14.05.2015 Views

Inside the Cold War - Project Gutenberg Consortia Center

Inside the Cold War - Project Gutenberg Consortia Center

Inside the Cold War - Project Gutenberg Consortia Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE COLD WARRIORS<br />

clearly showed that most existing communications systems were<br />

vulnerable to blackout periods lasting from minutes to hours.<br />

Since detonation of an antiballistic (ABM) warhead in <strong>the</strong><br />

atmosphere could “knock out” communications over <strong>the</strong><br />

United States, General Ellis initiated a comprehensive study of<br />

<strong>the</strong> various effects on command and control communications<br />

during deployments of strategic forces in wartime. The results<br />

of <strong>the</strong> study prompted <strong>the</strong> JCS to create <strong>the</strong> Joint Strategic<br />

Connectivity Staff (JSCS), which would be collocated with SAC<br />

Headquarters at Offutt AFB. The CINCSAC would be JSCS<br />

director; a rear admiral would be vice director and chief<br />

operating officer.<br />

The purpose of JSCS was to analyze strategic connectivity<br />

systems and procedures for SAC “readiness.” There were many<br />

dimensions to <strong>the</strong> SAC’s forces and alert postures—policy, analysis,<br />

planning, continuous evaluation of both threat and<br />

personnel—and <strong>the</strong> third leg of <strong>the</strong> Triad, <strong>the</strong> nuclear-powered<br />

strategic ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), became operational<br />

in <strong>the</strong> early 1960s. After analyzing <strong>the</strong>se myriad components,<br />

JSCS would make recommendations to <strong>the</strong> Joint Chiefs.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 1950s, <strong>the</strong> Navy began to seriously investigate<br />

<strong>the</strong> feasibility of launching large missiles from submarines.<br />

The furor over <strong>the</strong> “missile gap” and Soviet advances in SSBN<br />

and SLBM development hastened <strong>the</strong>ir investigation and<br />

stimulated <strong>the</strong> availability of money for <strong>the</strong> pursuit. The major<br />

questions were how to design missile size and propulsion to<br />

“fit” into a submarine and how to acquire <strong>the</strong> ability to safely<br />

launch it. Atlas, Titan, and Minuteman were not feasible<br />

because of <strong>the</strong>ir size. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> volatile liquid propellants of<br />

Atlas and Titan could not be considered for submarine use.<br />

Even a more moderate version of any available system<br />

would require horizontal storage aboard <strong>the</strong> submarine and a<br />

launch pad on <strong>the</strong> sub’s surface. O<strong>the</strong>r considerations were<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential for enlarging <strong>the</strong> basic submarine size and<br />

maintaining buoyancy after a missile launch. A missile launch<br />

from beneath <strong>the</strong> surface immediately extracts thousands of<br />

pounds from a submerged boat, causing a sudden shift in<br />

transfer of buoyant weight—and <strong>the</strong> principle of submarine<br />

technology revolves around <strong>the</strong> delicate balance between<br />

positive and negative buoyancy. The Navy, however, had to get<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!