01.04.2015 Views

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and TeV-band ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

threshold up to a few GeV [8].<br />

In addition to the theoretical approach, the parametrization of the <strong>in</strong>clusive cross section<br />

of π 0 production <strong>in</strong> pp collisions based on the accelerator data was also studied [10, 21, 24].<br />

The validity of a parametrization depends on the functional formulae chosen <strong>and</strong> also the<br />

data used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the free parameters. Thus, the parametrization method often reproduces<br />

tails extend<strong>in</strong>g beyond the energy-momentum conservation limit, which might<br />

result <strong>in</strong> unphysical structures when the spectrum is calculated <strong>in</strong> a broad energy range. It<br />

is recognized [20, 22] that these parametrizations lose accuracy <strong>in</strong> the high energy regime<br />

<strong>and</strong> come with a k<strong>in</strong>ematic limit of validity. The parametrization of Stephens <strong>and</strong> Badhwar<br />

[10] under-predicts the yield of high energy pions. The work of Blattnig et al. [21] is valid<br />

only for energies E p below 50 GeV, <strong>and</strong> above this energy it extremely over-predicts the<br />

pion production <strong>and</strong> carries a k<strong>in</strong>ematic <strong>in</strong>validity; Kamae et al. [24] have exercised much<br />

care <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>clusive cross section near the pion production threshold, but the<br />

same problems with k<strong>in</strong>ematic <strong>in</strong>validities, etc, arise <strong>in</strong> the high energy range.<br />

The spectral distribution of secondary particles <strong>and</strong> the total cross section are not directly<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>able due to the lack of data. Nevertheless, one can calculate the energy spectrum<br />

or total <strong>in</strong>clusive cross section by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the parameterized differential <strong>in</strong>clusive cross<br />

section over the whole phase space (the scatter<strong>in</strong>g angle <strong>and</strong> the energy). By analyz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

behavior of the <strong>in</strong>tegral, it is possible to evaluate the accuracy <strong>and</strong> validity limit of different<br />

parametrizations. For example, by the analysis of the total cross section, a parametrization<br />

which cannot <strong>in</strong>tegrate to a correct total cross section can be ruled out, even though the<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant differential cross section data can be reproduced, s<strong>in</strong>ce the global behavior of<br />

the parametrization is not accurate. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, produc<strong>in</strong>g a correct total cross<br />

section upon <strong>in</strong>tegration doesn’t necessarily imply accuracy of the global behavior of this<br />

parametrization. This disadvantage results from the fact that the available data are not<br />

sufficiently constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the parametrization of differential cross sections.<br />

B. <strong>Cosmic</strong>-ray generated hadronic <strong>in</strong>teractions by Monte Carlo event generator<br />

DPMJET-III<br />

In particle physics, the Monte Carlo simulation approach is widely applied to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on particle production <strong>in</strong> hadronic <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple advantage of<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!