19.04.2015 Views

CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320

CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320

CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TEAMSTERS CANADA<br />

RAIL CONFERENCE<br />

DIVISION <strong>320</strong><br />

Social and Communications Office<br />

20358-118 th Ave<br />

Maple Ridge, B.C.<br />

V2X 2M4<br />

www.tcrc<strong>320</strong>.org<br />

September 19, 2010<br />

Subject: <strong>CPR</strong> <strong>Wrongful</strong> <strong>Dismissal</strong> <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Goes</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />

Dear Brothers and Sisters,<br />

Appended please find an e-mail I received from President Bill Brehl of the <strong>TCRC</strong> MWED<br />

regarding a recent wrongful dismissal, and subsequent court case in Alberta. To read the<br />

court’s finding, please view the document on our site titled “Chapell V <strong>CPR</strong>”.<br />

In Solidarity,<br />

Murray Douglas<br />

Brothers and Sisters,<br />

The attached document is a court decision recently handed down in Alberta. Although Mr. Chappell<br />

was management at <strong>CPR</strong>, there is still a lot <strong>to</strong> be learned from this case.<br />

Ms. Mittleman is now Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Employee Relations which entails the handling of Human Rights<br />

issues, as well as other matters dealing with employment equity, harassment and<br />

discrimination. Ms. Mittleman is also in charge of privacy issues at CP and deals with cases<br />

involving management and unionized employees.<br />

Mr. Hallam (also mentioned in the decision) has been involved in the investigations of our<br />

members on many occasions, including but not limited <strong>to</strong>, acting as the investigating officer at<br />

formal statements. I have personally had quite a few disagreements with both Mr. Hallam and Ms.<br />

Mittleman over the years, concerning decisions they have made, positions they have taken and/or<br />

the methods they employ. But this is not simply a case of "..I <strong>to</strong>ld you so..".<br />

We cannot simply point fingers at individuals within the company who have acted inappropriately.<br />

We have <strong>to</strong> realize that all these decisions are being approved (or at least condoned) by many<br />

others. I believe that often the manner in which a company conducts itself is first determined by the<br />

actions and opinions of those at its highest level and then followed by their subordinates.<br />

Mr. Chappell did not have the ability <strong>to</strong> rely on union representation when he was unjustly treated<br />

and then wrongfully dismissed. He didn't belong <strong>to</strong> a Union.


It is important that you remember that you do. It is imperative that you always seek the assistance<br />

of your Union representative when faced with any disciplinary investigation. Never blindly trust that<br />

the company will conduct their investigations in a fair and impartial manner, simply because the<br />

law and the collective agreement state that they should.<br />

Though Mr. Chappell was awarded financial 'damages' for the way he was treated, I do not believe<br />

that they even come close <strong>to</strong> making up for the pain and suffering he received as a result of the<br />

mishandling of his investigation, his wrongful dismissal by <strong>CPR</strong> and the devastating aftermath.<br />

<strong>CPR</strong> must make some decisions on how it wants <strong>to</strong> treat its employees and who it wants dealing<br />

with them. I am <strong>to</strong>ld that new VP Ed Harris is going <strong>to</strong> bring about many management changes in<br />

an effort <strong>to</strong> streamline <strong>CPR</strong> and improve its efficiency. A good place <strong>to</strong> start might be <strong>to</strong> eliminate<br />

unnecessary and costly court cases (along the line of 'Woollard' and 'Chappelle'), simply by<br />

following the law, the rules and/or the regulations. Not only would this reduce costs and negative<br />

PR, it would improve the quality of life and/or safety of their employees.<br />

I have often been accused by company representatives of being <strong>to</strong>o vocal in my distrust of them,<br />

their motives and their code of ethics. They have repeatedly said that the <strong>TCRC</strong>MWED is <strong>to</strong>o<br />

strenuous in our objections <strong>to</strong> their methods and their heavy handed way of dealing with their<br />

employees. We have been <strong>to</strong>ld that we are far <strong>to</strong>o critical. One manager even suggested that<br />

because of this, I was the "..most hated man by <strong>CPR</strong> since Billy Miner.." .<br />

However, decisions like this have renewed and revitalized my commitment <strong>to</strong> continue strenuously<br />

objecting. They have strengthened my resolve <strong>to</strong> stay vigilant and watchful, especially when<br />

dealing with Employee Relations. They have again given me reason <strong>to</strong> not back off and <strong>to</strong> keep<br />

taking them <strong>to</strong> task.<br />

We can see how they dealt with Mr. Chapell ... how they repaid his 27 years of loyal service. Now<br />

let's see how they deal with those that directly had a hand in Mr. Chapell's treatment. Let's see if<br />

they can make their "Visions and Values" and "Code of Ethics" more than just lip service, but<br />

actually applicable in the workplace. Let's see if they can actually become the company that they<br />

advertise themselves <strong>to</strong> be.<br />

Stay safe, stay strong, stay united,<br />

Bill Brehl<br />

President

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!