SI 501 Final Report - Soma Ray
SI 501 Final Report - Soma Ray
SI 501 Final Report - Soma Ray
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Team Crusoe: <strong>SI</strong> <strong>501</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
recommendations as to how CSS can improve and streamline their file sharing and use of the<br />
network drive.<br />
Methodology<br />
Project Scope<br />
Our team’s investigation into the structure of the drive usage at CSS began by meeting with the<br />
Administrative Specialist of CSS. This initial meeting provided our team with information on the<br />
background of CSS, their current educational mission, and the role that our analysis would play<br />
in moving the organization forward. The scope of the project included three interrelated parts:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Assessing the folder structure and document organization of the Shared directory,<br />
Assessing the folder structure and document organization of the Core directory, and<br />
Examining the continued use-life of the research paper file.<br />
As our team interviewed select researchers in the organization, however, our analysis and<br />
recommendations focused more on improving the organization of Shared and Core, to improve<br />
the ability for researchers to not only organize their own research materials, but also to create an<br />
environment where project resources can be easily archived and Shared between researchers and<br />
their students. The paper file was still analyzed and addressed by our recommendations, but to a<br />
lesser extent. Furthermore, after speaking with the Director of CSS in the same meeting, it was<br />
apparent that an assessment of organization of the file servers was top priority. The paper file<br />
analysis became a secondary concern in terms of successfully streamlining the organization’s<br />
research needs.<br />
Data Collection<br />
Our team’s first priority was to gain an inclusive picture of CSS: how the researchers interacted<br />
with each other, their students, how they used and managed their project resources on the Shared,<br />
and Core file servers, and the paper file. We conducted a total of six interviews with researchers<br />
in different stages of their careers at CSS. We interviewed CSS members from a range of<br />
experiences and research interests, with job titles including:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Director<br />
Administrative Specialist<br />
Assistant Professor<br />
Research Specialist<br />
Research Scientist<br />
PhD Candidate<br />
5