GENERAL PRESENTATION - Concrete Layer Innovations
GENERAL PRESENTATION - Concrete Layer Innovations
GENERAL PRESENTATION - Concrete Layer Innovations
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>GENERAL</strong> <strong>PRESENTATION</strong>
Proposing 4 unreinforced <strong>Concrete</strong> Armour Units:<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ECOPODE<br />
Invented in 1981 by<br />
SOGREAH<br />
Invented in 1995 by the<br />
USACOE<br />
Invented in 1996 by<br />
SOGREAH<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
Invented in 1999<br />
by SOGREAH<br />
Representing a total of more than 230 applications worldwide
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
CLI is a subsidiary of SOGREAH located in Tours; France<br />
Licensee of SOGREAH and CHL<br />
on behalf of the USACE<br />
Technology provider<br />
Licensor/inventor<br />
SOGREAH Armouring Division<br />
- Assistance for design reviews<br />
- Acts on behalf of for<br />
tailored technical assistance<br />
during construction<br />
Client / Sub-Licensee
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
History<br />
ACCROPODE unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-TETRAPOD invented by SOGREAH in 1952<br />
-ACCROPODE developed from the Tetrapod experience<br />
-Pioneer in conventional single layer armouring<br />
-Invented and patented in 1981 by SOGREAH<br />
-180 applications around the world
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
History<br />
CORE-LOC unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-Developed by the US Corps of Engineers at WES<br />
-Patented in 1995<br />
-Ideal for moderate wave exposure<br />
-Widely used in the Middle-East<br />
-About 50 projects worldwide
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Time and cost<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
vs. ACCROPODE <br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-An ACCROPODE II (called “A2” for short) solution saves<br />
a few percent of concrete compared to an equivalent<br />
ACCROPODE (“A1”) solution<br />
-A2 installation on the breakwater requires less constraints<br />
due to an easier/simpler interlocking (higher output)<br />
-Overall, A2 saves materials and construction time<br />
compared to A1
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
Time and cost<br />
ACCROPODE II vs. CORE-LOC<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-Robustness: The A2 optimised shape, benefits of improved<br />
characteristics of every aspects from the original A1 (containing<br />
embedded A1 know-how), and is considered in this respect<br />
to possess a structural advantage over the CL.<br />
-Hydraulic stability: Due to its higher porosity, the CL armour will<br />
be able to dissipate a little more efficiently the wave energy.<br />
This advantage is somehow offset by the effects of the A2 friction<br />
enhancers (which also help limiting settlements along the slope).<br />
-<strong>Concrete</strong> consumption rate: the CL saves about 2% less<br />
concrete than the A2.<br />
-Practical aspects: CL concrete strength requirements<br />
are greater than A2: 35MPa grade vs. 25 to 30MPa. In line with this<br />
advantage, a shorter striking, lifting and placement time is expected<br />
in favour of the A2.<br />
Because of its simpler overall geometry, A2 placement output rates<br />
will be greater.<br />
Mould cost, ease of casting, handling ad storage: minor differences
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
New Shape<br />
ACCROPODE II unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-Shape optimised from the ECOPODE and ACCROPODE<br />
-More balanced / rugged facets / progressive fillets<br />
-”Pyramids” friction enhancement, limit settlements,<br />
extra locking effect and greater wave energy dissipation<br />
-New geometry leading to 3 key areas of improvements:<br />
Hydraulic stability performance<br />
Structural integrity<br />
Practical aspects
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Greater Sturdiness<br />
ACCROPODE II unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-ACCROPODE sturdiness confirmed over the years<br />
-Shape optimisation: increased robustness due to trimming<br />
-Pyramids on front facets: features with multiple advantages<br />
-Pyramids are partially sacrificial indicators under loading<br />
-<strong>Concrete</strong> strength Rc28d = min 25 MPa for units ≤ 4 m 3<br />
and min 30 MPa for larger units<br />
1.80<br />
1.60<br />
1.40<br />
Von Mises stresses (MPa)<br />
1.20<br />
1.00<br />
0.80<br />
0.60<br />
0.40<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ACCROPODE <br />
0.20<br />
0.00<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
Volume (m 3 )
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Hydraulic performance<br />
ACCROPODE II unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Extensive physical modeling and initial field feedback:<br />
-The new shape allows improvements in stability:<br />
Better spreading in interlocking<br />
Greater hydraulic stability Slight Kd increase<br />
-Placement grid adjustment in order to :<br />
Simplify placement procedures<br />
Minimise settlements on armour slope
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Installation and Maintenance<br />
ACCROPODE II unit<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-Easier placement due to:<br />
-Maintenance:<br />
A more uniform (symmetry) unit geometry<br />
Less placement constraints<br />
The tuning of the positioning grid<br />
Good records: First generation unit (A1) has<br />
shown to require minimum maintenance<br />
Considering that the second generation (A2)<br />
offers improvements on key aspects, it is then<br />
expected to require even less maintenance
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
A typical arrangement is a staggered layout in lines which required the minimum<br />
precast yard area.<br />
Unit casting area S can be evaluated by using S = 1.24 H 2 , H being the height of the<br />
unit.
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
MAIN CASTING SPECIFICATIONS<br />
. Mould preparation:<br />
Wheels height adjusted – Shells fully connected<br />
- Safety platform secured<br />
•Base waterproofing: levelled sand bed<br />
over lean concrete slab<br />
•Transport by mix-trucks:<br />
In general < 45 minutes for ready-mix concrete<br />
•Casting:<br />
•No cold joint – High workability / low W/C<br />
•Ht of fall >2m = use a chute<br />
•Each vibrated layer should not exceed 50cm<br />
•Casting time:<br />
20 mn in normal conditions<br />
40 mn in cold / humid wheather conditions<br />
•Attention : Max heat of hydration < 65°C<br />
•Vibration: 2 or 3 inches poker – external<br />
vibrators not advised<br />
Form-oiling<br />
Connecting shells<br />
<strong>Concrete</strong> pumping<br />
Half-mould (shell) set in place in place<br />
Mould ready for casting<br />
Vibration
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
•TYPICAL CYCLE:<br />
•Hardening of concrete:<br />
In general between 15 and 24 hours to reach the<br />
minimum striking strength Rc7days<br />
1- <strong>Concrete</strong> hardening 2- Striking<br />
•Mould Striking min Rc7d: ≤ 4m 3 6MPa min<br />
between 5m 3 and 15m 3 7MPa min<br />
≥ 15m 3 10MPa min<br />
•Unit curing: 14 days with suitable curing compound<br />
+<br />
•Cleaning and form-oiling: each re-use<br />
3- Curing<br />
4- Cleaning and form oiling<br />
•Transport to storage yard min Rc: ≤ 4m 3 15MPa<br />
min<br />
between 5m 3 and 15m 3 20MPa min<br />
≥ 15m 3 25MPa min<br />
•Storage time:<br />
Units must have gone through their curing, be 28d<br />
aged and reach the Rc 28d before being installed<br />
5- Transport to storage 6- Storage
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Slinging :<br />
HANDLING<br />
A2 units can be lifted when min Rc28d = 15 MPa for units ≤ 4 m³ and 20 MPa for units between 5 and<br />
15 m³, 25 MPa for larger units<br />
Typical handling<br />
machinery:<br />
Cranes or fork-lift<br />
trucks or front-end<br />
wheel loaders can be<br />
used depending on<br />
the distance of<br />
transport and unit<br />
size<br />
Two ways of slinging<br />
the units can be<br />
considered
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
STORAGE method:<br />
-Nested in tight rows: Area needed<br />
per level: 0,55 H2<br />
-H = the unit height<br />
N.B:<br />
-The storage area must be carefully<br />
levelled<br />
-Suitable bearing capacity of the soils<br />
-Two-levels storage is feasible, the<br />
second level must however not<br />
extend until the edge of the first<br />
stored level, for safety reasons;<br />
-If safety requires, the second level<br />
can be strapped in groups.<br />
-Some space must be given between<br />
the units so that they can easily be<br />
slinged or fork-lifted for their removal<br />
when ready for placement
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
TRANSPORT OF ACCROPODE II BY DECK BARGE
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
Advantages of<br />
the CORE-LOC unit<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
CORE LOC<br />
‘’Highly dissipating and most cost-effective’’<br />
1. Developed at the Waterways Experiments Station (WES)<br />
2. Superior hydraulic stability<br />
3. High porosity ratio Low overtopping<br />
4. Ideally suited to moderate wave conditions<br />
5. Least concrete consumption<br />
6. Substantial number of projects worldwide
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC PROCESS SEQUENCE<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
View of CORE-LOC moulds<br />
Form oiling<br />
Sand bed being prepared
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Mould setting<br />
Platform mounting<br />
Concreting<br />
Assembling<br />
Mould removal
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Water sprinkling<br />
Applying curing<br />
compound<br />
Two typical casting methods<br />
Fork-lifting a 5m3 unit
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Storage yards<br />
Handling a 11 m³ unit<br />
Transporting 1.4m³ units
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Deck barge transport<br />
Placement from land<br />
TRANSPORTING CORE-LOC units in a cargo ship
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Construction Methods (CM)<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Posibloc display installed in crane cabine<br />
Barging units out to site<br />
Placing from a barge<br />
Virtual display of Core-Loc in-progress placement – Side view
The environmentally friendly unit<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ECOPODE<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
The ECOPODE single layer: an<br />
alternative solution to armour rocks<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
What exactly is ECOPODE?<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE Origin<br />
ECOPODE<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Man-made geometry:<br />
i.e. the ACCROPODE<br />
+ =<br />
Architectured<br />
aspects adaptable<br />
to specific site<br />
conditions<br />
The ECOPODE unit<br />
Developed at SOGREAH in 1996
Design – Materials volumes comparision<br />
ECOPODE<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Solid materials volumes for various configurations<br />
Armour<br />
Underlayer (filter)<br />
Core<br />
Rocks - 2/1 slope<br />
Rocks - 3/2 slope<br />
ECOPODE 1m 3 - 4/3 slope<br />
ECOPODE 2m 3 - 4/3 slope
Manufacturing - Mould principle<br />
ECOPODE<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
The mould system is similar to an ACCROPODE<br />
mould in its operating principle:<br />
casting<br />
Two half shells that are assembled before<br />
Opening of the mould using small jacks<br />
A complete set of mould consists of the<br />
following:<br />
Coffrage ACCROPODE II<br />
A tubular structure (« spider frame »)<br />
Two symmetrical shells made of composite<br />
material (same shape and texture as the Master)<br />
The inside of the shells is lined with a<br />
special « gel coat » allowing easy opening of the<br />
mould<br />
Coffrage ECOPODE II
Fabrication of ECOPODE units<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE application<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
Casting procedures ACCROPODE and<br />
ECOPODE are identical:<br />
Same concrete characteristics<br />
Same casting method<br />
Same production cycle (1 unit a day per set of mould)<br />
<strong>Concrete</strong> coloring as an option
ECOPODE Placement principle<br />
ECOPODE application<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
The ECOPODE placement principle is<br />
identical to the ACCROPODE II:<br />
Conditions:<br />
Conventional similar equipment is used<br />
(cable cranes and slings)<br />
Adapted rock underlayer (W/7 to W/15)<br />
Simplified placement rules:<br />
Placement in a single layer<br />
Placement according to a defined grid<br />
Ramdom orientation of the units
Views of ECOPODE armour<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE application<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
New process: Ospedaletti marina, liguria, Italy – Works in progress
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
Knowledge-based technical<br />
assistance<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
CLI offers knowledge-based support at key stages as<br />
the project develops:<br />
-Design stage:<br />
Armour design: respond/interact to/with<br />
Designers provide specific advice and comments<br />
Physical modeling (often recommended):<br />
supply required model units to Laboratories; provide<br />
advice and comment tests results<br />
-Construction stage:<br />
Tailored assistance provided to the Contractor<br />
from the beginning of the manufacturing up to the end<br />
of placement of the armour units
CLI Single layer techniques<br />
Assistance on Site<br />
HISTORY<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
ACCROPODE<br />
ACCROPODE II VS.<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ACCROPODE II<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
CORE-LOC<br />
ADVANTAGES & CM<br />
ECOPODE<br />
CLI SERVICES<br />
-Typical sequence of technical assistance provided during implementation:<br />
Provision of the Technical documentation and mould drawings<br />
Review and advice about the Contractor construction methods<br />
First site visit at start of the units manufacturing<br />
Supply of the positioning drawings based on the relevant data provided by<br />
the contractor<br />
Second visit before or at the beginning of the placement<br />
Several visits during the placement<br />
-In addition to timely site visits, interactive support is made available to the<br />
Contractor throughout the construction until completion of the works.