24.04.2015 Views

2011_ContactBabel - Syntellect

2011_ContactBabel - Syntellect

2011_ContactBabel - Syntellect

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Many of the gaps noticed in respondents’ current performance management solutions talk about integration, and<br />

the absence of the data that are needed to get a complete picture of what is happening in the whole contact<br />

center. 35% of respondents stated that they could not integrate everything they needed to in order to understand<br />

fully what was happening in their contact center operation. There was little real difference between size bands<br />

with this question, but financial services and public sector respondents indicated that their systems were often too<br />

complex to integrate fully.<br />

Figure 7: How true? 'It is too costly and complex to integrate our data sources to provide a full view of what is happening in the contact<br />

center'<br />

Agent scorecards record performance against key metrics: first call resolution, revenue, AHT, quality and<br />

adherence. However, finding the reason for an unsatisfactory score can require extensive searching through<br />

multiple data sources and archives. If possible, a unified approach more efficiently and effectively relates<br />

performance to specific contributing statistics. Not all relevant data comes from an ACD - agent performance<br />

scorecards and informed comment on the types of calls being received are also part of understanding the overall<br />

picture, thus closing the loop between quality assurance at a agent level and optimizing the performance of the<br />

contact center as a whole.<br />

With a unified approach, a supervisor views a composite performance management scorecard with a single value<br />

that represents performance in a number of areas: first call resolution, revenue, AHT, quality, adherence, etc.<br />

Using a streamlined process, the user drills through the data and views contributing scores in each area—quality<br />

scores, for example. The user then drills down further and views the recording and evaluation of a particular<br />

quality score, relating that specific instance to the top-level composite score. The facts behind the top-level score<br />

are discovered without time-consuming searches through multiple sources, and a unified approach even allows the<br />

supervisor or manager to identify training needs specific to the agent. 41% of respondents state that they have this<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!