Minutes - Corrugated Packaging Council
Minutes - Corrugated Packaging Council
Minutes - Corrugated Packaging Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Build story commodity by commodity, using top volume categories as<br />
models<br />
• Keep points short and sweet, but do have documentation backup<br />
available (“like IFCO brochure”)<br />
Building story:<br />
• Need up-to-date documentation<br />
• Run retailer as well as grower/shipper-focused, new Full Disclosure<br />
studies on commodity list with allocation of costs.<br />
• Build environmental story – LCA comparative with RPCs – RFP has<br />
gone out, Dwight has received 6 responses, 3 promising prospects.<br />
• Preference survey of growers and retailers<br />
The committee agreed with the recommended approach and approved an<br />
additional $75,000 in funding to come out of reserves, if necessary.<br />
9. SWOT ANALYSIS RESEARCH VERIFICATION STUDY – Dwight<br />
Schmidt<br />
The recently completed PTIS study was not reviewed by the Committee due to<br />
time constraints. All participants were able to view the results during the<br />
Wednesday Session III program. The results will be forwarded to the Committee<br />
members when the analysis is complete.<br />
10. LCA UPDATE – Reid Miner, NCASI & Brian O’Banion<br />
One of the initial goals for the 2006 LCA was to submit the LCI data to Wal-Mart,<br />
GreenBlue and the EPA for use in their models. They would like data points for<br />
100% recycled and 100% virgin, but would take any two data points that would<br />
allow them the ability to interpolate or extrapolate impacts based on variable<br />
recycled content. We have repeatedly explained that this linear<br />
interpolation/extrapolation does not mirror the actual impacts, as the raw mill data<br />
we provided them showed no correlation between recycled content and GHG<br />
emissions.<br />
CPA asked NCASI to see if it is possible to extract two data sets from the 2006<br />
study. NCASI concluded it is not possible to responsibly develop two separate<br />
data points given the way our data was constructed. At our January meeting with<br />
EPA and GreenBlue/SPC, we explained this and suggested they use the<br />
COMPASS tool data for the Wal-Mart scorecard. They declined because it is<br />
based on a European data set. COMPASS has a U.S. energy grid overlay which<br />
is a reasonable approximation – more current than what is currently in there for<br />
EPA and for Wal-Mart. We eventually determined that they preferred to have two<br />
data sets reflecting our industry’s products: industry average and 100% recycled.<br />
Given that background, the CPA was asked to make two different decisions: (1)<br />
what level of data do we wish to provide in our next industry LCA study? (2) If our<br />
needs do not coincide with the requests made by stakeholders, how<br />
accommodating do we want to be? They want a 100% recycled data set and an