CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320
CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320
CPR Wrongful Dismissal Case Goes to Court - TCRC 320
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TEAMSTERS CANADA<br />
RAIL CONFERENCE<br />
DIVISION <strong>320</strong><br />
Social and Communications Office<br />
20358-118 th Ave<br />
Maple Ridge, B.C.<br />
V2X 2M4<br />
www.tcrc<strong>320</strong>.org<br />
September 19, 2010<br />
Subject: <strong>CPR</strong> <strong>Wrongful</strong> <strong>Dismissal</strong> <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Goes</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
Dear Brothers and Sisters,<br />
Appended please find an e-mail I received from President Bill Brehl of the <strong>TCRC</strong> MWED<br />
regarding a recent wrongful dismissal, and subsequent court case in Alberta. To read the<br />
court’s finding, please view the document on our site titled “Chapell V <strong>CPR</strong>”.<br />
In Solidarity,<br />
Murray Douglas<br />
Brothers and Sisters,<br />
The attached document is a court decision recently handed down in Alberta. Although Mr. Chappell<br />
was management at <strong>CPR</strong>, there is still a lot <strong>to</strong> be learned from this case.<br />
Ms. Mittleman is now Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Employee Relations which entails the handling of Human Rights<br />
issues, as well as other matters dealing with employment equity, harassment and<br />
discrimination. Ms. Mittleman is also in charge of privacy issues at CP and deals with cases<br />
involving management and unionized employees.<br />
Mr. Hallam (also mentioned in the decision) has been involved in the investigations of our<br />
members on many occasions, including but not limited <strong>to</strong>, acting as the investigating officer at<br />
formal statements. I have personally had quite a few disagreements with both Mr. Hallam and Ms.<br />
Mittleman over the years, concerning decisions they have made, positions they have taken and/or<br />
the methods they employ. But this is not simply a case of "..I <strong>to</strong>ld you so..".<br />
We cannot simply point fingers at individuals within the company who have acted inappropriately.<br />
We have <strong>to</strong> realize that all these decisions are being approved (or at least condoned) by many<br />
others. I believe that often the manner in which a company conducts itself is first determined by the<br />
actions and opinions of those at its highest level and then followed by their subordinates.<br />
Mr. Chappell did not have the ability <strong>to</strong> rely on union representation when he was unjustly treated<br />
and then wrongfully dismissed. He didn't belong <strong>to</strong> a Union.
It is important that you remember that you do. It is imperative that you always seek the assistance<br />
of your Union representative when faced with any disciplinary investigation. Never blindly trust that<br />
the company will conduct their investigations in a fair and impartial manner, simply because the<br />
law and the collective agreement state that they should.<br />
Though Mr. Chappell was awarded financial 'damages' for the way he was treated, I do not believe<br />
that they even come close <strong>to</strong> making up for the pain and suffering he received as a result of the<br />
mishandling of his investigation, his wrongful dismissal by <strong>CPR</strong> and the devastating aftermath.<br />
<strong>CPR</strong> must make some decisions on how it wants <strong>to</strong> treat its employees and who it wants dealing<br />
with them. I am <strong>to</strong>ld that new VP Ed Harris is going <strong>to</strong> bring about many management changes in<br />
an effort <strong>to</strong> streamline <strong>CPR</strong> and improve its efficiency. A good place <strong>to</strong> start might be <strong>to</strong> eliminate<br />
unnecessary and costly court cases (along the line of 'Woollard' and 'Chappelle'), simply by<br />
following the law, the rules and/or the regulations. Not only would this reduce costs and negative<br />
PR, it would improve the quality of life and/or safety of their employees.<br />
I have often been accused by company representatives of being <strong>to</strong>o vocal in my distrust of them,<br />
their motives and their code of ethics. They have repeatedly said that the <strong>TCRC</strong>MWED is <strong>to</strong>o<br />
strenuous in our objections <strong>to</strong> their methods and their heavy handed way of dealing with their<br />
employees. We have been <strong>to</strong>ld that we are far <strong>to</strong>o critical. One manager even suggested that<br />
because of this, I was the "..most hated man by <strong>CPR</strong> since Billy Miner.." .<br />
However, decisions like this have renewed and revitalized my commitment <strong>to</strong> continue strenuously<br />
objecting. They have strengthened my resolve <strong>to</strong> stay vigilant and watchful, especially when<br />
dealing with Employee Relations. They have again given me reason <strong>to</strong> not back off and <strong>to</strong> keep<br />
taking them <strong>to</strong> task.<br />
We can see how they dealt with Mr. Chapell ... how they repaid his 27 years of loyal service. Now<br />
let's see how they deal with those that directly had a hand in Mr. Chapell's treatment. Let's see if<br />
they can make their "Visions and Values" and "Code of Ethics" more than just lip service, but<br />
actually applicable in the workplace. Let's see if they can actually become the company that they<br />
advertise themselves <strong>to</strong> be.<br />
Stay safe, stay strong, stay united,<br />
Bill Brehl<br />
President