28.03.2015 Views

2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain

2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain

2010 Vol 101.pdf (1.63mb) - Primate Society of Great Britain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong><br />

No. 101<br />

JUNE <strong>2010</strong>


THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN Registered Charity No. 290185<br />

Officers:<br />

President: Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kim Bard (10)<br />

(Centre for the Study <strong>of</strong> Emotion, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Portsmouth, King Henry<br />

Building, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth,<br />

Hampshire, PO1 2DY)<br />

Hon. Secretary: Dr Sarah Elton (10)<br />

(Functional Morphology and Evolution Unit, Hull York<br />

Medical School, The University <strong>of</strong> York, Heslington,<br />

York, YO10 5DD)<br />

Hon. Treasurer Dr Gillian Brown (09)<br />

(School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews,<br />

St Mary’s College, South Street,<br />

St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9JP, UK)<br />

Membership Secretary: Dr Clare Cunningham (09)<br />

(Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, School <strong>of</strong> Social and<br />

Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Kydd<br />

Building (Level 5), Bell Street, Dundee, DD1 1HG)<br />

e-mail: membership@psgb.org<br />

Council Members:<br />

Ms K. Balolia (University College London) – Student Representative (09)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. H. Buchanan-Smith (Stirling) (08)<br />

Dr H. Chatterjee (University College, London) – Marketing Committee Convenor (09)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. R. Dunbar (Oxford University) (09)<br />

Dr A. Fletcher (University <strong>of</strong> Chester) (09)<br />

Dr R. Kendal (Durham) (10)<br />

Dr S. Koski (Cambridge) (10)<br />

Dr J. Lehmann (Roehampton) (10)<br />

Dr N. Newton-Fisher (Kent) (08)<br />

Dr V. Nijman (Oxford Brookes University) (09)<br />

Dr S. Pika (Manchester) (08)<br />

Dr K. Pullen (Paignton Zoo) – Book Review Editor (09)<br />

Dr C. Schwitzer (Bristol Zoo) (10)<br />

Dr S. Thorpe (Birmingham) (10)<br />

Convenors <strong>of</strong> Working Parties:<br />

Dr C. Harcourt (Dept <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Clinical Science, Leahurst, Chester High Road,<br />

Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK) - Convenor, Conservation Working Party<br />

Dr S. Hill (North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong>, Chester Zoo, Caughall Road,<br />

Upton-by-Chester, Chester, CH2 1LH) - Convenor, Captive Care Working Party<br />

Assistant Members <strong>of</strong> Council:<br />

Dr S. Evans (Du Mond Conservancy, c/o Monkey Jungle Inc., PO Box 246, Miami,<br />

Florida 33170, USA) - for US membership<br />

Dr T.C. Rae (Roehampton) - Editor, <strong>Primate</strong> Eye<br />

Mr C. Rosen MBE (IPPL) - Financial Advisor<br />

Dr A. Smith (Anglia Ruskin) – Meetings Officer<br />

Honorary Auditors: Messrs Morris & Co., Chester<br />

Subscription Rates:<br />

Annual subscription rates (send cheques and sterling drafts to the Treasurer):<br />

Full members and Associate members:<br />

Payment by Banker's Order £25.00<br />

Payment by cheque, postal order, cash, credit card £27.50<br />

Undergraduate and postgraduate student membership £15.00<br />

(Membership <strong>of</strong> P.S.G.B. includes <strong>Primate</strong> Eye and supplements)<br />

Institutions wishing to receive <strong>Primate</strong> Eye and supplements only:<br />

Annual subscription £30.00<br />

Overseas subscriptions may be paid at longer intervals by arrangement with the Treasurer


EDITORIAL<br />

This time last year, I commented on the media hoopla surrounding the<br />

announcement <strong>of</strong> Ida, the now-world-famous ‘missing link’ (or<br />

cercamonine adapid strepsirhine, as I suggested). A scientific response<br />

subsequently appeared; Seiffert et al. (Nature 461: 1118-1121, 2009)<br />

reported the discovery <strong>of</strong> a new African adapid (Afradapis longicristatus)<br />

similar to Darwinius (Ida’s genus); the authors showed convincingly that<br />

both <strong>of</strong> these Eocene genera belong to the strepsirhine side <strong>of</strong> the primate<br />

clade. Not surprisingly, this did not make the front page <strong>of</strong> every daily<br />

newspaper, nor did it generate any television news coverage. Thus, once<br />

again, the non-Nature-reading general public are left with the mental<br />

residue <strong>of</strong> misleading hyperbole without exposure to the more considered,<br />

analysis-driven research.<br />

Sadly, it would appear that the cycle is beginning again. Anderson et al.<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>) sparked a similar media feeding-frenzy with their recent paper<br />

entitled ‘Pan thanatology’.* The authors suggest that the behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

captive chimpanzees during the period surrounding the death <strong>of</strong> a member<br />

<strong>of</strong> the troop bears similarities to the reactions <strong>of</strong> humans to the death <strong>of</strong> a<br />

relative. The new coverage, on the other hand, went straight to the<br />

conclusion that chimpanzees have a human-like understanding <strong>of</strong> death;<br />

they illustrated the story with an older photo, taken from National<br />

Geographic, showing an unrelated group <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees. As with the Ida<br />

debacle, the journal article raises legitimate scientific issues; the academic<br />

debate has already begun on the Current Biology website<br />

. The public-at-large, however, will<br />

almost necessarily be excluded from these discussions. As a result,<br />

‘conclusions’ reached entirely by the print and online media (‘Chimps<br />

grieve when faced with death’, as reported in the Independent newspaper)<br />

will be accepted as legitimate inferences. And, as with other media<br />

favourites like aquatic ape ‘theory’, it means I’ll have to spend an inordinate<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> my lecturing time have to ‘un-teach’ this to my students.<br />

There may not be a simple solution to this frankly unacceptable state <strong>of</strong><br />

affairs. We are increasingly urged by our institutions and granting agencies<br />

to make our work accessible to the general public. This brings us into<br />

contact with reporters, who are under pressure to deliver content that can be<br />

considered news (derived from the word ‘new’, implying an emphasis on<br />

novelty) and that will generate interest at a glance. There is little room for<br />

caveats, modifiers or conditions – as Ben Goldacre’s Guardian column<br />

continually points out, the media filtering process <strong>of</strong>ten results in<br />

simplifying to the point <strong>of</strong> deception. One colleague <strong>of</strong> mine provided<br />

ample information on a recent journal article to the print media, only to<br />

have the country in which the research took place misreported and to have<br />

his name attached to entirely made-up quotes. Another had hours <strong>of</strong><br />

1


interview videotaped, only for the editors to cut it in such a way as to<br />

suggest he was saying the opposite <strong>of</strong> what he actually said (and meant).<br />

Given these experiences, it is more important than ever to make sure that<br />

our statements to the press are as clear and precise as possible. Even if there<br />

is no guarantee that they will be reported that way.<br />

Complete reference to the original paper: James R. Anderson, Alasdair<br />

Gillies and Louise C. Lock (<strong>2010</strong>) Pan thanatology. Current Biology 20(8):<br />

R349-R351<br />

* I had to look it up, too.<br />

The articles and abstracts included in <strong>Primate</strong> Eye are not for citation or<br />

quotation without permission <strong>of</strong> the authors. The deadline for the next issue<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Primate</strong> Eye is 15th September <strong>2010</strong>. Items (manuscript or electronic in<br />

any standard format) for future issues should be sent to:<br />

Todd C. Rae<br />

Editor, <strong>Primate</strong> Eye<br />

Centre for Research in Evolutionary Anthropology<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Human and Life Sciences<br />

Whitelands College<br />

Roehampton University<br />

Holybourne Avenue<br />

London SW15 4JD<br />

Email: editor@psgb.org<br />

Tel: UK (0)20 8392 3726<br />

Fax: UK (0)20 8392 3527<br />

PSGB correspondence unrelated to <strong>Primate</strong> Eye should be addressed to the<br />

Hon. Secretary. Notification <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> address should be sent to the<br />

Membership Secretary.<br />

The PSGB WebSite can be found at <br />

2


REPORT: PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />

Social Cognition and Human Evolution<br />

7 th and 8 th April <strong>2010</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Dundee<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Abertay, Dundee hosted the Spring Meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> for the first time in its history. The<br />

conference took place on the 7 th and 8 th <strong>of</strong> April featuring typical Dundee<br />

Spring weather (sunny but cold). Successfully organised by Dr Clare<br />

Cunningham, the meeting consisted <strong>of</strong> 4 invited speakers, 18 pr<strong>of</strong>fered<br />

speakers, 14 poster presentations and a workshop.<br />

Following registration, Abertay Principal and Vice Chancellor Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Bernard King CBE addressed the delegates, welcoming them to the<br />

University. Clare Cunningham opened the conference and introduced the<br />

chair <strong>of</strong> this first session. Our first invited speaker <strong>of</strong> the conference was<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Carel Van Schaik from the University <strong>of</strong> Zürich. His talk<br />

concentrated on suggestions that the role <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeding extends<br />

the ‘expensive brain’ framework in human cognitive evolution. This was<br />

followed by talks on social network analysis as a tool to explore the social<br />

structure and cumulative culture in chimpanzees. Morning c<strong>of</strong>fee then gave<br />

us a chance to engage in some social networking <strong>of</strong> our own and the<br />

opportunity to browse the poster presentations.<br />

The second session, chaired by Sean O’Hara, consisted <strong>of</strong> talks based on<br />

social behaviour in the form <strong>of</strong> gestural repertoire in wild chimpanzees, non<br />

linguistic vocal behaviour in human infants and play back calls as a<br />

facilitator <strong>of</strong> increased social affiliation. Everyone then was directed back to<br />

the student centre for lunch (which was excellent), more browsing <strong>of</strong><br />

posters and further opportunity to catch up with colleagues and meet new<br />

members.<br />

Dr Susanne Shultz from the University <strong>of</strong> Oxford was the second invited<br />

speaker <strong>of</strong> the conference and was introduced by chair Sarah Elton.<br />

Susanne’s presentation discussed further evidence illustrating<br />

encephalisation across mammals as a result <strong>of</strong> social bonds and social<br />

stability. This led onto further presentations in the session based on<br />

anatomical and anthropological perspectives on social behaviour. The final<br />

session <strong>of</strong> the day was chaired by Hannah Buchanan-Smith. Invited speaker<br />

Dr James Anderson from the University <strong>of</strong> Stirling presented evidence from<br />

his many years <strong>of</strong> research, on primate self-awareness, empathy and<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> death. Within his talk a moving piece <strong>of</strong> film was shown<br />

capturing the moments <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> an old chimpanzee and the reaction <strong>of</strong><br />

others in the group. A wine reception concluded the first part <strong>of</strong> the spring<br />

conference.<br />

3


The evening entertainment in true Scottish tradition was a Céilidh at the<br />

Apex City Quay Hotel, which was a huge success and seemed to be enjoyed<br />

by all who attended. There was no escape for the faint-hearted; we danced,<br />

we drank and were merry!<br />

So, to return to serious business, day two kicked <strong>of</strong>f with a workshop hosted<br />

by Sarah Elton and Joanna Setchell on how to get published, which was<br />

extremely helpful and well worth the early start. Chairing the first session <strong>of</strong><br />

the day, Sonya Hill introduced invited speaker Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Thomas Bugnyar<br />

from the University <strong>of</strong> Vienna. Diverging from primatology, Thomas<br />

examined the role <strong>of</strong> social relationships in socio-cognitive abilities in<br />

ravens compared to primate social relationships; illustrating that ravens<br />

have the same relationship quality as chimpanzees. Continuing the ‘non<br />

primate’ topic the next talk was on forest elephants’ social arenas and<br />

ending the morning oral presentation session was a presentation providing<br />

evidence that social relationships affect choice <strong>of</strong> sleeping area in captive<br />

chimpanzees.<br />

After c<strong>of</strong>fee and a last chance to browse the posters on display, chair Scott<br />

Hardie introduced the last three speakers <strong>of</strong> the conference all based on<br />

anatomical perspectives on human evolution. The conference came to a<br />

close with the presentation <strong>of</strong> the student prizes for best oral presentation<br />

and best poster which were reported as being <strong>of</strong> extremely high standard<br />

and diverse in content. Steven Montgomery from the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Cambridge received the prize for best oral presentation covering the topic <strong>of</strong><br />

microcephaly genes and their role in primate brain evolution and Catherine<br />

Hobaiter from the University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews was runner-up presenting a<br />

comparative study <strong>of</strong> gestural repertoire between captive and wild<br />

chimpanzees. Cris Casar, also from the University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, won best<br />

student poster presentation on predator alarm calls in wild black fronted titi<br />

monkeys.<br />

On the whole the conference was a success thanks to the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Abertay and all who helped in the organisation. From a personal<br />

perspective, I specifically enjoyed James Anderson’s presentation, which<br />

had me captivated. Faye Clark’s talk on social network analysis was also<br />

very enjoyable being relevant to my own research. Emma Nelson’s talk on<br />

digit ratio as a predictor <strong>of</strong> social systems in fossil hominids and Catherine<br />

Hobaiter’s study were also ones that stood out for me. Clare has received<br />

nothing but praise for her hard work in putting together such an enjoyable<br />

conference. The only complaint made was too little time for discussion,<br />

reflecting the amount <strong>of</strong> good research to discuss. Not a bad complaint!<br />

Mairi McLeod<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />

4


REPORT: Pre-PSGB Spring Meeting Workshop<br />

Training <strong>Primate</strong>s for Cognitive Research, RZSS Edinburgh Zoo<br />

Before the PSGB Spring meeting began in Dundee, a small group <strong>of</strong><br />

workshop delegates met at the Royal Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Scotland’s<br />

Edinburgh Zoo. The workshop, hosted by staff <strong>of</strong> the Living Links to<br />

Human Evolution Research Centre and Budongo Trail, both zoo and<br />

academic, focussed on the establishment <strong>of</strong> cognitive research within a zoo<br />

setting.<br />

The day started with introductions from both Graham Catlow (RZSS<br />

Edinburgh Zoo) and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Hannah Buchanan-Smith (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling),<br />

both <strong>of</strong> whom highlighted the uniqueness within the UK <strong>of</strong> the<br />

collaboration between the zoo and academic institutions. Living Links was<br />

opened just two years ago, and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Andy Whiten (Director <strong>of</strong> Living<br />

Links, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews) highlighted how many research projects<br />

had already been conducted there. We were given a brief overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the Living Links centre, which houses mixed-species<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> capuchin and squirrel monkeys, and the subsequent development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Budongo Trail chimpanzee exhibit by the zoo. We then had guided<br />

tours <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the facilities including to their especially designed research<br />

testing areas.<br />

In each building, tours were divided into small enough groups to allow<br />

demonstrations <strong>of</strong> the current work being undertaken. There was particular<br />

emphasis on how well-designed enclosures coupled with well-designed<br />

training programmes can facilitate the separation <strong>of</strong> animals for cognitive<br />

testing without compromising either the social group or the zoo’s animal<br />

welfare, breeding and conservation objectives. Each demonstration was<br />

accompanied by both zoo staff and researchers, giving the opportunity to<br />

discuss issues both from a zoo and a research point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

The afternoon consisted <strong>of</strong> talks from both researchers and keeping staff<br />

associated with the two facilities. It was good to see not only the enthusiasm<br />

<strong>of</strong> the researchers but how that has obviously spread to the zoo staff <strong>of</strong> both<br />

the facilities and the wider zoo. In addition Dr Mark Bowler’s talk<br />

highlighted the convergent needs <strong>of</strong> both a zoo and an academic situation:<br />

engaging the public. It also reminded us <strong>of</strong> the potential for additional<br />

funding available to achieve taking science to the public.<br />

The day was full <strong>of</strong> interest; it was very apparent that good collaboration<br />

can allow institutions with different objectives to achieve high quality<br />

research and to find a common ground in the education <strong>of</strong> the visiting<br />

public. Although Living Links is the only such dedicated research centre in<br />

the UK, it is refreshing to see that other collaborations between zoos and<br />

5


academic institutions are continuing to emerge (Southampton University<br />

and Marwell Wildlife; Exeter University and Paignton Zoo).<br />

Thanks to all those involved - managers, researchers and keepers - for a<br />

great day; lots <strong>of</strong> fun and an encouraging demonstration <strong>of</strong> the potentials<br />

possible with a strong collaboration.<br />

Kirsten Pullen<br />

Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust<br />

Jack Griffey (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling) and the staff <strong>of</strong> Living Links<br />

have trained capuchins using positive reinforcement to enter cubicles<br />

and perform visual preference tests (photo by Mark Bowler)<br />

Betsy Herrelko (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling) and the keepers <strong>of</strong> Budongo Trail<br />

have trained the chimpanzees to do touch screen tasks<br />

(photo by Kevin Flay)<br />

6


PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />

Social Cognition and Human Evolution<br />

April 7 th and 8 th<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />

Organised by:<br />

Clare Cunningham (University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee)<br />

Abstracts for oral presentations<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> brain size: benefits, costs and consequences<br />

C.P. van Schaik, J.M. Burkart and K. Isler<br />

Anthropological Institute & Museum, University <strong>of</strong> Zürich, Switzerland<br />

Among primates, brain size predicts cognitive performance. Thus, selection<br />

on intelligence is selection on brain size. However, brains are energetically<br />

very expensive, which implies that brain size increases must not only bring<br />

behavioural benefits, but must also be possible energetically. The<br />

"expensive brain" framework predicts that relatively large-brained animals<br />

either exhibit increased total energy flow or re-allocate energy from other<br />

expensive functions such as digestion or production (growth and<br />

reproduction). Extensive comparative tests support most <strong>of</strong> this framework.<br />

Particularly relevant is the effect <strong>of</strong> brain size on life history, leading to the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> the grey ceiling. The framework also predicts that cooperative<br />

breeding, through the energetic support to breeding females, reduces<br />

energetic constraints and thus allows for brain enlargement; this prediction<br />

is supported for altricial birds and mammals. We present evidence that the<br />

different psychology <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeders changes prosocial behaviour.<br />

We then use these results to speculate about the role <strong>of</strong> cooperative breeding<br />

in human cognitive evolution.<br />

From individual to community: using social network analysis to explore<br />

the social structure <strong>of</strong> captive chimpanzees<br />

F.E. Clark<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, Royal<br />

Veterinary College and Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London<br />

The social lives <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have captivated<br />

researchers for decades, from the pioneering field-work <strong>of</strong> Goodall, to more<br />

recent explorations <strong>of</strong> ‘chimpanzee politics’ in the zoo. However, research<br />

has traditionally focused on the behaviour <strong>of</strong> individuals, dyads or whole<br />

groups without considering how these interplay. Recent analytical advances<br />

7


now make it possible to quantify entire animal social networks, and ‘Social<br />

Network Analysis’ (SNA) techniques are ripe for the picking by<br />

‘chimpologists’, and indeed other primatologists. This study investigated<br />

the social structure <strong>of</strong> captive chimpanzees housed at Edinburgh Zoo, UK.<br />

Patterns <strong>of</strong> association and interaction among individuals were sampled<br />

using focal observations and scans <strong>of</strong> sub-groups (parties). Social network<br />

diagrams (sociograms) were produced from spatial association, and<br />

interaction data. Comparisons were made within and between networks, and<br />

cluster analysis was used to identify sub-grouping within networks. There<br />

were four main findings. (1) Matrix correlation tests showed that<br />

individuals preferred to associate and interact affiliatively with their<br />

maternal kin, and individuals spent time close to those with whom they had<br />

an affiliative bond. (2) Cluster analysis revealed significant sub-groups<br />

related to agonistic encounters, and parties frequently changed over time<br />

and space. (3) The community exhibited a low level <strong>of</strong> ‘fission-fusion’<br />

behaviour because parties frequently changed over time and space. (4) The<br />

dominant female held highly central positions in both affiliative and<br />

agonistic networks, and was pivotal to group cohesion. This study used<br />

SNA techniques to study chimpanzee social structure at a number <strong>of</strong> levels,<br />

from individual to community, and I encourage other researchers to use<br />

SNA in pure and applied contexts.<br />

Constraints on cumulative culture in chimpanzees<br />

L.G. Dean 1 , R.L. Kendal 2 and K.N. Laland 1<br />

1. School <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, Fife, U.K.<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, U.K.<br />

Most researchers agree that humans are the only species with cumulative<br />

culture. A number <strong>of</strong> hypotheses have been proposed to explain this<br />

difference, but few studies have explicitly tested them. Here we used a<br />

cumulative puzzle-box, which could be solved to gain three sequentially<br />

better rewards. We tested 76 chimpanzees in 8 groups with trained<br />

demonstrator seeded and unseeded open diffusion experiments. We also<br />

presented the puzzle-box to 35 children in 8 groups in unseeded open<br />

diffusion experiments. Of the 76 chimpanzees there were only four that<br />

learned to open the puzzle-box beyond the first, simplest, stage accessing<br />

only the least desirable food reward. In only one group did more than one<br />

chimpanzee learn to access the higher stages <strong>of</strong> the puzzle-box. In contrast,<br />

multiple children, both across and within groups, accessed the higher, more<br />

difficult, stages <strong>of</strong> the puzzle-box to access the more desirable sticker<br />

rewards. By analysing when and how animals manipulated the puzzle-box<br />

and learned to use it, we assess which hypotheses our data are consistent<br />

with. Accordingly we posit that a lack <strong>of</strong> imitation, teaching and<br />

cooperation in chimpanzees inhibits the evolution <strong>of</strong> cumulative culture.<br />

8


The case for a common gestural repertoire among great apes: evidence<br />

from the wild chimpanzees<br />

C. Hobaiter and R.W. Byrne<br />

Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish <strong>Primate</strong><br />

Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />

We compare and contrast the results from captive work on gestural<br />

communication in all great apes with observations from the first systematic<br />

study <strong>of</strong> gestural communication in wild chimpanzees, a 2-year study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sonso community in Budongo, Uganda. We describe the gestural repertoire<br />

<strong>of</strong> wild chimpanzees. Until recently, the acquisition <strong>of</strong> great ape gestures<br />

has been accepted to derive from ontogenetic ritualization, with<br />

communicative gestures shaped from effective actions by mutual<br />

conditioning between dyads <strong>of</strong> individuals. Biologically inherited gestures<br />

were considered to be a minor subset <strong>of</strong> gestures used inflexibly and<br />

without intention (Tomasello et al., 1985, 1994). This view has recently<br />

been challenged with data on gorilla gesture (Genty et al., 2009). Here we<br />

use evidence from wild chimpanzees, and a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

great-ape literature, to propose an alternative model <strong>of</strong> flexible, intentional<br />

gestural communication in terms <strong>of</strong> species-typical chimpanzee gestures<br />

and a family-typical repertoire <strong>of</strong> great-ape gesture.<br />

Non-linguistic vocal behaviour in human infants (Homo sapiens):<br />

primatological perspective<br />

V.Kersken, J.C.Gomez and K. Zuberbühler<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />

In order to examine whether infants between the ages <strong>of</strong> 7 and 20months<br />

selectively produce certain non-linguistic vocalizations in specific contexts,<br />

we observed the vocal behaviour <strong>of</strong> 30 infants in one <strong>of</strong> their natural<br />

habitats – a nursery environment. We identified the contexts in which<br />

vocalization occurred and conducted an analysis <strong>of</strong> the acoustic features <strong>of</strong><br />

the vocalizations in five distinct contexts: protests, requests for food or<br />

actions, vocalizations co-occurring with declarative pointings, and<br />

accompanying acts <strong>of</strong> giving objects to others. A discriminant function<br />

analysis was conducted on different acoustic variables <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the 209<br />

calls and could correctly classify 56.8% <strong>of</strong> the call types. We conducted a<br />

Monte Carlo simulation and found that the model could classify<br />

significantly more cases correctly than a randomly generated data set (chi<br />

squared = 26.99, df = 1, p> .0001). The results suggest that prelinguistic<br />

infants do produce vocal behaviours selectively in certain contexts and that<br />

these classes <strong>of</strong> vocalizations might serve specific functions be. Although<br />

this is not a complete description <strong>of</strong> infant vocal behaviour, it nevertheless<br />

suggests some homogenous classes <strong>of</strong> non-linguistic vocalizations that are<br />

systematically related to their production context and therefore could<br />

9


function referentially in comparable way to the vocalizations <strong>of</strong> non-human<br />

primates. This consistency in production could provide caregivers with nonlinguistic<br />

referential clues to what the infant wants or needs.<br />

Can a social culture <strong>of</strong> increased affiliation be facilitated in captive<br />

monkeys through call playback?<br />

C.F.I. Watson, C.A. Caldwell and H.M. Buchanan-Smith<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

Empirical investigation <strong>of</strong> cultural transmission mechanisms has focused on<br />

culture conceived as discrete, group specific, non-species typical behaviour.<br />

Sapolsky (2006) proposed an alternative conception <strong>of</strong> culture as a set <strong>of</strong><br />

species typical behaviours performed to an atypical degree within particular<br />

groups, termed ‘social culture’. Changes towards a more pacific social<br />

culture have been recorded in wild baboons and similar shifts to a less<br />

aggressive culture have been observed after cross-species interaction in<br />

captive juvenile macaques. However, the transmission <strong>of</strong> social culture<br />

within species <strong>of</strong> nonhuman primates has not yet been experimentally<br />

investigated. We have previously demonstrated that spontaneous chirp<br />

vocalisations produced by captive marmosets are associated with an<br />

increase in the affiliative behaviour <strong>of</strong> nearby social groups through social<br />

contagion. The current study investigated whether a social culture <strong>of</strong><br />

increased affiliation could be artificially generated in social groups <strong>of</strong><br />

captive marmosets through the playback <strong>of</strong> conspecific chirp calls. We<br />

recorded the behaviour: before, during, and after 11 days <strong>of</strong> playback (3 hr<br />

per day) <strong>of</strong> 16 focal marmosets in the experimental condition (exposed to<br />

playback <strong>of</strong> pre-recorded chirp calls at an above average rate) and 16<br />

marmosets in the control condition (playback <strong>of</strong> recorded silence). A<br />

significant increase in the time spent performing affiliative behaviour by<br />

marmosets in the experimental condition during and following call<br />

playback, relative to before playback and to marmosets in the control group,<br />

would indicate a shift in social culture. We report the results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

experiment and discuss implications for mechanisms underlying social<br />

culture.<br />

What role do microcephaly genes play in primate brain evolution?<br />

S.H. Montgomery¹, I. Capellini 2 , C. Venditti 3 , R.A. Barton² and N.I. Mundy 1<br />

1. University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, 2. University <strong>of</strong> Durham, 3. University <strong>of</strong><br />

Reading<br />

Understanding the genetic basis <strong>of</strong> phenotypic change can aid our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> what processes constrain or contribute to the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

a trait. Where evolution proceeds in parallel directions along independent<br />

lineages it can also help us to understand whether similar phenotypes are<br />

10


produced by similar genetic changes, and if not, help identify species<br />

specific adaptation. Genes linked to human microcephaly have received<br />

much attention as they have accelerated evolutionary rates along lineages<br />

leading to humans. However, the link between gene and brain evolution is<br />

disputed. We analyzed the molecular evolution <strong>of</strong> four genes associated<br />

with microcephaly (ASPM, CDK5RAP2, CENPJ, MCPH1) across 21<br />

primates representing all major clades <strong>of</strong> anthropoids. We show that all four<br />

loci have experienced positive selection across anthropoids. We found a<br />

relationship between CDK5RAP2 and absolute neonatal brain mass, and<br />

ASPM and absolute neonatal brain mass when a strong outlier, the<br />

marmoset, was removed. We also found evidence for a weak association <strong>of</strong><br />

ASPM and CDK5RAP2 and adult brain size. The stronger association <strong>of</strong><br />

ASPM and CDK5RAP2 evolution with neonatal brain size than adult brain<br />

size is consistent with a direct effect <strong>of</strong> these loci on neuronal proliferation,<br />

which is plausibly related to their cellular functions in mitotic spindle<br />

orientation. In contrast, we find no evidence linking CENPJ and MCPH1 to<br />

either neonatal or adult brain size evolution. These results suggest ASPM<br />

and CDK5RAP2 may have a conserved role in primate brain evolution.<br />

Evolutionary encephalisation is not a general phenomenon in<br />

mammals, but is common to socially bonded groups<br />

S. Shultz<br />

Institute for Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Oxford<br />

Across vertebrates, variation in total and relative brain size across mammals<br />

is marked, and is proposed to have a functional basis because brains are<br />

metabolically costly. Species should be expected to maximise the costbenefit<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> supporting costly tissues. A vast and expanding literature<br />

has identified associations between relative brain size amongst extant<br />

species and ecological and behavioural correlates including social<br />

characteristics, ecological flexibility, resilience, innovation, social learning,<br />

etc. However, a still unresolved question is how (and why) evolutionary<br />

trends in encephalisation vary across taxonomic groups. This is for two<br />

main reasons: 1) variation in extant species between and within groups is<br />

commonly accepted as a measure <strong>of</strong> evolutionary trends, and 2) evaluating<br />

allometric signals <strong>of</strong> encephalisation is notoriously contentious. In this talk,<br />

I will discuss the insights from and limitations <strong>of</strong> current approaches to<br />

estimating evolutionary encephalisation and propose a novel quantitative<br />

macroevolutionary approach. In contrast to the conventional approach <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluating variation in extant species, I evaluated changes in relative brain<br />

size within taxa as a function <strong>of</strong> first appearance dates. The results<br />

challenge the conventional assumption that encephalisation is a general<br />

trend within mammalian groups. For example some groups, such as<br />

ruminants, felids and insectivores show no evidence <strong>of</strong> directional selection<br />

11


for large brains. However, those groups characterized by strong<br />

encephalisation signals were also likely to show bonded, stable sociality<br />

amongst extant species. Some non-social groups, particularly amongst the<br />

carnivores, also showed strong evidence <strong>of</strong> encephalisation. These results<br />

finally are put into the context <strong>of</strong> conventional ecological and social<br />

explanations <strong>of</strong> brain size increase. I will also discuss encephalisation in<br />

primates versus other mammals.<br />

Clinal patterns <strong>of</strong> crani<strong>of</strong>acial morphology in baboons (Papio spp.): a<br />

geometric morphometric approach<br />

J. Dunn 1 , A.Cardini 2 and S. Elton 1<br />

1. Hull York Medical School, The University <strong>of</strong> Hull, 2. Museo di<br />

Paleobiologia e dell’Orto Botanico, Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia,<br />

Italy<br />

Clinal variation in morphology is found in several primate species, yet the<br />

ecological underpinning <strong>of</strong> these trends is unknown. Recent research on<br />

African monkeys has discovered a trend common to three disparate taxa.<br />

Blue monkeys, vervets and red colobus monkeys all exhibit a decreasing<br />

size cline from Central to East Africa. This raises the question which other<br />

species exhibit similarities in this clinal pattern and what can be learnt by<br />

comparing these patterns? The baboon has an extensive geographical range<br />

and exhibits subspecific diversity lending itself well to the exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

clinal variation. This study uses a trend surface analysis to visualise and<br />

quantify the clinal trend. Environmental factors <strong>of</strong> known significance in<br />

baboon ecology are included in a partial regression along with spatial terms<br />

allowing the effects <strong>of</strong> the two factors to be quantified. The morphological<br />

cline is separated into its allometric and nonallometric components. Size is<br />

found to decrease from Central to East Africa in baboons as with red<br />

colobus, vervets, and blue monkeys. Comparing allometrically and<br />

nonallometrically controlled clines reveals that most <strong>of</strong> the observed<br />

morphological diversity in baboons is the result <strong>of</strong> size only. Taxa<br />

considered outliers in size, such as the Kinda baboon, cease to be such when<br />

allometry is controlled for. However, some clinal patterning remains but<br />

along a north-south axis and is perhaps indicative <strong>of</strong> a more ancient<br />

diversification in morphology. These observations should aid further<br />

research on determining the mechanisms underpinning clinal variation.<br />

Ecological and life history considerations related size are discussed.<br />

12


Application <strong>of</strong> the comparative method in reconstructing extinct<br />

primate social behaviour<br />

K. Balolia<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, University College London<br />

The comparative method has had some application to date in reconstructing<br />

the social behaviour <strong>of</strong> extinct primates, in that many researchers have used<br />

observed level <strong>of</strong> skeletal dimorphism in extant primates to make inferences<br />

about mating systems <strong>of</strong> extinct taxa. However, in this context, the<br />

comparative method is limited in its application to the reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />

primate social behaviour in that dimorphism alone is not able to distinguish<br />

between specific types <strong>of</strong> mating behaviour (Plavcan, 2000; J Hum Evol 39,<br />

327-344).<br />

A new approach to the study <strong>of</strong> extinct hominin social behaviour by<br />

Lockwood et al. (2007; Science 318, 1443-1446) showed that Paranthropus<br />

robustus males underwent extended development into adulthood and<br />

matured later than females to attain a high level <strong>of</strong> cranial dimorphism. In<br />

taking this approach, they provided new scope for considering the<br />

relationship between social behaviour and morphology using a comparative<br />

framework. Through measuring overall levels <strong>of</strong> sexual dimorphism<br />

combined with size and shape changes in the adult skull <strong>of</strong> Pan, Gorilla,<br />

Pongo, Hylobates and Papio, I show how this approach, in conjunction with<br />

methodological advances in quantifying cranial morphology, can be used to<br />

investigate the relationship between morphology and intrasexual<br />

relationships in primates. In addition to males showing prolonged growth to<br />

attain full adult size, I consider the suggestion that cranial size and shape<br />

changes occur, which relate to social dominance, both in males and in<br />

females. Associated implications for future attempts to reconstruct extinct<br />

primate social organisation using a comparative framework are discussed.<br />

Digit ratios and social systems in fossil hominids<br />

E. Nelson<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Social systems underpin many aspects <strong>of</strong> primate behaviour and predicting<br />

the social systems <strong>of</strong> extinct hominids (great apes) is critical for<br />

understanding human palaeobiology, as well as social and cognitive<br />

evolution. However, predicting social systems from fossils is problematic<br />

due to difficulties in estimating body size dimorphism from fragmentary<br />

remains and, in hominins, low canine size dimorphism. Recent studies have<br />

shown that the second-to-fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D), a putative<br />

biomarker for prenatal androgen effects, co-varies with social systems<br />

across haplorrhines; polygynous species have significantly lower 2D:4D<br />

ratios (high prenatal androgen effects) than pair-bonded species. This study<br />

13


uses proximal phalanx ratios from extant apes and discriminant function<br />

analysis to predict the social systems from the fossilised hand bone ratios <strong>of</strong><br />

five extinct hominids and one early anatomically modern human. The<br />

method predicts polygynous social systems for the early apes<br />

Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Hispanopithecus laietanus, and supports a<br />

proposed pair-bonded social system for Australopithecus afarensis, but not<br />

for Ardipithecus ramidus. Evidence also suggests that the social systems <strong>of</strong><br />

Neanderthals and early modern humans may have been similar and could<br />

have been characterised by higher levels <strong>of</strong> competition than evident in<br />

most contemporary human societies. Small fossil sample sizes and<br />

taphonomic factors preclude drawing firm conclusions using this method<br />

but, as more fossil hand bones become available, digit ratios could<br />

supplement current techniques used for predicting the social systems <strong>of</strong><br />

fossil hominids.<br />

Public Engagement with Science at the Living Links to Human<br />

Evolution Research Centre<br />

M. Bowler¹, H. Buchanan-Smith² and A. Whiten¹<br />

1. School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, 2. Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

‘Public Engagement with Science’ (PES) is a hot topic for Universities and<br />

researchers. It is becoming an important or essential component in attracting<br />

funding and assessing ‘impact’ and there are calls for PES to be<br />

incorporated into the mission statements <strong>of</strong> UK Universities. Living Links<br />

is a university research centre built with PES as one <strong>of</strong> its primary goals.<br />

Situated within Edinburgh Zoo it has already received hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> visitors, many <strong>of</strong> whom have witnessed live cognitive research<br />

in action. We describe the development <strong>of</strong> the visitor experience at Living<br />

Links in terms <strong>of</strong> activities and interpretive displays and discuss our efforts<br />

to maximise and measure the impact <strong>of</strong> our engagement activities.<br />

<strong>Primate</strong> “I”<br />

J.R. Anderson<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

What is the nature <strong>of</strong> nonhuman primates’ sense <strong>of</strong> self? Are there<br />

differences among species in the capacity to become the object <strong>of</strong> one’s<br />

own awareness? These questions have occupied comparative psychologists<br />

for the past three decades, with no lack <strong>of</strong> controversy. The study <strong>of</strong> selfrecognition<br />

has given rise to many claims and counterclaims regarding not<br />

only the use <strong>of</strong> reflections for mirror-guided self- or environment-directed<br />

behaviour, but also the cognitive implications <strong>of</strong> these abilities. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

this work will be reviewed, with additional discussion <strong>of</strong> two phenomena<br />

14


that might illustrate cognitive differences across species, namely empathy<br />

and awareness <strong>of</strong> death.<br />

What is personality and how can we study it in primates?<br />

J. Uher<br />

Free University Berlin, Germany<br />

Primatologists are increasingly interested in personality differences in<br />

nonhuman primates. Yet definitions and concepts are <strong>of</strong>ten vague and<br />

suitable methods <strong>of</strong> their measurement and analyses not well known. I<br />

introduce basic meta-theoretical concepts underlying the various theoretical<br />

concepts commonly used in the field. I clarify that differences in personality<br />

or temperament denote variations <strong>of</strong> individual-specific patterns in<br />

behaviour and mind. Methodological difficulties arise because individualspecific<br />

patterns are always masked by considerable random or ephemeral<br />

variations that derive from behavioural flexibility, ephemeral environmental<br />

conditions, and measurement error. Therefore, their empirical identification<br />

requires specific methodologies and analytical perspectives that are<br />

fundamentally different from those <strong>of</strong> other areas <strong>of</strong> behavioural<br />

primatology. I introduce two principal perspectives that allow exploring<br />

behavioural data for meaningful individual differences. The variablecentred<br />

perspective focuses on population-level phenomena and studies<br />

between-individual differences; the individual-centred perspective focuses<br />

on individual-level phenomena and studies the single individual’s unique<br />

configuration <strong>of</strong> behavioural patterns and their deviations relative to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the other individuals in the population. These two perspectives also allow<br />

exploring the puzzling finding that the individuals’ patterns <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />

and mind are <strong>of</strong>ten only moderately consistent across different situational<br />

contexts. Finally, I critically discuss the utility <strong>of</strong> observer ratings that have<br />

become more popular among animal researchers. I highlight that the<br />

apparent advantages <strong>of</strong> observer judgments, such as higher correlations<br />

among measurement variables or across situations, may derive from biased<br />

perceptions and ascriptions <strong>of</strong> human observers that need not accurately<br />

reflect the behavioural reality <strong>of</strong> primate individuals.<br />

Enriching the individual: Can personality predict response to<br />

enrichment in primates?<br />

K. Knight 1,2,4 , S. Robinson 2 , K. Stubbs 2 , A. Stacey 3 and V. Melfi 1,2,3,4<br />

1. Newquay Zoo, 2. University <strong>of</strong> Exeter, 3. University <strong>of</strong> Plymouth,<br />

4. Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust<br />

Individual differences in personality, whether defined as differences in<br />

‘temperament’, ‘coping style’ or ‘behavioural traits’, have been studied in<br />

great detail in humans, and there has been a recent increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

15


animal personality studies. Many <strong>of</strong> these studies have found evidence for<br />

fixed personality types in a wide range <strong>of</strong> taxa including non-human<br />

primates (NHP). We would expect that these differences in personality may<br />

affect other variables such as an animal’s use <strong>of</strong> environmental enrichment<br />

items (EE). This study looked at personality and enrichment use in Sulawesi<br />

crested black macaques (Macaca nigra). Subjects were 12 (6.6.0) M. nigra,<br />

housed at Paignton Zoo Environmental Park. Personality data were<br />

collected through keeper questionnaires. Broad state behaviours and<br />

enclosure use were recorded using instantaneous scan sampling every<br />

30mins, from 0800-1700 for 6 days for each condition. Six conditions were<br />

presented to the macaques: baseline (no enrichment), food in cages, kongs,<br />

food in bags, egg boxes and herb paste. Factor analysis were used to explore<br />

the data collected and revealed that M. nigra have a 3 factor model <strong>of</strong><br />

personality. The factors were labeled ‘Extroversion’, ‘Dominance’ and<br />

‘Sociability’. Regression analysis was used to see if individual scores on<br />

these personality factors could predict behavioural responses to EE. Results<br />

showed that the ‘Extroversion’ and ‘Dominance’ Factors could significantly<br />

predict the response <strong>of</strong> individuals to EE, in two <strong>of</strong> the five EE conditions;<br />

Kongs (R2= 0.75, F3,11 = 8.079, p


Exploring social arenas for forest elephants<br />

V. Fishlock and P. Lee<br />

Psychology Department, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

African savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana africana) have complex,<br />

well-studied social lives with stable multi-female groups and gregarious but<br />

independent males. Individuals live in an intricate social landscape, in<br />

which associations may persist for decades. In contrast, relatively little is<br />

known <strong>of</strong> social dynamics in forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis)<br />

inhabiting the Congo basin and no model <strong>of</strong> sociality has been empirically<br />

demonstrated. Social systems represent the outcomes <strong>of</strong> dynamic<br />

interactions among an individual, its conspecifics and its environment. Thus<br />

our lack <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> forest elephant sociality limits our<br />

understanding both <strong>of</strong> their environmental requirements and important<br />

drivers in the evolution <strong>of</strong> elephant social systems. Direct observations <strong>of</strong><br />

forest elephants were made at forest clearings, and these data are used to<br />

address questions <strong>of</strong> social dynamics. Clearings represent a special<br />

environment, providing mineral and food resources, as well as potential<br />

social opportunities and possible predation risks. They are hypothesised to<br />

function as social arenas for the individuals that use them, but traditional<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> analysing or describing social structure fail due to the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

fixed point observations and relatively low identification rates. The advent<br />

<strong>of</strong> accessible network analyses, as have been successfully applied to<br />

cetacean and primate societies, provides an alternative approach to model<br />

and explore the nature <strong>of</strong> forest elephant society and evaluate the role <strong>of</strong><br />

clearings as social arenas. We couple the use <strong>of</strong> network analyses with an<br />

age-sex class approach, to explore our forest clearing data.<br />

Daytime associations, kinship, and preferred sleeping areas: their<br />

influence on sleep site selection in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)<br />

L. Lock<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> non-human primates’ behaviour has traditionally been biased<br />

toward daytime activities, despite the fact that resting and sleep can account<br />

for up half <strong>of</strong> primate’s life spans. Most primates are gregarious, and so<br />

their social behaviours and relationships have been well studied, but the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> these behaviours and relationships on sleep-related activities have<br />

not received comparable levels <strong>of</strong> empirical investigation. Over 30 days, we<br />

recorded the daytime associations <strong>of</strong> a small group <strong>of</strong> zoo-housed<br />

chimpanzees, and the areas <strong>of</strong> the enclosure they subsequently retired to.<br />

The data showed that male chimpanzees that associate frequently during<br />

daytime also retired to the same area to sleep, especially the highest-ranking<br />

males. We also found that sleep site selection was not strongly dependent<br />

on the presence <strong>of</strong> kin. Our data also suggest that chimpanzees habitually<br />

17


eturn to the same sleeping areas; there are even preferred sleeping locations<br />

within the enclosure. There is a general need for more systematic studies<br />

into sleep-related behaviours <strong>of</strong> captive primates. Research into social<br />

aspects that influence sleep site selection, and group and individual<br />

preferences for sleeping sites might also have implications for enclosure<br />

design and welfare <strong>of</strong> captive primates<br />

The socioecological adaptive basis <strong>of</strong> primate mosaic brain evolution<br />

J. B. Smaers<br />

University College London and University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Neocortex hyperscaling in primates is commonly interpreted as the prime<br />

factor behind brain enlargement and as a main factor underlying primate<br />

‘higher’ cognition. Hypotheses attempting to clarify neocortical adaptation<br />

are thus fundamental to the study <strong>of</strong> primate cognitive evolution. In this<br />

context, it has been debated whether social or ecological factors are the<br />

main driving force behind brain adaptation. Although these hypotheses<br />

make specific predictions about subregions <strong>of</strong> the neocortex, they have been<br />

tested using the neocortex as a whole because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> data. In our recent<br />

work we presented new data on frontal and non-frontal neocortical lobe and<br />

neocerebellum. We show that distinct cortico-cerebellar neural circuits<br />

related to distinct aspects <strong>of</strong> learned behaviour can be recognized as<br />

important mosaic patterns <strong>of</strong> a concerted brain structure evolution across the<br />

primate clade. We also indicate that although both social and ecological<br />

variables are associated to size changes in whole neocortex volume, social<br />

variables are solely responsible for the evolution <strong>of</strong> frontal lobe size, while<br />

ecological factors explain the evolution <strong>of</strong> non-frontal lobe size. We<br />

propose a new model <strong>of</strong> primate brain evolution emphasizing the mosaic<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> neural circuits <strong>of</strong> interconnected brain structures and<br />

integrating both social and ecological selective pressures driving brain<br />

evolution. Our results help clarify a longstanding debate on the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

primate neocortical adaptation and demonstrate that primate brain<br />

architecture reflects adaptation at an intracortical neuroanatomical level.<br />

The neuro-anatomy <strong>of</strong> the face processing area in chimpanzees and<br />

humans.<br />

S. A. Chance 1 , E. K. Sawyer 1 , P. R. H<strong>of</strong> 2 and T. J. Crow 3<br />

1. Neuropathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New<br />

York, USA<br />

3. SANE POWIC Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Face recognition provides important social cues in primates. Multiple<br />

studies report that faces are processed on the right side <strong>of</strong> the brain in<br />

18


humans and such brain asymmetries may be a key component <strong>of</strong> human<br />

evolution. However, it is not clear how asymmetrical structures and<br />

functions are linked. One hypothesis for leftward language lateralization in<br />

Wernicke’s area is based on the asymmetry <strong>of</strong> vertical units <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

(minicolumns) in the cerebral cortex, where minicolumns are wider in the<br />

left hemisphere in humans but symmetrical in non-human primates. It is not<br />

known whether there is a similar species difference in the face processing<br />

region, the fusiform cortex. We investigated the fusiform <strong>of</strong> 14 human and<br />

14 chimpanzee post-mortem brains for species differences in minicolumn<br />

and cell size symmetry. Minicolumn spacing and neuron size were<br />

asymetrical* in humans (wider and larger on the left, respectively), but<br />

symmetrical* in chimpanzees (species differences p


Abstracts for poster presentations<br />

Vocal communication in captive ruffed lemurs.<br />

L. Rudge 1,2 , N. Laici 1,2 , B.M. Bezerra 1 , C. Schwitzer 2 and G. Jones 1<br />

1. School <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

2. Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, Bristol Zoo Gardens<br />

Species and subspecies differences in vocalisations have proved to be useful<br />

for taxonomic classification. There has been an ongoing debate regarding<br />

the taxonomic status <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs due to their possibly overlapping<br />

distributions in eastern Madagascar. Early classification inferred that there<br />

were two subspecies <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs – the red ruffed lemur (Varecia<br />

variegata rubra) and the black-and-white ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata<br />

variegata). After further research, both former subspecies were elevated to<br />

species status, with most authors recognising three subspecies <strong>of</strong> the blackand-white<br />

ruffed lemur (V. variegata variegata, V. v. subcincta and V. v.<br />

editorum). We studied the vocal behaviour <strong>of</strong> the red ruffed lemur (Varecia<br />

rubra). Furthermore, we investigated whether the red ruffed lemur could be<br />

discriminated from two subspecies <strong>of</strong> black-and-white ruffed lemur,<br />

Varecia variegata variegata and V. v. editorum, from their conspicuous<br />

loud calls. We recorded naturally occurring calls <strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs at Bristol<br />

Zoo Gardens, Dudley Zoo and Twycross Zoo (United Kingdom). Seven out<br />

<strong>of</strong> 13 calls described in the vocal repertoire <strong>of</strong> the red ruffed lemur were<br />

observed in our study animals. There were significant differences in the<br />

physical structure <strong>of</strong> the ‘pulsed squawk’ loud call between V. rubra and the<br />

two V. variegata subspecies, supporting the current taxonomic classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> ruffed lemurs. Our results show that bioacoustics can be used efficiently<br />

as a taxonomic tool to discriminate between lemur taxa.<br />

Preliminary investigation <strong>of</strong> social integration and social success in<br />

captive female capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)<br />

M. McLeod, C.L. Cunningham and S. Hardie<br />

Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s are intensely social, spending much <strong>of</strong> their time engaged in<br />

interactions with others. Social investment in other group members can be<br />

beneficial; individuals can secure future reciprocity and reduce stress. How<br />

individuals manage their social investment will depend on both intrinsic and<br />

extrinsic factors, both <strong>of</strong> which will influence the opportunities available for<br />

interacting with others. Being well integrated (or central) in the group,<br />

rather than on the periphery and <strong>of</strong>ten alone, will afford greater social<br />

prospects and so animals should work to improve their level <strong>of</strong> integration<br />

and show detriments in behaviour (and health) if they are not able to spend<br />

time with conspecifics. This study is a preliminary investigation into social<br />

20


integration as a promoter <strong>of</strong> social success (support), measured by level <strong>of</strong><br />

integration in the group and level <strong>of</strong> stress exhibited. Female capuchins (n =<br />

6) are members <strong>of</strong> two separate (East and West) but environmentally similar<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> captive female capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) housed at the<br />

Living Links to Human Evolution research centre at Edinburgh Zoo.<br />

Behaviour such as grooming (given and received), time spent alone or with<br />

group members, dominance and scratching (as a measure <strong>of</strong> stress) were<br />

documented by both scan and focal methods. Social integration was<br />

calculated by mean time spent alone or with others. Statistical analysis<br />

revealed significance between level <strong>of</strong> integration and the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

time spent grooming others. All other analyses were non-significant;<br />

however, mean amounts <strong>of</strong> scratching were lower when percentage <strong>of</strong> time<br />

spent grooming was higher; also level <strong>of</strong> social integration illustrated some<br />

relevance to rank position and amount <strong>of</strong> time spent grooming. To<br />

conclude, this suggests that grooming is a commodity traded for a central<br />

position in the group, to reduce stress, as well as to maintain rank position.<br />

Bonobos (Pan paniscus) use copulation calls as a social signal<br />

Z. Clay and K. Zuberbühler<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />

Females <strong>of</strong> many primate species produce distinct vocalisations known as<br />

‘copulation calls’ during mating events. Typically, copulation calls are<br />

produced during heterosexual matings and thus their adaptive significance<br />

is considered to be for promoting reproductive success. However, in<br />

bonobos (Pan paniscus), females regularly engage in homosexual as well as<br />

heterosexual matings and produce copulation calls in both contexts. The<br />

way in which copulation calls have become detached from their biological<br />

function in bonobos challenges theories explaining these calls as purely<br />

reproductive strategies. In the current study, we examined bonobo<br />

copulation calling behaviour to investigate how females use these<br />

vocalisations as tools to pursue certain social and reproductive goals. We<br />

recorded copulation calls produced by mature females at Lola Ya Bonobo<br />

Sanctuary, DRC, during both homosexual and heterosexual interactions.<br />

Acoustic analyses revealed considerable similarity in the acoustic structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> copulation calls produced in both contexts. Furthermore, whilst females<br />

called more during heterosexual copulations, we found that copulation calls<br />

were used similarly in both contexts. For both homo- and heterosexual<br />

copulation calls, we observed strong effects <strong>of</strong> relative dominance rank,<br />

with low-rank females calling more with higher-ranked partners. In<br />

homosexual matings, the identity <strong>of</strong> the initiator also predicted calling. Our<br />

results suggest that bonobos use copulation calls as social signals to express<br />

social status and to advertise bonding relationships. Thus, rather than being<br />

restricted to purely reproductive contexts, copulation calls in bonobos<br />

appear to have assumed a greater social significance.<br />

21


Social monitoring by reputation: How to compare human and animals<br />

in an evolutionary framework?<br />

Y.I. Russell<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Social and Cultural Anthropology, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Reputation is usually defined as an entirely human construct. This is<br />

because the majority <strong>of</strong> studies in human disciplines (economics,<br />

commerce, psychology, etc.) define reputation as a sort <strong>of</strong> one-dimensional<br />

yardstick whereupon the same information is accessible to everyone. This<br />

definition is <strong>of</strong> limited usefulness to animal studies because it requires<br />

language ability and ubiquitous sources <strong>of</strong> public information. The exact<br />

psychological processes that underlay social reputation monitoring are<br />

poorly understood even in humans. In order to begin a comparative study <strong>of</strong><br />

human and animal reputation monitoring, “reputation” should be redefined<br />

in a way that accommodates all animals. Here, I present a framework for<br />

investigating the evolution <strong>of</strong> social monitoring abilities across all animal<br />

taxa. I define reputation as “knowledge about an individual’s typical<br />

behaviour, based on a knowledge <strong>of</strong> that individual’s past behaviour”<br />

(Russell, 2007). The psychological process <strong>of</strong> reputation monitoring should<br />

be dissected into its constituent parts in order to compare the abilities<br />

between animals in a componential way (this approach is similar to<br />

Hockett’s design features approach to language). Most organisms are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> some form <strong>of</strong> social eavesdropping and intention reading, but the<br />

smallest brained animals are unlikely to cogitate much on the personalities<br />

<strong>of</strong> their conspecifics. At the human end <strong>of</strong> the continuum, social reputation<br />

monitoring probably involves a type <strong>of</strong> social expertise. It is important to be<br />

aware, however, that human social expertise will necessarily involve a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> memory distortions, affected by highly emotional events, schema<br />

effects, primacy, and recency.<br />

Emotional laterality - the influence <strong>of</strong> emotion upon visual field<br />

preferences<br />

A. Milligan<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

Emotional lateralisation may influence motor lateralisation, and may<br />

therefore have played a significant role in the evolution <strong>of</strong> social signals in<br />

both humans and non-human animals. The ‘affective state’ <strong>of</strong> animals has<br />

been shown to exert influence upon functional lateralisation in species from<br />

five classes <strong>of</strong> vertebrates with studies observing strong lateral biases during<br />

particular social interactions. However, the association between specific<br />

emotions and social interactions may be more complex than previously<br />

thought. Almost all <strong>of</strong> these studies focused upon scenarios <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

emotion such as fear or aggression, and in each case visual field preferences<br />

were identified as suitable indicators <strong>of</strong> lateral preference whereby subjects<br />

22


consistently observed conspecifics with the same eye. There exist two<br />

competing theories that posit the lateralisation <strong>of</strong> emotion within the brain:<br />

one suggests right-hemisphere dominance in the interpretation and<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> all affective states (Campbell, 1982), whilst the other<br />

contends that the right hemisphere is responsible for negative emotion alone<br />

whereas positive emotion is regulated by the left hemisphere (the Valence<br />

Hypothesis; Davidson, 1992) but the almost exclusive investigation <strong>of</strong><br />

aggressive/fearful scenarios prevents objective evaluation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

competing theories. This study addresses the problem by considering<br />

interactions across the full spectrum <strong>of</strong> emotion, testing both theories whilst<br />

also considering whether the strength <strong>of</strong> emotional intensity can be<br />

correlated to lateral bias, and whether age-sex effects exist.<br />

Composition <strong>of</strong> vigilance periods in gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) social play<br />

J.A. Mayhew and J.C. Gómez<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews<br />

Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) play bouts are complex and dynamic social<br />

interactions that incorporate locomotory movements and behaviours from<br />

outside social contexts such as aggression or predation. Such diverse bouts<br />

are typically punctuated with intermittent periods where the close physical<br />

activity between the interacting individuals seems to momentarily conclude.<br />

During these cessations, or “vigilance periods”, the play partners may break<br />

contact and give pause to their physical interaction, may readjust their body<br />

positioning, move in or out <strong>of</strong> proximity from their partner, or they may<br />

transition from one type <strong>of</strong> generalized play pattern to another. This study<br />

presents a preliminary examination <strong>of</strong> the structure and composition <strong>of</strong><br />

vigilance periods taking into account several variables including eye gaze,<br />

head orientation, body orientation and posturing <strong>of</strong> the interacting<br />

individuals. Specific organization <strong>of</strong> these subtle social cues may be<br />

essential for initiating, maintaining, and terminating play and may also shed<br />

light on the advantages and preferences <strong>of</strong> using certain social cues over<br />

others. During vigilance periods, young gorillas might learn about the social<br />

cues that signal attention and intention in others as well as in themselves<br />

and an investigation <strong>of</strong> these periods can be useful in further exploring what<br />

social cognitive functions social play may have for young gorillas.<br />

Can hand and footpad morphology distinguish slow loris taxa?<br />

C. J. Wheeler, R.A. Munds and K.A I. Nekaris<br />

Nocturnal <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences and Law,<br />

Oxford Brookes University<br />

Once considered a widespread homogeneous taxon, a minimum <strong>of</strong> five<br />

species <strong>of</strong> slow loris (Nycticebus) are now recognised based on genetic,<br />

23


morphological and behavioural data. Characteristics such as pelage, body<br />

size, and reproductive parameters indicate further variability, but logistical<br />

difficulties preclude their study throughout much <strong>of</strong> their range. Museum<br />

specimens thus <strong>of</strong>fer an insight into their diversity. In particular, hand and<br />

foot pad morphology has been used to identify species <strong>of</strong> galago, tarsier and<br />

lemur. For lorises in particular, that rely to varying degrees on grasping <strong>of</strong><br />

large trunks to engage in exudativory, hands and feet may show distinctive<br />

characters. Here, we quantitatively describe the palmar and plantar surface<br />

morphology <strong>of</strong> 142 loris specimens from five zoological collections. We<br />

took digital photographs <strong>of</strong> the palmar and plantar surfaces; we<br />

subsequently performed comparative scaling and both qualitative and<br />

quantitative investigation using imaging s<strong>of</strong>tware. We used SPSS to analyse<br />

the resultant data. All lorises displayed six palmar and plantar pads,<br />

although in some specimens, pads 1 and 6 merged. Discriminant function<br />

analyses grouped between 3 and 9 taxa based on palmar and plantar<br />

morphology, with pads 1, 4, and 5 usefully distinguishing groups. These<br />

taxonomic designations support recent studies, and provide evidence for 2-3<br />

taxa on the island <strong>of</strong> Borneo. Pad measurements were log transformed to<br />

compare across the variably-sized taxa. Preliminary analyses reveal that<br />

hand pads tend to be larger in taxa currently known to exploit more gum,<br />

potentially providing them with more surface area grip on vertical surfaces.<br />

What factors determine successful reintroductions? A slow loris case<br />

study<br />

A.L. Doughty, R.S. Moore and K.A.I. Nekaris<br />

Nocturnal <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences and Law,<br />

Oxford Brookes University<br />

Slow lorises are amongst the most widely traded primates in Southeast Asia,<br />

popular with consumers as both medicine and pets. In Indonesia, more than<br />

100 animals are regularly confiscated each month, and the need for<br />

reintroducing these wild-born yet highly endangered primates is becoming<br />

vital. In October 2009, we began the first large-scale systematic slow loris<br />

restocking project in Ciapus, Mt Salak, Indonesia. Previous slow loris<br />

reintroductions have failed due to: lack <strong>of</strong> funding; no pre- or post-release<br />

monitoring; death due to starvation and hypothermia; predation; and release<br />

<strong>of</strong> species into the wrong geographic areas. As one means to determine how<br />

to avoid such problems for the current project, we systematically analysed<br />

eight categories regarding success or failure <strong>of</strong> 52 reintroduction projects,<br />

reported in the same format to the IUCN Reintroduction Specialists Group<br />

(IRSG) in 2008. We entered ordinal and categorical data for six higher<br />

taxonomic groupings <strong>of</strong> 48 species <strong>of</strong> reintroduced animals into SPSS.<br />

Success rate differed significantly (2=19.2, df=3, p


enclosures (81% <strong>of</strong> studies) and long-term post-release monitoring (77% <strong>of</strong><br />

studies) were deemed as contributing to a project’s success, whereas lack <strong>of</strong><br />

local community support (43%) and lack <strong>of</strong> specialised skills and<br />

knowledge (38%) contributed notably to projects’ failures. These data<br />

strongly support the use <strong>of</strong> the IRSG’s guidelines, which have been too<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten ignored in the case <strong>of</strong> slow lorises, as good practice.<br />

Grooming reciprocity and kinship in captive lion tailed macaques<br />

(Macaca silenus)<br />

F.R. Moore 1 , C. Cunningham 1 and M. Kingston Jones 2<br />

1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee, 2. Howletts Wild<br />

Animal Park, Bekesbourne, Canterbury<br />

We investigated grooming reciprocity in relation to within-dyad relatedness<br />

in a group <strong>of</strong> captive Macaca silenus. We predicted an inverse relationship<br />

between within-dyad relatedness and time-matching <strong>of</strong> grooming bouts, as<br />

grooming kin has indirect fitness benefits for the individual. We also<br />

predicted that high ranking individuals would receive more, and contribute<br />

less, grooming and that there would be an inverse relationship between<br />

time-matching <strong>of</strong> reciprocal bouts and within-dyad dominance rank<br />

distance. Subjects were a captive group <strong>of</strong> females (n = 5) housed at<br />

Howletts Wild Animal Park (UK). Related dyads did not time-match their<br />

grooming bouts to the same extent as non-related dyads and there was a<br />

strong negative relationship demonstrating that high-ranking individuals<br />

groomed down and low-ranking individuals groomed up the hierarchy.<br />

Further analysis suggested that this was due to strategic preferential<br />

grooming by mid- and low-ranking individuals up the hierarchy and<br />

preferential grooming down, rather than across, the hierarchy by highranking<br />

individuals. We conclude that our results support biological markets<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> grooming and implicate a role <strong>of</strong> relatedness in the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

grooming interactions.<br />

Predator alarm calls in wild black-fronted titi moneys Callicebus<br />

nigrifrons<br />

C. Cäsar 1,2,3 , R. Byrne 1 , R. Young 2 and K. Zuberbühler 1<br />

1. Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group, School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St<br />

Andrews, 2. Conservation, Ecology and Animal Behaviour Group,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Post-Graduate Studies in Zoology, Pontifícia Universidade<br />

Católica de Minas Gerais, Brazil, 3. Inhotim, Rua B 20, 35460-000,<br />

Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, Brazil<br />

Some primates produce acoustically distinct alarm calls to different<br />

predators. In some species there is evidence that recipients react with<br />

25


adaptive responses to such calls. Callicebus monkeys have been known for<br />

their large repertoire <strong>of</strong> vocalizations, and some <strong>of</strong> their calls are combined<br />

into long and complex sequences. However, the monkeys’ vocal responses<br />

to distinct external events have not been studied systematically. We studied<br />

the alarm calls <strong>of</strong> undisturbed black-fronted titi monkey (C. nigrifrons) in<br />

Minas Gerais, southeast Brazil, by presenting visual predator models. Our<br />

preliminary results show that monkeys produce two different types <strong>of</strong> calls<br />

when first encountering different types <strong>of</strong> predators. Furthermore, they<br />

produce a long sequence <strong>of</strong> calls, in which some <strong>of</strong> them can be further<br />

subdivided into four acoustic variants, which are obtained by optional<br />

suffixation and duplications <strong>of</strong> the call stem. In addition, one <strong>of</strong> the alarm<br />

calls, given to puma for instance, is also used in other contexts, such as<br />

when monkeys were foraging close to the ground, and in response to a non<br />

predator animal. Overall, our results indicate no fundamental differences to<br />

the acoustic flexibility previously reported from Old World monkeys,<br />

suggesting an early origin within the primate lineage. However, the fact that<br />

some calls or call sequences were given in both predatory and nonpredatory<br />

situations illustrate the need for empirical studies that focus on<br />

naturally produced calls and their context. Additionally, future research<br />

using playback experiments with alarm calls and analyses <strong>of</strong> listeners’<br />

responses is required.<br />

Sponsors: CAPES/Brazil and FAPEMIG/Brazil.<br />

The Aspinall Foundations in situ primate conservation projects<br />

M. Kingston Jones 1 and N. Laurence 2<br />

1. Howletts and Port Lympne Wild Animal Parks<br />

2. The Aspinall Foundation<br />

The Aspinall Foundation (TAF) is a registered charity that is actively<br />

involved with several projects that incorporate a diverse range <strong>of</strong> in situ<br />

conservation activities. These include the well-established overseas projects<br />

in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo and Gabon and more recent developing projects in<br />

Indonesia and Madagascar. Our main spheres <strong>of</strong> in situ conservation-based<br />

activity include ecosystem management, local community education<br />

projects, capacity building, habitat surveys, rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> confiscated<br />

wild animals and reintroduction <strong>of</strong> captive-bred and confiscated wild-born<br />

animals. This poster will summarise our recent activities over these three<br />

key projects, including - from Congo and Gabon - updates from the PPG<br />

field sites with the Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and<br />

wildlife law enforcement in Congo. In Indonesia, our new rehabilitation and<br />

possible reintroduction site in Java for the moloch gibbon (Hylobates<br />

moloch) and Javan langur (Trachypithecus auratus), protected area<br />

management in Indonesia and Camera trapping in Java and Sumatra. And<br />

from Madagascar, updates on the current status <strong>of</strong> new projects with the<br />

26


greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus) and crowned sifaka (Propithecus<br />

coronatus).<br />

Testing the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in<br />

human male faces<br />

F.R. Moore 1 and D.I. Perrett 2<br />

1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee<br />

2. School <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> St Andrews, St Andrews<br />

Recent research implicates the role <strong>of</strong> stress in the Immunocompetence<br />

Handicap Hypothesis (ICHH) <strong>of</strong> sexual selection. An interaction between<br />

putative cues to immunocompetence (masculinity) and current health in<br />

men’s faces suggests that this may apply to humans. We explored<br />

relationships between sex- and stress-hormones (i.e., testosterone and<br />

cortisol) and facial masculinity and attractiveness. Twenty-four facial<br />

stimuli were constructed from images <strong>of</strong> males on the basis <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong><br />

salivary cortisol and testosterone. These were rated by female participants<br />

across fertile and non-fertile phases <strong>of</strong> the menstrual cycle. Results<br />

demonstrated that preferences for cues to testosterone in the face are<br />

contingent upon co-occurring levels <strong>of</strong> cortisol and are discussed in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the stress-linked ICHH.<br />

Crops, conflict and behaviour on farms among Buton macaques<br />

R. Wyper 1 , P.C. Lee 1 and N.E.C. Priston 2<br />

1. Anthropology and Geography, Oxford Brookes University<br />

2. Psychology, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling & Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group<br />

Predicting behavioural responses and survival probabilities for populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> threatened endemic species in human-dominated and changing<br />

environments are global concerns facing many primatologists. This problem<br />

is particularly acute for the Buton macaque (Macaca ochreata<br />

brunnescens), which is endemic to Buton Island, southeast Sulawesi,<br />

Indonesia. Our study aimed to investigate the crop raiding characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

this endemic species over time, and to explore the value <strong>of</strong> longitudinal<br />

studies for assessing crop raiding. The behavioural repertoire exhibited<br />

during crop raiding inside the farm perimeter was observed over a period <strong>of</strong><br />

seven years (2002-2008). The average raid frequency per year decreased<br />

slightly during the study period, raising interesting questions about the<br />

feeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> the macaques over time and in response to<br />

management strategies. Behaviour differed significantly as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

penetration distance into the farm, as well as among some age-sex classes,<br />

but not all. Storage organ crops (e.g., sweet potato) were most abundant and<br />

most frequently raided by macaques. Future work on wild versus cultivated<br />

27


food choice is essential for ensuring the survival <strong>of</strong> the Buton macaque in a<br />

human-dominated environment. We aim to investigate the ecological<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> crop raiding over an 18-month period, to assess feeding<br />

ecology in relation to forest phenology. The results <strong>of</strong> this PhD study will<br />

be used directly to support conservation efforts for the Buton macaque and<br />

to benefit the people <strong>of</strong> Buton. This study is funded by a NERC/ESRC joint<br />

studentship to R. Wyper.<br />

A sex difference in effect <strong>of</strong> relevant object experience on objectmediated<br />

problem-solving in gibbons (Hylobatidae)<br />

C. Cunningham 1 , J. Anderson 2 and A. Mootnick 3<br />

1. Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Abertay Dundee, 2. Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Stirling, 3. Gibbon Conservation Center, Santa Clarita, California, USA<br />

Understanding the functional properties <strong>of</strong> objects that make them useful in<br />

novel situations is likely facilitated by prior exposure during which object<br />

affordances can be explored. However, explorations <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> previous<br />

object experience on object-mediated problem solving have provided<br />

conflicting results. Previous opportunity to explore objects and their<br />

properties could manifest as increased propensity to approach and interact<br />

with novel objects (a requirement for successful object-mediated solutions),<br />

and improved efficiency in goal-directed manipulation. Here, we examine<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> prior domain-specific experience on acquisition <strong>of</strong> object<br />

manipulation skills in gibbons (Hylobatidae). These small arboreal apes do<br />

not frequently use tools. This argues against any evolved cognitive<br />

mechanism specifically for processing object properties. Gibbons provided<br />

with the opportunity to learn about the affordances <strong>of</strong> a potential tool before<br />

using it to obtain a reward were expected to demonstrate increased<br />

efficiency in goal realisation. Using a simple zero-order manipulation that<br />

required the apes to use a rake-tool to pull in an out-or-reach item, 14 out <strong>of</strong><br />

22 tested individuals successfully solved the task. Prior exposure did not<br />

facilitate appropriate tool use in males although females performed<br />

significantly more efficiently with previous experience, seemingly<br />

benefitting from a period <strong>of</strong> learning about the objects neutrality. This may<br />

be due to gender differences in costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> perceived risk-taking.<br />

28


Future Meetings<br />

PSGB Winter Meeting <strong>2010</strong><br />

Gombe 50<br />

8 th and 9 th December <strong>2010</strong><br />

Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London, Regent’s Park, London<br />

This year marks the 50th anniversary <strong>of</strong> the start <strong>of</strong> Dr Jane Goodall DBE’s<br />

ground-breaking research on chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)<br />

at Gombe Stream, Tanganyika - now Gombe Stream National Park,<br />

Tanzania. It also marks the beginning <strong>of</strong> a long tradition <strong>of</strong> other<br />

primatological research at this site, including olive baboons (Papio<br />

cynocephalus anubis), red colobus (Colobus badius tephrosceles), and<br />

people.<br />

The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> is proud to hold its two-day scientific<br />

Winter Meeting, on 8 th and 9 th December <strong>2010</strong>, in celebration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primatological research done at, or inspired by, the Gombe research over<br />

the past 50 years, and looking forward to the future. Gombe’s impact is farreaching<br />

globally, and covers a wide range <strong>of</strong> scientific disciplines, from<br />

human evolution, to ethology, to disease transmission, to conservation. Dr<br />

Goodall and the Gombe research have also inspired many young scientists<br />

around the world to go into careers relating to primate behaviour, as well as<br />

more broadly in biodiversity conservation and other related fields, in the<br />

wild, in zoos and in sanctuaries.<br />

We are delighted to announce that the invited speakers at “Gombe 50”<br />

include the following:<br />

• Dr Jane Goodall DBE* (Founder, The Jane Goodall Institute;<br />

http://www.janegoodall.org/; http://www.janegoodall.org.uk/home)<br />

• Dr D. Anthony Collins* (Gombe Stream Research Centre,<br />

Tanzania)<br />

• Tara Golshan (Executive Director for Education, The Jane<br />

Goodall Institute–UK)<br />

• Dr Shadrack Kamenya (Gombe Stream Research Centre,<br />

Tanzania)<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Phyllis C. Lee* (University <strong>of</strong> Stirling, UK)<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. William C. McGrew* (University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, UK)<br />

• Guy Norton* (Anglia Ruskin University, UK / Director <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Animal Behaviour Research Unit, Mikumi National Park,<br />

Tanzania)<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anne E. Pusey* (Duke University, USA)<br />

29


• Ian Redmond OBE* (Chief Consultant, GRASP -<br />

UNEP/UNESCO <strong>Great</strong> Ape Survival Partnership)<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Richard Wrangham (Harvard University, USA)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Andy Whiten* (St Andrews University) will give this year’s Osman<br />

Hill Lecture: “Cultural elements in a chimpanzee community (Goodall,<br />

1973) 37 years on."<br />

(* indicates confirmed speaker)<br />

We anticipate that advance registration will be required, as we expect a<br />

great deal <strong>of</strong> interest. As in recent years, the Winter Meeting will include<br />

oral and poster presentation sessions, and we welcome pr<strong>of</strong>fered oral papers<br />

on areas <strong>of</strong> primatological research relating to, or stimulated by, Gombe<br />

studies, as well as pr<strong>of</strong>fered posters on any area <strong>of</strong> primatological research<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest to PSGB members. Registration and the call for papers will be<br />

announced in the near future, so please keep an eye on the PSGB website<br />

for updates . Announcements<br />

will also be sent to PSGB members via our JISCmail list<br />

.<br />

During the Winter Meeting, we plan to hold a book-signing event with Dr<br />

Goodall, and also a social event on the evening <strong>of</strong> 8 th December. The<br />

evening ‘do’ allows delegates and speakers an opportunity to discuss their<br />

work with each other, as well as to catch up with old friends, and make new<br />

ones.<br />

We do hope you will be able to join us for this very exciting scientific<br />

meeting, in celebration <strong>of</strong> “Gombe 50” and the influential work <strong>of</strong> Dr Jane<br />

Goodall DBE and others!<br />

Further information on the contributions <strong>of</strong> Dr Goodall to the fields <strong>of</strong><br />

ethology, primatology and conservation, can be found at<br />

.<br />

If you have any questions about the event in the meantime, please contact<br />

the organiser:<br />

Dr Sonya P. Hill<br />

Conservation Medicine Division<br />

North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong><br />

Chester Zoo<br />

Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester<br />

Chester, CH2 1LH<br />

UK<br />

<br />

30


Announcement:<br />

International Symposium – Compassionate Conservation<br />

Compassionate Conservation:<br />

Animal Welfare in Conservation Practice<br />

An International Symposium<br />

Lady Margaret Hall, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

1 – 3 September <strong>2010</strong><br />

The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) and the Born Free<br />

Foundation are delighted to announce an International Symposium on<br />

animal welfare in conservation practice, to be held at Oxford. The<br />

Symposium will bring together scientists and practitioners from a range <strong>of</strong><br />

disciplines to debate animal welfare issues in conservation, examine<br />

potential synergies, look for practical outcomes and promote a dialogue<br />

between these two disciplines that are <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as mutually<br />

exclusive.<br />

The Symposium will be organized around the following themes:<br />

Animal welfare in field conservation<br />

Captive animal welfare and conservation<br />

Conservation consequences <strong>of</strong> wildlife rescue, rehabilitation and release<br />

International trade in live wild animals<br />

The Symposium will be <strong>of</strong> interest to academics and graduates in<br />

conservation biology, animal welfare and animal ethics, as well as<br />

conservation and animal welfare organisations and practitioners.<br />

Further details and online registration will shortly be available at<br />

.<br />

To express your interest in attending the symposium, please contact Chris<br />

Draper (email: chris@bornfree.org.uk; tel: +44(0)1403 240170)<br />

About the Organisers<br />

Born Free Foundation<br />

The Born Free Foundation is an international wildlife charity working<br />

throughout the world to stop individual wild animal suffering and protect<br />

threatened species in the wild. www.bornfree.org.uk<br />

Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Founded in 1986, WildCRU was the first university-based conservation<br />

research unit in Europe. WildCRU’s mission is to achieve practical<br />

solutions to conservation problems through original scientific research.<br />

www.wildcru.org<br />

31


Announcement:<br />

Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants<br />

As previously reported, the family <strong>of</strong> Charles Lockwood generously<br />

donated a sum <strong>of</strong> money to fund a scheme <strong>of</strong> special PSGB grants,<br />

dedicated to the memory <strong>of</strong> the late UCL lecturer and designed to support<br />

the research <strong>of</strong> PSGB student members. The <strong>Society</strong> received over 20<br />

applications for Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants. The<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> applications was exceptionally high, and the awards panel<br />

(comprising Andrew Smith, Robin Dunbar, Simone Pika and Alison<br />

Fletcher) had a tough job making the final decision. The range <strong>of</strong> proposals<br />

received shows the great breadth and depth <strong>of</strong> primatological research<br />

amongst students in the UK, and bodes very well for the future <strong>of</strong> PSGB.<br />

We are pleased to announce that Lockwood grants have been awarded to:<br />

Graham Banes, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge: ‘Factors influencing male orangutan<br />

reproductive success’<br />

Conrad Brimacombe, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield: ‘Growth and development in<br />

the genus Pan: a life history approach’<br />

Laura Buck, Roehampton University: ‘Crani<strong>of</strong>acial morphology, paranasal<br />

sinuses and adaptation in Pleistocene hominins’<br />

Camille Coudrat, Oxford Brookes University: ‘Ecology <strong>of</strong> the red-shanked<br />

douc monkey in Nakai Nam Theun National Protected Area, central-eastern<br />

Laos’<br />

Blake Morton, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling: ‘Inter-individual differences in<br />

cognitive ability and social networking strategies in brown capuchin<br />

monkeys’<br />

Caroline Phillips, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge: ‘Chimpanzee diet:<br />

pyrosequencing DNA from faeces’<br />

Isabelle Winder, University <strong>of</strong> York: ‘Linking primate foot anatomy,<br />

ecology and landscape use’<br />

Rebecca Wyper, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling: ‘Ecological drivers <strong>of</strong> macaque crop<br />

raiding in Buton, Indonesia: human responses and implications for<br />

conservation’<br />

Awardees will present the results <strong>of</strong> their research at a PSGB meeting, and<br />

are also encouraged to submit their work for publication. The <strong>Society</strong> would<br />

like to congratulate the grant recipients and thank all the applicants and the<br />

award committee for their time and effort.<br />

32


CONSERVATION GRANT REPORTS<br />

Ecology and status <strong>of</strong> the drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in Korup<br />

National Park, Southwest Cameroon: implications for their<br />

conservation<br />

CHRISTOS ASTARAS<br />

christos_astaras@yahoo.ca<br />

Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in August 2006<br />

The drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) is a terrestrial primate endemic to the<br />

Cross-Sanaga-Bioko rainforests <strong>of</strong> Central Africa whose survival is<br />

endangered by increasing pressure from hunting and habitat loss. Few<br />

studies have ever examined the ecology <strong>of</strong> wild drills and our current<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the conservation needs <strong>of</strong> the species is limited. This<br />

project studied the ecology <strong>of</strong> drills in a 63 km 2 section <strong>of</strong> Korup National<br />

Park in southwest Cameroon over twelve months (Feb – Jun 2006, Jul 2007<br />

– Jan 2008). It also evaluated the status and threats <strong>of</strong> the drill in the greater<br />

Korup region with the intent <strong>of</strong> improving the species’ protection. Finally,<br />

the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> assuming near-identical ecologies between the drill<br />

and its better studied, allopatric and sole congener – the mandrill (M.<br />

sphinx) – was assessed.<br />

Wild drills in foliage, Korup National Park (2006)<br />

33


Analysis <strong>of</strong> faecal samples and feeding remains showed that the drill<br />

maintains a diverse, yet not indiscriminate, omnivorous diet throughout the<br />

year consisting primarily <strong>of</strong> fruits and seeds, and to a lesser extent leaves,<br />

mushrooms and insects. Drills ingested and dispersed intact seeds from 110<br />

plant types primarily during periods <strong>of</strong> fruit abundance, while there was a<br />

shift towards increased seed predation during the pronounced fruit-scarce<br />

dry season.<br />

Visual and audio encounters <strong>of</strong> drill groups during 3,284 km <strong>of</strong> trail patrols<br />

provided information on group structure and primate associations. Mean<br />

group size was 43.3 ± 18.4 (range 25-77) and groups with both one and<br />

multiple males emitting the adult male specific two-phase-grunt were<br />

observed. Solitary males were encountered twice. Drills were in association<br />

with at least one additional primate species at some time during most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

encounters, involving all <strong>of</strong> the diurnal primates in Korup (Cercopithecus<br />

mona, C. nictitans, C. erythrotis, C. pogonias, Procolobus pennantii preussi<br />

and Cercocebus torquatus) except the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).<br />

The total drill population was conservatively estimated at 950-1450 within<br />

Korup National Park and 2,500-3,000 in the entire Korup region, which<br />

makes the region a stronghold for the species’ survival. However, drill subpopulations<br />

are becoming increasingly isolated within the ever more<br />

fragmented landscape and are under hunting pressure everywhere. Eight<br />

core areas were identified across the region as priorities for protection.<br />

Interviews with local communities <strong>of</strong>fered insight on the destructive<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> hunting with dogs as well as the socioeconomic role <strong>of</strong> dogs –<br />

information needed for effectively managing this major threat to drill<br />

survival. The drill was also found to suffer from a limited local recognition<br />

<strong>of</strong> its current status and legal protection, which is unfavourable for<br />

conservation. As a result <strong>of</strong> the project’s findings, a list <strong>of</strong> drill-focused<br />

conservation recommendations was developed and submitted to government<br />

agencies and non-government organizations active in wildlife management<br />

and conservation in the region.<br />

34


Conducting hunter interviews (Fabe village, May 2006)<br />

Population density surveys and taxonomic assessment <strong>of</strong> the Western<br />

tarsier (Tarsius bancanus borneanus) and Bornean slow loris<br />

(Nycticebus menagensis) in the Lower Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah,<br />

Malaysia<br />

RACHEL A. MUNDS<br />

<br />

Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in August 2008<br />

The Bornean slow loris (Nycticebus menagensis) and tarsier (Tarsius<br />

bancanus borneanus) are the only nocturnal primates on Borneo. Their<br />

current classification as Vulnerable (VU) by IUCN is based only on habitat<br />

loss. No recent systematic surveys have been done to determine if they are<br />

truly VU. Found only on Borneo and a few surrounding islands, these<br />

primates are threatened not only by habitat loss but also by the pet,<br />

medicinal and food markets. The aim <strong>of</strong> this research was to provide a<br />

current assessment <strong>of</strong> the estimated abundance <strong>of</strong> these primates in a<br />

protected degraded floodplain in east Sabah, Malaysia Borneo.<br />

The research took place in the Danau Girang Field Centre (DGFC) (5°24'<br />

48"N, 118°02' 16"E, elevation 15 m asl), a cooperative research facility<br />

between Cardiff University and the Sabah Wildlife Department. It is a 123-<br />

ha flat forest located in the centre <strong>of</strong> the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife<br />

35


Sanctuary (LKWS) (5°20'-5°45'N, 117°40'-118°30'E). Two types <strong>of</strong> forest<br />

dominate the DGFC: semi-inundated and mixed riparian. Forest density<br />

could restrict visibility to as little as 2 m. The study was conducted from the<br />

17 March-4 Sept, 2009, between the hours <strong>of</strong> 18:30-02:00. Surveys were<br />

done on seven trails/transects and walked a minimum <strong>of</strong> four times each.<br />

Average trail length was 1.1 km, walked at 600 m/hr. Between 2-3 people<br />

surveyed with the use <strong>of</strong> a Petzl Myo Zoom 4.5 V headlamp, with a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

red and white filters. Lorises were detected by their reflective eye-shine.<br />

Tarsiers were detected by movement or by a dull red eye glare which was<br />

only noticeable with the use <strong>of</strong> a red light. Results yielded a survey effort <strong>of</strong><br />

68.56 km, with only 8 lorises (0.1 lorises/km or 5.05 lorises/km²) and 5<br />

tarsiers (0.06 tarsiers/km or 2.75 tarsiers/km²) sighted.<br />

Although the slow loris results are low, they fall within their expected range<br />

<strong>of</strong> abundance (0.02-1.63 individuals/km). Being primarily arboreal animals,<br />

lorises were sighted at heights between 8.5-30 m. Such heights, plus the<br />

extreme forest density in some areas, made them difficult to detect. Their<br />

semi-solitary or monogamous social structure, slow and silent locomotion,<br />

and their anti-predator strategy <strong>of</strong> remaining still for a long period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

contributed to the challenge <strong>of</strong> finding these elusive primates.<br />

36


The low encounter rate <strong>of</strong> tarsiers was surprising, as they are presumed to<br />

be common throughout much <strong>of</strong> their range. Outdated by 25 years,<br />

Crompton & Andau (1986) estimated Bornean tarsier populations to range<br />

from 15-80 individuals/km². Tarsiers were difficult to detect, as unlike the<br />

Sulawesi species, they do not vocalize regularly and as mentioned before,<br />

they lack a distinct reflective eye-shine. But if these results are an accurate<br />

estimation, then a 5-30%<br />

decline is concerning.<br />

More research on these<br />

cryptic primates <strong>of</strong> Borneo<br />

is needed to provide an<br />

accurate depiction <strong>of</strong> how<br />

habitat loss and other<br />

anthropogenic threats are<br />

affecting populations. This<br />

study was an essential part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a longer-term project that<br />

will investigate the<br />

taxonomy, population<br />

viability and social<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> these primates<br />

in the LKWS and Borneo.<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s for posterity: assessment <strong>of</strong> a primate conservation education<br />

programme on 15- 17 year old students in schools in Tamil Nadu, India<br />

MARTINA VICTORIA STEPHEN PAUL ANANDAM<br />

<br />

Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in March 2009<br />

India is home to vast diversity <strong>of</strong> wildlife. Sixteen species (after the addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Macaca munzala in 2005) and 39 subspecies <strong>of</strong> non-human primates<br />

occupy the subcontinent, with certain endemic species such as the liontailed<br />

macaque (Macaca silenus) and the Nilgiri langur (Trachypitecus<br />

johnii) occupying a narrow range in the Western Ghats <strong>of</strong> Southern India<br />

37


and Gee’s golden langur (Trachypitecus geeii) in the Eastern Himalayas.<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> primates and their conservation crisis should bring about<br />

ecological awareness and responsibility: conservation education best serves<br />

this function. ‘<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity’ was designed to endow the<br />

participants with techniques and values required to exhibit ecologically<br />

responsible behaviour. The project was conducted in four schools in Tamil<br />

Nadu, India: 2 test schools (one from a lowland area and one from a<br />

mountain region) and 2 control schools (again, one from a lowland and one<br />

from a mountain area). The authenticity <strong>of</strong> the programme was measured in<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> ways.<br />

The project demonstrated that time is not a barrier to an environmental<br />

education programme by proving the credibility <strong>of</strong> ‘<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity’<br />

through pre-test and post-test knowledge and attitude score assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the participants. A significant rise in post-test scores was evident across the<br />

sample. The test schools scored higher than the control schools in the posttest<br />

indicating that the education programme had a positive effect. The<br />

attitude scores <strong>of</strong> the participants remained fairly constant before and after<br />

the programme. The mandatory Environmental Science module and<br />

religious views <strong>of</strong> the participants could be considered to influence the<br />

attitude <strong>of</strong> the participants towards animals. The impact <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />

location (participants were either from the mountain region close to wildlife<br />

or a plain farther from wildlife) was tested as a possible factor <strong>of</strong> influence<br />

on the environmental knowledge and attitude <strong>of</strong> the participants.<br />

Geographical location was found to have a significant impact on the<br />

environmental knowledge and attitude quotient <strong>of</strong> the participants. Both<br />

male and female participants showed no difference in knowledge and<br />

attitude scores, thus removing gender as a possible factor <strong>of</strong> disparity.<br />

The credibility <strong>of</strong> tools such as Micros<strong>of</strong>t PowerPoint was tested and a new<br />

tool namely Jungle Sounds was introduced and assessed. The first<br />

presentation “<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity: <strong>Primate</strong>s and their conservation” was<br />

most favoured by the participants followed by the ‘Virtual Jungle: Jungle<br />

sounds’ session. This assessment paves the way for introducing more<br />

creative tools that bring conservation to life in a classroom by prompting the<br />

aesthetic awareness <strong>of</strong> the participants. Another important feature <strong>of</strong><br />

“<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity” is the career lecture which sought to explain to the<br />

participants the prospective careers one could have in conservation.<br />

Twenty-five percent <strong>of</strong> the test group participants found the lecture to be<br />

“very informative” and 46.9% found the lecture to be “informative”, thus<br />

reinstating the importance <strong>of</strong> such features in environmental education in<br />

India.<br />

38


Students with the principal investigator<br />

Conservation assessment <strong>of</strong> Taï monkey fauna from two survey<br />

methods and a bushmeat market study: how hunting impacts Taï<br />

National Park<br />

RYAN COVEY<br />

<br />

Awarded a PSGB Conservation Grant in March 2009<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s throughout Côte d’Ivoire are at risk <strong>of</strong> being hunted to extinction.<br />

The national park status afforded to Taï National Park and its inclusion on<br />

UNESCO’s World Heritage List has failed to protect its biodiversity. In<br />

addition to hunting, deforestation, gold panning, and overuse <strong>of</strong> the buffer<br />

zone by locals threatens many species with extinction. In order to assess the<br />

threats facing Taï National Park’s primate fauna, I used two survey methods<br />

to determine density and distribution <strong>of</strong> eight diurnal monkey species<br />

adjacent to a protected research area. In addition, I assessed the most<br />

significant threats facing these primates, and analyzed the impact <strong>of</strong> a local<br />

bushmeat market.<br />

39


My study was conducted at the Taï Monkey Project field site, located in Taï<br />

National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Line-transect distance sampling was used to<br />

determine group density <strong>of</strong> eight monkey species within a protected<br />

research area and the surrounding non-protected forests. Twenty 500 m<br />

transects were walked four times each within a protected 2 x 1 sq km grid<br />

and six 3 km transects were walked three times each outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

protected area. Occupancy modelling was tested within the protected<br />

research area to determine its accuracy in detecting primate fauna. Over the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> nine weeks I visited a local bushmeat market seven times. Meat<br />

from all animal species observed at the market was recorded.<br />

Cercopithecus diana (5.84 groups/km²) and Procolobus badius (6.02<br />

groups/km²) had the highest group density estimates determined from linetransect<br />

sampling in the research grid. Outside the protected area, group<br />

density could only be calculated for three monkey species because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

significant decrease in monkey observations (i.e., Cercopithecus diana - 3.4<br />

groups/km²; Procolobus badius – 2.75 groups/km²). Based on the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> detections, ranging patterns, and vocal repertoire <strong>of</strong> the monkey species,<br />

occupancy modelling was reliable in determining primate presence. The<br />

most numerous and vocal monkeys were Cercopithecus diana and<br />

Procolobus badius, and thus had the highest detection probability (0.55 &<br />

0.67 respectively). Cercocebus atys (large home ranges) and Procolobus<br />

verus monkeys (few vocalizations) had the lowest detection probability<br />

(0.09 & 0.07 respectively). A total <strong>of</strong> 634 animals were observed at the<br />

40


ushmeat market. A weekly average <strong>of</strong> 33 primates (1,716/year) reveal<br />

unsustainable hunting is occurring in the adjoining forests <strong>of</strong> Liberia.<br />

The protection afforded to primates within the Taï Monkey Project research<br />

grid from the presence <strong>of</strong> researches has allowed them to flourish. The<br />

observed drop-<strong>of</strong>f in detections and calculated group densities reveals that<br />

where hunting occurs, group densities are significantly lower than in areas<br />

where protection occurs. Occupancy modelling appears to be a reliable<br />

method in detecting primate presence. The number <strong>of</strong> primates harvested<br />

from the forests <strong>of</strong> Liberia, which could form a natural corridor to Taï<br />

National Park, reveals the degree <strong>of</strong> unsustainable hunting occurring.<br />

Conservation efforts in this area should focus on the immediate protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the animal fauna within Taï National Park. Protection efforts need to<br />

begin in Liberia to prevent genetically isolated populations from occurring.<br />

41


Identifying the CITES Appendix I-listed Asian slow loris Nycticebus<br />

spp: a training programme for enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and rescue centres<br />

in Southeast Asia<br />

TRICIA PARISH<br />

<br />

Awarded a PSGB and Born Free Grant in August 2008<br />

All five recognised species <strong>of</strong> Asian slow lorises (<strong>Primate</strong>s: Lorisidae:<br />

Nycticebus) were listed on Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the Convention on International<br />

Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 2007 due<br />

to unsustainable harvesting for the illegal pet and medicine trade as well as<br />

due to habitat loss. N. javanicus was added to the 25 Most Endangered<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s List in 2008 due to the severe risks it faces from the same threats<br />

but which are compounded in its smaller habitat.<br />

No IUCN species survival programme is in place for slow lorises but the<br />

Southeast Asian Mammal Database and CITES call for additional slow loris<br />

education to be conducted as <strong>of</strong>ficials are unable to identify the species seen<br />

in illegal trade. This project provided five one-day workshops to<br />

enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and rescue centres in slow loris range countries and<br />

East Asian trade hubs (peninsular Malaysia, Malaysian Borneo (Sarawak),<br />

Brunei, Taiwan and Japan) between February and November 2009. The<br />

project was based on a set <strong>of</strong> four pilot workshops that were conducted in<br />

slow loris range states in 2008.<br />

The workshop used a range <strong>of</strong> training materials (PowerPoint presentations,<br />

identification leaflet, training DVD and picture flashcards) and techniques<br />

(lecture, small and large group discussions) to maximise learning. Topics<br />

included slow loris taxonomy, identification and behaviour, look-alike<br />

species, legislative protection, key threats, common smuggling techniques<br />

and captive slow loris care protocols (both short- and long-term). Workshop<br />

effectiveness was assessed using pre- and post-workshop questionnaires,<br />

review sheets and video exercises. The project aimed to raise awareness<br />

about slow lorises with enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials, improve their knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

Nycticebus spp. and enhance individual slow loris species identification<br />

abilities. Over the longer term it is hoped that equipping enforcement<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials with improved knowledge about slow lorises and how to identify<br />

them will contribute to a reduction <strong>of</strong> illegal slow loris trade and the<br />

inappropriate release <strong>of</strong> confiscated slow lorises.<br />

Quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> the workshops showed that significant<br />

improvements in knowledge levels were achieved across key areas<br />

including individual slow loris species identification ability (Wilcoxon: n =<br />

180, z = -8.782, p = 0.000), slow loris range countries (Wilcoxon: n = 179, z<br />

= -3.564, p = 0.000), that the slow loris is a primate (Wilcoxon: n = 179, z =<br />

42


-5.545, p = 0.000) and that the slow loris is protected under CITES<br />

(Wilcoxon: n = 180, z = -4.447, p = 0.000). The results support previous<br />

findings that knowledge levels are low amongst enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials and<br />

that training is lacking. This research does however indicate that the<br />

learning deficit can be addressed and that one-day workshops can affect<br />

significant knowledge change. Although this training workshop was<br />

designed for slow lorises, the education model is applicable to other species.<br />

Workshop participants in Kuching<br />

43


BOOK REVIEWS<br />

MOUNTAIN GORILLAS: BIOLOGY, CONSERVATION, AND<br />

COEXISTENCE<br />

Gene Eckhart and Annette Lanjouw (2008)<br />

The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore<br />

ISBN: 080189011 (S<strong>of</strong>tback) £19.00<br />

This impressive-looking book is both large and easy on the eye, illustrated<br />

throughout with beautiful photographs <strong>of</strong> mountain gorillas, their habitat,<br />

and people living in, or visiting, their range countries. A scientific text book<br />

this isn’t, but nonetheless it is a resource that I am certain will be <strong>of</strong> great<br />

interest to primate and conservation enthusiasts. The authors state that part<br />

<strong>of</strong> their intent is that this book will “make available to a larger audience the<br />

valuable information gained through many people’s work over the years,”<br />

especially in areas relating to research and conservation and, generally, I<br />

think they succeed in this.<br />

The first chapter is an account <strong>of</strong> a tourist visit to the Susa group in<br />

Rwanda, written with the descriptive, familiar tones <strong>of</strong> a personal travel-log<br />

entry or a letter home, thus painting a very informative scene <strong>of</strong> what it is<br />

actually like to do one <strong>of</strong> these visits. Some <strong>of</strong> the photo captions are<br />

somewhat ‘over the top,’ as they are written in rather flowery language that<br />

isn’t necessary when the main text <strong>of</strong> the book is more than capable <strong>of</strong><br />

setting the scene; some <strong>of</strong> the captions actually detract from it, so it’s a<br />

good job the photographs themselves are stunning. The second chapter goes<br />

on to describe matters relating to evolution and classification in accessible<br />

terms, although a figure showing the classification <strong>of</strong> apes is so oversimplified<br />

as to inadvertently imply that only Hylobatidae and Hominidae<br />

make up the order <strong>Primate</strong>s. Again, the photo captions are a bit longer/more<br />

detailed than are probably necessary - almost acting as summaries <strong>of</strong> some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the main points <strong>of</strong> the chapter – and so it is probably the case that some<br />

readers will find this helpful, and others annoying; it is the same throughout<br />

the whole book.<br />

The following eight chapters summarise other areas <strong>of</strong> gorilla natural<br />

history, including several chapters on aspects <strong>of</strong> social relationships, daily<br />

patterns, and feeding habits; none <strong>of</strong> these present anything particularly new<br />

to a gorilla person, but will still be a good introduction to, or reminder <strong>of</strong>,<br />

the topic for general enthusiasts; as I mentioned, this is not intended to be a<br />

text book, although some scientific data are cited. In places, the text seems<br />

unnecessarily childish/basic, such as the section title: “Martha Robbins: She<br />

Wants her Research to Have Conservation Implications” – but, at least this<br />

section does introduce non-scientists to the work <strong>of</strong> people like Martha,<br />

about which they might not otherwise get to hear. The book then moves on<br />

to include a ‘gorilla gallery’, showing photographs <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />

44


<strong>of</strong> different ages and sexes, highlighting the individuality <strong>of</strong> these apes, and<br />

how different each one looks – not necessarily something that is generally<br />

known to non-primatologists. Further chapters then describe the forests and<br />

National Parks in which mountain gorillas live, including summaries <strong>of</strong><br />

classification <strong>of</strong> vegetation types for the Virungas and for Bwindi, and<br />

fauna in the region. The importance <strong>of</strong> the forests is also discussed, not only<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> their environmental impact, but also in terms <strong>of</strong> human presence,<br />

such as the Batwa/Bantu populations, local staff working to protect the<br />

forests and habituate gorillas, and so on. The discussion <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

impact on gorilla range countries goes on to explore colonialism in the<br />

region, and the horrific conflicts in DRC and Rwanda, and tourist killings at<br />

Bwindi in 1999, in terms <strong>of</strong> the impact on gorilla conservation as well as the<br />

region as a whole. These are clearly heavy and diverse topics for such a<br />

book to cover, but it does so well, and all within the context <strong>of</strong> celebrating<br />

the people working to protect and study mountain gorillas and their habitat.<br />

The next couple <strong>of</strong> chapters focus more on the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> those living<br />

and working around the gorillas’ range areas, whose lives are affected in<br />

some way by gorilla conservation and tourism (whether a positive impact,<br />

such as making a living from tourism, or negative, such as crop-raiding by<br />

gorillas and other animals). With the theme <strong>of</strong> conservation running<br />

throughout this book, the final chapters deal with this topic specifically,<br />

starting from a historic perspective, through to the present and future. There<br />

are useful summaries <strong>of</strong> key organisations in the region, such as the Office<br />

Rwandais du Tourisme et des Parcs Nationaux (ORTPN), the Ugandan<br />

Wildlife Authority, the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project, as well as<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the national parks’ guides, and other people working<br />

towards gorilla conservation, all <strong>of</strong> which help to bring the book to life. All<br />

in all, this book is a must-have for anyone interested in gorillas.<br />

Sonya P. Hill<br />

North <strong>of</strong> England Zoological <strong>Society</strong>, Chester Zoo<br />

ENDOCRINOLOGY OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS<br />

Peter T. Ellison and Peter B. Gray (eds.) (2009)<br />

Harvard University Press<br />

ISBN: 9780674031173 (Hardback) £36.95<br />

Understanding how hormones and behaviour are linked is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

fascinating topics in biology today. For primatologists this is a field <strong>of</strong><br />

research that has just started to produce a wealth <strong>of</strong> new exciting materialnot<br />

least because new non-invasive techniques are starting to allow us to<br />

monitor hormones <strong>of</strong> wild animals without the need for trapping and taking<br />

blood. One <strong>of</strong> the most exciting outcomes <strong>of</strong> this research is that studies <strong>of</strong><br />

wild animals can now investigate the causes <strong>of</strong> behaviour at a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

levels – both proximate and ultimate.<br />

45


In 16 chapters various authors review a large range <strong>of</strong> studies on recent<br />

research that look at relationships hormones and social relationships. The<br />

first section <strong>of</strong> the book introduces important theoretical ideas. Lee’s<br />

introduction to animal mating and parenting systems gives a framework for<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the book- as it discusses the evolutionary basis <strong>of</strong> diversity in<br />

social systems and the ways in which different parenting systems might<br />

evolve. Further chapters introduce the ways in which mammalian<br />

neuroendocrine system integrates neural and hormonal responses to the<br />

environment and the physiological mechanisms that regulate it (Wallen and<br />

Hauser; Wingfield) and Ellison’s chapter focuses on how the endocrine<br />

system regulates reproductive ecology. Ellison makes the crucial point that<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> the endocrine system can only be understood in relation to<br />

evolution as ‘social relationships trigger endocrine signals to help regulate<br />

reproductive effort’. Given this, it is perhaps not surprisingly that much <strong>of</strong><br />

the book focuses on the ways in which hormones regulate reproductive<br />

systems, with sexual and parental relationships being discussed in detail and<br />

an emphasis on sexual dimorphism and infant care patterns.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> the book looks at humans, with all <strong>of</strong> part three (chapters<br />

10-16) looking at humans, and some <strong>of</strong> the other chapters also being<br />

primarily human-focused. However, part two has four chapters that look at<br />

non-human animals with one (Carter et al.) discussing rodents and three<br />

non-human primates. The non-human primate chapters look at<br />

endocrinology <strong>of</strong> social relationships in callitrichids (Ziegler and Snowdon),<br />

other group living monkeys (Fairbanks) and apes (Emery Thompson). All<br />

three <strong>of</strong> the non-human primate chapters provide excellent overviews <strong>of</strong><br />

recent research but with different areas highlighted. Zeigler and Snowdon<br />

give an overview <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> work carried out on pair-bonding and<br />

parental care in callitrichids and stress the importance <strong>of</strong> long-term bonds<br />

and chemical signalling for reproductive success in these species. Hence,<br />

they focus particularly on hormonal regulation <strong>of</strong> parental care and<br />

communication between mated pairs. In contrast, Fairbanks deals primarily<br />

with studies on group-living matrilineal monkeys where paternal care in<br />

minimal and male rank is likely to have a major influence on male<br />

reproductive success. Fairbanks discusses hormonal correlates <strong>of</strong><br />

dominance and aggression in a range <strong>of</strong> species, including some extremely<br />

useful summary tables that allow the reader to easily see the variety <strong>of</strong><br />

species and hormonal studies. Finally, Emery Thompson examines how the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> mating systems and reproductive strategies in apes are related<br />

to the endocrine physiology <strong>of</strong> female cycling and male competition.<br />

Some interesting themes arise through the book. For example, authors<br />

comment on the way in which paternal care influences males in both<br />

humans and other species. Lancaster and Kaplan discuss how male’s<br />

commitment to pair-bonding may be increased with the birth <strong>of</strong> children<br />

and Zeigler and Snowdon explain the effect <strong>of</strong> previous paternal experience<br />

46


on callitrichid males’ responses to infants. Gray and Campbell discuss<br />

whether testosterone levels are correlated with mating and paternal effort in<br />

men. In all cases the authors suggest that looking at variation in paternal<br />

effort may <strong>of</strong>fer insights into understanding different male reproductive<br />

strategies.<br />

It is perhaps surprising that, in a book with this title, so little <strong>of</strong> it discusses<br />

social relationships other than those related to mating and parenting. Given<br />

that most authors’ work on humans and/or other primates this is even more<br />

surprising as a huge number or social interactions in social species involve<br />

neither mates nor <strong>of</strong>fspring. For many individuals, particularly prereproductive<br />

animals such interactions may make up all or most <strong>of</strong> their<br />

social behaviour. The exceptions to this are chapters by which touch on<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the ways in which hormones may mediate other social interactions.<br />

For example, McIntyre and Hooven’s chapter on sex differences in children<br />

and adults looks at how androgens are involved in sex differences in<br />

behaviour and personality traits such as dominance and narcissism. Two<br />

chapters that concentrate on the effects <strong>of</strong> the neuropeptides, oxytocin and<br />

vasopressin on behaviour also suggest that non-reproductive social<br />

behaviour may be important. Carter et al. examine rodents and particularly<br />

the monogamous prairie voles. This provides both an excellent overview <strong>of</strong><br />

both function <strong>of</strong> oxytocin and vasopressin in social behaviour with good<br />

summary tables listing previous work done in this area and then goes on to<br />

discuss the authors’ work on prairie voles in detail. The second chapter<br />

(Sanchez et al.) focuses on humans and reviews studies that have<br />

investigates mood, memory and behaviour. Although most research in voles<br />

has looked at how these oxytocin and vasopressin regulate parental and<br />

pair-bonding behaviour, the work on humans show that they have an effect<br />

on many other aspects <strong>of</strong> behaviour as well- perhaps suggesting future lines<br />

<strong>of</strong> research in other species.<br />

The book is very well produced with a high standard <strong>of</strong> editing and with all<br />

chapters keeping to a standard well-written format and provides an up-todate<br />

and comprehensive overview <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> studies in this area.<br />

Summary tables <strong>of</strong> previous research and clear introduction to each topic<br />

make it accessible for those who are unfamiliar with some <strong>of</strong> the ideas.<br />

However this is a scholarly work and not a ‘popular’ read. I would hesitate<br />

to recommend it to a first year undergraduate, but it should be accessible to<br />

more advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students who are looking<br />

for an inroad into recent research. This book will undoubtedly be <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

to researchers and lecturers who are seeking to integrate their understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> endocrinology, social relationships and evolution, and would certainly be<br />

a welcome addition to many libraries.<br />

Caroline Ross<br />

Roehampton University<br />

47


CONSERVATION IN THE 21 ST CENTURY GORILLAS AS A CASE<br />

STUDY<br />

T.S. Stoinski, H.D. Steklis, & P.T. Mehlman (eds) 2008<br />

(Developments in primatology: progress and prospects)<br />

Springer<br />

ISBN: 9780387707204 (Hardback) £87.50<br />

This book describes the status <strong>of</strong> gorilla conservation and looks at actual<br />

and potential tools, plans and strategies that are being or could be used in an<br />

attempt to counteract current threats. One strength <strong>of</strong> the book is the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> ideas, tools and strategies used in other countries for other<br />

species that might be potentially useful for gorilla, and indeed, primate<br />

conservation in general.<br />

The first section, containing only one chapter by Patrick Mehlman,<br />

describes the threats facing each gorilla species and outlines the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

surveying and estimating gorilla numbers in different habitats and<br />

conditions with particular emphasis on Grauer’s gorilla. Mehlman reviews<br />

current conservation strategies and makes suggestions for future research. I<br />

found this chapter very useful as some <strong>of</strong> the information provided on<br />

surveying mountain gorillas is applicable to my study area in northern<br />

Morocco where conventional methods like line transect surveying are not<br />

appropriate.<br />

The second section is all about conservation on the ground with information<br />

<strong>of</strong> benefit to everyone managing a primate conservation project. The<br />

impressive work <strong>of</strong> the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project with its holistic<br />

approach to both gorilla and human health is <strong>of</strong> interest to all. Farmer &<br />

Courage give a long overdue review <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> sanctuaries and<br />

reintroduction in gorilla conservation. The chapter on gorilla tourism<br />

attempts to summarise this sometimes controversial conservation strategy,<br />

outlining guidelines for current best practise and warning against an over<br />

dependence on ecotourism as the only strategy to conserve gorillas. Steklis<br />

and Steklis outline the benefits <strong>of</strong> a long-term research project for<br />

conservation. Jim Sanderson gives a brief but useful guide on how to do<br />

camera trapping using an example <strong>of</strong> such a study in the Virungas but,<br />

frustratingly, not expanding the chapter to include the results! Another<br />

inspirational chapter was the description <strong>of</strong> the potential benefits <strong>of</strong> using<br />

theatre to increase awareness amongst local people <strong>of</strong> chimpanzees and<br />

their conservation around the Taï Forest by Christophe Boesch and his<br />

team.<br />

Tools facilitating the planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

strategies are the focus <strong>of</strong> the penultimate section. These include a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> Population and Habitat Viability Analysis workshops, the<br />

TAMARIN system <strong>of</strong> landscape planning for conservation, a method<br />

48


empowering local communities living alongside endangered species, a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the difficulties and benefits <strong>of</strong> producing a GIS map <strong>of</strong><br />

mountain gorilla habitat, and the use, collection and analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

biomaterials. All these chapters have something to <strong>of</strong>fer those attempting to<br />

put conservation into practise on the ground.<br />

The final section focuses mainly on the importance <strong>of</strong> building relationships<br />

between governments (mountain gorilla transboundary conservation), and<br />

NGOs and researchers (the <strong>Great</strong> Ape World Heritage Species Project and<br />

www.western-gorilla.com). Stoinski et al. encourage zoos to coordinate<br />

their funding efforts and thus improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> their<br />

contributions and the final chapter focuses on the Bushmeat Crisis<br />

Taskforce and its work in combating the unsustainable bushmeat trade.<br />

I would have liked to see a chapter on human-gorilla conflict resolution<br />

along with more information on the work being conducted with the local<br />

communities in and around gorilla habitats. That aside, I found it a very<br />

useful volume and will be referring back to it in relation to my own project<br />

as it holds so many potentially useful ideas, strategies and initiatives that<br />

can be put into practice albeit on a much smaller scale. The price <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hardback is high for those on a limited budget but maybe Springer can be<br />

encouraged to bring it out in paperback!<br />

Siân S. Waters<br />

Barbary Macaque Conservation in the Rif (BMCRif), Royal Zoological<br />

<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Scotland and Durham University<br />

THE GIBBONS: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON SMALL APE<br />

SOCIOECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY<br />

S. Lappan & D.J. Whittaker (eds) 2009<br />

Springer<br />

ISBN: 9780387886039 (Hardback) £90<br />

Today there are six surviving kinds <strong>of</strong> ape: humans, bonobos, chimpanzees,<br />

gorillas, orang-utans, and gibbons. Within this domain, however, it seems<br />

that classification <strong>of</strong> “greatness” in ape species is largely determined by size<br />

alone; and unfortunately, the gibbons have consistently been under<br />

acknowledged by primatologists, and consequently overlooked by the<br />

public eye. Indeed, there is little doubt that substantially more focus has<br />

been placed on great apes rather than their smaller counterparts; still,<br />

gibbons bear many <strong>of</strong> the same requisites praised in other apes, notably a<br />

high encephalisation quotient, no tail, and rotary shoulder blades.<br />

Additionally, when we consider the value <strong>of</strong> small apes as being the only<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary link between monkeys and great apes, it<br />

is surprising how we still know comparatively little about them.<br />

49


Small apes are notoriously difficult to study, travelling silently at high<br />

speeds through the forest. Yet, unlike any other primate, they provide<br />

unique insight into the evolution <strong>of</strong> primate socioecological systems: Why<br />

do gibbons occupy an overall niche that contradicts the majority <strong>of</strong> other<br />

primate societies? Why is monogamy so successful for this group <strong>of</strong><br />

primates, but rarely seen in others? Why do they occupy the smallest home<br />

range <strong>of</strong> any other primate, yet are a group-living primate with a highly<br />

frugivourous diet? In the newly published book entitled The Gibbons: New<br />

Perspectives on Small Ape Socioecology and Population Biology, the<br />

authors have composed a set <strong>of</strong> studies to capture different socioecological<br />

facets <strong>of</strong> the small ape clade to address these questions and more.<br />

Part I <strong>of</strong> the book opens with a general discussion on the study <strong>of</strong><br />

hylobatids, emphasising the importance <strong>of</strong> population-wide studies in<br />

providing critical information towards identifying the mechanistic ways in<br />

which their societies function. Gibbon taxonomy is briefly mentioned, as<br />

well as a tentative examination <strong>of</strong> the flexibility in gibbon socioecological<br />

behaviour.<br />

This carries over into Part II, which discusses the biogeographical variation<br />

seen among gibbon species – such as inter-population and individual<br />

differences in vocal communication. In this section <strong>of</strong> the book, the authors<br />

dive more deeply into the taxonomical and geographical distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

gibbons, showing different scenarios in the phylogenetic inter-relationships<br />

between species that have been proposed by colleagues over the last three<br />

decades. An overview <strong>of</strong> the paleontological record <strong>of</strong> gibbons and their<br />

forest environment is given, as well as inferences on phylogenetic<br />

placements <strong>of</strong> species based on DNA sequencing, recent gene flow, and<br />

historical gene flow between populations.<br />

The final chapter <strong>of</strong> Part II deserves special mention, as it is a complete<br />

record <strong>of</strong> gibbon fossils found to date. Often primatologists ask<br />

evolutionarily-relevant questions using extant primates as models from<br />

which ancestral lifestyles are reconstructed. However, while it depends on<br />

the kind <strong>of</strong> questions being asked, modern primates are simply a product <strong>of</strong><br />

their evolutionary history. Food species distribution, phenological patterns,<br />

predator density, and inter-species competition are all features that regulate<br />

primate societies today, yet given that these ecological variables are<br />

dynamic within themselves; it seems unlikely that their degree <strong>of</strong> selective<br />

force remained consistent throughout the millennia. The fossil data<br />

presented in Part II are discussed in light <strong>of</strong> morphological changes in<br />

gibbon populations throughout their evolutionary history, allowing us to<br />

compliment these findings with data on historical landscape changes to<br />

begin unearthing key features <strong>of</strong> past gibbon socioecology.<br />

50


Part III discusses ecological diversity in gibbons, addressing important<br />

theoretical issues in primatology such as the relationships between body<br />

mass and diet quality, and niche overlap between gibbons and other<br />

sympatric species. This combines nicely with Part IV <strong>of</strong> the book, which<br />

explores factors influencing inter- and intraspecific variation in gibbon<br />

communities, and how this is a function <strong>of</strong> contextual ramifications such as<br />

social systems, defensibility, and habitat use.<br />

Part V presents a nice overview <strong>of</strong> the mating systems <strong>of</strong> hylobatids, and<br />

tentatively addresses particular evolutionary advantages <strong>of</strong> living in a<br />

monogamous society and the proximate means through which this structure<br />

is maintained. Following this synopsis, complimentary data are given on<br />

specific species, notably siamangs and white-handed gibbons, to highlight<br />

particular behavioural and hormonal aspects <strong>of</strong> gibbon societies. Female<br />

reproductive status is examined in relation to temporal fluctuation in genital<br />

swellings and hormone concentrations using data from captive and wild<br />

individuals. The authors also discuss differences between male and female<br />

gibbons living in polyandrous and monogamous groups, and how flexible<br />

grouping and mating, relatedness, infanticide risk, and social networks are<br />

causal factors for variation in allocation <strong>of</strong> parental care and degree <strong>of</strong><br />

monogamy.<br />

While socioecological data on primates is meaningful from a purely<br />

academic point <strong>of</strong> view, we must not forget the obligations researchers have<br />

towards the welfare and conservation <strong>of</strong> the species they study. Indeed,<br />

while gibbons are arguably the most successful species <strong>of</strong> non-human ape<br />

on the planet, some species are among the rarest and most critically<br />

endangered <strong>of</strong> any primate. In the final chapter <strong>of</strong> The Gibbons, several<br />

authors bring forth case studies on a few gibbon species to discuss<br />

important threats to gibbon populations in the wild, highlighting regions <strong>of</strong><br />

major impact, habitat requirements, and population trends. This section <strong>of</strong><br />

the book concludes with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the urgent need for further<br />

information on gibbon behaviour to refine protocols for conservation<br />

management, and provides recommendations for improving conservation<br />

success through rehabilitation programs and canopy bridges.<br />

The Gibbons represents an important progression towards better<br />

understanding small ape behaviour. This book should be treated as a wellrounded<br />

reference for scholars interested in learning more about small apes,<br />

or for anyone wishing to examine important topics in primatology from a<br />

small ape standpoint. Commonly labelled “the lesser ape” by non-partisans,<br />

this book celebrates the importance <strong>of</strong> such exceptional beings, warranting<br />

the small apes recognition far “greater” than what they typically are given<br />

within the scientific and public domain.<br />

F. Blake Morton<br />

Scottish <strong>Primate</strong> Research Group and University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

51


THE INFANTICIDE CONTROVERSY: PRIMATOLOGY AND THE<br />

ART OF FIELD SCIENCE<br />

Amanda Rees (2009)<br />

Chicago University Press<br />

ISBN 0226707113 (Hardback) £27.50<br />

As a discipline, primatology has a relatively short and complex history, with<br />

early researchers drawn from fields as diverse as biology, mathematics,<br />

anthropology and social science. This complexity is reflected in the mature<br />

discipline we know today, with primatologists still regularly working and<br />

publishing with collaborators from other fields and located anywhere from<br />

medical schools to archaeology departments depending upon institutional<br />

perspectives and the precise nature <strong>of</strong> their research. Much <strong>of</strong> this history,<br />

and many <strong>of</strong> the (potential and actual) tensions between proponents <strong>of</strong><br />

different modes <strong>of</strong> primatological thinking are discussed in fascinating<br />

detail in Amanda Rees’s book, The Infanticide Controversy, which uses the<br />

sociobiological revolution and concomitant debate over infanticidal<br />

behaviour in primates as a vehicle through which to examine the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

field science and the emergence <strong>of</strong> primatological theories and paradigms.<br />

The book is organised into three sections which reflect the nature <strong>of</strong> Rees’s<br />

arguments about the importance <strong>of</strong> theory, method and disciplinary history<br />

to the development <strong>of</strong> the infanticide controversies. Part one, entitled<br />

“Fielding the Question” takes a primarily historical approach to<br />

primatology, discussing the development <strong>of</strong> disciplinary perspectives to<br />

field science and the study <strong>of</strong> primate social behaviour, thus providing a<br />

useful background for those whose disciplinary history is not so welldeveloped.<br />

It introduces the key players in the nascent primatology, and<br />

quotes extensively from publications to demonstrate how the attitudes and<br />

methods employed by primatologists changed through the twentieth<br />

century, particularly in response to a change in emphasis from explanations<br />

relying upon socioecology to those employing sociobiological principles in<br />

the 1970s. Part two, “The Infanticide Debates”, covers the same<br />

chronological period but with emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong> just one<br />

series <strong>of</strong> observations and arguments: those relating to the “infant biting”<br />

behaviour newly observed in non-human primates in Asia and Africa.<br />

Particular emphasis during these chapters is given to theories developed to<br />

explain infant biting (or infanticide, as it is known in humans) and the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the controversy apparent in the 1970s and 1990s as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

differential perspectives on primatological fieldwork. Rees’s methods,<br />

which include detailed interviews with primatologists as well as a clearly<br />

extensive survey <strong>of</strong> the primatological literature, produce abundant<br />

observations and insights into the thought processes <strong>of</strong> scientists on both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> the debate, while her background in the sociology and history <strong>of</strong><br />

science shows in the comprehensive links she forges between the specifics –<br />

<strong>of</strong> one debate in one field – and the general attitudes <strong>of</strong> scientists,<br />

52


governments, researchers and the public to scientific research and activity.<br />

Part three, in contrast, returns readers to the present (with a chapter detailing<br />

the most recent developments in the infanticide controversy) and the<br />

broader viewpoint associated with an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> “Controversy<br />

and Authority, Narrative and Testimony” in primatology and science in<br />

general.<br />

Rees states early on that she is not going to judge the winners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

infanticide controversy (and indeed, mentions that the open nature <strong>of</strong> that<br />

controversy helps in that it ensures she cannot view it “knowing who won”),<br />

but nonetheless manages to use her detailed history <strong>of</strong> this one debate to<br />

shed light on several intriguing aspects <strong>of</strong> primatology and science. In<br />

particular, my relatively modest knowledge <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> primatology<br />

was substantially expanded – especially as many <strong>of</strong> the theoretical and<br />

methodological topics discussed were <strong>of</strong> relevance to a much wider part <strong>of</strong><br />

the field than just the infanticide debates. In addition, a number <strong>of</strong> puzzling<br />

questions about the philosophy and sociology <strong>of</strong> science are raised and<br />

discussed. Rees’s “fieldworker’s regress”, the situation in which<br />

observations can never be replicated in field science because <strong>of</strong> specifics<br />

and uniqueness <strong>of</strong> place and conditions, is linked to some interesting<br />

debates over the importance <strong>of</strong> personality to behavioural observations, our<br />

tendency to anthropomorphise the primates, and the role <strong>of</strong> theory in<br />

developing and testing hypotheses, all <strong>of</strong> which are ably evaluated in the<br />

book.<br />

At the same time, however, I would question whether the infanticide<br />

debates are really still “open”. As Janson (2000) states, research into<br />

primate infanticide today has largely moved on from questioning whether<br />

the behaviour is adaptive to consider the reproductive consequences on<br />

adult females and the counterstrategies they employ to minimise the<br />

consequences. That said, Rees does note in several places that the<br />

infanticide debates are more important to modern primatology in the USA,<br />

and, indeed, fourteen <strong>of</strong> her eighteen interviewees are, or were, based in<br />

American institutions. Perhaps, as she notes, the anthropological aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

American primatology (which drew more <strong>of</strong> its early practitioners from<br />

anthropology while European countries drew heavily upon zoology) is<br />

sufficient to explain the difference in opinion and justify the retention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

debate in that country; alternatively, perhaps there are just a few key players<br />

in the infanticide debates who refuse to accept the majority opinion. Indeed,<br />

The Infanticide Controversy does emphasise the importance <strong>of</strong> individuality<br />

– not only <strong>of</strong> place, but also <strong>of</strong> person – in the conception and design <strong>of</strong><br />

primatological research, suggesting that perhaps controversy is not so much<br />

an objective discussion as a conflict between personalities and world-views<br />

in a discipline which cannot, for good or for ill, conduct completely<br />

objective research. While many scientists may consider this an<br />

inconvenience or even a substantial barrier to research, however, Rees’s<br />

53


ook does an admirable job not only <strong>of</strong> showing that complete objectivity is<br />

impossible in any science, but also <strong>of</strong> demonstrating that primatology can<br />

still produce high-quality, important research despite being subject to the<br />

fieldworkers’ and experimenters’ regresses.<br />

Isabelle C. Winder<br />

University <strong>of</strong> York<br />

Reference:<br />

Janson, C.H. (2000). <strong>Primate</strong> Socio-Ecology: The End <strong>of</strong> a Golden Age.<br />

Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 9: 73-86.<br />

54


THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN<br />

(Affiliated to the International Primatological <strong>Society</strong> and the European Federation <strong>of</strong> Primatology)<br />

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP<br />

Please visit our website at www.psgb.org to ensure you have the most recent version <strong>of</strong> our membership form<br />

Full Membership - limited to those possessing a recognised qualification in a scientific field (including postgraduates)<br />

or those who have made a significant contribution to primatology<br />

Associate Membership - open to anyone with a serious interest in primates. Associate members can participate in all<br />

<strong>Society</strong> activities, but are not eligible to hold <strong>of</strong>fice or to vote at the AGM or other <strong>Society</strong> meetings<br />

Student Membership - as for Associate Membership, but only open to full-time students<br />

Institutional Membership – open to any ‘Institution’ in the broad fields <strong>of</strong> education, research or commerce whose<br />

efforts are seen as beneficial to primates<br />

Applications should be returned to:<br />

Complete in BLOCK CAPITALS or type<br />

Dr Clare Cunningham (Membership Secretary PSGB)<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychology<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social and Health Sciences<br />

Kydd Building (Level 5), Bell Street<br />

Dundee, DD1 1HG<br />

membership@psgb.org<br />

I wish to apply for FULL / ASSOCIATE / STUDENT / INSTITUTIONAL Membership (delete as appropriate)<br />

Title: Forenames: Surname:<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Address:<br />

Address for correspondence (if different):<br />

Email address (required if requesting electronic <strong>Primate</strong> Eye):<br />

Present appointment/occupation:<br />

Degrees, diplomas, certificates, etc.:<br />

Membership <strong>of</strong> other societies:<br />

Your main areas <strong>of</strong> interest:<br />

FULL MEMBERSHIP<br />

The Constitution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> requires that a <strong>Society</strong> member who has personal knowledge <strong>of</strong> the applicant support<br />

each application. (If you do not know a PSGB member, please send a CV.)<br />

(Name)<br />

has expressed a wish to join the <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> as a Full<br />

Member. I the undersigned recommend them as a proper person to become one <strong>of</strong> its members.<br />

Name (CAPITALS): Signature: Date:<br />

STUDENT MEMBERSHIP (to be renewed annually) - The following to be completed by a tutor/supervisor:<br />

(Name) is a student at University/College<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Tutor (CAPITALS): Signature: Date:<br />

Address:<br />

INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP<br />

Please include details <strong>of</strong> your institution so that we may judge whether it fulfils the <strong>Society</strong>’s conditions for<br />

membership.


SUBSCRIPTION RATES:<br />

Full/Associate Membership by cheque/credit card - £ 27.50<br />

Full/Associate Membership by banker’s order - £ 25.00<br />

Full/Associate Lifetime Membership - £500.00<br />

Student Membership - £ 15.00<br />

Institutional Membership - £ 30.00<br />

Overseas Postage Supplement (paper copy only) - £ 3.00<br />

The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> is a charity, and we would encourage you to make a donation to allow the <strong>Society</strong><br />

to continue in its high pr<strong>of</strong>ile activities.<br />

I should like to make a donation <strong>of</strong>: £50 £30 £20 £10 £5 Other £……….<br />

I should like my donation to go towards the following donation category (please tick box):<br />

Conservation Working Party Captive Care Working Party Speaker Fund <br />

Sponsorship <strong>of</strong> Member from Habitat Country General <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Activities <br />

Total Subscription Amount: £<br />

Signature <strong>of</strong> Applicant:<br />

I would prefer to receive <strong>Primate</strong> Eye in electronic format <br />

(email address required; overseas postage not required)<br />

Date:<br />

PAYMENT MUST BE ENCLOSED WITH YOUR APPLICATION<br />

Cheques should be made payable to ‘The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’<br />

Credit Card Payment Please debit my MASTERCARD / VISA (delete as appropriate) for £<br />

Name on Card:<br />

Card Number: _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _ / _ _ _ _<br />

Signed:<br />

Expires: _ _ / _ _<br />

BANKER’S ORDER – Full/Associate Members only<br />

To the Manager:<br />

Bank<br />

Bank Sort Code:<br />

Bank Address:<br />

Please pay the sum <strong>of</strong> £ on the first day <strong>of</strong> October 2009, or immediately if this date has passed, and pay this sum<br />

thereafter on the first day <strong>of</strong> October until further notice to the Cooperative Bank (Sort Code 08-92-99) for the account<br />

<strong>of</strong> The <strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong> (Account No 65049352), debiting such amounts to my/our account.<br />

Please quote the following reference in relation to this transfer: (leave blank) ...………………………………<br />

Name:<br />

Address:<br />

Bank Account Number:<br />

Signature:


THE PRIMATE SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN<br />

founded on May 22 1967 by the <strong>Primate</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> the Zoological <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Founding Council:<br />

J.R. NAPIER (President), R.P. MICHAEL (Hon.Sec.), R.J. ANDREW (Hon.Treasurer),<br />

E.H. ASHTON, L.D. BROOKES, C.R. COID, P. COTES, J.H. CROOK, J. DAVIES,<br />

R.N. T-W-FIENNES, R.A. HINDE, G.H. MANLEY, I. ROWLANDS, A.C. WARREN,<br />

L. WEISKRANTZ<br />

Past Presidents:<br />

1967 - 1970 J.R. NAPIER 1986 - 1969 B. WOOD<br />

1970 - 1973 R.P. MICHAEL 1989 - 1993 R.I.M. DUNBAR<br />

1973 - 1976 R.N. T-W-FIENNES 1993 - 1998 H.O. BOX<br />

1976 - 1979 M.H. DAY 1998 - 2001 P.C. LEE<br />

1979 - 1982 R.D. MARTIN 2001 - 2005 R. BARTON<br />

1982 - 1986 D.J. CHIVERS 2005 - <strong>2010</strong> A. MACLARNON<br />

Past Secretaries:<br />

1967 - 1970 R.P. MICHAEL 1987 - 1990 R.C. HUBRECHT<br />

1970 - 1974 K.R. HOBBS 1990 - 1993 P.C. LEE<br />

1974 - 1975 V. REYNOLDS 1993 - 1996 C. ROSS<br />

1975 - 1978 R.D. MARTIN 1996 - 1999 H. BUCHANAN-SMITH<br />

1978 - 1981 A.F. DIXSON 1999 - 2005 J. LYCETT<br />

1981 - 1985 S.K. BEARDER 2005 - <strong>2010</strong> C. SCHAFFNER<br />

1985 - 1987 H.O. BOX<br />

Past Treasurers:<br />

1967 - 1970 R.J. ANDREW 1987 - 1990 S. KINGSLEY<br />

1970 - 1974 A. JOLLY 1990 - 1994 R. CROMPTON<br />

1974 - 1977 D.J. CHIVERS 1994 - 1998 G. R. HOSEY<br />

1977 - 1980 E.B. KEVERNE 1998 - 2002 C. EVANS<br />

1980 - 1984 L. AIELLO 2002 - 2009 R. HILL<br />

1984 - 1987 A. MACLARNON<br />

Past Editors:<br />

1974 - 1977 N.R. CHALMERS 1993 - 1996 D. BRANDON-JONES<br />

1977 - 1993 J.C. INGRAM 1996 - 2006 W. SELLERS<br />

Osman Hill Memorial Lecturers (established 1977):<br />

1978 M.H. DAY 1994 R.I.M. DUNBAR<br />

1980 R.A. HINDE 1996 T. ROWELL<br />

1982 F. BOURLIERE 1998 C.B. STRINGER<br />

1984 P.M. BUTLER 2000 A.F. DIXSON<br />

1986 J.P. HEARN 2002 I. TATTERSALL<br />

1988 H. KUMMER 2004 C. VAN SCHAIK<br />

1990 R.D. MARTIN 2006 A. JOLLY<br />

1992 J.H. CROOK 2008 W. MCGREW<br />

Napier Memorial Medal Winners (established 1991):<br />

1991 CHRISTOPHER PRYCE 2001 RUSSELL HILL<br />

1993 MARTA LAHR 2003 SUSANNE SHULTZ<br />

1995 CARLOS DREWS 2005 CORRI WAITT<br />

1997 NICOLA KOYAMA 2007 ANNIKA PAUKNER<br />

1999 MARK COLLARD 2009 ERIK WILLEMS<br />

Occasional Medal Winners (established 1996):<br />

1997 JANE GOODALL CBE: Conservation<br />

2007 CYRIL ROSEN MBE: Conservation<br />

2008 STEPHEN NASH: Special Contributions to Primatology<br />

Charles A. Lockwood Medal Winners (established 2009):<br />

2009 CLAIRE SANTORELLI<br />

The content <strong>of</strong> <strong>Primate</strong> Eye is printed on recycled paper by Top Copy, Bristol, BS16 6JE


<strong>Primate</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Britain</strong><br />

PRIMATE EYE No 101 JUNE <strong>2010</strong><br />

• CONTENTS •<br />

Page<br />

Editorial … … … … … … … 1<br />

Report: PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Social Cognition and<br />

Human Evolution … … … … … 3<br />

Report: Pre-PSGB Spring Meeting Workshop – Training<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s for Cognitive Research … … … 5<br />

PSGB Spring Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Social Cognition and Human<br />

Evolution<br />

Paper Abstracts … … … … … 7<br />

Poster Abstracts … … … … … 20<br />

Future Meetings:<br />

Winter Meeting <strong>2010</strong> – Gombe 50 … … … 29<br />

Announcement: International Symposium – Compassionate<br />

Conservation … … … … … 31<br />

Announcement: Charles A. Lockwood Memorial PSGB Grants 32<br />

Conservation Grant Reports:<br />

Ecology and Status <strong>of</strong> the Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in<br />

Korup National Park, Southwest Cameroon: Implications<br />

for their Conservation … … … … 33<br />

Population Density Surveys and Taxonomic Asssessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Western Tarsier (Tarsius bancanus borneanus) and<br />

Bornean slow loris (Nycitecebus menagensis) in the<br />

Lower Kinabatangan Floodplain, Sabah, Malaysia … 35<br />

<strong>Primate</strong>s for Posterity: Assessment <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Primate</strong><br />

Conservation Education Programme on 15-17 year old<br />

Students in Schools in Tamil Nadu, India … … 37<br />

Conservation Assessment <strong>of</strong> Taï Monkey Fauna from<br />

Two Survey Methods and a Bushmeat Market Study:<br />

How Hunting Impacts Taï National Park … … 39<br />

Identifying the CITES Appendix 1-listed Asian Slow Loris<br />

Nycticebus spp: A Training Programme for Enforcement<br />

Officials and Rescue Centres in Southeast Asia … 42<br />

Book Reviews:<br />

Mountain Gorillas: Biology, Conservation, and Coexistence 44<br />

Endocrinology <strong>of</strong> Social Relationships … … 45<br />

Conservation in the 21st Century Gorillas as a Case Study 48<br />

The Gibbons: New Perspectives on Small Ape Socioecology<br />

and Population Biology … … … … 49<br />

The Infanticide Controversy: Primatology and the Art <strong>of</strong><br />

Field Science … … … … … 52<br />

ISSN 0305-8417

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!