02.04.2015 Views

Government Security News

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transporting oil by<br />

rail: Is this a risk to<br />

national security?<br />

By K Denise Rucker Krepp<br />

24<br />

When a train<br />

carrying oil<br />

has an accident,<br />

the local<br />

community<br />

is the one<br />

that suffers.<br />

Residents are<br />

forced to leave<br />

their homes, sleep on gym floors,<br />

and pray that their lives return<br />

to normal. This suffering is increasing<br />

significantly as more<br />

and more trains derail around<br />

the country. One way to stop<br />

this suffering is to designate the<br />

oil transported by rail as security<br />

sensitive material. This designation<br />

automatically imposes<br />

greater safety and security measures<br />

and increased government<br />

oversight.<br />

Designating oil transported<br />

by rail as security sensitive material<br />

doesn’t require Congressional<br />

action. In 2007, Congress passed<br />

the Implementing the Recommendations<br />

of the 9/11 Commission<br />

Act. Section 1551 requires<br />

railroad carriers “to, no later than<br />

90 days after the end of each calendar<br />

year, compile security-sensitive<br />

materials commodity data.<br />

Such data must be collected by<br />

route, line segment, or series of<br />

line segments, as aggregated by<br />

the railroad carrier. Within the<br />

railroad carrier selected route,<br />

the commodity data must identify<br />

the geographic location of<br />

the route and the total number of<br />

shipments by the United Nations<br />

identification number for the security-sensitive<br />

materials.”<br />

Section 1551 also requires<br />

the railroad carriers to “provide a<br />

written analysis of the safety and<br />

security risks for the transportation<br />

routes identified in the security-sensitive<br />

materials commodity<br />

data collected.” Additionally,<br />

Section 1551 requires railroad<br />

carriers to “identify practicable<br />

alternative routes” and to examine<br />

the “risk of a catastrophic release<br />

from a shipment traveling<br />

along the alternate route compared<br />

to the primary route.”<br />

Unfortunately, the Obama<br />

Administration has not fully defined<br />

security sensitive material.<br />

Section 1501 of the 9/11 Act defines<br />

it as “a material, or a group<br />

or class of material, in a particular<br />

amount and form that the<br />

Secretary, in consultation with<br />

the Secretary of Transportation,<br />

determines, through a rulemaking<br />

with opportunity for public<br />

comment, poses a significant risk<br />

to national security while being<br />

transported in commerce due to<br />

the potential use of the material<br />

in an act of terrorism.”<br />

It’s been 8 years and the U.S.<br />

Department of Homeland Secu-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!