30.04.2015 Views

NEW! - Jeffersonian

NEW! - Jeffersonian

NEW! - Jeffersonian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~; .'<br />

..<br />

..<br />

~<br />

••• ,•. ••<br />

,.;.~..<br />

·lli.<br />

•<br />

Eight different.41 Avenger 'oads printed these 25-yard machine rest groups, averaging<br />

on'y 1. 19 inch. They show potentia' match accuracy of the Avenger.<br />

nitely more controllable than the same cine<br />

using A5 ACP with loads ofsimilar power.<br />

In fact, I fired one 2.2 inch group and several<br />

other good ones, and I don't shoot that<br />

well. Then I got down to serious bench<br />

testing, knowing that my pistolstnithing<br />

had produced a smooth, reliable gun.<br />

TEST FIRING<br />

Mounting the gun in a Lee machine rest,<br />

I fired five-shot groups on a reversed target<br />

at 25 yards, clocking each shot over the<br />

Oehler Model 33 Chronotach Skyscreens.<br />

I have confidence in the Lee rest and my<br />

ability to turn out reliable, repeatable results<br />

with it.<br />

The first group was 1.56 inch, measured<br />

center-to-center ofthe widest hits. Then<br />

they began to get even better: 1.38 inch and<br />

1.20 inch. The fourth was 2.12 inch, but it<br />

was definitely overpressured,judging from<br />

the primer cratering. In fact, several of<br />

these loads caused cratering of the CCI<br />

# 350 magnum large pistol primers.<br />

The first four loads were in full-length<br />

A5 Winchester Magnum brass; then I<br />

switched to a series in old Federal A5 ACP<br />

cases, expecting poorer accuracy.<br />

Here are the groups which followed, in<br />

order: 1.51 inch, .89 inch, 1.25 inch, 1.36<br />

inch, 84 'inch, 1.16 inch, 1.43 inch, and 1.11<br />

inch. Eight straight groups and all different<br />

loads with two· different bullets. And all<br />

grouped into 1.5 inch or less. That may be<br />

the best series of diverse handloads ever<br />

fired from a big-bore semi-auto. The ve-<br />

locities ranged from a mild 854 feet per<br />

second to a hot 1,287 fps.<br />

Hand cyCling shows chambering of a .41<br />

Avenger round in a Co't automatic.<br />

Only one conclusion was possibl~: the<br />

Al Avenger is a great caliber. In later firing,<br />

I have seen nothing to lower that opinion.<br />

If anything, it has become even more<br />

solid.<br />

I also made a load with a 21O-grain cast<br />

semi-wadcutter; it printed a 1.5l-inch<br />

group. The average size for all 13 groups<br />

fired that day was a splendid l.33-inch.<br />

.,That is far better than many custom accurized<br />

.45s will average with factory<br />

match ammo.<br />

Such results cannot be accidental, or<br />

lucky. One or two lucky groups, yes. But<br />

13? Everything has to be just right. Yet, I<br />

had done nothing beyond my usual handloading<br />

and test-firing methods. There is<br />

no reason why most any other shooter<br />

could not h~ve done as well, using the<br />

same hardware and methods.<br />

VARIOUS LOADS<br />

Now, let's consider specific handloads,<br />

picked to show the versatility, power a,nd<br />

accuracy of the Avenger. My favorite bullet<br />

in this caliber is Sierra's nO-grain jacketed<br />

hollow-cavity (JHC), because it is<br />

very accurate and it can be pushed to maximum<br />

power with mild recoil. For instance,<br />

a nice medium load was 6.5 grains<br />

of Winchester 231 powder in Federal A5<br />

ACP brass with CCI # 350 magnum large<br />

pistol primers. This gave that fine .89-inch<br />

group at 1,027 fps. Winchester 231 is cleanburning<br />

and often yields exceptional accuracy.<br />

In the same brass, 7.0 grains made<br />

the .84-inch group at 1,072 fps. These loads<br />

have fine target potential, but I have yet to<br />

confirm or optimize them.<br />

The maximum charge ofWinchester 231<br />

with the Sierra nO-grain JHC bullet was<br />

7.5 grains in my gun, in .45 Winchester<br />

Magnum-type cases. CCI # 350 primers<br />

are a bit soft for this load and cratered too<br />

much; even so, the load clocked 1,162 fps<br />

and I had two groups of 1.38 inch and 1.34<br />

inch yielding 510 foot pounds of muzzle<br />

energy. With harder CCI #200 rifle primers,<br />

the cratering was nil and the same<br />

charge gave 1,155 fps and produced a 1.54­<br />

inch group; but eight grains was too hot.<br />

Although all the loads listed here are<br />

based on SSK data, my velocities were definitely<br />

higher than the data indicated, and<br />

my maximum reasonable charges were<br />

smaller. This points up again that heavy<br />

loads must be worked up carefully for each<br />

gun.<br />

The differences were so sizable and consistent<br />

that they require comment. A major<br />

factor undoubtedly is temperature. My firing<br />

was done in 80-90 degree summer<br />

weather, and each degree adds 2-3 fps to<br />

velocity. Also, the chamber and bore ofmy<br />

gun may be tighter than the original barrel<br />

used for the SSK tests.<br />

Mild cratering of primers is acceptable,<br />

although such loads should be limited to<br />

stronger, full-length brass-not the weaker<br />

A5 ACP cases. I had no blown primers or<br />

brass; but it is possible that some cases<br />

might bulge or blowout in the unsupported<br />

area around the extraction groove.<br />

None of my cases bulged, but brass does<br />

vary in strength and resiliency.<br />

The use of harder primers, such as<br />

Winchester-Western's (W-W) 7M-l1lF<br />

magnum large pistol or CCI # 200 rifle<br />

primers, is best for heavy loads. Heavier<br />

gun springs also help to prevent primrr<br />

cup extrusion into the firing pin hole. For<br />

the heaviest loads, I substituted Wolff<br />

springs in my Gold Cup: a 22-pound recoil<br />

spring, a 28-pound hammer spring, and an<br />

extra-power firing pin spring. The gun<br />

would not cycle with light loads, but the<br />

springs protect it and make acceptable<br />

loads out of touchy ones.<br />

Continued on page 77<br />

AMERICAN HANDGUNNER . JANUARYIFEBRUARY 1983 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!