye<br />
Centre for Research in Evolutionary Anthropology<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Human and Life Sciences<br />
Whitelands College<br />
Roehampton University<br />
Holybourne Avenue<br />
London SW15 4JD<br />
Email: editor@psgb.org<br />
Tel: UK (0)20 8392 3726<br />
Fax: UK (0)20 8392 3527<br />
PSGB correspondence unrelated to <strong>Primate</strong> Eye should be addressed to the<br />
Hon. Secretary. Notification <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> address should be sent to the<br />
Membership Secretary.<br />
The PSGB WebSite can be found at <br />
2
REPORT: PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />
Social Cognition and Human Evolution<br />
7 th and 8 th April <strong>2010</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Dundee<br />
The University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Dundee hosted the Spring Meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> for the first time in its history. The<br />
conference took place on the 7 th and 8 th <strong>of</strong> April featuring typical Dundee<br />
Spring weather (sunny but cold). Successfully organised by Dr Clare<br />
Cunningham, the meeting consisted <strong>of</strong> 4 invited speakers, 18 pr<strong>of</strong>fered<br />
speakers, 14 poster presentations and a workshop.<br />
Following registration, Abertay Principal and Vice Chancellor Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Bernard King CBE addressed the delegates, welcoming them to the<br />
University. Clare Cunningham opened the conference and introduced the<br />
chair <strong>of</strong> this first session. Our first invited speaker <strong>of</strong> the conference was<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Carel Van Schaik from the University <strong>of</strong> Zürich. His talk<br />
concentrated on suggestions that the role <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeding extends<br />
the ‘expensive brain’ framework in human cognitive evolution. This was<br />
followed by talks on social network analysis as a tool to explore the social<br />
structure and cumulative culture in chimpanzees. Morning c<strong>of</strong>fee then gave<br />
us a chance to engage in some social networking <strong>of</strong> our own and the<br />
opportunity to browse the poster presentations.<br />
The second session, chaired by Sean O’Hara, consisted <strong>of</strong> talks based on<br />
social behaviour in the form <strong>of</strong> gestural repertoire in wild chimpanzees, non<br />
linguistic vocal behaviour in human infants and play back calls as a<br />
facilitator <strong>of</strong> increased social affiliation. Everyone then was directed back to<br />
the student centre for lunch (which was excellent), more browsing <strong>of</strong><br />
posters and further opportunity to catch up with colleagues and meet new<br />
members.<br />
Dr Susanne Shultz from the University <strong>of</strong> Oxford was the second invited<br />
speaker <strong>of</strong> the conference and was introduced by chair Sarah Elton.<br />
Susanne’s presentation discussed further evidence illustrating<br />
encephalisation across mammals as a result <strong>of</strong> social bonds and social<br />
stability. This led onto further presentations in the session based on<br />
anatomical and anthropological perspectives on social behaviour. The final<br />
session <strong>of</strong> the day was chaired by Hannah Buchanan-Smith. Invited speaker<br />
Dr James Anderson from the University <strong>of</strong> Stirling presented evidence from<br />
his many years <strong>of</strong> research, on primate self-awareness, empathy and<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> death. Within his talk a moving piece <strong>of</strong> film was shown<br />
capturing the moments <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> an old chimpanzee and the reaction <strong>of</strong><br />
others in the group. A wine reception concluded the first part <strong>of</strong> the spring<br />
conference.<br />
3
The evening entertainment in true Scottish tradition was a Céilidh at the<br />
Apex City Quay Hotel, which was a huge success and seemed to be enjoyed<br />
by all who attended. There was no escape for the faint-hearted; we danced,<br />
we drank and were merry!<br />
So, to return to serious business, day two kicked <strong>of</strong>f with a workshop hosted<br />
by Sarah Elton and Joanna Setchell on how to get published, which was<br />
extremely helpful and well worth the early start. Chairing the first session <strong>of</strong><br />
the day, Sonya Hill introduced invited speaker Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Thomas Bugnyar<br />
from the University <strong>of</strong> Vienna. Diverging from primatology, Thomas<br />
examined the role <strong>of</strong> social relationships in socio-cognitive abilities in<br />
ravens compared to primate social relationships; illustrating that ravens<br />
have the same relationship quality as chimpanzees. Continuing the ‘non<br />
primate’ topic the next talk was on forest elephants’ social arenas and<br />
ending the morning oral presentation session was a presentation providing<br />
evidence that social relationships affect choice <strong>of</strong> sleeping area in captive<br />
chimpanzees.<br />
After c<strong>of</strong>fee and a last chance to browse the posters on display, chair Scott<br />
Hardie introduced the last three speakers <strong>of</strong> the conference all based on<br />
anatomical perspectives on human evolution. The conference came to a<br />
close with the presentation <strong>of</strong> the student prizes for best oral presentation<br />
and best poster which were reported as being <strong>of</strong> extremely high standard<br />
and diverse in content. Steven Montgomery from the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Cambridge received the prize for best oral presentation covering the topic <strong>of</strong><br />
microcephaly genes and their role in primate brain evolution and Catherine<br />
Hobaiter from the University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews was runner-up presenting a<br />
comparative study <strong>of</strong> gestural repertoire between captive and wild<br />
chimpanzees. Cris Casar, also from the University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, won best<br />
student poster presentation on predator alarm calls in wild black fronted titi<br />
monkeys.<br />
On the whole the conference was a success thanks to the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Abertay and all who helped in the organisation. From a personal<br />
perspective, I specifically enjoyed James Anderson’s presentation, which<br />
had me captivated. Faye Clark’s talk on social network analysis was also<br />
very enjoyable being relevant to my own research. Emma Nelson’s talk on<br />
digit ratio as a predictor <strong>of</strong> social systems in fossil hominids and Catherine<br />
Hobaiter’s study were also ones that stood out for me. Clare has received<br />
nothing but praise for her hard work in putting together such an enjoyable<br />
conference. The only complaint made was too little time for discussion,<br />
reflecting the amount <strong>of</strong> good research to discuss. Not a bad complaint!<br />
Mairi McLeod<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />
4
REPORT: Pre-PSGB Spring Meeting Workshop<br />
Training <strong>Primate</strong>s for Cognitive Research, RZSS Edinburgh Zoo<br />
Before the PSGB Spring meeting began in Dundee, a small group <strong>of</strong><br />
workshop delegates met at the Royal Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Scotland’s<br />
Edinburgh Zoo. The workshop, hosted by staff <strong>of</strong> the Living Links to<br />
Human Evolution Research Centre and Budongo Trail, both zoo and<br />
academic, focussed on the establishment <strong>of</strong> cognitive research within a zoo<br />
setting.<br />
The day started with introductions from both Graham Catlow (RZSS<br />
Edinburgh Zoo) and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Hannah Buchanan-Smith (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling),<br />
both <strong>of</strong> whom highlighted the uniqueness within the UK <strong>of</strong> the<br />
collaboration between the zoo and academic institutions. Living Links was<br />
opened just two years ago, and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Andy Whiten (Director <strong>of</strong> Living<br />
Links, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews) highlighted how many research projects<br />
had already been conducted there. We were given a brief overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> the Living Links centre, which houses mixed-species<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> capuchin and squirrel monkeys, and the subsequent development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Budongo Trail chimpanzee exhibit by the zoo. We then had guided<br />
tours <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the facilities including to their especially designed research<br />
testing areas.<br />
In each building, tours were divided into small enough groups to allow<br />
demonstrations <strong>of</strong> the current work being undertaken. There was particular<br />
emphasis on how well-designed enclosures coupled with well-designed<br />
training programmes can facilitate the separation <strong>of</strong> animals for cognitive<br />
testing without compromising either the social group or the zoo’s animal<br />
welfare, breeding and conservation objectives. Each demonstration was<br />
accompanied by both zoo staff and researchers, giving the opportunity to<br />
discuss issues both from a zoo and a research point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
The afternoon consisted <strong>of</strong> talks from both researchers and keeping staff<br />
associated with the two facilities. It was good to see not only the enthusiasm<br />
<strong>of</strong> the researchers but how that has obviously spread to the zoo staff <strong>of</strong> both<br />
the facilities and the wider zoo. In addition Dr Mark Bowler’s talk<br />
highlighted the convergent needs <strong>of</strong> both a zoo and an academic situation:<br />
engaging the public. It also reminded us <strong>of</strong> the potential for additional<br />
funding available to achieve taking science to the public.<br />
The day was full <strong>of</strong> interest; it was very apparent that good collaboration<br />
can allow institutions with different objectives to achieve high quality<br />
research and to find a common ground in the education <strong>of</strong> the visiting<br />
public. Although Living Links is the only such dedicated research centre in<br />
the UK, it is refreshing to see that other collaborations between zoos and<br />
5
academic institutions are continuing to emerge (Southampton University<br />
and Marwell Wildlife; Exeter University and Paignton Zoo).<br />
Thanks to all those involved - managers, researchers and keepers - for a<br />
great day; lots <strong>of</strong> fun and an encouraging demonstration <strong>of</strong> the potentials<br />
possible with a strong collaboration.<br />
Kirsten Pullen<br />
Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust<br />
Jack Griffey (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling) and the staff <strong>of</strong> Living Links<br />
have trained capuchins using positive reinforcement to enter cubicles<br />
and perform visual preference tests (photo by Mark Bowler)<br />
Betsy Herrelko (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling) and the keepers <strong>of</strong> Budongo Trail<br />
have trained the chimpanzees to do touch screen tasks<br />
(photo by Kevin Flay)<br />
6
PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />
Social Cognition and Human Evolution<br />
April 7 th and 8 th<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />
Organised by:<br />
Clare Cunningham (University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee)<br />
Abstracts for oral presentations<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> brain size: benefits, costs and consequences<br />
C.P. van Schaik, J.M. Burkart and K. Isler<br />
Anthropological Institute & Museum, University <strong>of</strong> Zürich, Switzerland<br />
Among primates, brain size predicts cognitive performance. Thus, selection<br />
on intelligence is selection on brain size. However, brains are energetically<br />
very expensive, which implies that brain size increases must not only bring<br />
behavioural benefits, but must also be possible energetically. The<br />
"expensive brain" framework predicts that relatively large-brained animals<br />
either exhibit increased total energy flow or re-allocate energy from other<br />
expensive functions such as digestion or production (growth and<br />
reproduction). Extensive comparative tests support most <strong>of</strong> this framework.<br />
Particularly relevant is the effect <strong>of</strong> brain size on life history, leading to the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> the grey ceiling. The framework also predicts that cooperative<br />
breeding, through the energetic support to breeding females, reduces<br />
energetic constraints and thus allows for brain enlargement; this prediction<br />
is supported for altricial birds and mammals. We present evidence that the<br />
different psychology <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeders changes prosocial behaviour.<br />
We then use these results to speculate about the role <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeding<br />
in human cognitive evolution.<br />
From individual to community: using social network analysis to explore<br />
the social structure <strong>of</strong> captive chimpanzees<br />
F.E. Clark<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, Royal<br />
Veterinary College and Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London<br />
The social lives <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have captivated<br />
researchers for decades, from the pioneering field-work <strong>of</strong> Goodall, to more<br />
recent explorations <strong>of</strong> ‘chimpanzee politics’ in the zoo. However, research<br />
has traditionally focused on the behaviour <strong>of</strong> individuals, dyads or whole<br />
groups without considering how these interplay. Recent analytical advances<br />
7
now make it possible to quantify entire animal social networks, and ‘Social<br />
Network Analysis’ (SNA) techniques are ripe for the picking by<br />
‘chimpologists’, and indeed other primatologists. This study investigated<br />
the social structure <strong>of</strong> captive chimpanzees housed at Edinburgh Zoo, UK.<br />
Patterns <strong>of</strong> association and interaction among individuals were sampled<br />
using focal observations and scans <strong>of</strong> sub-groups (parties). Social network<br />
diagrams (sociograms) were produced from spatial association, and<br />
interaction data. Comparisons were made within and between networks, and<br />
cluster analysis was used to identify sub-grouping within networks. There<br />
were four main findings. (1) Matrix correlation tests showed that<br />
individuals preferred to associate and interact affiliatively with their<br />
maternal kin, and individuals spent time close to those with whom they had<br />
an affiliative bond. (2) Cluster analysis revealed significant sub-groups<br />
related to agonistic encounters, and parties frequently changed over time<br />
and space. (3) The community exhibited a low level <strong>of</strong> ‘fission-fusion’<br />
behaviour because parties frequently changed over time and space. (4) The<br />
dominant female held highly central positions in both affiliative and<br />
agonistic networks, and was pivotal to group cohesion. This study used<br />
SNA techniques to study chimpanzee social structure at a number <strong>of</strong> levels,<br />
from individual to community, and I encourage other researchers to use<br />
SNA in pure and applied contexts.<br />
Constraints on cumulative culture in chimpanzees<br />
L.G. Dean 1 , R.L. Kendal 2 and K.N. Laland 1<br />
1. School <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, Fife, U.K.<br />
2. Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, U.K.<br />
Most researchers agree that humans are the only species with cumulative<br />
culture. A number <strong>of</strong> hypotheses have been proposed to explain this<br />
difference, but few studies have explicitly tested them. Here we used a<br />
cumulative puzzle-box, which could be solved to gain three sequentially<br />
better rewards. We tested 76 chimpanzees in 8 groups with trained<br />
demonstrator seeded and unseeded open diffusion experiments. We also<br />
presented the puzzle-box to 35 children in 8 groups in unseeded open<br />
diffusion experiments. Of the 76 chimpanzees there were only four that<br />
learned to open the puzzle-box beyond the first, simplest, stage accessing<br />
only the least desirable food reward. In only one group did more than one<br />
chimpanzee learn to access the higher stages <strong>of</strong> the puzzle-box. In contrast,<br />
multiple children, both across and within groups, accessed the higher, more<br />
difficult, stages <strong>of</strong> the puzzle-box to access the more desirable sticker<br />
rewards. By analysing when and how animals manipulated the puzzle-box<br />
and learned to use it, we assess which hypotheses our data are consistent<br />
with. Accordingly we posit that a lack <strong>of</strong> imitation, teaching and<br />
cooperation in chimpanzees inhibits the evolution <strong>of</strong> cumulative culture.<br />
8
The case for a common gestural repertoire among great apes: evidence<br />
from the wild chimpanzees<br />
C. Hobaiter and R.W. Byrne<br />
Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish <strong>Primate</strong><br />
Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />
We compare and contrast the results from captive work on gestural<br />
communication in all great apes with observations from the first systematic<br />
study <strong>of</strong> gestural communication in wild chimpanzees, a 2-year study <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Sonso community in Budongo, Uganda. We describe the gestural repertoire<br />
<strong>of</strong> wild chimpanzees. Until recently, the acquisition <strong>of</strong> great ape gestures<br />
has been accepted to derive from ontogenetic ritualization, with<br />
communicative gestures shaped from effective actions by mutual<br />
conditioning between dyads <strong>of</strong> individuals. Biologically inherited gestures<br />
were considered to be a minor subset <strong>of</strong> gestures used inflexibly and<br />
without intention (Tomasello et al., 1985, 1994). This view has recently<br />
been challenged with data on gorilla gesture (Genty et al., 2009). Here we<br />
use evidence from wild chimpanzees, and a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />
great-ape literature, to propose an alternative model <strong>of</strong> flexible, intentional<br />
gestural communication in terms <strong>of</strong> species-typical chimpanzee gestures<br />
and a family-typical repertoire <strong>of</strong> great-ape gesture.<br />
Non-linguistic vocal behaviour in human infants (Homo sapiens):<br />
primatological perspective<br />
V.Kersken, J.C.Gomez and K. Zuberbühler<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />
In order to examine whether infants between the ages <strong>of</strong> 7 and 20months<br />
selectively produce certain non-linguistic vocalizations in specific contexts,<br />
we observed the vocal behaviour <strong>of</strong> 30 infants in one <strong>of</strong> their natural<br />
habitats – a nursery environment. We identified the contexts in which<br />
vocalization occurred and conducted an analysis <strong>of</strong> the acoustic features <strong>of</strong><br />
the vocalizations in five distinct contexts: protests, requests for food or<br />
actions, vocalizations co-occurring with declarative pointings, and<br />
accompanying acts <strong>of</strong> giving objects to others. A discriminant function<br />
analysis was conducted on different acoustic variables <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the 209<br />
calls and could correctly classify 56.8% <strong>of</strong> the call types. We conducted a<br />
Monte Carlo simulation and found that the model could classify<br />
significantly more cases correctly than a randomly generated data set (chi<br />
squared = 26.99, df = 1, p> .0001). The results suggest that prelinguistic<br />
infants do produce vocal behaviours selectively in certain contexts and that<br />
these classes <strong>of</strong> vocalizations might serve specific functions be. Although<br />
this is not a complete description <strong>of</strong> infant vocal behaviour, it nevertheless<br />
suggests some homogenous classes <strong>of</strong> non-linguistic vocalizations that are<br />
systematically related to their production context and therefore could<br />
9
function referentially in comparable way to the vocalizations <strong>of</strong> non-human<br />
primates. This consistency in production could provide caregivers with nonlinguistic<br />
referential clues to what the infant wants or needs.<br />
Can a social culture <strong>of</strong> increased affiliation be facilitated in captive<br />
monkeys through call playback?<br />
C.F.I. Watson, C.A. Caldwell and H.M. Buchanan-Smith<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
Empirical investigation <strong>of</strong> cultural transmission mechanisms has focused on<br />
culture conceived as discrete, group specific, non-species typical behaviour.<br />
Sapolsky (2006) proposed an alternative conception <strong>of</strong> culture as a set <strong>of</strong><br />
species typical behaviours performed to an atypical degree within particular<br />
groups, termed ‘social culture’. Changes towards a more pacific social<br />
culture have been recorded in wild baboons and similar shifts to a less<br />
aggressive culture have been observed after cross-species interaction in<br />
captive juvenile macaques. However, the transmission <strong>of</strong> social culture<br />
within species <strong>of</strong> nonhuman primates has not yet been experimentally<br />
investigated. We have previously demonstrated that spontaneous chirp<br />
vocalisations produced by captive marmosets are associated with an<br />
increase in the affiliative behaviour <strong>of</strong> nearby social groups through social<br />
contagion. The current study investigated whether a social culture <strong>of</strong><br />
increased affiliation could be artificially generated in social groups <strong>of</strong><br />
captive marmosets through the playback <strong>of</strong> conspecific chirp calls. We<br />
recorded the behaviour: before, during, and after 11 days <strong>of</strong> playback (3 hr<br />
per day) <strong>of</strong> 16 focal marmosets in the experimental condition (exposed to<br />
playback <strong>of</strong> pre-recorded chirp calls at an above average rate) and 16<br />
marmosets in the control condition (playback <strong>of</strong> recorded silence). A<br />
significant increase in the time spent performing affiliative behaviour by<br />
marmosets in the experimental condition during and following call<br />
playback, relative to before playback and to marmosets in the control group,<br />
would indicate a shift in social culture. We report the results <strong>of</strong> this<br />
experiment and discuss implications for mechanisms underlying social<br />
culture.<br />
What role do microcephaly genes play in primate brain evolution?<br />
S.H. Montgomery¹, I. Capellini 2 , C. Venditti 3 , R.A. Barton² and N.I. Mundy 1<br />
1. University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, 2. University <strong>of</strong> Durham, 3. University <strong>of</strong><br />
Reading<br />
Understanding the genetic basis <strong>of</strong> phenotypic change can aid our<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> what processes constrain or contribute to the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
a trait. Where evolution proceeds in parallel directions along independent<br />
lineages it can also help us to understand whether similar phenotypes are<br />
10
produced by similar genetic changes, and if not, help identify species<br />
specific adaptation. Genes linked to human microcephaly have received<br />
much attention as they have accelerated evolutionary rates along lineages<br />
leading to humans. However, the link between gene and brain evolution is<br />
disputed. We analyzed the molecular evolution <strong>of</strong> four genes associated<br />
with microcephaly (ASPM, CDK5RAP2, CENPJ, MCPH1) across 21<br />
primates representing all major clades <strong>of</strong> anthropoids. We show that all four<br />
loci have experienced positive selection across anthropoids. We found a<br />
relationship between CDK5RAP2 and absolute neonatal brain mass, and<br />
ASPM and absolute neonatal brain mass when a strong outlier, the<br />
marmoset, was removed. We also found evidence for a weak association <strong>of</strong><br />
ASPM and CDK5RAP2 and adult brain size. The stronger association <strong>of</strong><br />
ASPM and CDK5RAP2 evolution with neonatal brain size than adult brain<br />
size is consistent with a direct effect <strong>of</strong> these loci on neuronal proliferation,<br />
which is plausibly related to their cellular functions in mitotic spindle<br />
orientation. In contrast, we find no evidence linking CENPJ and MCPH1 to<br />
either neonatal or adult brain size evolution. These results suggest ASPM<br />
and CDK5RAP2 may have a conserved role in primate brain evolution.<br />
Evolutionary encephalisation is not a general phenomenon in<br />
mammals, but is common to socially bonded groups<br />
S. Shultz<br />
Institute for Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Oxford<br />
Across vertebrates, variation in total and relative brain size across mammals<br />
is marked, and is proposed to have a functional basis because brains are<br />
metabolically costly. Species should be expected to maximise the costbenefit<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> supporting costly tissues. A vast and expanding literature<br />
has identified associations between relative brain size amongst extant<br />
species and ecological and behavioural correlates including social<br />
characteristics, ecological flexibility, resilience, innovation, social learning,<br />
etc. However, a still unresolved question is how (and why) evolutionary<br />
trends in encephalisation vary across taxonomic groups. This is for two<br />
main reasons: 1) variation in extant species between and within groups is<br />
commonly accepted as a measure <strong>of</strong> evolutionary trends, and 2) evaluating<br />
allometric signals <strong>of</strong> encephalisation is notoriously contentious. In this talk,<br />
I will discuss the insights from and limitations <strong>of</strong> current approaches to<br />
estimating evolutionary encephalisation and propose a novel quantitative<br />
macroevolutionary approach. In contrast to the conventional approach <strong>of</strong><br />
evaluating variation in extant species, I evaluated changes in relative brain<br />
size within taxa as a function <strong>of</strong> first appearance dates. The results<br />
challenge the conventional assumption that encephalisation is a general<br />
trend within mammalian groups. For example some groups, such as<br />
ruminants, felids and insectivores show no evidence <strong>of</strong> directional selection<br />
11
for large brains. However, those groups characterized by strong<br />
encephalisation signals were also likely to show bonded, stable sociality<br />
amongst extant species. Some non-social groups, particularly amongst the<br />
carnivores, also showed strong evidence <strong>of</strong> encephalisation. These results<br />
finally are put into the context <strong>of</strong> conventional ecological and social<br />
explanations <strong>of</strong> brain size increase. I will also discuss encephalisation in<br />
primates versus other mammals.<br />
Clinal patterns <strong>of</strong> crani<strong>of</strong>acial morphology in baboons (Papio spp.): a<br />
geometric morphometric approach<br />
J. Dunn 1 , A.Cardini 2 and S. Elton 1<br />
1. Hull York Medical School, The University <strong>of</strong> Hull, 2. Museo di<br />
Paleobiologia e dell’Orto Botanico, Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia,<br />
Italy<br />
Clinal variation in morphology is found in several primate species, yet the<br />
ecological underpinning <strong>of</strong> these trends is unknown. Recent research on<br />
African monkeys has discovered a trend common to three disparate taxa.<br />
Blue monkeys, vervets and red colobus monkeys all exhibit a decreasing<br />
size cline from Central to East Africa. This raises the question which other<br />
species exhibit similarities in this clinal pattern and what can be learnt by<br />
comparing these patterns? The baboon has an extensive geographical range<br />
and exhibits subspecific diversity lending itself well to the exploration <strong>of</strong><br />
clinal variation. This study uses a trend surface analysis to visualise and<br />
quantify the clinal trend. Environmental factors <strong>of</strong> known significance in<br />
baboon ecology are included in a partial regression along with spatial terms<br />
allowing the effects <strong>of</strong> the two factors to be quantified. The morphological<br />
cline is separated into its allometric and nonallometric components. Size is<br />
found to decrease from Central to East Africa in baboons as with red<br />
colobus, vervets, and blue monkeys. Comparing allometrically and<br />
nonallometrically controlled clines reveals that most <strong>of</strong> the observed<br />
morphological diversity in baboons is the result <strong>of</strong> size only. Taxa<br />
considered outliers in size, such as the Kinda baboon, cease to be such when<br />
allometry is controlled for. However, some clinal patterning remains but<br />
along a north-south axis and is perhaps indicative <strong>of</strong> a more ancient<br />
diversification in morphology. These observations should aid further<br />
research on determining the mechanisms underpinning clinal variation.<br />
Ecological and life history considerations related size are discussed.<br />
12
Application <strong>of</strong> the comparative method in reconstructing extinct<br />
primate social behaviour<br />
K. Balolia<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, University College London<br />
The comparative method has had some application to date in reconstructing<br />
the social behaviour <strong>of</strong> extinct primates, in that many researchers have used<br />
observed level <strong>of</strong> skeletal dimorphism in extant primates to make inferences<br />
about mating systems <strong>of</strong> extinct taxa. However, in this context, the<br />
comparative method is limited in its application to the reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />
primate social behaviour in that dimorphism alone is not able to distinguish<br />
between specific types <strong>of</strong> mating behaviour (Plavcan, 2000; J Hum Evol 39,<br />
327-344).<br />
A new approach to the study <strong>of</strong> extinct hominin social behaviour by<br />
Lockwood et al. (2007; Science 318, 1443-1446) showed that Paranthropus<br />
robustus males underwent extended development into adulthood and<br />
matured later than females to attain a high level <strong>of</strong> cranial dimorphism. In<br />
taking this approach, they provided new scope for considering the<br />
relationship between social behaviour and morphology using a comparative<br />
framework. Through measuring overall levels <strong>of</strong> sexual dimorphism<br />
combined with size and shape changes in the adult skull <strong>of</strong> Pan, Gorilla,<br />
Pongo, Hylobates and Papio, I show how this approach, in conjunction with<br />
methodological advances in quantifying cranial morphology, can be used to<br />
investigate the relationship between morphology and intrasexual<br />
relationships in primates. In addition to males showing prolonged growth to<br />
attain full adult size, I consider the suggestion that cranial size and shape<br />
changes occur, which relate to social dominance, both in males and in<br />
females. Associated implications for future attempts to reconstruct extinct<br />
primate social organisation using a comparative framework are discussed.<br />
Digit ratios and social systems in fossil hominids<br />
E. Nelson<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />
Social systems underpin many aspects <strong>of</strong> primate behaviour and predicting<br />
the social systems <strong>of</strong> extinct hominids (great apes) is critical for<br />
understanding human palaeobiology, as well as social and cognitive<br />
evolution. However, predicting social systems from fossils is problematic<br />
due to difficulties in estimating body size dimorphism from fragmentary<br />
remains and, in hominins, low canine size dimorphism. Recent studies have<br />
shown that the second-to-fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D), a putative<br />
biomarker for prenatal androgen effects, co-varies with social systems<br />
across haplorrhines; polygynous species have significantly lower 2D:4D<br />
ratios (high prenatal androgen effects) than pair-bonded species. This study<br />
13
uses proximal phalanx ratios from extant apes and discriminant function<br />
analysis to predict the social systems from the fossilised hand bone ratios <strong>of</strong><br />
five extinct hominids and one early anatomically modern human. The<br />
method predicts polygynous social systems for the early apes<br />
Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Hispanopithecus laietanus, and supports a<br />
proposed pair-bonded social system for Australopithecus afarensis, but not<br />
for Ardipithecus ramidus. Evidence also suggests that the social systems <strong>of</strong><br />
Neanderthals and early modern humans may have been similar and could<br />
have been characterised by higher levels <strong>of</strong> competition than evident in<br />
most contemporary human societies. Small fossil sample sizes and<br />
taphonomic factors preclude drawing firm conclusions using this method<br />
but, as more fossil hand bones become available, digit ratios could<br />
supplement current techniques used for predicting the social systems <strong>of</strong><br />
fossil hominids.<br />
Public Engagement with Science at the Living Links to Human<br />
Evolution Research Centre<br />
M. Bowler¹, H. Buchanan-Smith² and A. Whiten¹<br />
1. School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, 2. Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
‘Public Engagement with Science’ (PES) is a hot topic for Universities and<br />
researchers. It is becoming an important or essential component in attracting<br />
funding and assessing ‘impact’ and there are calls for PES to be<br />
incorporated into the mission statements <strong>of</strong> UK Universities. Living Links<br />
is a university research centre built with PES as one <strong>of</strong> its primary goals.<br />
Situated within Edinburgh Zoo it has already received hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> visitors, many <strong>of</strong> whom have witnessed live cognitive research<br />
in action. We describe the development <strong>of</strong> the visitor experience at Living<br />
Links in terms <strong>of</strong> activities and interpretive displays and discuss our efforts<br />
to maximise and measure the impact <strong>of</strong> our engagement activities.<br />
<strong>Primate</strong> “I”<br />
J.R. Anderson<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
What is the nature <strong>of</strong> nonhuman primates’ sense <strong>of</strong> self? Are there<br />
differences among species in the capacity to become the object <strong>of</strong> one’s<br />
own awareness? These questions have occupied comparative psychologists<br />
for the past three decades, with no lack <strong>of</strong> controversy. The study <strong>of</strong> selfrecognition<br />
has given rise to many claims and counterclaims regarding not<br />
only the use <strong>of</strong> reflections for mirror-guided self- or environment-directed<br />
behaviour, but also the cognitive implications <strong>of</strong> these abilities. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
this work will be reviewed, with additional discussion <strong>of</strong> two phenomena<br />
14
that might illustrate cognitive differences across species, namely empathy<br />
and awareness <strong>of</strong> death.<br />
What is personality and how can we study it in primates?<br />
J. Uher<br />
Free University Berlin, Germany<br />
Primatologists are increasingly interested in personality differences in<br />
nonhuman primates. Yet definitions and concepts are <strong>of</strong>ten vague and<br />
suitable methods <strong>of</strong> their measurement and analyses not well known. I<br />
introduce basic meta-theoretical concepts underlying the various theoretical<br />
concepts commonly used in the field. I clarify that differences in personality<br />
or temperament denote variations <strong>of</strong> individual-specific patterns in<br />
behaviour and mind. Methodological difficulties arise because individualspecific<br />
patterns are always masked by considerable random or ephemeral<br />
variations that derive from behavioural flexibility, ephemeral environmental<br />
conditions, and measurement error. Therefore, their empirical identification<br />
requires specific methodologies and analytical perspectives that are<br />
fundamentally different from those <strong>of</strong> other areas <strong>of</strong> behavioural<br />
primatology. I introduce two principal perspectives that allow exploring<br />
behavioural data for meaningful individual differences. The variablecentred<br />
perspective focuses on population-level phenomena and studies<br />
between-individual differences; the individual-centred perspective focuses<br />
on individual-level phenomena and studies the single individual’s unique<br />
configuration <strong>of</strong> behavioural patterns and their deviations relative to those<br />
<strong>of</strong> the other individuals in the population. These two perspectives also allow<br />
exploring the puzzling finding that the individuals’ patterns <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
and mind are <strong>of</strong>ten only moderately consistent across different situational<br />
contexts. Finally, I critically discuss the utility <strong>of</strong> observer ratings that have<br />
become more popular among animal researchers. I highlight that the<br />
apparent advantages <strong>of</strong> observer judgments, such as higher correlations<br />
among measurement variables or across situations, may derive from biased<br />
perceptions and ascriptions <strong>of</strong> human observers that need not accurately<br />
reflect the behavioural reality <strong>of</strong> primate individuals.<br />
Enriching the individual: Can personality predict response to<br />
enrichment in primates?<br />
K. Knight 1,2,4 , S. Robinson 2 , K. Stubbs 2 , A. Stacey 3 and V. Melfi 1,2,3,4<br />
1. Newquay Zoo, 2. University <strong>of</strong> Exeter, 3. University <strong>of</strong> Plymouth,<br />
4. Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust<br />
Individual differences in personality, whether defined as differences in<br />
‘temperament’, ‘coping style’ or ‘behavioural traits’, have been studied in<br />
great detail in humans, and there has been a recent increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
15
animal personality studies. Many <strong>of</strong> these studies have found evidence for<br />
fixed personality types in a wide range <strong>of</strong> taxa including non-human<br />
primates (NHP). We would expect that these differences in personality may<br />
affect other variables such as an animal’s use <strong>of</strong> environmental enrichment<br />
items (EE). This study looked at personality and enrichment use in Sulawesi<br />
crested black macaques (Macaca nigra). Subjects were 12 (6.6.0) M. nigra,<br />
housed at Paignton Zoo Environmental Park. Personality data were<br />
collected through keeper questionnaires. Broad state behaviours and<br />
enclosure use were recorded using instantaneous scan sampling every<br />
30mins, from 0800-1700 for 6 days for each condition. Six conditions were<br />
presented to the macaques: baseline (no enrichment), food in cages, kongs,<br />
food in bags, egg boxes and herb paste. Factor analysis were used to explore<br />
the data collected and revealed that M. nigra have a 3 factor model <strong>of</strong><br />
personality. The factors were labeled ‘Extroversion’, ‘Dominance’ and<br />
‘Sociability’. Regression analysis was used to see if individual scores on<br />
these personality factors could predict behavioural responses to EE. Results<br />
showed that the ‘Extroversion’ and ‘Dominance’ Factors could significantly<br />
predict the response <strong>of</strong> individuals to EE, in two <strong>of</strong> the five EE conditions;<br />
Kongs (R2= 0.75, F3,11 = 8.079, p
Exploring social arenas for forest elephants<br />
V. Fishlock and P. Lee<br />
Psychology Department, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
African savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana africana) have complex,<br />
well-studied social lives with stable multi-female groups and gregarious but<br />
independent males. Individuals live in an intricate social landscape, in<br />
which associations may persist for decades. In contrast, relatively little is<br />
known <strong>of</strong> social dynamics in forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis)<br />
inhabiting the Congo basin and no model <strong>of</strong> sociality has been empirically<br />
demonstrated. Social systems represent the outcomes <strong>of</strong> dynamic<br />
interactions among an individual, its conspecifics and its environment. Thus<br />
our lack <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> forest elephant sociality limits our<br />
understanding both <strong>of</strong> their environmental requirements and important<br />
drivers in the evolution <strong>of</strong> elephant social systems. Direct observations <strong>of</strong><br />
forest elephants were made at forest clearings, and these data are used to<br />
address questions <strong>of</strong> social dynamics. Clearings represent a special<br />
environment, providing mineral and food resources, as well as potential<br />
social opportunities and possible predation risks. They are hypothesised to<br />
function as social arenas for the individuals that use them, but traditional<br />
methods <strong>of</strong> analysing or describing social structure fail due to the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
fixed point observations and relatively low identification rates. The advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> accessible network analyses, as have been successfully applied to<br />
cetacean and primate societies, provides an alternative approach to model<br />
and explore the nature <strong>of</strong> forest elephant society and evaluate the role <strong>of</strong><br />
clearings as social arenas. We couple the use <strong>of</strong> network analyses with an<br />
age-sex class approach, to explore our forest clearing data.<br />
Daytime associations, kinship, and preferred sleeping areas: their<br />
influence on sleep site selection in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)<br />
L. Lock<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
The study <strong>of</strong> non-human primates’ behaviour has traditionally been biased<br />
toward daytime activities, despite the fact that resting and sleep can account<br />
for up half <strong>of</strong> primate’s life spans. Most primates are gregarious, and so<br />
their social behaviours and relationships have been well studied, but the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> these behaviours and relationships on sleep-related activities have<br />
not received comparable levels <strong>of</strong> empirical investigation. Over 30 days, we<br />
recorded the daytime associations <strong>of</strong> a small group <strong>of</strong> zoo-housed<br />
chimpanzees, and the areas <strong>of</strong> the enclosure they subsequently retired to.<br />
The data showed that male chimpanzees that associate frequently during<br />
daytime also retired to the same area to sleep, especially the highest-ranking<br />
males. We also found that sleep site selection was not strongly dependent<br />
on the presence <strong>of</strong> kin. Our data also suggest that chimpanzees habitually<br />
17
eturn to the same sleeping areas; there are even preferred sleeping locations<br />
within the enclosure. There is a general need for more systematic studies<br />
into sleep-related behaviours <strong>of</strong> captive primates. Research into social<br />
aspects that influence sleep site selection, and group and individual<br />
preferences for sleeping sites might also have implications for enclosure<br />
design and welfare <strong>of</strong> captive primates<br />
The socioecological adaptive basis <strong>of</strong> primate mosaic brain evolution<br />
J. B. Smaers<br />
University College London and University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />
Neocortex hyperscaling in primates is commonly interpreted as the prime<br />
factor behind brain enlargement and as a main factor underlying primate<br />
‘higher’ cognition. Hypotheses attempting to clarify neocortical adaptation<br />
are thus fundamental to the study <strong>of</strong> primate cognitive evolution. In this<br />
context, it has been debated whether social or ecological factors are the<br />
main driving force behind brain adaptation. Although these hypotheses<br />
make specific predictions about subregions <strong>of</strong> the neocortex, they have been<br />
tested using the neocortex as a whole because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> data. In our recent<br />
work we presented new data on frontal and non-frontal neocortical lobe and<br />
neocerebellum. We show that distinct cortico-cerebellar neural circuits<br />
related to distinct aspects <strong>of</strong> learned behaviour can be recognized as<br />
important mosaic patterns <strong>of</strong> a concerted brain structure evolution across the<br />
primate clade. We also indicate that although both social and ecological<br />
variables are associated to size changes in whole neocortex volume, social<br />
variables are solely responsible for the evolution <strong>of</strong> frontal lobe size, while<br />
ecological factors explain the evolution <strong>of</strong> non-frontal lobe size. We<br />
propose a new model <strong>of</strong> primate brain evolution emphasizing the mosaic<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> neural circuits <strong>of</strong> interconnected brain structures and<br />
integrating both social and ecological selective pressures driving brain<br />
evolution. Our results help clarify a longstanding debate on the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
primate neocortical adaptation and demonstrate that primate brain<br />
architecture reflects adaptation at an intracortical neuroanatomical level.<br />
The neuro-anatomy <strong>of</strong> the face processing area in chimpanzees and<br />
humans.<br />
S. A. Chance 1 , E. K. Sawyer 1 , P. R. H<strong>of</strong> 2 and T. J. Crow 3<br />
1. Neuropathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford<br />
2. Department <strong>of</strong> Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New<br />
York, USA<br />
3. SANE POWIC Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />
Face recognition provides important social cues in primates. Multiple<br />
studies report that faces are processed on the right side <strong>of</strong> the brain in<br />
18
humans and such brain asymmetries may be a key component <strong>of</strong> human<br />
evolution. However, it is not clear how asymmetrical structures and<br />
functions are linked. One hypothesis for leftward language lateralization in<br />
Wernicke’s area is based on the asymmetry <strong>of</strong> vertical units <strong>of</strong> cells<br />
(minicolumns) in the cerebral cortex, where minicolumns are wider in the<br />
left hemisphere in humans but symmetrical in non-human primates. It is not<br />
known whether there is a similar species difference in the face processing<br />
region, the fusiform cortex. We investigated the fusiform <strong>of</strong> 14 human and<br />
14 chimpanzee post-mortem brains for species differences in minicolumn<br />
and cell size symmetry. Minicolumn spacing and neuron size were<br />
asymetrical* in humans (wider and larger on the left, respectively), but<br />
symmetrical* in chimpanzees (species differences p
Abstracts for poster presentations<br />
Vocal communication in captive ruffed lemurs.<br />
L. Rudge 1,2 , N. Laici 1,2 , B.M. Bezerra 1 , C. Schwitzer 2 and G. Jones 1<br />
1. School <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />
2. Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, Bristol Zoo Gardens<br />
Species and subspecies differences in vocalisations have proved to be useful<br />
for taxonomic classification. There has been an ongoing debate regarding<br />
the taxonomic status <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs due to their possibly overlapping<br />
distributions in eastern Madagascar. Early classification inferred that there<br />
were two subspecies <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs – the red ruffed lemur (Varecia<br />
variegata rubra) and the black-and-white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata<br />
variegata). After further research, both former subspecies were elevated to<br />
species status, with most authors recognising three subspecies <strong>of</strong> the blackand-white<br />
ruffed lemur (V. variegata variegata, V. v. subcincta and V. v.<br />
editorum). We studied the vocal behaviour <strong>of</strong> the red ruffed lemur (Varecia<br />
rubra). Furthermore, we investigated whether the red ruffed lemur could be<br />
discriminated from two subspecies <strong>of</strong> black-and-white ruffed lemur,<br />
Varecia variegata variegata and V. v. editorum, from their conspicuous<br />
loud calls. We recorded naturally occurring calls <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs at Bristol<br />
Zoo Gardens, Dudley Zoo and Twycross Zoo (United Kingdom). Seven out<br />
<strong>of</strong> 13 calls described in the vocal repertoire <strong>of</strong> the red ruffed lemur were<br />
observed in our study animals. There were significant differences in the<br />
physical structure <strong>of</strong> the ‘pulsed squawk’ loud call between V. rubra and the<br />
two V. variegata subspecies, supporting the current taxonomic classification<br />
<strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs. Our results show that bioacoustics can be used efficiently<br />
as a taxonomic tool to discriminate between lemur taxa.<br />
Preliminary investigation <strong>of</strong> social integration and social success in<br />
captive female capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)<br />
M. McLeod, C.L. Cunningham and S. Hardie<br />
Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s are intensely social, spending much <strong>of</strong> their time engaged in<br />
interactions with others. Social investment in other group members can be<br />
beneficial; individuals can secure future reciprocity and reduce stress. How<br />
individuals manage their social investment will depend on both intrinsic and<br />
extrinsic factors, both <strong>of</strong> which will influence the opportunities available for<br />
interacting with others. Being well integrated (or central) in the group,<br />
rather than on the periphery and <strong>of</strong>ten alone, will afford greater social<br />
prospects and so animals should work to improve their level <strong>of</strong> integration<br />
and show detriments in behaviour (and health) if they are not able to spend<br />
time with conspecifics. This study is a preliminary investigation into social<br />
20
integration as a promoter <strong>of</strong> social success (support), measured by level <strong>of</strong><br />
integration in the group and level <strong>of</strong> stress exhibited. Female capuchins (n =<br />
6) are members <strong>of</strong> two separate (East and West) but environmentally similar<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> captive female capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) housed at the<br />
Living Links to Human Evolution research centre at Edinburgh Zoo.<br />
Behaviour such as grooming (given and received), time spent alone or with<br />
group members, dominance and scratching (as a measure <strong>of</strong> stress) were<br />
documented by both scan and focal methods. Social integration was<br />
calculated by mean time spent alone or with others. Statistical analysis<br />
revealed significance between level <strong>of</strong> integration and the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
time spent grooming others. All other analyses were non-significant;<br />
however, mean amounts <strong>of</strong> scratching were lower when percentage <strong>of</strong> time<br />
spent grooming was higher; also level <strong>of</strong> social integration illustrated some<br />
relevance to rank position and amount <strong>of</strong> time spent grooming. To<br />
conclude, this suggests that grooming is a commodity traded for a central<br />
position in the group, to reduce stress, as well as to maintain rank position.<br />
Bonobos (Pan paniscus) use copulation calls as a social signal<br />
Z. Clay and K. Zuberbühler<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />
Females <strong>of</strong> many primate species produce distinct vocalisations known as<br />
‘copulation calls’ during mating events. Typically, copulation calls are<br />
produced during heterosexual matings and thus their adaptive significance<br />
is considered to be for promoting reproductive success. However, in<br />
bonobos (Pan paniscus), females regularly engage in homosexual as well as<br />
heterosexual matings and produce copulation calls in both contexts. The<br />
way in which copulation calls have become detached from their biological<br />
function in bonobos challenges theories explaining these calls as purely<br />
reproductive strategies. In the current study, we examined bonobo<br />
copulation calling behaviour to investigate how females use these<br />
vocalisations as tools to pursue certain social and reproductive goals. We<br />
recorded copulation calls produced by mature females at Lola Ya Bonobo<br />
Sanctuary, DRC, during both homosexual and heterosexual interactions.<br />
Acoustic analyses revealed considerable similarity in the acoustic structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> copulation calls produced in both contexts. Furthermore, whilst females<br />
called more during heterosexual copulations, we found that copulation calls<br />
were used similarly in both contexts. For both homo- and heterosexual<br />
copulation calls, we observed strong effects <strong>of</strong> relative dominance rank,<br />
with low-rank females calling more with higher-ranked partners. In<br />
homosexual matings, the identity <strong>of</strong> the initiator also predicted calling. Our<br />
results suggest that bonobos use copulation calls as social signals to express<br />
social status and to advertise bonding relationships. Thus, rather than being<br />
restricted to purely reproductive contexts, copulation calls in bonobos<br />
appear to have assumed a greater social significance.<br />
21
Social monitoring by reputation: How to compare human and animals<br />
in an evolutionary framework?<br />
Y.I. Russell<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Social and Cultural Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />
Reputation is usually defined as an entirely human construct. This is<br />
because the majority <strong>of</strong> studies in human disciplines (economics,<br />
commerce, psychology, etc.) define reputation as a sort <strong>of</strong> one-dimensional<br />
yardstick whereupon the same information is accessible to everyone. This<br />
definition is <strong>of</strong> limited usefulness to animal studies because it requires<br />
language ability and ubiquitous sources <strong>of</strong> public information. The exact<br />
psychological processes that underlay social reputation monitoring are<br />
poorly understood even in humans. In order to begin a comparative study <strong>of</strong><br />
human and animal reputation monitoring, “reputation” should be redefined<br />
in a way that accommodates all animals. Here, I present a framework for<br />
investigating the evolution <strong>of</strong> social monitoring abilities across all animal<br />
taxa. I define reputation as “knowledge about an individual’s typical<br />
behaviour, based on a knowledge <strong>of</strong> that individual’s past behaviour”<br />
(Russell, 2007). The psychological process <strong>of</strong> reputation monitoring should<br />
be dissected into its constituent parts in order to compare the abilities<br />
between animals in a componential way (this approach is similar to<br />
Hockett’s design features approach to language). Most organisms are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> some form <strong>of</strong> social eavesdropping and intention reading, but the<br />
smallest brained animals are unlikely to cogitate much on the personalities<br />
<strong>of</strong> their conspecifics. At the human end <strong>of</strong> the continuum, social reputation<br />
monitoring probably involves a type <strong>of</strong> social expertise. It is important to be<br />
aware, however, that human social expertise will necessarily involve a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> memory distortions, affected by highly emotional events, schema<br />
effects, primacy, and recency.<br />
Emotional laterality - the influence <strong>of</strong> emotion upon visual field<br />
preferences<br />
A. Milligan<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
Emotional lateralisation may influence motor lateralisation, and may<br />
therefore have played a significant role in the evolution <strong>of</strong> social signals in<br />
both humans and non-human animals. The ‘affective state’ <strong>of</strong> animals has<br />
been shown to exert influence upon functional lateralisation in species from<br />
five classes <strong>of</strong> vertebrates with studies observing strong lateral biases during<br />
particular social interactions. However, the association between specific<br />
emotions and social interactions may be more complex than previously<br />
thought. Almost all <strong>of</strong> these studies focused upon scenarios <strong>of</strong> negative<br />
emotion such as fear or aggression, and in each case visual field preferences<br />
were identified as suitable indicators <strong>of</strong> lateral preference whereby subjects<br />
22
consistently observed conspecifics with the same eye. There exist two<br />
competing theories that posit the lateralisation <strong>of</strong> emotion within the brain:<br />
one suggests right-hemisphere dominance in the interpretation and<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> all affective states (Campbell, 1982), whilst the other<br />
contends that the right hemisphere is responsible for negative emotion alone<br />
whereas positive emotion is regulated by the left hemisphere (the Valence<br />
Hypothesis; Davidson, 1992) but the almost exclusive investigation <strong>of</strong><br />
aggressive/fearful scenarios prevents objective evaluation <strong>of</strong> these<br />
competing theories. This study addresses the problem by considering<br />
interactions across the full spectrum <strong>of</strong> emotion, testing both theories whilst<br />
also considering whether the strength <strong>of</strong> emotional intensity can be<br />
correlated to lateral bias, and whether age-sex effects exist.<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> vigilance periods in gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) social play<br />
J.A. Mayhew and J.C. Gómez<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />
Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) play bouts are complex and dynamic social<br />
interactions that incorporate locomotory movements and behaviours from<br />
outside social contexts such as aggression or predation. Such diverse bouts<br />
are typically punctuated with intermittent periods where the close physical<br />
activity between the interacting individuals seems to momentarily conclude.<br />
During these cessations, or “vigilance periods”, the play partners may break<br />
contact and give pause to their physical interaction, may readjust their body<br />
positioning, move in or out <strong>of</strong> proximity from their partner, or they may<br />
transition from one type <strong>of</strong> generalized play pattern to another. This study<br />
presents a preliminary examination <strong>of</strong> the structure and composition <strong>of</strong><br />
vigilance periods taking into account several variables including eye gaze,<br />
head orientation, body orientation and posturing <strong>of</strong> the interacting<br />
individuals. Specific organization <strong>of</strong> these subtle social cues may be<br />
essential for initiating, maintaining, and terminating play and may also shed<br />
light on the advantages and preferences <strong>of</strong> using certain social cues over<br />
others. During vigilance periods, young gorillas might learn about the social<br />
cues that signal attention and intention in others as well as in themselves<br />
and an investigation <strong>of</strong> these periods can be useful in further exploring what<br />
social cognitive functions social play may have for young gorillas.<br />
Can hand and footpad morphology distinguish slow loris taxa?<br />
C. J. Wheeler, R.A. Munds and K.A I. Nekaris<br />
Nocturnal <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences and Law,<br />
Oxford Brookes University<br />
Once considered a widespread homogeneous taxon, a minimum <strong>of</strong> five<br />
species <strong>of</strong> slow loris (Nycticebus) are now recognised based on genetic,<br />
23
morphological and behavioural data. Characteristics such as pelage, body<br />
size, and reproductive parameters indicate further variability, but logistical<br />
difficulties preclude their study throughout much <strong>of</strong> their range. Museum<br />
specimens thus <strong>of</strong>fer an insight into their diversity. In particular, hand and<br />
foot pad morphology has been used to identify species <strong>of</strong> galago, tarsier and<br />
lemur. For lorises in particular, that rely to varying degrees on grasping <strong>of</strong><br />
large trunks to engage in exudativory, hands and feet may show distinctive<br />
characters. Here, we quantitatively describe the palmar and plantar surface<br />
morphology <strong>of</strong> 142 loris specimens from five zoological collections. We<br />
took digital photographs <strong>of</strong> the palmar and plantar surfaces; we<br />
subsequently performed comparative scaling and both qualitative and<br />
quantitative investigation using imaging s<strong>of</strong>tware. We used SPSS to analyse<br />
the resultant data. All lorises displayed six palmar and plantar pads,<br />
although in some specimens, pads 1 and 6 merged. Discriminant function<br />
analyses grouped between 3 and 9 taxa based on palmar and plantar<br />
morphology, with pads 1, 4, and 5 usefully distinguishing groups. These<br />
taxonomic designations support recent studies, and provide evidence for 2-3<br />
taxa on the island <strong>of</strong> Borneo. Pad measurements were log transformed to<br />
compare across the variably-sized taxa. Preliminary analyses reveal that<br />
hand pads tend to be larger in taxa currently known to exploit more gum,<br />
potentially providing them with more surface area grip on vertical surfaces.<br />
What factors determine successful reintroductions? A slow loris case<br />
study<br />
A.L. Doughty, R.S. Moore and K.A.I. Nekaris<br />
Nocturnal <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences and Law,<br />
Oxford Brookes University<br />
Slow lorises are amongst the most widely traded primates in Southeast Asia,<br />
popular with consumers as both medicine and pets. In Indonesia, more than<br />
100 animals are regularly confiscated each month, and the need for<br />
reintroducing these wild-born yet highly endangered primates is becoming<br />
vital. In October 2009, we began the first large-scale systematic slow loris<br />
restocking project in Ciapus, Mt Salak, Indonesia. Previous slow loris<br />
reintroductions have failed due to: lack <strong>of</strong> funding; no pre- or post-release<br />
monitoring; death due to starvation and hypothermia; predation; and release<br />
<strong>of</strong> species into the wrong geographic areas. As one means to determine how<br />
to avoid such problems for the current project, we systematically analysed<br />
eight categories regarding success or failure <strong>of</strong> 52 reintroduction projects,<br />
reported in the same format to the IUCN Reintroduction Specialists Group<br />
(IRSG) in 2008. We entered ordinal and categorical data for six higher<br />
taxonomic groupings <strong>of</strong> 48 species <strong>of</strong> reintroduced animals into SPSS.<br />
Success rate differed significantly (2=19.2, df=3, p
enclosures (81% <strong>of</strong> studies) and long-term post-release monitoring (77% <strong>of</strong><br />
studies) were deemed as contributing to a project’s success, whereas lack <strong>of</strong><br />
local community support (43%) and lack <strong>of</strong> specialised skills and<br />
knowledge (38%) contributed notably to projects’ failures. These data<br />
strongly support the use <strong>of</strong> the IRSG’s guidelines, which have been too<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten ignored in the case <strong>of</strong> slow lorises, as good practice.<br />
Grooming reciprocity and kinship in captive lion tailed macaques<br />
(Macaca silenus)<br />
F.R. Moore 1 , C. Cunningham 1 and M. Kingston Jones 2<br />
1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee, 2. Howletts Wild<br />
Animal Park, Bekesbourne, Canterbury<br />
We investigated grooming reciprocity in relation to within-dyad relatedness<br />
in a group <strong>of</strong> captive Macaca silenus. We predicted an inverse relationship<br />
between within-dyad relatedness and time-matching <strong>of</strong> grooming bouts, as<br />
grooming kin has indirect fitness benefits for the individual. We also<br />
predicted that high ranking individuals would receive more, and contribute<br />
less, grooming and that there would be an inverse relationship between<br />
time-matching <strong>of</strong> reciprocal bouts and within-dyad dominance rank<br />
distance. Subjects were a captive group <strong>of</strong> females (n = 5) housed at<br />
Howletts Wild Animal Park (UK). Related dyads did not time-match their<br />
grooming bouts to the same extent as non-related dyads and there was a<br />
strong negative relationship demonstrating that high-ranking individuals<br />
groomed down and low-ranking individuals groomed up the hierarchy.<br />
Further analysis suggested that this was due to strategic preferential<br />
grooming by mid- and low-ranking individuals up the hierarchy and<br />
preferential grooming down, rather than across, the hierarchy by highranking<br />
individuals. We conclude that our results support biological markets<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> grooming and implicate a role <strong>of</strong> relatedness in the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
grooming interactions.<br />
Predator alarm calls in wild black-fronted titi moneys Callicebus<br />
nigrifrons<br />
C. Cäsar 1,2,3 , R. Byrne 1 , R. Young 2 and K. Zuberbühler 1<br />
1. Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St<br />
Andrews, 2. Conservation, Ecology and Animal Behaviour Group,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Pontifícia Universidade<br />
Católica de Minas Gerais, Brazil, 3. Inhotim, Rua B 20, 35460-000,<br />
Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, Brazil<br />
Some primates produce acoustically distinct alarm calls to different<br />
predators. In some species there is evidence that recipients react with<br />
25
adaptive responses to such calls. Callicebus monkeys have been known for<br />
their large repertoire <strong>of</strong> vocalizations, and some <strong>of</strong> their calls are combined<br />
into long and complex sequences. However, the monkeys’ vocal responses<br />
to distinct external events have not been studied systematically. We studied<br />
the alarm calls <strong>of</strong> undisturbed black-fronted titi monkey (C. nigrifrons) in<br />
Minas Gerais, southeast Brazil, by presenting visual predator models. Our<br />
preliminary results show that monkeys produce two different types <strong>of</strong> calls<br />
when first encountering different types <strong>of</strong> predators. Furthermore, they<br />
produce a long sequence <strong>of</strong> calls, in which some <strong>of</strong> them can be further<br />
subdivided into four acoustic variants, which are obtained by optional<br />
suffixation and duplications <strong>of</strong> the call stem. In addition, one <strong>of</strong> the alarm<br />
calls, given to puma for instance, is also used in other contexts, such as<br />
when monkeys were foraging close to the ground, and in response to a non<br />
predator animal. Overall, our results indicate no fundamental differences to<br />
the acoustic flexibility previously reported from Old World monkeys,<br />
suggesting an early origin within the primate lineage. However, the fact that<br />
some calls or call sequences were given in both predatory and nonpredatory<br />
situations illustrate the need for empirical studies that focus on<br />
naturally produced calls and their context. Additionally, future research<br />
using playback experiments with alarm calls and analyses <strong>of</strong> listeners’<br />
responses is required.<br />
Sponsors: CAPES/Brazil and FAPEMIG/Brazil.<br />
The Aspinall Foundations in situ primate conservation projects<br />
M. Kingston Jones 1 and N. Laurence 2<br />
1. Howletts and Port Lympne Wild Animal Parks<br />
2. The Aspinall Foundation<br />
The Aspinall Foundation (TAF) is a registered charity that is actively<br />
involved with several projects that incorporate a diverse range <strong>of</strong> in situ<br />
conservation activities. These include the well-established overseas projects<br />
in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo and Gabon and more recent developing projects in<br />
Indonesia and Madagascar. Our main spheres <strong>of</strong> in situ conservation-based<br />
activity include ecosystem management, local community education<br />
projects, capacity building, habitat surveys, rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> confiscated<br />
wild animals and reintroduction <strong>of</strong> captive-bred and confiscated wild-born<br />
animals. This poster will summarise our recent activities over these three<br />
key projects, including - from Congo and Gabon - updates from the PPG<br />
field sites with the Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and<br />
wildlife law enforcement in Congo. In Indonesia, our new rehabilitation and<br />
possible reintroduction site in Java for the moloch gibbon (Hylobates<br />
moloch) and Javan langur (Trachypithecus auratus), protected area<br />
management in Indonesia and Camera trapping in Java and Sumatra. And<br />
from Madagascar, updates on the current status <strong>of</strong> new projects with the<br />
26
greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus) and crowned sifaka (Propithecus<br />
coronatus).<br />
Testing the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in<br />
human male faces<br />
F.R. Moore 1 and D.I. Perrett 2<br />
1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />
2. School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, St Andrews<br />
Recent research implicates the role <strong>of</strong> stress in the Immunocompetence<br />
Handicap Hypothesis (ICHH) <strong>of</strong> sexual selection. An interaction between<br />
putative cues to immunocompetence (masculinity) and current health in<br />
men’s faces suggests that this may apply to humans. We explored<br />
relationships between sex- and stress-hormones (i.e., testosterone and<br />
cortisol) and facial masculinity and attractiveness. Twenty-four facial<br />
stimuli were constructed from images <strong>of</strong> males on the basis <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong><br />
salivary cortisol and testosterone. These were rated by female participants<br />
across fertile and non-fertile phases <strong>of</strong> the menstrual cycle. Results<br />
demonstrated that preferences for cues to testosterone in the face are<br />
contingent upon co-occurring levels <strong>of</strong> cortisol and are discussed in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the stress-linked ICHH.<br />
Crops, conflict and behaviour on farms among Buton macaques<br />
R. Wyper 1 , P.C. Lee 1 and N.E.C. Priston 2<br />
1. Anthropology and Geography, Oxford Brookes University<br />
2. Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling & Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group<br />
Predicting behavioural responses and survival probabilities for populations<br />
<strong>of</strong> threatened endemic species in human-dominated and changing<br />
environments are global concerns facing many primatologists. This problem<br />
is particularly acute for the Buton macaque (Macaca ochreata<br />
brunnescens), which is endemic to Buton Island, southeast Sulawesi,<br />
Indonesia. Our study aimed to investigate the crop raiding characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
this endemic species over time, and to explore the value <strong>of</strong> longitudinal<br />
studies for assessing crop raiding. The behavioural repertoire exhibited<br />
during crop raiding inside the farm perimeter was observed over a period <strong>of</strong><br />
seven years (2002-2008). The average raid frequency per year decreased<br />
slightly during the study period, raising interesting questions about the<br />
feeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> the macaques over time and in response to<br />
management strategies. Behaviour differed significantly as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
penetration distance into the farm, as well as among some age-sex classes,<br />
but not all. Storage organ crops (e.g., sweet potato) were most abundant and<br />
most frequently raided by macaques. Future work on wild versus cultivated<br />
27
food choice is essential for ensuring the survival <strong>of</strong> the Buton macaque in a<br />
human-dominated environment. We aim to investigate the ecological<br />
determinants <strong>of</strong> crop raiding over an 18-month period, to assess feeding<br />
ecology in relation to forest phenology. The results <strong>of</strong> this PhD study will<br />
be used directly to support conservation efforts for the Buton macaque and<br />
to benefit the people <strong>of</strong> Buton. This study is funded by a NERC/ESRC joint<br />
studentship to R. Wyper.<br />
A sex difference in effect <strong>of</strong> relevant object experience on objectmediated<br />
problem-solving in gibbons (Hylobatidae)<br />
C. Cunningham 1 , J. Anderson 2 and A. Mootnick 3<br />
1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee, 2. Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Stirling, 3. Gibbon Conservation Center, Santa Clarita, California, USA<br />
Understanding the functional properties <strong>of</strong> objects that make them useful in<br />
novel situations is likely facilitated by prior exposure during which object<br />
affordances can be explored. However, explorations <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> previous<br />
object experience on object-mediated problem solving have provided<br />
conflicting results. Previous opportunity to explore objects and their<br />
properties could manifest as increased propensity to approach and interact<br />
with novel objects (a requirement for successful object-mediated solutions),<br />
and improved efficiency in goal-directed manipulation. Here, we examine<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> prior domain-specific experience on acquisition <strong>of</strong> object<br />
manipulation skills in gibbons (Hylobatidae). These small arboreal apes do<br />
not frequently use tools. This argues against any evolved cognitive<br />
mechanism specifically for processing object properties. Gibbons provided<br />
with the opportunity to learn about the affordances <strong>of</strong> a potential tool before<br />
using it to obtain a reward were expected to demonstrate increased<br />
efficiency in goal realisation. Using a simple zero-order manipulation that<br />
required the apes to use a rake-tool to pull in an out-or-reach item, 14 out <strong>of</strong><br />
22 tested individuals successfully solved the task. Prior exposure did not<br />
facilitate appropriate tool use in males although females performed<br />
significantly more efficiently with previous experience, seemingly<br />
benefitting from a period <strong>of</strong> learning about the objects neutrality. This may<br />
be due to gender differences in costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> perceived risk-taking.<br />
28
Future Meetings<br />
PSGB Winter Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />
Gombe 50<br />
8 th and 9 th December <strong>2010</strong><br />
Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London, Regent’s Park, London<br />
This year marks the 50th anniversary <strong>of</strong> the start <strong>of</strong> Dr Jane Goodall DBE’s<br />
ground-breaking research on chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)<br />
at Gombe Stream, Tanganyika - now Gombe Stream National Park,<br />
Tanzania. It also marks the beginning <strong>of</strong> a long tradition <strong>of</strong> other<br />
primatological research at this site, including olive baboons (Papio<br />
cynocephalus anubis), red colobus (Colobus badius tephrosceles), and<br />
people.<br />
The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> is proud to hold its two-day scientific<br />
Winter Meeting, on 8 th and 9 th December <strong>2010</strong>, in celebration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
primatological research done at, or inspired by, the Gombe research over<br />
the past 50 years, and looking forward to the future. Gombe’s impact is farreaching<br />
globally, and covers a wide range <strong>of</strong> scientific disciplines, from<br />
human evolution, to ethology, to disease transmission, to conservation. Dr<br />
Goodall and the Gombe research have also inspired many young scientists<br />
around the world to go into careers relating to primate behaviour, as well as<br />
more broadly in biodiversity conservation and other related fields, in the<br />
wild, in zoos and in sanctuaries.<br />
We are delighted to announce that the invited speakers at “Gombe 50”<br />
include the following:<br />
• Dr Jane Goodall DBE* (Founder, The Jane Goodall Institute;<br />
http://www.janegoodall.org/; http://www.janegoodall.org.uk/home)<br />
• Dr D. Anthony Collins* (Gombe Stream Research Centre,<br />
Tanzania)<br />
• Tara Golshan (Executive Director for Education, The Jane<br />
Goodall Institute–UK)<br />
• Dr Shadrack Kamenya (Gombe Stream Research Centre,<br />
Tanzania)<br />
• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Phyllis C. Lee* (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling, UK)<br />
• Pr<strong>of</strong>. William C. McGrew* (University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, UK)<br />
• Guy Norton* (Anglia Ruskin University, UK / Director <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Animal Behaviour Research Unit, Mikumi National Park,<br />
Tanzania)<br />
• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anne E. Pusey* (Duke University, USA)<br />
29
• Ian Redmond OBE* (Chief Consultant, GRASP -<br />
UNEP/UNESCO <strong>Great</strong> Ape Survival Partnership)<br />
• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Richard Wrangham (Harvard University, USA)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Andy Whiten* (St Andrews University) will give this year’s Osman<br />
Hill Lecture: “Cultural elements in a chimpanzee community (Goodall,<br />
1973) 37 years on."<br />
(* indicates confirmed speaker)<br />
We anticipate that advance registration will be required, as we expect a<br />
great deal <strong>of</strong> interest. As in recent years, the Winter Meeting will include<br />
oral and poster presentation sessions, and we welcome pr<strong>of</strong>fered oral papers<br />
on areas <strong>of</strong> primatological research relating to, or stimulated by, Gombe<br />
studies, as well as pr<strong>of</strong>fered posters on any area <strong>of</strong> primatological research<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest to PSGB members. Registration and the call for papers will be<br />
announced in the near future, so please keep an eye on the PSGB website<br />
for updates . Announcements<br />
will also be sent to PSGB members via our JISCmail list<br />
.<br />
During the Winter Meeting, we plan to hold a book-signing event with Dr<br />
Goodall, and also a social event on the evening <strong>of</strong> 8 th December. The<br />
evening ‘do’ allows delegates and speakers an opportunity to discuss their<br />
work with each other, as well as to catch up with old friends, and make new<br />
ones.<br />
We do hope you will be able to join us for this very exciting scientific<br />
meeting, in celebration <strong>of</strong> “Gombe 50” and the influential work <strong>of</strong> Dr Jane<br />
Goodall DBE and others!<br />
Further information on the contributions <strong>of</strong> Dr Goodall to the fields <strong>of</strong><br />
ethology, primatology and conservation, can be found at<br />
.<br />
If you have any questions about the event in the meantime, please contact<br />
the organiser:<br />
Dr Sonya P. Hill<br />
Conservation Medicine Division<br />
North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong><br />
Chester Zoo<br />
Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester<br />
Chester, CH2 1LH<br />
UK<br />
<br />
30
Announcement:<br />
International Symposium – Compassionate Conservation<br />
Compassionate Conservation:<br />
Animal Welfare in Conservation Practice<br />
An International Symposium<br />
Lady Margaret Hall, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />
1 – 3 September <strong>2010</strong><br />
The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) and the Born Free<br />
Foundation are delighted to announce an International Symposium on<br />
animal welfare in conservation practice, to be held at Oxford. The<br />
Symposium will bring together scientists and practitioners from a range <strong>of</strong><br />
disciplines to debate animal welfare issues in conservation, examine<br />
potential synergies, look for practical outcomes and promote a dialogue<br />
between these two disciplines that are <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as mutually<br />
exclusive.<br />
The Symposium will be organized around the following themes:<br />
Animal welfare in field conservation<br />
Captive animal welfare and conservation<br />
Conservation consequences <strong>of</strong> wildlife rescue, rehabilitation and release<br />
International trade in live wild animals<br />
The Symposium will be <strong>of</strong> interest to academics and graduates in<br />
conservation biology, animal welfare and animal ethics, as well as<br />
conservation and animal welfare organisations and practitioners.<br />
Further details and online registration will shortly be available at<br />
.<br />
To express your interest in attending the symposium, please contact Chris<br />
Draper (email: chris@bornfree.org.uk; tel: +44(0)1403 240170)<br />
About the Organisers<br />
Born Free Foundation<br />
The Born Free Foundation is an international wildlife charity working<br />
throughout the world to stop individual wild animal suffering and protect<br />
threatened species in the wild. www.bornfree.org.uk<br />
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />
Founded in 1986, WildCRU was the first university-based conservation<br />
research unit in Europe. WildCRU’s mission is to achieve practical<br />
solutions to conservation problems through original scientific research.<br />
www.wildcru.org<br />
31
Announcement:<br />
Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants<br />
As previously reported, the family <strong>of</strong> Charles Lockwood generously<br />
donated a sum <strong>of</strong> money to fund a scheme <strong>of</strong> special PSGB grants,<br />
dedicated to the memory <strong>of</strong> the late UCL lecturer and designed to support<br />
the research <strong>of</strong> PSGB student members. The <strong>Society</strong> received over 20<br />
applications for Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants. The<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> applications was exceptionally high, and the awards panel<br />
(comprising Andrew Smith, Robin Dunbar, Simone Pika and Alison<br />
Fletcher) had a tough job making the final decision. The range <strong>of</strong> proposals<br />
received shows the great breadth and depth <strong>of</strong> primatological research<br />
amongst students in the UK, and bodes very well for the future <strong>of</strong> PSGB.<br />
We are pleased to announce that Lockwood grants have been awarded to:<br />
Graham Banes, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge: ‘Factors influencing male orangutan<br />
reproductive success’<br />
Conrad Brimacombe, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield: ‘Growth and development in<br />
the genus Pan: a life history approach’<br />
Laura Buck, Roehampton University: ‘Crani<strong>of</strong>acial morphology, paranasal<br />
sinuses and adaptation in Pleistocene hominins’<br />
Camille Coudrat, Oxford Brookes University: ‘Ecology <strong>of</strong> the red-shanked<br />
douc monkey in Nakai Nam Theun National Protected Area, central-eastern<br />
Laos’<br />
Blake Morton, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling: ‘Inter-individual differences in<br />
cognitive ability and social networking strategies in brown capuchin<br />
monkeys’<br />
Caroline Phillips, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge: ‘Chimpanzee diet:<br />
pyrosequencing DNA from faeces’<br />
Isabelle Winder, University <strong>of</strong> York: ‘Linking primate foot anatomy,<br />
ecology and landscape use’<br />
Rebecca Wyper, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling: ‘Ecological drivers <strong>of</strong> macaque crop<br />
raiding in Buton, Indonesia: human responses and implications for<br />
conservation’<br />
Awardees will present the results <strong>of</strong> their research at a PSGB meeting, and<br />
are also encouraged to submit their work for publication. The <strong>Society</strong> would<br />
like to congratulate the grant recipients and thank all the applicants and the<br />
award committee for their time and effort.<br />
32
CONSERVATION GRANT REPORTS<br />
Ecology and status <strong>of</strong> the drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in Korup<br />
National Park, Southwest Cameroon: implications for their<br />
conservation<br />
CHRISTOS ASTARAS<br />
christos_astaras@yahoo.ca<br />
Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in August 2006<br />
The drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) is a terrestrial primate endemic to the<br />
Cross-Sanaga-Bioko rainforests <strong>of</strong> Central Africa whose survival is<br />
endangered by increasing pressure from hunting and habitat loss. Few<br />
studies have ever examined the ecology <strong>of</strong> wild drills and our current<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the conservation needs <strong>of</strong> the species is limited. This<br />
project studied the ecology <strong>of</strong> drills in a 63 km 2 section <strong>of</strong> Korup National<br />
Park in southwest Cameroon over twelve months (Feb – Jun 2006, Jul 2007<br />
– Jan 2008). It also evaluated the status and threats <strong>of</strong> the drill in the greater<br />
Korup region with the intent <strong>of</strong> improving the species’ protection. Finally,<br />
the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> assuming near-identical ecologies between the drill<br />
and its better studied, allopatric and sole congener – the mandrill (M.<br />
sphinx) – was assessed.<br />
Wild drills in foliage, Korup National Park (2006)<br />
33
Analysis <strong>of</strong> faecal samples and feeding remains showed that the drill<br />
maintains a diverse, yet not indiscriminate, omnivorous diet throughout the<br />
year consisting primarily <strong>of</strong> fruits and seeds, and to a lesser extent leaves,<br />
mushrooms and insects. Drills ingested and dispersed intact seeds from 110<br />
plant types primarily during periods <strong>of</strong> fruit abundance, while there was a<br />
shift towards increased seed predation during the pronounced fruit-scarce<br />
dry season.<br />
Visual and audio encounters <strong>of</strong> drill groups during 3,284 km <strong>of</strong> trail patrols<br />
provided information on group structure and primate associations. Mean<br />
group size was 43.3 ± 18.4 (range 25-77) and groups with both one and<br />
multiple males emitting the adult male specific two-phase-grunt were<br />
observed. Solitary males were encountered twice. Drills were in association<br />
with at least one additional primate species at some time during most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
encounters, involving all <strong>of</strong> the diurnal primates in Korup (Cercopithecus<br />
mona, C. nictitans, C. erythrotis, C. pogonias, Procolobus pennantii preussi<br />
and Cercocebus torquatus) except the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).<br />
The total drill population was conservatively estimated at 950-1450 within<br />
Korup National Park and 2,500-3,000 in the entire Korup region, which<br />
makes the region a stronghold for the species’ survival. However, drill subpopulations<br />
are becoming increasingly isolated within the ever more<br />
fragmented landscape and are under hunting pressure everywhere. Eight<br />
core areas were identified across the region as priorities for protection.<br />
Interviews with local communities <strong>of</strong>fered insight on the destructive<br />
practice <strong>of</strong> hunting with dogs as well as the socioeconomic role <strong>of</strong> dogs –<br />
information needed for effectively managing this major threat to drill<br />
survival. The drill was also found to suffer from a limited local recognition<br />
<strong>of</strong> its current status and legal protection, which is unfavourable for<br />
conservation. As a result <strong>of</strong> the project’s findings, a list <strong>of</strong> drill-focused<br />
conservation recommendations was developed and submitted to government<br />
agencies and non-government organizations active in wildlife management<br />
and conservation in the region.<br />
34
Conducting hunter interviews (Fabe village, May 2006)<br />
Population density surveys and taxonomic assessment <strong>of</strong> the Western<br />
tarsier (Tarsius bancanus borneanus) and Bornean slow loris<br />
(Nycticebus menagensis) in the Lower Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah,<br />
Malaysia<br />
RACHEL A. MUNDS<br />
<br />
Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in August 2008<br />
The Bornean slow loris (Nycticebus menagensis) and tarsier (Tarsius<br />
bancanus borneanus) are the only nocturnal primates on Borneo. Their<br />
current classification as Vulnerable (VU) by IUCN is based only on habitat<br />
loss. No recent systematic surveys have been done to determine if they are<br />
truly VU. Found only on Borneo and a few surrounding islands, these<br />
primates are threatened not only by habitat loss but also by the pet,<br />
medicinal and food markets. The aim <strong>of</strong> this research was to provide a<br />
current assessment <strong>of</strong> the estimated abundance <strong>of</strong> these primates in a<br />
protected degraded floodplain in east Sabah, Malaysia Borneo.<br />
The research took place in the Danau Girang Field Centre (DGFC) (5°24'<br />
48"N, 118°02' 16"E, elevation 15 m asl), a cooperative research facility<br />
between Cardiff University and the Sabah Wildlife Department. It is a 123-<br />
ha flat forest located in the centre <strong>of</strong> the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife<br />
35
Sanctuary (LKWS) (5°20'-5°45'N, 117°40'-118°30'E). Two types <strong>of</strong> forest<br />
dominate the DGFC: semi-inundated and mixed riparian. Forest density<br />
could restrict visibility to as little as 2 m. The study was conducted from the<br />
17 March-4 Sept, 2009, between the hours <strong>of</strong> 18:30-02:00. Surveys were<br />
done on seven trails/transects and walked a minimum <strong>of</strong> four times each.<br />
Average trail length was 1.1 km, walked at 600 m/hr. Between 2-3 people<br />
surveyed with the use <strong>of</strong> a Petzl Myo Zoom 4.5 V headlamp, with a mix <strong>of</strong><br />
red and white filters. Lorises were detected by their reflective eye-shine.<br />
Tarsiers were detected by movement or by a dull red eye glare which was<br />
only noticeable with the use <strong>of</strong> a red light. Results yielded a survey effort <strong>of</strong><br />
68.56 km, with only 8 lorises (0.1 lorises/km or 5.05 lorises/km²) and 5<br />
tarsiers (0.06 tarsiers/km or 2.75 tarsiers/km²) sighted.<br />
Although the slow loris results are low, they fall within their expected range<br />
<strong>of</strong> abundance (0.02-1.63 individuals/km). Being primarily arboreal animals,<br />
lorises were sighted at heights between 8.5-30 m. Such heights, plus the<br />
extreme forest density in some areas, made them difficult to detect. Their<br />
semi-solitary or monogamous social structure, slow and silent locomotion,<br />
and their anti-predator strategy <strong>of</strong> remaining still for a long period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
contributed to the challenge <strong>of</strong> finding these elusive primates.<br />
36
The low encounter rate <strong>of</strong> tarsiers was surprising, as they are presumed to<br />
be common throughout much <strong>of</strong> their range. Outdated by 25 years,<br />
Crompton & Andau (1986) estimated Bornean tarsier populations to range<br />
from 15-80 individuals/km². Tarsiers were difficult to detect, as unlike the<br />
Sulawesi species, they do not vocalize regularly and as mentioned before,<br />
they lack a distinct reflective eye-shine. But if these results are an accurate<br />
estimation, then a 5-30%<br />
decline is concerning.<br />
More research on these<br />
cryptic primates <strong>of</strong> Borneo<br />
is needed to provide an<br />
accurate depiction <strong>of</strong> how<br />
habitat loss and other<br />
anthropogenic threats are<br />
affecting populations. This<br />
study was an essential part<br />
<strong>of</strong> a longer-term project that<br />
will investigate the<br />
taxonomy, population<br />
viability and social<br />
structures <strong>of</strong> these primates<br />
in the LKWS and Borneo.<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s for posterity: assessment <strong>of</strong> a primate conservation education<br />
programme on 15- 17 year old students in schools in Tamil Nadu, India<br />
MARTINA VICTORIA STEPHEN PAUL ANANDAM<br />
<br />
Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in March 2009<br />
India is home to vast diversity <strong>of</strong> wildlife. Sixteen species (after the addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Macaca munzala in 2005) and 39 subspecies <strong>of</strong> non-human primates<br />
occupy the subcontinent, with certain endemic species such as the liontailed<br />
macaque (Macaca silenus) and the Nilgiri langur (Trachypitecus<br />
johnii) occupying a narrow range in the Western Ghats <strong>of</strong> Southern India<br />
37
and Gee’s golden langur (Trachypitecus geeii) in the Eastern Himalayas.<br />
Knowledge <strong>of</strong> primates and their conservation crisis should bring about<br />
ecological awareness and responsibility: conservation education best serves<br />
this function. ‘<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity’ was designed to endow the<br />
participants with techniques and values required to exhibit ecologically<br />
responsible behaviour. The project was conducted in four schools in Tamil<br />
Nadu, India: 2 test schools (one from a lowland area and one from a<br />
mountain region) and 2 control schools (again, one from a lowland and one<br />
from a mountain area). The authenticity <strong>of</strong> the programme was measured in<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> ways.<br />
The project demonstrated that time is not a barrier to an environmental<br />
education programme by proving the credibility <strong>of</strong> ‘<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity’<br />
through pre-test and post-test knowledge and attitude score assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
the participants. A significant rise in post-test scores was evident across the<br />
sample. The test schools scored higher than the control schools in the posttest<br />
indicating that the education programme had a positive effect. The<br />
attitude scores <strong>of</strong> the participants remained fairly constant before and after<br />
the programme. The mandatory Environmental Science module and<br />
religious views <strong>of</strong> the participants could be considered to influence the<br />
attitude <strong>of</strong> the participants towards animals. The impact <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />
location (participants were either from the mountain region close to wildlife<br />
or a plain farther from wildlife) was tested as a possible factor <strong>of</strong> influence<br />
on the environmental knowledge and attitude <strong>of</strong> the participants.<br />
Geographical location was found to have a significant impact on the<br />
environmental knowledge and attitude quotient <strong>of</strong> the participants. Both<br />
male and female participants showed no difference in knowledge and<br />
attitude scores, thus removing gender as a possible factor <strong>of</strong> disparity.<br />
The credibility <strong>of</strong> tools such as Micros<strong>of</strong>t PowerPoint was tested and a new<br />
tool namely Jungle Sounds was introduced and assessed. The first<br />
presentation “<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity: <strong>Primate</strong>s and their conservation” was<br />
most favoured by the participants followed by the ‘Virtual Jungle: Jungle<br />
sounds’ session. This assessment paves the way for introducing more<br />
creative tools that bring conservation to life in a classroom by prompting the<br />
aesthetic awareness <strong>of</strong> the participants. Another important feature <strong>of</strong><br />
“<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity” is the career lecture which sought to explain to the<br />
participants the prospective careers one could have in conservation.<br />
Twenty-five percent <strong>of</strong> the test group participants found the lecture to be<br />
“very informative” and 46.9% found the lecture to be “informative”, thus<br />
reinstating the importance <strong>of</strong> such features in environmental education in<br />
India.<br />
38
Students with the principal investigator<br />
Conservation assessment <strong>of</strong> Taï monkey fauna from two survey<br />
methods and a bushmeat market study: how hunting impacts Taï<br />
National Park<br />
RYAN COVEY<br />
<br />
Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in March 2009<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s throughout Côte d’Ivoire are at risk <strong>of</strong> being hunted to extinction.<br />
The national park status afforded to Taï National Park and its inclusion on<br />
UNESCO’s World Heritage List has failed to protect its biodiversity. In<br />
addition to hunting, deforestation, gold panning, and overuse <strong>of</strong> the buffer<br />
zone by locals threatens many species with extinction. In order to assess the<br />
threats facing Taï National Park’s primate fauna, I used two survey methods<br />
to determine density and distribution <strong>of</strong> eight diurnal monkey species<br />
adjacent to a protected research area. In addition, I assessed the most<br />
significant threats facing these primates, and analyzed the impact <strong>of</strong> a local<br />
bushmeat market.<br />
39
My study was conducted at the Taï Monkey Project field site, located in Taï<br />
National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Line-transect distance sampling was used to<br />
determine group density <strong>of</strong> eight monkey species within a protected<br />
research area and the surrounding non-protected forests. Twenty 500 m<br />
transects were walked four times each within a protected 2 x 1 sq km grid<br />
and six 3 km transects were walked three times each outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />
protected area. Occupancy modelling was tested within the protected<br />
research area to determine its accuracy in detecting primate fauna. Over the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> nine weeks I visited a local bushmeat market seven times. Meat<br />
from all animal species observed at the market was recorded.<br />
Cercopithecus diana (5.84 groups/km²) and Procolobus badius (6.02<br />
groups/km²) had the highest group density estimates determined from linetransect<br />
sampling in the research grid. Outside the protected area, group<br />
density could only be calculated for three monkey species because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
significant decrease in monkey observations (i.e., Cercopithecus diana - 3.4<br />
groups/km²; Procolobus badius – 2.75 groups/km²). Based on the frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> detections, ranging patterns, and vocal repertoire <strong>of</strong> the monkey species,<br />
occupancy modelling was reliable in determining primate presence. The<br />
most numerous and vocal monkeys were Cercopithecus diana and<br />
Procolobus badius, and thus had the highest detection probability (0.55 &<br />
0.67 respectively). Cercocebus atys (large home ranges) and Procolobus<br />
verus monkeys (few vocalizations) had the lowest detection probability<br />
(0.09 & 0.07 respectively). A total <strong>of</strong> 634 animals were observed at the<br />
40
ushmeat market. A weekly average <strong>of</strong> 33 primates (1,716/year) reveal<br />
unsustainable hunting is occurring in the adjoining forests <strong>of</strong> Liberia.<br />
The protection afforded to primates within the Taï Monkey Project research<br />
grid from the presence <strong>of</strong> researches has allowed them to flourish. The<br />
observed drop-<strong>of</strong>f in detections and calculated group densities reveals that<br />
where hunting occurs, group densities are significantly lower than in areas<br />
where protection occurs. Occupancy modelling appears to be a reliable<br />
method in detecting primate presence. The number <strong>of</strong> primates harvested<br />
from the forests <strong>of</strong> Liberia, which could form a natural corridor to Taï<br />
National Park, reveals the degree <strong>of</strong> unsustainable hunting occurring.<br />
Conservation efforts in this area should focus on the immediate protection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the animal fauna within Taï National Park. Protection efforts need to<br />
begin in Liberia to prevent genetically isolated populations from occurring.<br />
41
Identifying the CITES Appendix I-listed Asian slow loris Nycticebus<br />
spp: a training programme for enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and rescue centres<br />
in Southeast Asia<br />
TRICIA PARISH<br />
<br />
Awarded a PSGB and Born Free Grant in August 2008<br />
All five recognised species <strong>of</strong> Asian slow lorises (<strong>Primate</strong>s: Lorisidae:<br />
Nycticebus) were listed on Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the Convention on International<br />
Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 2007 due<br />
to unsustainable harvesting for the illegal pet and medicine trade as well as<br />
due to habitat loss. N. javanicus was added to the 25 Most Endangered<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s List in 2008 due to the severe risks it faces from the same threats<br />
but which are compounded in its smaller habitat.<br />
No IUCN species survival programme is in place for slow lorises but the<br />
Southeast Asian Mammal Database and CITES call for additional slow loris<br />
education to be conducted as <strong>of</strong>ficials are unable to identify the species seen<br />
in illegal trade. This project provided five one-day workshops to<br />
enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and rescue centres in slow loris range countries and<br />
East Asian trade hubs (peninsular Malaysia, Malaysian Borneo (Sarawak),<br />
Brunei, Taiwan and Japan) between February and November 2009. The<br />
project was based on a set <strong>of</strong> four pilot workshops that were conducted in<br />
slow loris range states in 2008.<br />
The workshop used a range <strong>of</strong> training materials (PowerPoint presentations,<br />
identification leaflet, training DVD and picture flashcards) and techniques<br />
(lecture, small and large group discussions) to maximise learning. Topics<br />
included slow loris taxonomy, identification and behaviour, look-alike<br />
species, legislative protection, key threats, common smuggling techniques<br />
and captive slow loris care protocols (both short- and long-term). Workshop<br />
effectiveness was assessed using pre- and post-workshop questionnaires,<br />
review sheets and video exercises. The project aimed to raise awareness<br />
about slow lorises with enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials, improve their knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
Nycticebus spp. and enhance individual slow loris species identification<br />
abilities. Over the longer term it is hoped that equipping enforcement<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials with improved knowledge about slow lorises and how to identify<br />
them will contribute to a reduction <strong>of</strong> illegal slow loris trade and the<br />
inappropriate release <strong>of</strong> confiscated slow lorises.<br />
Quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> the workshops showed that significant<br />
improvements in knowledge levels were achieved across key areas<br />
including individual slow loris species identification ability (Wilcoxon: n =<br />
180, z = -8.782, p = 0.000), slow loris range countries (Wilcoxon: n = 179, z<br />
= -3.564, p = 0.000), that the slow loris is a primate (Wilcoxon: n = 179, z =<br />
42
-5.545, p = 0.000) and that the slow loris is protected under CITES<br />
(Wilcoxon: n = 180, z = -4.447, p = 0.000). The results support previous<br />
findings that knowledge levels are low amongst enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and<br />
that training is lacking. This research does however indicate that the<br />
learning deficit can be addressed and that one-day workshops can affect<br />
significant knowledge change. Although this training workshop was<br />
designed for slow lorises, the education model is applicable to other species.<br />
Workshop participants in Kuching<br />
43
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
MOUNTAIN GORILLAS: BIOLOGY, CONSERVATION, AND<br />
COEXISTENCE<br />
Gene Eckhart and Annette Lanjouw (2008)<br />
The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore<br />
ISBN: 080189011 (S<strong>of</strong>tback) £19.00<br />
This impressive-looking book is both large and easy on the eye, illustrated<br />
throughout with beautiful photographs <strong>of</strong> mountain gorillas, their habitat,<br />
and people living in, or visiting, their range countries. A scientific text book<br />
this isn’t, but nonetheless it is a resource that I am certain will be <strong>of</strong> great<br />
interest to primate and conservation enthusiasts. The authors state that part<br />
<strong>of</strong> their intent is that this book will “make available to a larger audience the<br />
valuable information gained through many people’s work over the years,”<br />
especially in areas relating to research and conservation and, generally, I<br />
think they succeed in this.<br />
The first chapter is an account <strong>of</strong> a tourist visit to the Susa group in<br />
Rwanda, written with the descriptive, familiar tones <strong>of</strong> a personal travel-log<br />
entry or a letter home, thus painting a very informative scene <strong>of</strong> what it is<br />
actually like to do one <strong>of</strong> these visits. Some <strong>of</strong> the photo captions are<br />
somewhat ‘over the top,’ as they are written in rather flowery language that<br />
isn’t necessary when the main text <strong>of</strong> the book is more than capable <strong>of</strong><br />
setting the scene; some <strong>of</strong> the captions actually detract from it, so it’s a<br />
good job the photographs themselves are stunning. The second chapter goes<br />
on to describe matters relating to evolution and classification in accessible<br />
terms, although a figure showing the classification <strong>of</strong> apes is so oversimplified<br />
as to inadvertently imply that only Hylobatidae and Hominidae<br />
make up the order <strong>Primate</strong>s. Again, the photo captions are a bit longer/more<br />
detailed than are probably necessary - almost acting as summaries <strong>of</strong> some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the main points <strong>of</strong> the chapter – and so it is probably the case that some<br />
readers will find this helpful, and others annoying; it is the same throughout<br />
the whole book.<br />
The following eight chapters summarise other areas <strong>of</strong> gorilla natural<br />
history, including several chapters on aspects <strong>of</strong> social relationships, daily<br />
patterns, and feeding habits; none <strong>of</strong> these present anything particularly new<br />
to a gorilla person, but will still be a good introduction to, or reminder <strong>of</strong>,<br />
the topic for general enthusiasts; as I mentioned, this is not intended to be a<br />
text book, although some scientific data are cited. In places, the text seems<br />
unnecessarily childish/basic, such as the section title: “Martha Robbins: She<br />
Wants her Research to Have Conservation Implications” – but, at least this<br />
section does introduce non-scientists to the work <strong>of</strong> people like Martha,<br />
about which they might not otherwise get to hear. The book then moves on<br />
to include a ‘gorilla gallery’, showing photographs <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />
44
<strong>of</strong> different ages and sexes, highlighting the individuality <strong>of</strong> these apes, and<br />
how different each one looks – not necessarily something that is generally<br />
known to non-primatologists. Further chapters then describe the forests and<br />
National Parks in which mountain gorillas live, including summaries <strong>of</strong><br />
classification <strong>of</strong> vegetation types for the Virungas and for Bwindi, and<br />
fauna in the region. The importance <strong>of</strong> the forests is also discussed, not only<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> their environmental impact, but also in terms <strong>of</strong> human presence,<br />
such as the Batwa/Bantu populations, local staff working to protect the<br />
forests and habituate gorillas, and so on. The discussion <strong>of</strong> the human<br />
impact on gorilla range countries goes on to explore colonialism in the<br />
region, and the horrific conflicts in DRC and Rwanda, and tourist killings at<br />
Bwindi in 1999, in terms <strong>of</strong> the impact on gorilla conservation as well as the<br />
region as a whole. These are clearly heavy and diverse topics for such a<br />
book to cover, but it does so well, and all within the context <strong>of</strong> celebrating<br />
the people working to protect and study mountain gorillas and their habitat.<br />
The next couple <strong>of</strong> chapters focus more on the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> those living<br />
and working around the gorillas’ range areas, whose lives are affected in<br />
some way by gorilla conservation and tourism (whether a positive impact,<br />
such as making a living from tourism, or negative, such as crop-raiding by<br />
gorillas and other animals). With the theme <strong>of</strong> conservation running<br />
throughout this book, the final chapters deal with this topic specifically,<br />
starting from a historic perspective, through to the present and future. There<br />
are useful summaries <strong>of</strong> key organisations in the region, such as the Office<br />
Rwandais du Tourisme et des Parcs Nationaux (ORTPN), the Ugandan<br />
Wildlife Authority, the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project, as well as<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the national parks’ guides, and other people working<br />
towards gorilla conservation, all <strong>of</strong> which help to bring the book to life. All<br />
in all, this book is a must-have for anyone interested in gorillas.<br />
Sonya P. Hill<br />
North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong>, Chester Zoo<br />
ENDOCRINOLOGY OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS<br />
Peter T. Ellison and Peter B. Gray (eds.) (2009)<br />
Harvard University Press<br />
ISBN: 9780674031173 (Hardback) £36.95<br />
Understanding how hormones and behaviour are linked is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
fascinating topics in biology today. For primatologists this is a field <strong>of</strong><br />
research that has just started to produce a wealth <strong>of</strong> new exciting materialnot<br />
least because new non-invasive techniques are starting to allow us to<br />
monitor hormones <strong>of</strong> wild animals without the need for trapping and taking<br />
blood. One <strong>of</strong> the most exciting outcomes <strong>of</strong> this research is that studies <strong>of</strong><br />
wild animals can now investigate the causes <strong>of</strong> behaviour at a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
levels – both proximate and ultimate.<br />
45
In 16 chapters various authors review a large range <strong>of</strong> studies on recent<br />
research that look at relationships hormones and social relationships. The<br />
first section <strong>of</strong> the book introduces important theoretical ideas. Lee’s<br />
introduction to animal mating and parenting systems gives a framework for<br />
the rest <strong>of</strong> the book- as it discusses the evolutionary basis <strong>of</strong> diversity in<br />
social systems and the ways in which different parenting systems might<br />
evolve. Further chapters introduce the ways in which mammalian<br />
neuroendocrine system integrates neural and hormonal responses to the<br />
environment and the physiological mechanisms that regulate it (Wallen and<br />
Hauser; Wingfield) and Ellison’s chapter focuses on how the endocrine<br />
system regulates reproductive ecology. Ellison makes the crucial point that<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> the endocrine system can only be understood in relation to<br />
evolution as ‘social relationships trigger endocrine signals to help regulate<br />
reproductive effort’. Given this, it is perhaps not surprisingly that much <strong>of</strong><br />
the book focuses on the ways in which hormones regulate reproductive<br />
systems, with sexual and parental relationships being discussed in detail and<br />
an emphasis on sexual dimorphism and infant care patterns.<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> the book looks at humans, with all <strong>of</strong> part three (chapters<br />
10-16) looking at humans, and some <strong>of</strong> the other chapters also being<br />
primarily human-focused. However, part two has four chapters that look at<br />
non-human animals with one (Carter et al.) discussing rodents and three<br />
non-human primates. The non-human primate chapters look at<br />
endocrinology <strong>of</strong> social relationships in callitrichids (Ziegler and Snowdon),<br />
other group living monkeys (Fairbanks) and apes (Emery Thompson). All<br />
three <strong>of</strong> the non-human primate chapters provide excellent overviews <strong>of</strong><br />
recent research but with different areas highlighted. Zeigler and Snowdon<br />
give an overview <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> work carried out on pair-bonding and<br />
parental care in callitrichids and stress the importance <strong>of</strong> long-term bonds<br />
and chemical signalling for reproductive success in these species. Hence,<br />
they focus particularly on hormonal regulation <strong>of</strong> parental care and<br />
communication between mated pairs. In contrast, Fairbanks deals primarily<br />
with studies on group-living matrilineal monkeys where paternal care in<br />
minimal and male rank is likely to have a major influence on male<br />
reproductive success. Fairbanks discusses hormonal correlates <strong>of</strong><br />
dominance and aggression in a range <strong>of</strong> species, including some extremely<br />
useful summary tables that allow the reader to easily see the variety <strong>of</strong><br />
species and hormonal studies. Finally, Emery Thompson examines how the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> mating systems and reproductive strategies in apes are related<br />
to the endocrine physiology <strong>of</strong> female cycling and male competition.<br />
Some interesting themes arise through the book. For example, authors<br />
comment on the way in which paternal care influences males in both<br />
humans and other species. Lancaster and Kaplan discuss how male’s<br />
commitment to pair-bonding may be increased with the birth <strong>of</strong> children<br />
and Zeigler and Snowdon explain the effect <strong>of</strong> previous paternal experience<br />
46
on callitrichid males’ responses to infants. Gray and Campbell discuss<br />
whether testosterone levels are correlated with mating and paternal effort in<br />
men. In all cases the authors suggest that looking at variation in paternal<br />
effort may <strong>of</strong>fer insights into understanding different male reproductive<br />
strategies.<br />
It is perhaps surprising that, in a book with this title, so little <strong>of</strong> it discusses<br />
social relationships other than those related to mating and parenting. Given<br />
that most authors’ work on humans and/or other primates this is even more<br />
surprising as a huge number or social interactions in social species involve<br />
neither mates nor <strong>of</strong>fspring. For many individuals, particularly prereproductive<br />
animals such interactions may make up all or most <strong>of</strong> their<br />
social behaviour. The exceptions to this are chapters by which touch on<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the ways in which hormones may mediate other social interactions.<br />
For example, McIntyre and Hooven’s chapter on sex differences in children<br />
and adults looks at how androgens are involved in sex differences in<br />
behaviour and personality traits such as dominance and narcissism. Two<br />
chapters that concentrate on the effects <strong>of</strong> the neuropeptides, oxytocin and<br />
vasopressin on behaviour also suggest that non-reproductive social<br />
behaviour may be important. Carter et al. examine rodents and particularly<br />
the monogamous prairie voles. This provides both an excellent overview <strong>of</strong><br />
both function <strong>of</strong> oxytocin and vasopressin in social behaviour with good<br />
summary tables listing previous work done in this area and then goes on to<br />
discuss the authors’ work on prairie voles in detail. The second chapter<br />
(Sanchez et al.) focuses on humans and reviews studies that have<br />
investigates mood, memory and behaviour. Although most research in voles<br />
has looked at how these oxytocin and vasopressin regulate parental and<br />
pair-bonding behaviour, the work on humans show that they have an effect<br />
on many other aspects <strong>of</strong> behaviour as well- perhaps suggesting future lines<br />
<strong>of</strong> research in other species.<br />
The book is very well produced with a high standard <strong>of</strong> editing and with all<br />
chapters keeping to a standard well-written format and provides an up-todate<br />
and comprehensive overview <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> studies in this area.<br />
Summary tables <strong>of</strong> previous research and clear introduction to each topic<br />
make it accessible for those who are unfamiliar with some <strong>of</strong> the ideas.<br />
However this is a scholarly work and not a ‘popular’ read. I would hesitate<br />
to recommend it to a first year undergraduate, but it should be accessible to<br />
more advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students who are looking<br />
for an inroad into recent research. This book will undoubtedly be <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
to researchers and lecturers who are seeking to integrate their understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> endocrinology, social relationships and evolution, and would certainly be<br />
a welcome addition to many libraries.<br />
Caroline Ross<br />
Roehampton University<br />
47
CONSERVATION IN THE 21 ST CENTURY GORILLAS AS A CASE<br />
STUDY<br />
T.S. Stoinski, H.D. Steklis, & P.T. Mehlman (eds) 2008<br />
(Developments in primatology: progress and prospects)<br />
Springer<br />
ISBN: 9780387707204 (Hardback) £87.50<br />
This book describes the status <strong>of</strong> gorilla conservation and looks at actual<br />
and potential tools, plans and strategies that are being or could be used in an<br />
attempt to counteract current threats. One strength <strong>of</strong> the book is the<br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> ideas, tools and strategies used in other countries for other<br />
species that might be potentially useful for gorilla, and indeed, primate<br />
conservation in general.<br />
The first section, containing only one chapter by Patrick Mehlman,<br />
describes the threats facing each gorilla species and outlines the problems <strong>of</strong><br />
surveying and estimating gorilla numbers in different habitats and<br />
conditions with particular emphasis on Grauer’s gorilla. Mehlman reviews<br />
current conservation strategies and makes suggestions for future research. I<br />
found this chapter very useful as some <strong>of</strong> the information provided on<br />
surveying mountain gorillas is applicable to my study area in northern<br />
Morocco where conventional methods like line transect surveying are not<br />
appropriate.<br />
The second section is all about conservation on the ground with information<br />
<strong>of</strong> benefit to everyone managing a primate conservation project. The<br />
impressive work <strong>of</strong> the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project with its holistic<br />
approach to both gorilla and human health is <strong>of</strong> interest to all. Farmer &<br />
Courage give a long overdue review <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> sanctuaries and<br />
reintroduction in gorilla conservation. The chapter on gorilla tourism<br />
attempts to summarise this sometimes controversial conservation strategy,<br />
outlining guidelines for current best practise and warning against an over<br />
dependence on ecotourism as the only strategy to conserve gorillas. Steklis<br />
and Steklis outline the benefits <strong>of</strong> a long-term research project for<br />
conservation. Jim Sanderson gives a brief but useful guide on how to do<br />
camera trapping using an example <strong>of</strong> such a study in the Virungas but,<br />
frustratingly, not expanding the chapter to include the results! Another<br />
inspirational chapter was the description <strong>of</strong> the potential benefits <strong>of</strong> using<br />
theatre to increase awareness amongst local people <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees and<br />
their conservation around the Taï Forest by Christophe Boesch and his<br />
team.<br />
Tools facilitating the planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
strategies are the focus <strong>of</strong> the penultimate section. These include a<br />
description <strong>of</strong> Population and Habitat Viability Analysis workshops, the<br />
TAMARIN system <strong>of</strong> landscape planning for conservation, a method<br />
48
empowering local communities living alongside endangered species, a<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the difficulties and benefits <strong>of</strong> producing a GIS map <strong>of</strong><br />
mountain gorilla habitat, and the use, collection and analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
biomaterials. All these chapters have something to <strong>of</strong>fer those attempting to<br />
put conservation into practise on the ground.<br />
The final section focuses mainly on the importance <strong>of</strong> building relationships<br />
between governments (mountain gorilla transboundary conservation), and<br />
NGOs and researchers (the <strong>Great</strong> Ape World Heritage Species Project and<br />
www.western-gorilla.com). Stoinski et al. encourage zoos to coordinate<br />
their funding efforts and thus improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> their<br />
contributions and the final chapter focuses on the Bushmeat Crisis<br />
Taskforce and its work in combating the unsustainable bushmeat trade.<br />
I would have liked to see a chapter on human-gorilla conflict resolution<br />
along with more information on the work being conducted with the local<br />
communities in and around gorilla habitats. That aside, I found it a very<br />
useful volume and will be referring back to it in relation to my own project<br />
as it holds so many potentially useful ideas, strategies and initiatives that<br />
can be put into practice albeit on a much smaller scale. The price <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hardback is high for those on a limited budget but maybe Springer can be<br />
encouraged to bring it out in paperback!<br />
Siân S. Waters<br />
Barbary Macaque Conservation in the Rif (BMCRif), Royal Zoological<br />
<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Scotland and Durham University<br />
THE GIBBONS: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON SMALL APE<br />
SOCIOECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY<br />
S. Lappan & D.J. Whittaker (eds) 2009<br />
Springer<br />
ISBN: 9780387886039 (Hardback) £90<br />
Today there are six surviving kinds <strong>of</strong> ape: humans, bonobos, chimpanzees,<br />
gorillas, orang-utans, and gibbons. Within this domain, however, it seems<br />
that classification <strong>of</strong> “greatness” in ape species is largely determined by size<br />
alone; and unfortunately, the gibbons have consistently been under<br />
acknowledged by primatologists, and consequently overlooked by the<br />
public eye. Indeed, there is little doubt that substantially more focus has<br />
been placed on great apes rather than their smaller counterparts; still,<br />
gibbons bear many <strong>of</strong> the same requisites praised in other apes, notably a<br />
high encephalisation quotient, no tail, and rotary shoulder blades.<br />
Additionally, when we consider the value <strong>of</strong> small apes as being the only<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary link between monkeys and great apes, it<br />
is surprising how we still know comparatively little about them.<br />
49
Small apes are notoriously difficult to study, travelling silently at high<br />
speeds through the forest. Yet, unlike any other primate, they provide<br />
unique insight into the evolution <strong>of</strong> primate socioecological systems: Why<br />
do gibbons occupy an overall niche that contradicts the majority <strong>of</strong> other<br />
primate societies? Why is monogamy so successful for this group <strong>of</strong><br />
primates, but rarely seen in others? Why do they occupy the smallest home<br />
range <strong>of</strong> any other primate, yet are a group-living primate with a highly<br />
frugivourous diet? In the newly published book entitled The Gibbons: New<br />
Perspectives on Small Ape Socioecology and Population Biology, the<br />
authors have composed a set <strong>of</strong> studies to capture different socioecological<br />
facets <strong>of</strong> the small ape clade to address these questions and more.<br />
Part I <strong>of</strong> the book opens with a general discussion on the study <strong>of</strong><br />
hylobatids, emphasising the importance <strong>of</strong> population-wide studies in<br />
providing critical information towards identifying the mechanistic ways in<br />
which their societies function. Gibbon taxonomy is briefly mentioned, as<br />
well as a tentative examination <strong>of</strong> the flexibility in gibbon socioecological<br />
behaviour.<br />
This carries over into Part II, which discusses the biogeographical variation<br />
seen among gibbon species – such as inter-population and individual<br />
differences in vocal communication. In this section <strong>of</strong> the book, the authors<br />
dive more deeply into the taxonomical and geographical distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
gibbons, showing different scenarios in the phylogenetic inter-relationships<br />
between species that have been proposed by colleagues over the last three<br />
decades. An overview <strong>of</strong> the paleontological record <strong>of</strong> gibbons and their<br />
forest environment is given, as well as inferences on phylogenetic<br />
placements <strong>of</strong> species based on DNA sequencing, recent gene flow, and<br />
historical gene flow between populations.<br />
The final chapter <strong>of</strong> Part II deserves special mention, as it is a complete<br />
record <strong>of</strong> gibbon fossils found to date. Often primatologists ask<br />
evolutionarily-relevant questions using extant primates as models from<br />
which ancestral lifestyles are reconstructed. However, while it depends on<br />
the kind <strong>of</strong> questions being asked, modern primates are simply a product <strong>of</strong><br />
their evolutionary history. Food species distribution, phenological patterns,<br />
predator density, and inter-species competition are all features that regulate<br />
primate societies today, yet given that these ecological variables are<br />
dynamic within themselves; it seems unlikely that their degree <strong>of</strong> selective<br />
force remained consistent throughout the millennia. The fossil data<br />
presented in Part II are discussed in light <strong>of</strong> morphological changes in<br />
gibbon populations throughout their evolutionary history, allowing us to<br />
compliment these findings with data on historical landscape changes to<br />
begin unearthing key features <strong>of</strong> past gibbon socioecology.<br />
50
Part III discusses ecological diversity in gibbons, addressing important<br />
theoretical issues in primatology such as the relationships between body<br />
mass and diet quality, and niche overlap between gibbons and other<br />
sympatric species. This combines nicely with Part IV <strong>of</strong> the book, which<br />
explores factors influencing inter- and intraspecific variation in gibbon<br />
communities, and how this is a function <strong>of</strong> contextual ramifications such as<br />
social systems, defensibility, and habitat use.<br />
Part V presents a nice overview <strong>of</strong> the mating systems <strong>of</strong> hylobatids, and<br />
tentatively addresses particular evolutionary advantages <strong>of</strong> living in a<br />
monogamous society and the proximate means through which this structure<br />
is maintained. Following this synopsis, complimentary data are given on<br />
specific species, notably siamangs and white-handed gibbons, to highlight<br />
particular behavioural and hormonal aspects <strong>of</strong> gibbon societies. Female<br />
reproductive status is examined in relation to temporal fluctuation in genital<br />
swellings and hormone concentrations using data from captive and wild<br />
individuals. The authors also discuss differences between male and female<br />
gibbons living in polyandrous and monogamous groups, and how flexible<br />
grouping and mating, relatedness, infanticide risk, and social networks are<br />
causal factors for variation in allocation <strong>of</strong> parental care and degree <strong>of</strong><br />
monogamy.<br />
While socioecological data on primates is meaningful from a purely<br />
academic point <strong>of</strong> view, we must not forget the obligations researchers have<br />
towards the welfare and conservation <strong>of</strong> the species they study. Indeed,<br />
while gibbons are arguably the most successful species <strong>of</strong> non-human ape<br />
on the planet, some species are among the rarest and most critically<br />
endangered <strong>of</strong> any primate. In the final chapter <strong>of</strong> The Gibbons, several<br />
authors bring forth case studies on a few gibbon species to discuss<br />
important threats to gibbon populations in the wild, highlighting regions <strong>of</strong><br />
major impact, habitat requirements, and population trends. This section <strong>of</strong><br />
the book concludes with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the urgent need for further<br />
information on gibbon behaviour to refine protocols for conservation<br />
management, and provides recommendations for improving conservation<br />
success through rehabilitation programs and canopy bridges.<br />
The Gibbons represents an important progression towards better<br />
understanding small ape behaviour. This book should be treated as a wellrounded<br />
reference for scholars interested in learning more about small apes,<br />
or for anyone wishing to examine important topics in primatology from a<br />
small ape standpoint. Commonly labelled “the lesser ape” by non-partisans,<br />
this book celebrates the importance <strong>of</strong> such exceptional beings, warranting<br />
the small apes recognition far “greater” than what they typically are given<br />
within the scientific and public domain.<br />
F. Blake Morton<br />
Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group and University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />
51
THE INFANTICIDE CONTROVERSY: PRIMATOLOGY AND THE<br />
ART OF FIELD SCIENCE<br />
Amanda Rees (2009)<br />
Chicago University Press<br />
ISBN 0226707113 (Hardback) £27.50<br />
As a discipline, primatology has a relatively short and complex history, with<br />
early researchers drawn from fields as diverse as biology, mathematics,<br />
anthropology and social science. This complexity is reflected in the mature<br />
discipline we know today, with primatologists still regularly working and<br />
publishing with collaborators from other fields and located anywhere from<br />
medical schools to archaeology departments depending upon institutional<br />
perspectives and the precise nature <strong>of</strong> their research. Much <strong>of</strong> this history,<br />
and many <strong>of</strong> the (potential and actual) tensions between proponents <strong>of</strong><br />
different modes <strong>of</strong> primatological thinking are discussed in fascinating<br />
detail in Amanda Rees’s book, The Infanticide Controversy, which uses the<br />
sociobiological revolution and concomitant debate over infanticidal<br />
behaviour in primates as a vehicle through which to examine the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
field science and the emergence <strong>of</strong> primatological theories and paradigms.<br />
The book is organised into three sections which reflect the nature <strong>of</strong> Rees’s<br />
arguments about the importance <strong>of</strong> theory, method and disciplinary history<br />
to the development <strong>of</strong> the infanticide controversies. Part one, entitled<br />
“Fielding the Question” takes a primarily historical approach to<br />
primatology, discussing the development <strong>of</strong> disciplinary perspectives to<br />
field science and the study <strong>of</strong> primate social behaviour, thus providing a<br />
useful background for those whose disciplinary history is not so welldeveloped.<br />
It introduces the key players in the nascent primatology, and<br />
quotes extensively from publications to demonstrate how the attitudes and<br />
methods employed by primatologists changed through the twentieth<br />
century, particularly in response to a change in emphasis from explanations<br />
relying upon socioecology to those employing sociobiological principles in<br />
the 1970s. Part two, “The Infanticide Debates”, covers the same<br />
chronological period but with emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong> just one<br />
series <strong>of</strong> observations and arguments: those relating to the “infant biting”<br />
behaviour newly observed in non-human primates in Asia and Africa.<br />
Particular emphasis during these chapters is given to theories developed to<br />
explain infant biting (or infanticide, as it is known in humans) and the<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the controversy apparent in the 1970s and 1990s as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
differential perspectives on primatological fieldwork. Rees’s methods,<br />
which include detailed interviews with primatologists as well as a clearly<br />
extensive survey <strong>of</strong> the primatological literature, produce abundant<br />
observations and insights into the thought processes <strong>of</strong> scientists on both<br />
sides <strong>of</strong> the debate, while her background in the sociology and history <strong>of</strong><br />
science shows in the comprehensive links she forges between the specifics –<br />
<strong>of</strong> one debate in one field – and the general attitudes <strong>of</strong> scientists,<br />
52
governments, researchers and the public to scientific research and activity.<br />
Part three, in contrast, returns readers to the present (with a chapter detailing<br />
the most recent developments in the infanticide controversy) and the<br />
broader viewpoint associated with an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> “Controversy<br />
and Authority, Narrative and Testimony” in primatology and science in<br />
general.<br />
Rees states early on that she is not going to judge the winners <strong>of</strong> the<br />
infanticide controversy (and indeed, mentions that the open nature <strong>of</strong> that<br />
controversy helps in that it ensures she cannot view it “knowing who won”),<br />
but nonetheless manages to use her detailed history <strong>of</strong> this one debate to<br />
shed light on several intriguing aspects <strong>of</strong> primatology and science. In<br />
particular, my relatively modest knowledge <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> primatology<br />
was substantially expanded – especially as many <strong>of</strong> the theoretical and<br />
methodological topics discussed were <strong>of</strong> relevance to a much wider part <strong>of</strong><br />
the field than just the infanticide debates. In addition, a number <strong>of</strong> puzzling<br />
questions about the philosophy and sociology <strong>of</strong> science are raised and<br />
discussed. Rees’s “fieldworker’s regress”, the situation in which<br />
observations can never be replicated in field science because <strong>of</strong> specifics<br />
and uniqueness <strong>of</strong> place and conditions, is linked to some interesting<br />
debates over the importance <strong>of</strong> personality to behavioural observations, our<br />
tendency to anthropomorphise the primates, and the role <strong>of</strong> theory in<br />
developing and testing hypotheses, all <strong>of</strong> which are ably evaluated in the<br />
book.<br />
At the same time, however, I would question whether the infanticide<br />
debates are really still “open”. As Janson (2000) states, research into<br />
primate infanticide today has largely moved on from questioning whether<br />
the behaviour is adaptive to consider the reproductive consequences on<br />
adult females and the counterstrategies they employ to minimise the<br />
consequences. That said, Rees does note in several places that the<br />
infanticide debates are more important to modern primatology in the USA,<br />
and, indeed, fourteen <strong>of</strong> her eighteen interviewees are, or were, based in<br />
American institutions. Perhaps, as she notes, the anthropological aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
American primatology (which drew more <strong>of</strong> its early practitioners from<br />
anthropology while European countries drew heavily upon zoology) is<br />
sufficient to explain the difference in opinion and justify the retention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
debate in that country; alternatively, perhaps there are just a few key players<br />
in the infanticide debates who refuse to accept the majority opinion. Indeed,<br />
The Infanticide Controversy does emphasise the importance <strong>of</strong> individuality<br />
– not only <strong>of</strong> place, but also <strong>of</strong> person – in the conception and design <strong>of</strong><br />
primatological research, suggesting that perhaps controversy is not so much<br />
an objective discussion as a conflict between personalities and world-views<br />
in a discipline which cannot, for good or for ill, conduct completely<br />
objective research. While many scientists may consider this an<br />
inconvenience or even a substantial barrier to research, however, Rees’s<br />
53
ook does an admirable job not only <strong>of</strong> showing that complete objectivity is<br />
impossible in any science, but also <strong>of</strong> demonstrating that primatology can<br />
still produce high-quality, important research despite being subject to the<br />
fieldworkers’ and experimenters’ regresses.<br />
Isabelle C. Winder<br />
University <strong>of</strong> York<br />
Reference:<br />
Janson, C.H. (2000). <strong>Primate</strong> Socio-Ecology: The End <strong>of</strong> a Golden Age.<br />
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 9: 73-86.<br />
54
THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN<br />
(Affiliated to the International Primatological <strong>Society</strong> and the European Federation <strong>of</strong> Primatology)<br />
APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP<br />
Please visit our website at www.psgb.org to ensure you have the most recent version <strong>of</strong> our membership form<br />
Full Membership - limited to those possessing a recognised qualification in a scientific field (including postgraduates)<br />
or those who have made a significant contribution to primatology<br />
Associate Membership - open to anyone with a serious interest in primates. Associate members can participate in all<br />
<strong>Society</strong> activities, but are not eligible to hold <strong>of</strong>fice or to vote at the AGM or other <strong>Society</strong> meetings<br />
Student Membership - as for Associate Membership, but only open to full-time students<br />
Institutional Membership – open to any ‘Institution’ in the broad fields <strong>of</strong> education, research or commerce whose<br />
efforts are seen as beneficial to primates<br />
Applications should be returned to:<br />
Complete in BLOCK CAPITALS or type<br />
Dr Clare Cunningham (Membership Secretary PSGB)<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Social and Health Sciences<br />
Kydd Building (Level 5), Bell Street<br />
Dundee, DD1 1HG<br />
membership@psgb.org<br />
I wish to apply for FULL / ASSOCIATE / STUDENT / INSTITUTIONAL Membership (delete as appropriate)<br />
Title: Forenames: Surname:<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Address:<br />
Address for correspondence (if different):<br />
Email address (required if requesting electronic <strong>Primate</strong> Eye):<br />
Present appointment/occupation:<br />
Degrees, diplomas, certificates, etc.:<br />
Membership <strong>of</strong> other societies:<br />
Your main areas <strong>of</strong> interest:<br />
FULL MEMBERSHIP<br />
The Constitution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> requires that a <strong>Society</strong> member who has personal knowledge <strong>of</strong> the applicant support<br />
each application. (If you do not know a PSGB member, please send a CV.)<br />
(Name)<br />
has expressed a wish to join the <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> as a Full<br />
Member. I the undersigned recommend them as a proper person to become one <strong>of</strong> its members.<br />
Name (CAPITALS): Signature: Date:<br />
STUDENT MEMBERSHIP (to be renewed annually) - The following to be completed by a tutor/supervisor:<br />
(Name) is a student at University/College<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Tutor (CAPITALS): Signature: Date:<br />
Address:<br />
INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP<br />
Please include details <strong>of</strong> your institution so that we may judge whether it fulfils the <strong>Society</strong>’s conditions for<br />
membership.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:<br />
Full/Associate Membership by cheque/credit card - £ 27.50<br />
Full/Associate Membership by banker’s order - £ 25.00<br />
Full/Associate Lifetime Membership - £500.00<br />
Student Membership - £ 15.00<br />
Institutional Membership - £ 30.00<br />
Overseas Postage Supplement (paper copy only) - £ 3.00<br />
The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> is a charity, and we would encourage you to make a donation to allow the <strong>Society</strong><br />
to continue in its high pr<strong>of</strong>ile activities.<br />
I should like to make a donation <strong>of</strong>: £50 £30 £20 £10 £5 Other £……….<br />
I should like my donation to go towards the following donation category (please tick box):<br />
Conservation Working Party Captive Care Working Party Speaker Fund <br />
Sponsorship <strong>of</strong> Member from Habitat Country General <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Activities <br />
Total Subscription Amount: £<br />
Signature <strong>of</strong> Applicant:<br />
I would prefer to receive <strong>Primate</strong> Eye in electronic format <br />
(email address required; overseas postage not required)<br />
Date:<br />
PAYMENT MUST BE ENCLOSED WITH YOUR APPLICATION<br />
Cheques should be made payable to ‘The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’<br />
Credit Card Payment Please debit my MASTERCARD / VISA (delete as appropriate) for £<br />
Name on Card:<br />
Card Number: _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _<br />
Signed:<br />
Expires: _ _ / _ _<br />
BANKER’S ORDER – Full/Associate Members only<br />
To the Manager:<br />
Bank<br />
Bank Sort Code:<br />
Bank Address:<br />
Please pay the sum <strong>of</strong> £ on the first day <strong>of</strong> October 2009, or immediately if this date has passed, and pay this sum<br />
thereafter on the first day <strong>of</strong> October until further notice to the Cooperative Bank (Sort Code 08-92-99) for the account<br />
<strong>of</strong> The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> (Account No 65049352), debiting such amounts to my/our account.<br />
Please quote the following reference in relation to this transfer: (leave blank) ...………………………………<br />
Name:<br />
Address:<br />
Bank Account Number:<br />
Signature:
THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN<br />
founded on May 22 1967 by the <strong>Primate</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> the Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London<br />
Founding Council:<br />
J.R. NAPIER (President), R.P. MICHAEL (Hon.Sec.), R.J. ANDREW (Hon.Treasurer),<br />
E.H. ASHTON, L.D. BROOKES, C.R. COID, P. COTES, J.H. CROOK, J. DAVIES,<br />
R.N. T-W-FIENNES, R.A. HINDE, G.H. MANLEY, I. ROWLANDS, A.C. WARREN,<br />
L. WEISKRANTZ<br />
Past Presidents:<br />
1967 - 1970 J.R. NAPIER 1986 - 1969 B. WOOD<br />
1970 - 1973 R.P. MICHAEL 1989 - 1993 R.I.M. DUNBAR<br />
1973 - 1976 R.N. T-W-FIENNES 1993 - 1998 H.O. BOX<br />
1976 - 1979 M.H. DAY 1998 - 2001 P.C. LEE<br />
1979 - 1982 R.D. MARTIN 2001 - 2005 R. BARTON<br />
1982 - 1986 D.J. CHIVERS 2005 - <strong>2010</strong> A. MACLARNON<br />
Past Secretaries:<br />
1967 - 1970 R.P. MICHAEL 1987 - 1990 R.C. HUBRECHT<br />
1970 - 1974 K.R. HOBBS 1990 - 1993 P.C. LEE<br />
1974 - 1975 V. REYNOLDS 1993 - 1996 C. ROSS<br />
1975 - 1978 R.D. MARTIN 1996 - 1999 H. BUCHANAN-SMITH<br />
1978 - 1981 A.F. DIXSON 1999 - 2005 J. LYCETT<br />
1981 - 1985 S.K. BEARDER 2005 - <strong>2010</strong> C. SCHAFFNER<br />
1985 - 1987 H.O. BOX<br />
Past Treasurers:<br />
1967 - 1970 R.J. ANDREW 1987 - 1990 S. KINGSLEY<br />
1970 - 1974 A. JOLLY 1990 - 1994 R. CROMPTON<br />
1974 - 1977 D.J. CHIVERS 1994 - 1998 G. R. HOSEY<br />
1977 - 1980 E.B. KEVERNE 1998 - 2002 C. EVANS<br />
1980 - 1984 L. AIELLO 2002 - 2009 R. HILL<br />
1984 - 1987 A. MACLARNON<br />
Past Editors:<br />
1974 - 1977 N.R. CHALMERS 1993 - 1996 D. BRANDON-JONES<br />
1977 - 1993 J.C. INGRAM 1996 - 2006 W. SELLERS<br />
Osman Hill Memorial Lecturers (established 1977):<br />
1978 M.H. DAY 1994 R.I.M. DUNBAR<br />
1980 R.A. HINDE 1996 T. ROWELL<br />
1982 F. BOURLIERE 1998 C.B. STRINGER<br />
1984 P.M. BUTLER 2000 A.F. DIXSON<br />
1986 J.P. HEARN 2002 I. TATTERSALL<br />
1988 H. KUMMER 2004 C. VAN SCHAIK<br />
1990 R.D. MARTIN 2006 A. JOLLY<br />
1992 J.H. CROOK 2008 W. MCGREW<br />
Napier Memorial Medal Winners (established 1991):<br />
1991 CHRISTOPHER PRYCE 2001 RUSSELL HILL<br />
1993 MARTA LAHR 2003 SUSANNE SHULTZ<br />
1995 CARLOS DREWS 2005 CORRI WAITT<br />
1997 NICOLA KOYAMA 2007 ANNIKA PAUKNER<br />
1999 MARK COLLARD 2009 ERIK WILLEMS<br />
Occasional Medal Winners (established 1996):<br />
1997 JANE GOODALL CBE: Conservation<br />
2007 CYRIL ROSEN MBE: Conservation<br />
2008 STEPHEN NASH: Special Contributions to Primatology<br />
Charles A. Lockwood Medal Winners (established 2009):<br />
2009 CLAIRE SANTORELLI<br />
The content <strong>of</strong> <strong>Primate</strong> Eye is printed on recycled paper by Top Copy, Bristol, BS16 6JE
<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong><br />
PRIMATE EYE No 101 JUNE <strong>2010</strong><br />
• CONTENTS •<br />
Page<br />
Editorial … … … … … … … 1<br />
Report: PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Social Cognition and<br />
Human Evolution … … … … … 3<br />
Report: Pre-PSGB Spring Meeting Workshop – Training<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s for Cognitive Research … … … 5<br />
PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Social Cognition and Human<br />
Evolution<br />
Paper Abstracts … … … … … 7<br />
Poster Abstracts … … … … … 20<br />
Future Meetings:<br />
Winter Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Gombe 50 … … … 29<br />
Announcement: International Symposium – Compassionate<br />
Conservation … … … … … 31<br />
Announcement: Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants 32<br />
Conservation Grant Reports:<br />
Ecology and Status <strong>of</strong> the Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in<br />
Korup National Park, Southwest Cameroon: Implications<br />
for their Conservation … … … … 33<br />
Population Density Surveys and Taxonomic Asssessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Western Tarsier (Tarsius bancanus borneanus) and<br />
Bornean slow loris (Nycitecebus menagensis) in the<br />
Lower Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah, Malaysia … 35<br />
<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity: Assessment <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Primate</strong><br />
Conservation Education Programme on 15-17 year old<br />
Students in Schools in Tamil Nadu, India … … 37<br />
Conservation Assessment <strong>of</strong> Taï Monkey Fauna from<br />
Two Survey Methods and a Bushmeat Market Study:<br />
How Hunting Impacts Taï National Park … … 39<br />
Identifying the CITES Appendix 1-listed Asian Slow Loris<br />
Nycticebus spp: A Training Programme for Enforcement<br />
Officials and Rescue Centres in Southeast Asia … 42<br />
Book Reviews:<br />
Mountain Gorillas: Biology, Conservation, and Coexistence 44<br />
Endocrinology <strong>of</strong> Social Relationships … … 45<br />
Conservation in the 21st Century Gorillas as a Case Study 48<br />
The Gibbons: New Perspectives on Small Ape Socioecology<br />
and Population Biology … … … … 49<br />
The Infanticide Controversy: Primatology and the Art <strong>of</strong><br />
Field Science … … … … … 52<br />
ISSN 0305-8417