07.04.2015 Views

Posters IV - The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology

Posters IV - The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology

Posters IV - The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(age>=18). Using artificial neural networks, decision tree induction, and logistic regression, we<br />

induced multiple possible predictive models <strong>of</strong> adherence for the three age groups using: only<br />

NPDS data elements, and combined NPDS data elements/narrative text. We validated models<br />

using one year <strong>of</strong> reserved data. We calculated non-parametric area under the receiver operating<br />

characteristic curve (AROC) for model comparison. Results: AROC values for predictive models<br />

based on NPDS data elements ranged from 0.64-0.71. AROC values for predictive models based<br />

on both NPDS data elements and narrative text ranged from 0.53-0.73. For 11 <strong>of</strong> 14 models, the<br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> narrative text resulted in increased performance. <strong>The</strong> mean difference in AROC =<br />

0.02. Conclusions: Coded representations <strong>of</strong> narrative text improved the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

predictive models <strong>of</strong> caller adherence to PCC referral to EDs. <strong>The</strong> NPDS data elements<br />

accurately described key caller and exposure characteristics, and so the narrative text may reflect<br />

additional PCC staff concerns and impressions resulting from the communication process. In<br />

clinical decision support applications, PCCs should consider the modest improvement in<br />

predictive modeling realized with additional natural language processing in the context <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

implications and increased processing times necessary to include narrative text in computerized<br />

decision support tools.<br />

264<br />

Exotic Venomous Snakebite Drill<br />

Rittirak Othong 1 , Sophia Sheikh 1 , Nahar D Alruwaili 1 , Rachel Gorodetsky 2 , Brent W Morgan 1 , Brad<br />

Lock 3 , Ziad N Kazzi 1<br />

1 Emory University, Atlanta GA 2 Georgia Poison Center, Atlanta GA 3 Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta GA USA<br />

Background: <strong>The</strong> National Poison Data System has reported 41-93 patients/year exposed to exotic<br />

venomous snakes from 2005 to 2009. According to the Association <strong>of</strong> Zoos and Aquariums'<br />

recommendation, institutions housing venomous animals should have protocols in place for appropriate<br />

and timely transport <strong>of</strong> envenomated individuals to hospitals. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to use a<br />

functional exercise to evaluate the existing exotic snakebite protocol (ESP) that is used by our local zoo.<br />

Methods: Prior to the exercise, all involved parties were contacted, including the poison center (PC), zoo,<br />

emergency medical services (EMS), receiving hospital emergency department (ED) and pharmacy. A<br />

checklist <strong>of</strong> all required actions in the ESP was created and used during the exercise. <strong>The</strong> exercise was<br />

divided into 4 phases that were evaluated by independent observers: zoo, EMS, PC, and hospital ED. <strong>The</strong><br />

zoo component was further divided into 3 action lists (victim, assistant, and zoo dispatch). After the drill,<br />

we held a debriefing session and generated an after action report that was submitted to the zoo, PC, and<br />

hospital administrations. Results: We found that the ESP contained procedures for zoo personnel that<br />

were easy to follow, but the procedures for hospital personnel lacked details regarding signs and<br />

symptoms expected from each species; indications, dosing, reconstituting and forms (liquid vs. powder) <strong>of</strong><br />

each antivenin (AV). Zoo personnel performed almost all required actions (93%-victim, 100%-assistant,<br />

93%-zoo dispatch). EMS and ED personnel completed 90% and 78% <strong>of</strong> the listed tasks while<br />

PC personnel completed 25% <strong>of</strong> the tasks. Additionally, we discovered that pharmacy was not included in<br />

the ESP, even though reconstituting and dosing the exotic AV consumed time (22 minutes). Finally, we<br />

encountered problems communicating the ESP to the ED and pharmacy due to the PC phone system<br />

problem. Despite the identified shortcomings, the time from simulated envenomation to AV<br />

administration was under an hour. Conclusions: This drill identified several potential issues that led us to<br />

revise our protocol by adding signs and symptoms expected from each species; indications, dosing and<br />

reconstituting <strong>of</strong> each AV; and a pharmacy section. We also identified suboptimal PC response in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!