01.04.2015 Views

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

angular resolution elements per diameter [45]. The data we use here consist of 25 <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

spectral flux measurement for the entire remnant, taken with the complete HESS array <strong>in</strong><br />

2004. S<strong>in</strong>ce SNR RX J1713.7-3946 appears closely associated with dense molecular clouds<br />

along the l<strong>in</strong>e of sight [46, 47], it is reasonable to expect a strong signal of hadronic γ-rays.<br />

Given the <strong>in</strong>tegrated flux <strong>in</strong> the <strong>TeV</strong> b<strong>and</strong>, for the hadronic scenario the required total<br />

energy <strong>in</strong> accelerated cosmic-ray nucleons is<br />

W tot<br />

p<br />

≈ (2 · 10 50 erg)<br />

( D<br />

kpc<br />

) 2 (<br />

n<br />

atoms/cm −3 ) −1<br />

(12)<br />

There is k<strong>in</strong>ematic evidence that the distance D is 1.3 ± 0.4 kpc [46], whereas the weakness<br />

of thermal X-ray emission implies a density of n 0.05 atoms/cm −3 <strong>in</strong> the center of the<br />

remnant [48] <strong>and</strong> a postshock density of n 0.02 atoms/cm −3 [49]. The low postshock<br />

density <strong>in</strong>dicates that about 1 solar mass or less have been swept up by the SNR, which<br />

therefore should just be <strong>in</strong> transition from the adiabatic phase to the Taylor-Sedov phase,<br />

when its ability to accelerate particles is presumable at its peak. The low density also implies<br />

a total energy <strong>in</strong> cosmic rays of about 10 52 erg, somewhat larger than the canonical value<br />

for the total k<strong>in</strong>etic energy <strong>in</strong> a supernova explosion.<br />

A high energy density of energetic particles is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the notion of Fermi-type acceleration<br />

at the forward shock of SNR. This process is <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically efficient, <strong>and</strong> a significant<br />

fraction of the pressure <strong>and</strong> energy density will be carried by energetic particles. In that<br />

case the shocks should be strongly modified, because the energetic particles have a smaller<br />

adiabatic <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>and</strong> a much larger mean free path for scatter<strong>in</strong>g than does the quasi-thermal<br />

plasma. In addition the particles at the highest energy escape, thus mak<strong>in</strong>g the shock essentially<br />

radiative <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the compression ratio [50].<br />

While the details of the published acceleration models differ, they essentially all predict a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous harden<strong>in</strong>g of the particle spectrum with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g energy, until a cut-off occurs<br />

at an energy that is difficult to predict [51]. At particle energies <strong>in</strong> excess of 1 <strong>TeV</strong>, i.e.<br />

relevant for γ-ray production above 200 GeV, the spectrum should be harder than E −2 <strong>and</strong><br />

display a positive curvature, unless the cut-off has already set <strong>in</strong> [52]. We therefore chose to<br />

parametrize the spectrum of accelerated hadrons <strong>in</strong> RX J1713.7-3946 as<br />

N(E) = N 0<br />

( E<br />

E 0<br />

) −s+σ ln<br />

E<br />

E 0<br />

Θ [Emax − E] (13)<br />

where Θ is the step function <strong>and</strong> E 0 = 15 <strong>TeV</strong> is a normalization chosen to render variations<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!