20.04.2015 Views

The Resource Magazine For Apple, Atari, and Commodore ...

The Resource Magazine For Apple, Atari, and Commodore ...

The Resource Magazine For Apple, Atari, and Commodore ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPUTE! September/October, 198O. Issue 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> Reader's<br />

Feedback<br />

Robert Lock,<br />

Publisher/Editor,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Readers<br />

In case you missed it in the Editor's Notes, we're go<br />

ing monthly. Check there for a full timetable <strong>and</strong> in<br />

formation on keeping your subscription current.<br />

Votes for Best Article in Issue 5 indicate that<br />

lots of readers like the current range of material in<br />

COMPUTE. Jim Butterfleld took the honors with<br />

Mixing Basic <strong>and</strong> Machine Language. Second place<br />

went to Plotting With the 2022, closely followed by<br />

How to Program in BASIC with the Subroutine<br />

Power of FORTRAN <strong>and</strong> Assembly Language Pro<br />

gramming with<br />

Author<br />

UCSD PASCAL.<br />

And now for the rest of the feedback ...<br />

Note<br />

A <strong>Commodore</strong> user makes this request:<br />

You should indicate on all machine language listings the<br />

ROM version...<br />

I agree. You should also indicate what machine<br />

you're using, e.g. keyboard, etc. We're already hav<br />

ing review problems trying to keep machine con<br />

figurations matched up with software design, so<br />

when you send software for review, please indicate<br />

what it will run on.<br />

One More Author<br />

Plea<br />

Please present machine language programs with fluent ex<br />

planations. If one now uses "BASIC" to program, how<br />

would one enter this program into PET using machine<br />

language? Please do not be afraid to offend us with simple<br />

explanations.<br />

On Merging Our Two<br />

<strong>Magazine</strong>s<br />

What happened to Nuts <strong>and</strong> Volts?<br />

Include OSI in COMPUTE. My C2-4PMF has more in<br />

common with the <strong>Apple</strong> or PET than with a SYM...<br />

First of all, Nuts <strong>and</strong> Volts moved to compute II<br />

when we established that single- board computer<br />

magazine. Secondly, I admit that compute II wasn't<br />

necessarily the place for OSI machines.<br />

Our ability to go monthly has in part been<br />

defined by the merger of our two magazines. We an<br />

nounced in the August/September issue of compute<br />

II that we were merging the two magazines effective<br />

with the November/December issue of COMPUTE.<br />

In that issue, you'll find the return of the Single-<br />

Board Computer Gazette (covering the 6502 based<br />

KIM, SYM, <strong>and</strong> AIM systems), <strong>and</strong> the addition of<br />

an OSI Gazette. You OSI owners will in part deter<br />

mine the stability of the OSI Gazette by your sub<br />

missions, so get writing!<br />

Issue 7 of COMPUTE! (November/December)<br />

will be one united issue again, <strong>and</strong> in January you'll<br />

receive the first monthly issue of COMPUTE!<br />

And Coming Next Issue<br />

(Ouch! Groan!)<br />

I learned my lesson last time. Please underst<strong>and</strong> that<br />

one of the advantages of waiting 'till the last minute<br />

to write my columns is keeping you as current as<br />

possible on "coming attractions". <strong>The</strong> disadvantage<br />

is that I got carried away in my enthusiasm last time<br />

round. Looking back, I must have said "And next<br />

issue we'll have..." 10 times in the first three pages.<br />

I blew it. I hereby officially announce that you<br />

should read such comments on my part as "And in a<br />

future issue we'll have...". That way if my en<br />

thusiasm gets ahead of our collective abilities here<br />

you won't be disappointed.<br />

In a future issue, we'll have those promised<br />

business reviews. I am very pleased to report that<br />

over 50 business users have signed up to review pro<br />

fessional software. What we're trying to do is get<br />

things rolling so that reviews will be the balanced<br />

opinion of several reviewers rather than the hasty<br />

overview of one. I apologize for my over enthusiastic<br />

promises last time.<br />

On <strong>The</strong> Quality of COMPUTE!<br />

I was fascinated to see that the most prevalent com<br />

ment regarding our going monthly was "Yes, do it,<br />

but only ifyou can maintain your current quality. '' We<br />

pride ourselves on the quality of COMPUTE!, both<br />

in editorial quality <strong>and</strong> physical quality. That's been<br />

our goal since we started the magazine in the Fall of<br />

1979, <strong>and</strong> we're committed to maintaining thai<br />

quality. As always, keep me posted on our progress.<br />

R.C.L. ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!