t Hooft limit (1, 2, 3, ···â) - Theoretical Physics (TIFR)
t Hooft limit (1, 2, 3, ···â) - Theoretical Physics (TIFR)
t Hooft limit (1, 2, 3, ···â) - Theoretical Physics (TIFR)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
The gluoN c plasma and its ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> <strong>limit</strong><br />
(1, 2, 3, · · · ∞)<br />
Saumen Datta and Sourendu Gupta<br />
ILGTI: <strong>TIFR</strong><br />
Extreme QCD 2010<br />
Physikzentrum Bad Honnef, Germany<br />
June 21, 2010<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
RG scaling and ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
Latent heat<br />
Equation of state<br />
Summary<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Limiting procedures<br />
◮ ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling <strong>limit</strong>: take N c → ∞ and g 2 → 0 keeping<br />
λ = g 2 N c fixed. Correlation functions can be computed<br />
non-perturbatively but diagrammatically by resumming a<br />
well-defined class of diagrams. Simple caricature of hadron<br />
physics in this <strong>limit</strong>.<br />
’t <strong>Hooft</strong>, Coleman; tested by Teper and collaborators<br />
Extended to many other classes of theories. AdS/CFT<br />
correspondence works in the ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> <strong>limit</strong> of N c → ∞.<br />
◮ Strong scaling <strong>limit</strong>: work at (fixed) long distance scales and<br />
take N c → ∞. Non-perturbative content of the theory may be<br />
explored on the lattice and the <strong>limit</strong> taken.<br />
Teper, Lucini and collaborators<br />
Corrections organized in power of 1/N c<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Flag diagram of gluoN c plasmas<br />
line of chiral transitions<br />
0<br />
m<br />
N c<br />
3<br />
2+ε<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Flag diagram of gluoN c plasmas<br />
line of chiral transitions<br />
N c<br />
3<br />
0<br />
~10 MeV<br />
m<br />
2+ε<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Flag diagram of gluoN c plasmas<br />
line of chiral transitions<br />
0<br />
m<br />
Τ<br />
Deconfined<br />
Baryonic<br />
Α<br />
Quarkyonic<br />
µ<br />
N c<br />
3<br />
2+ε<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Flag diagram of gluoN c plasmas<br />
line of chiral transitions<br />
Τ<br />
Baryonic<br />
Deconfined<br />
Quarkyonic?<br />
µ<br />
N c<br />
Β<br />
3<br />
0<br />
m<br />
2+ε<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline<br />
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
RG scaling and ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
Latent heat<br />
Equation of state<br />
Summary<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Unphysical strong–weak coupling crossover<br />
0.65<br />
0.60<br />
<br />
0.55<br />
0.50<br />
0.45<br />
0.40<br />
8 terms<br />
7 terms<br />
0.35<br />
0.30<br />
0.25<br />
8 9 10 11 12<br />
β<br />
Wilson action. Earlier generation of simulations <strong>limit</strong>ed by this<br />
bulk transition; solution now: move to smaller lattice spacing.<br />
Teper and collaborators, Panero<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
· · · no longer a problem<br />
0.6<br />
SU(4)<br />
<br />
0.55<br />
N s =18<br />
N<br />
0.5<br />
s =24<br />
10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4<br />
Clear 1st order transition signal in L but not in plaquette: therefore<br />
thermal transition, not bulk. Similarly for N c = 6, 8 and 10.<br />
Computations for N t = 6, 8, 10 and (sometimes) 12.<br />
SG<br />
β<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
· · · no longer a problem<br />
0.12<br />
SU(4)<br />
<br />
0.08<br />
0.04<br />
N s =18<br />
N<br />
0<br />
s =24<br />
10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4<br />
Clear 1st order transition signal in L but not in plaquette: therefore<br />
thermal transition, not bulk. Similarly for N c = 6, 8 and 10.<br />
Computations for N t = 6, 8, 10 and (sometimes) 12.<br />
SG<br />
β<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
· · · no longer a problem<br />
0.08<br />
SU(4),β=10.79<br />
0.04<br />
N s =22<br />
Im L<br />
0<br />
-0.04<br />
-0.08<br />
-0.08 -0.04 0 0.04 0.08<br />
Re L<br />
Clear 1st order transition signal in L but not in plaquette: therefore<br />
thermal transition, not bulk. Similarly for N c = 6, 8 and 10.<br />
Computations for N t = 6, 8, 10 and (sometimes) 12.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Precision test of RG<br />
Nt<br />
10<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
8<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
6<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
β 10.788 11.078 11.339<br />
β c determined to one part in 10 4 . Strong coupling determined<br />
non-perturbatively. 2-loop RG works with precision of two parts in<br />
10 3 for a ≤ 1/(8T c ). For larger a: non-perturbative RG.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Precision test of RG<br />
Nt<br />
10<br />
8<br />
(4/5)<br />
Τ c<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
6<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
(4/3) Τ<br />
c<br />
β 10.788 11.078 11.339<br />
β c determined to one part in 10 4 . Strong coupling determined<br />
non-perturbatively. 2-loop RG works with precision of two parts in<br />
10 3 for a ≤ 1/(8T c ). For larger a: non-perturbative RG.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Precision test of RG<br />
Nt<br />
10<br />
(4/5)<br />
Τ c<br />
0.804(3)<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
8<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
6<br />
Τ<br />
c<br />
(4/3) Τ<br />
c<br />
1.308 (2)<br />
β 10.788 11.078 11.339<br />
β c determined to one part in 10 4 . Strong coupling determined<br />
non-perturbatively. 2-loop RG works with precision of two parts in<br />
10 3 for a ≤ 1/(8T c ). For larger a: non-perturbative RG.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Precision test of RG<br />
2.5<br />
SU(4)<br />
T/T c (N t =6)<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
N t =5<br />
N t =6<br />
N t =8<br />
N t =10<br />
10.8 11 11.2 11.4 11.6 11.8<br />
β c determined to one part in 10 4 . Strong coupling determined<br />
non-perturbatively. 2-loop RG works with precision of two parts in<br />
10 3 for a ≤ 1/(8T c ). For larger a: non-perturbative RG.<br />
SG<br />
β<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Precision test of RG<br />
4<br />
3<br />
SU(4)<br />
T/T c (N t =6)<br />
2<br />
1<br />
N t =5<br />
N t =6<br />
N t =8<br />
N t =10<br />
10.4 11 11.6 12.2<br />
β c determined to one part in 10 4 . Strong coupling determined<br />
non-perturbatively. 2-loop RG works with precision of two parts in<br />
10 3 for a ≤ 1/(8T c ). For larger a: non-perturbative RG.<br />
SG<br />
β<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Step-scaling functions<br />
0.6<br />
∆β=β(a)-β(2a)<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
V-scheme<br />
E-scheme<br />
Nonperturbative<br />
Boyd et al<br />
SU(3)<br />
0.3<br />
6 6.5 7<br />
β(a)<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Step-scaling functions<br />
1<br />
V-scheme<br />
E-scheme<br />
∆β=β(a)-β(2a)<br />
0.6<br />
Nonperturbative<br />
0.2<br />
SU(4)<br />
10.6 11 11.4 11.8 12.2<br />
β(a)<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling: fixed λ, fixed physics<br />
10.5<br />
10<br />
λ c (2πT c )<br />
9.5<br />
9<br />
8.5<br />
8<br />
0 0.04 0.08 0.12<br />
2<br />
1/N c<br />
λ c = g 2 (T c )N c . Clearly non-linear (even ignoring N t = 8 and 10).<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Very large corrections<br />
Best-fit function:<br />
λ c =<br />
{<br />
9.8771(4) −<br />
14.2562(2)<br />
N 2 c<br />
9.9904(6) + 1.2081(3)<br />
N 2 c<br />
+ 54.7830(2)<br />
N 4 c<br />
− 23.5709(3)<br />
N 4 c<br />
(non-perturbative),<br />
(2-loop).<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Very large corrections<br />
Best-fit function:<br />
λ c =<br />
{<br />
9.8771(4) −<br />
14.2562(2)<br />
N 2 c<br />
9.9904(6) + 1.2081(3)<br />
N 2 c<br />
+ 54.7830(2)<br />
N 4 c<br />
− 23.5709(3)<br />
N 4 c<br />
(non-perturbative),<br />
(2-loop).<br />
For N c = 3<br />
λ c =<br />
{<br />
9.8771(4) − 1.584 + 0.676 (non-perturbative),<br />
9.9904(6) + 0.134 − 0.291 (2-loop).<br />
1/N 2 c and 1/N 4 c corrections nearly equal to each other.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline<br />
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
RG scaling and ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
Latent heat<br />
Equation of state<br />
Summary<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Multiple peaks?<br />
50<br />
SU(4), N t =6, β=10.79<br />
40<br />
Prob(|L|)<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
N s =16<br />
0<br />
N s =24<br />
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08<br />
|L|<br />
Clear multiple peaks for L but not for plaquette. Entropy surface<br />
not flat? Not a true first order transition?<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Multiple peaks?<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
SU(4), N t =6<br />
β=10.79<br />
N s =24<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
N s =16<br />
0<br />
-0.002 -0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003<br />
δP<br />
Clear multiple peaks for L but not for plaquette. Entropy surface<br />
not flat? Not a true first order transition?<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Isolate phases using order parameter<br />
800<br />
β=10.78<br />
800<br />
β=10.78<br />
600<br />
Low<br />
High<br />
600<br />
Low<br />
High<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
400<br />
200<br />
8000<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
8000<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
β=10.79<br />
High<br />
β=10.80<br />
High<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
Prob(δP)<br />
400<br />
200<br />
8000<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
8000<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
β=10.79<br />
High<br />
β=10.80<br />
High<br />
Stable against change in V and a<br />
0<br />
-0.002 -0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003<br />
0<br />
-0.002 -0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003<br />
δP<br />
δP<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Is N c = 3 special?<br />
N t N s ∆E/Tc 4 ∆E/∆ max<br />
4 16 2.06(1)(3)<br />
24 1.93(1)(3)<br />
32 1.90(2)(2)<br />
6 16 1.79(2)(4) 0.65(2)<br />
32 1.54(2)(5)<br />
48 1.44(4)(3)<br />
N c ≥ 4 results stable for N s /N t ≃ 3. But large finite size effect for<br />
N c = 3.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Scaling with N c<br />
Latent heat depends on N c even after scaling by number of gluons:<br />
T A = N 2 c − 1. Best fit result—<br />
∆ǫ<br />
T A T 4 c<br />
= 0.388(3) − 1.61(4)<br />
Nc<br />
2 .<br />
N c = 3 may have larger finite volume effects than larger N c .<br />
For N c = 2<br />
∆ǫ<br />
T A Tc<br />
4 = 0.388(3) − 0.40(1) = 0!<br />
Good news? Bad news?<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline<br />
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
RG scaling and ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
Latent heat<br />
Equation of state<br />
Summary<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Conformal symmetry breaking<br />
0.4<br />
SU(3)<br />
SU(4)<br />
SU(6)<br />
∆/(T A T 4 )<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
T/T c<br />
Good scaling of ∆/T 4 = (E − 3P)/T 4 with N c at fixed T/T c<br />
(strong N c scaling).<br />
∆ 1/4 ≃ T even at T ≃ 2T c for N c = 3: conformal symmetry<br />
broken. SG Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Evidence for mass?<br />
0.4<br />
∆/(T A T 2 T c<br />
2 )<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
SU(3)<br />
SU(4)<br />
SU(6)<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
T/T c<br />
∆/T 2 ≃ constant is generic evidence for mass scales persisting in<br />
the high temperature phase.<br />
Meisinger, Miller, Ogilvie, 2002; Pisarski, 2007<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Cutoff dependence of pressure<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
SU(4)<br />
p/p SB<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
N t =5(Panero)<br />
N t =6<br />
N t =8<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
T/T c<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Main results<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
4<br />
SU(4)<br />
Ts/p SB<br />
3<br />
ε/p SB<br />
2<br />
1<br />
p/p SB<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
T/T c<br />
Far from ideal gas.<br />
Good scaling of EOS with N c at fixed T/T c (strong N c scaling).<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Main results<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
ε/ε SB<br />
p/p SB<br />
SU(3)<br />
SU(4)<br />
SU(6)<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
T/T c<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
Far from ideal gas.<br />
Good scaling of EOS with N c at fixed T/T c (strong N c scaling).<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
s/s SB<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
SU(3)<br />
SU(4)<br />
SU(6)<br />
6 7 8 9 10<br />
λ(2πT)<br />
’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling fails for T ≤ 2T c .<br />
N = 4 SYM does not describe pure gauge theory.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
Conformal theory?<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
SU(3)<br />
SU(4)<br />
SU(6)<br />
p/p SB<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />
ε/ε SB<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline<br />
Outline T c<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
RG scaling and ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> scaling<br />
Latent heat<br />
Equation of state<br />
Summary<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics
Outline T c<br />
Main results<br />
Latent heat EOS Summary<br />
◮ Location of deconfining first order transition measured with<br />
high accuracy. Yields high precision test of RG scaling and ’t<br />
<strong>Hooft</strong> scaling. ’t <strong>Hooft</strong> coupling at T c has large 1/N c<br />
corrections near N c = 3. Signs of breakdown of the ’t <strong>Hooft</strong><br />
procedure.<br />
◮ New method developed for determination of latent heat in<br />
gluoN c plasmas. Find<br />
∆ǫ<br />
T A T 4 c<br />
= 0.388(3) − 1.61(4)<br />
Nc<br />
2 .<br />
◮ Strong N c scaling works very well for EOS. Conformal<br />
symmetry strongly broken up to T ≃ 3T c . Resummed weak<br />
coupling theory works much better in description of lattice<br />
data.<br />
SG<br />
Large N c Thermodynamics