06.05.2015 Views

35th NPS abstract book

35th NPS abstract book

35th NPS abstract book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P5<br />

An ancient trans-kingdom horizontal transfer of Penelope-like retroelements<br />

from insects to conifers<br />

X. LIN 1 , N. FARIDI 1, 2 , C. CASOLA 1<br />

1 Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX<br />

77843, USA; 2 USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Saucier, MS 77843, USA<br />

Penelope-like elements, or PLEs, represent a class of retroelements represented by two main types:<br />

EN(+)PLEs, which encode the unique combination of a reverse transcriptase (RT) domain and a GIY-<br />

YIG endonuclease (EN) domain; and EN(-)PLEs, encoding only a RT domain. While members of the<br />

second type occur in a variety of eukaryotes, EN(+)PLEs have thus far been detected only in animal<br />

genomes. In this work, we have investigated the evolutionary history of conifers EN(+)PLEs, which<br />

we have named Dryads, recently discovered in loblolly pine. In phylogenies of PLE sequences,<br />

Dryads form a monophyletic group placed within a major animal EN(+)PLE lineage. Furthermore,<br />

Dryads are closely related to a clade of EN(+)PLEs primarily found in insects. Bioinformatics surveys<br />

revealed no EN(+)PLEs in 625 fully sequenced non-metazoan and non-conifer genomes from twelve<br />

major eukaryotic lineages. Additionally, PCR assays indicate that Dryads are absent in non-conifer<br />

gymnosperms, including Ginkgo biloba and several cycads and gnetales. These findings indicate that<br />

Dryads emerged following an ancient horizontal transfer of Penelope-like elements from an insect<br />

group to a common ancestor of conifers in the late Paleozoic, and suggest that retroelements<br />

horizontal transfers might have played an important role in the expansion of the very large conifers<br />

genomes.<br />

P6<br />

Detecting local selection in spatially heterogeneous environments: clues from<br />

simulations and empirical data from a widespread boreal tree, Populus<br />

balsamifera<br />

V. E. CHHATRE 1 , M. C. FITZPATRICK 2 and S. R. KELLER 1<br />

1 Dept. of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; 2 Appalachian Laboratory,<br />

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532, USA<br />

Most widely distributed tree species inhabiting spatially heterogeneous environments experience<br />

varying strengths and types of ecological selection, often giving rise to strong local adaptation.<br />

Frequentist and Bayesian approaches to detect genomic responses to selection along environmental<br />

gradients typically assume linear responses, even though empirical allele frequencies often vary nonlinearly<br />

along environmental gradients. Here, we compare the power of several existing methods in<br />

SNP-environment association analysis (BayeScEnv, Bayenv2 and LFMM), as well as two more recent<br />

biodiversity modelling techniques – Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling (GDM) and Gradient Forests<br />

(GF), at detecting non-linear selection in population genomic datasets. We tested these methods<br />

using two approaches. First, we used spatially explicit simulations of 1000 loci in 30 populations<br />

arrayed in a linear stepping stone model with varying amounts of migration. Selection was applied to<br />

one locus in the form of differential mortality increasing either linearly or non-linearly along the<br />

gradient, and both false positive and false negative rates were calculated across replicate<br />

simulations of each scenario. Second, we compared the performance of the different methods on an<br />

empirical SNP data set from the widely distributed tree Populus balsamifera, consisting of ~1100<br />

trees from 90 populations genotyped at 297 candidate SNPs from the flowering time network<br />

controlling adaptive phenology.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!