Methodology and Research in Organizational Behavior

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4 Methodology and Research in Organizational Behavior Ali Asghar Pourezzat , University of Tehran, Ph.D Course. Mohrman, Susan Albers; Gibson, Cristina B; Mohrman, Allan M. 2001. “Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration”. Academy of Management Journal; 44(2):357-375. Morgan, Gareth; Smircich, Linda. 1980. "The case for qualitative research". Academy of Management Review; 5: 491-500. Pandit, Naresh R. 1996. "The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method". The Qualitative Report, 2(4). Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. 2006. “Interdisciplinarity and Peirce’s classification of the Sciences: A Centennial Reassessment”. Perspectives on Science, 14(2): 127-152. Prasad, Pushkala. 1993. "Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization". Academy of Management Journal, 36, 6: 1400-1429. Scandura, Terri A; Williams, Ethlyn A. 2000. “Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implication for future research”. Academy of Management Journal; 43, 6:1248-1264. Serra, Jordi. 2008.” Proactive intelligence”. Futures 40: 664–673. Simon, Herbert A. 1946. “The Proverbs of Administration”. Public Administration Review, 6(1): 53-67. Steffy, Brian D. Grimes, Andrew J. 1986. "A Critical Theory of Organization Science". Academy of Management Review, 11(2): 322- 336. Van de Ven, Andrew H. 1989. “Nothing Is Quite so Practical as a Good Theory”. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 486-489. Weick, Karl E. 1992. “Agenda Setting in Organizational Behavior: A Theory-Focused Approach”. Journal of Management Inquiry; 1: 171- 182. Whetten, David A. 1989. “What constitutes a theoretical contribution?”. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 490-495. Yang, Baiyin .2002. "Meta-Analysis Research and Theory Building". Advances in Developing Human Resources. 4(3): 296-316. Brown, Andrew, D. Yiannis Gabriel & Silvia Gherardi .2009. "Storytelling and Change An Unfolding Story", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. Beech, Nic , Stacy A. MacPhail & Christine Coupland .2009. "Antidialogic Positioning in Change Stories", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. Driver, Michaela. 2009. "From Loss to Lack Stories of Organizational Change", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. Sims, David, Chris Huxham & Nic Beech. 2009. "On Telling Stories But Hearing Snippets Sense-taking", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333.
5 Methodology and Research in Organizational Behavior Ali Asghar Pourezzat , University of Tehran, Ph.D Course. Pedersen, Anne Reff. 2009. "Moving Away from Chronological Time", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. ISSN 1350–5084. Murgia , Annalisa & Barbara Poggio. 2009. "Challenging Hegemonic Masculinities Men's Stories on Gender Culture", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. Whittle, Andrea, Frank Mueller & Anita Mangan. 2009. "Storytelling and `Character' Victims, Villains and Heroes", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. Peirano-Vejo, Maria Elisa & Ralph E. Stablein. 2009. "Constituting Change and Stability Sense-making Stories in a Farming Organization", Organization, Volume 16(3): 323–333. V. Optional Texts Bryman, Alan & Emma Bell .2007. Business Research Methods. Second edition. Oxford University Press. Thietart, Raymond-Alain et al. 2001. Doing Management Research. Translated by Samantha Wauchope. Sage Publications. VI. Procedures and Expectations 1. We expect students to complete assigned readings on time and to come to class prepared to discuss them. Participation in class discussions is encouraged and expected. Students are encouraged to speak out in class to ask questions and express ideas and opinions. Except under unusual circumstances, assignment grades will be reduced if they are not handed over on time. Assignments are due at the beginning of class on the date indicated. Any assignment turned in after this time is considered late. Late assignments will receive a 20 percent reduction in points awarded. 2. Classroom Etiquette: While we disagree with other’s ideas, we should respect to them and appreciate our common bond of human dignity. In order to have a positive and safe learning environment, we as a class will have to agree to disagree at times. Some of us may have strong feelings and/or reactions to class materials, readings, etc. Expressing these reactions is encouraged as long as this is done in a respectful manner. Hostile and/or disrespectful behavior is not allowed. In addition, we must be watchful to not take up too much “airtime” and allow for everyone to share. Talking a lot is generally not a good way of actively participating. Instead, carefully listening to others and clearly and concisely expressing your ideas is the best strategy. Remember to address each other when talking rather than directing your comments to me unless they are solely intended for me. 3. Class attendance is required throughout the semester and on-time attendance is considered mandatory. Coming to class late is a disruption to all members of the class.
Page 1 and 2: 1 Methodology and Research in Organ
Page 3: 3 Methodology and Research in Organ
Page 7 and 8: 7 Methodology and Research in Organ
Page 9: 9 Methodology and Research in Organ

Methodology and Research in Organizational Behavior

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?