05.04.2015 Views

2003.001 Sexual Ethics and Criminal Law, Lester ... - Francis Bennion

2003.001 Sexual Ethics and Criminal Law, Lester ... - Francis Bennion

2003.001 Sexual Ethics and Criminal Law, Lester ... - Francis Bennion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bill's elaborate de®nition gets us no nearer grasping which of<br />

The<br />

six is intended here. We are forced to turn for guidance to the<br />

the<br />

80 de®nes ``sexual'' for the purposes of this Part. This<br />

Clause<br />

is relevant to many of the o€ences under this Part.<br />

de®nition<br />

example, clause 3(1)(b) refers to penetration which is<br />

For<br />

<strong>and</strong> clause 9(1)(b) refers to touching which is sexual.<br />

sexual<br />

(a) requires the reasonable person to look at the<br />

Paragraph<br />

of the activity in question. If, from looking at the<br />

nature<br />

of the activity, it would not occur to the reasonable<br />

nature<br />

that it would be sexual, it does not meet the test, even<br />

person<br />

a particular individual may obtain sexual grati®cation from<br />

if<br />

out the activity. The e€ect of this is that obscure<br />

carrying<br />

do not fall within the de®nition of sexual activity. The<br />

fetishes<br />

of some activities is such that they are obviously<br />

nature<br />

such as sexual intercourse, <strong>and</strong> they would meet the<br />

sexual,<br />

Other activities may or may not be sexual depending on<br />

test.<br />

circumstances <strong>and</strong> the intentions of the people carrying<br />

the<br />

out, for example, digital penetration of the vagina may<br />

them<br />

sexual or may be carried out for a medical reason. These<br />

be<br />

would meet the test in paragraph (a) since the<br />

activities<br />

person need only think that the activities may be<br />

reasonable<br />

he does not need to come to any conclusion about the<br />

sexual;<br />

Activities which meet the test in paragraph (a) must<br />

matter.<br />

be considered under paragraph (b). In order to assess<br />

then<br />

the activity is sexual, the reasonable person must<br />

whether<br />

at any or all of the following factors: the nature of the<br />

look<br />

the circumstances in which the activity is carried out;<br />

activity;<br />

the purpose of any of the participants. Where the activity<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

for example, oral sex, it seems likely that the reasonable<br />

is,<br />

would only need to consider the nature of the activity<br />

person<br />

determine that it is sexual. But where it is digital<br />

to<br />

of the vagina, the reasonable person would need<br />

penetration<br />

consider the nature of the activity (it may or may not be<br />

to<br />

the circumstances in which it is carried out (if it is in a<br />

sexual),<br />

surgery, it is probably not sexual) <strong>and</strong> the purpose of<br />

doctor's<br />

of the participants (if the doctor's purpose is medical, the<br />

any<br />

o<br />

cial explanatory notes.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!