15.05.2015 Views

Budget Constraints qStart to Build a Theory of Consumer Choice ...

Budget Constraints qStart to Build a Theory of Consumer Choice ...

Budget Constraints qStart to Build a Theory of Consumer Choice ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Constraints</strong><br />

●Start <strong>to</strong> <strong>Build</strong> a <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Consumer</strong> <strong>Choice</strong><br />

●Describe the Axioms <strong>of</strong> Human Behavior<br />

●Show how axioms map in<strong>to</strong> a concept called The Utility Function<br />

Axioms <strong>of</strong> Behavior<br />

●Insatiability<br />

–More is better<br />

●Continuity<br />

●even just a little bit more is better<br />

●Rationality<br />

–<strong>Consumer</strong> can judge and choose between options<br />

●Transitivity<br />

–If A is better than B and B is better than C, the consumer must prefer A <strong>to</strong> C<br />

Footnote On Arrow<br />

● Arrow has shown that it is impossible for a collection <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>to</strong><br />

possess a representation that follows all <strong>of</strong> these axioms.<br />

●This is called the Impossibility Theorem<br />

●The most conspicuous culprit is transitivity<br />

The Representation Theorem<br />

●Given the axioms <strong>of</strong> behavior, there exists a utility function that represents<br />

the consumer’s tastes<br />

●This utility function is ordinal not cardinal<br />

●Like a thermometer, scale is irrelevant<br />

●Utility function is consistent <strong>to</strong> a mono<strong>to</strong>ne increasing transformation<br />

Review:<br />

. <strong>Consumer</strong> preferences<br />

. Indifference curves<br />

. Utility<br />

●Derive the <strong>Budget</strong> Constraint<br />

●Derive the Principles <strong>of</strong> Utility Maximization<br />

Page 1 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Optimization – Technical foundation for most problems<br />

in economics<br />

1. Definition <strong>of</strong> the objective function<br />

- utility function for consumers<br />

- production function for producers<br />

- pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

- cost function<br />

2. Want either maximize or minimize the objective function. Your<br />

objective function must be well specified and conceptually<br />

measurable.<br />

3. <strong>Choice</strong> variables – they are imbedded in the objective function.<br />

Example: you have a consumer who is self interested with utility<br />

function that has numerous arguments as U=U(X1, X2,….Xn), the Xi<br />

are different things that make you happy. Start with things<br />

consumables from which you derive pleasure.<br />

4. Objective function has a goal.<br />

5. Be as large as possible (maximize your utility function)<br />

6. Introduce constraint<br />

7. Constrained optimization – optimization problems do not have <strong>to</strong> be<br />

constrained. However, the most interesting optimization problems in<br />

economics are constrained.<br />

- objective function<br />

- set <strong>of</strong> constraints (n-1 is the maximum number <strong>of</strong> constraints)<br />

- the optimizer chooses the levels <strong>of</strong> the choice variables.<br />

Assume a consumer picks Xi <strong>to</strong> maximize Utility.<br />

1) People have unlimited desires (wants) – which is not economics if<br />

there is no constraint.<br />

2) <strong>Budget</strong> constraint (Income is limited)<br />

M=I=P1X1+P2X2+P3X3+….PnXn (price times quantity that you<br />

choose) or M=∑<br />

n<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

P i<br />

X i<br />

3) Each consumer has idiosyncratic parameters such as:<br />

U=U(X1,X2…..Xn) is subject <strong>to</strong> constraint M=∑<br />

dU\dx is the marginal utility <strong>of</strong> the i-th good.<br />

n<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

P i<br />

X i<br />

Page 2 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

U(X1, X2)<br />

X2<br />

U1<br />

U2<br />

X1<br />

It is impossible for indifference curves <strong>to</strong> cross each other because that<br />

would violate the axiom <strong>of</strong> transitivity. Prove follows.<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

One way <strong>to</strong> solve it is <strong>to</strong> use Mr. Lagrange<br />

n<br />

1<br />

, X<br />

2,<br />

X<br />

3...<br />

X<br />

n<br />

) + ( M −∑<br />

Pi<br />

X<br />

i<br />

)<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

L = U ( X<br />

λ<br />

Page 3 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

The <strong>Consumer</strong>’s Problem<br />

●Attain the highest possible level <strong>of</strong> utility<br />

–Scale utility mountain<br />

●The available budget constitutes the constraint<br />

●Think <strong>of</strong> the budget as a fence on the mountain<br />

●Find the highest place on the fence<br />

The <strong>Budget</strong> Constraint<br />

●The consumer has a sum <strong>of</strong> money <strong>to</strong> spend each period, M<br />

This money is spread across many goods, X i<br />

●Thus the expenditure on the first good, X 1<br />

, is<br />

●And similarly for all other goods<br />

Graphical Construction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Budget</strong> Constraint<br />

The <strong>Budget</strong> Line in Mathematical Terms<br />

●Imagine the consumer spends all income on good Y<br />

●The maximum amount <strong>of</strong> Y that can be purchased is M/(P Y<br />

)<br />

●If all income is spent on good X then the maximum quantity is M/(P X<br />

)<br />

●Join these two points <strong>to</strong> make a straight line<br />

●Any combination on the line exhausts the entire budget M<br />

The Slope <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Budget</strong> Constraint<br />

●The slope is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the two prices: derive: (M/Py)/(M/Px)<br />

●-P Y<br />

/P X<br />

The <strong>Consumer</strong> <strong>Choice</strong><br />

●Attain highest possible utility<br />

●Don’t violate the budget constraint<br />

●<br />

<strong>Budget</strong>: I = P 1 X 1 + P 2 X 2 , where X 1 and X 2 are goods.<br />

X 2<br />

50<br />

I<br />

P 2<br />

I<br />

P 1<br />

= X 1<br />

+ P 2<br />

P 1<br />

X 2<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Slope = -1 = − P 2<br />

P 1<br />

I<br />

X 1<br />

= I P 1<br />

− P 2<br />

P 1<br />

X 2<br />

10<br />

10 20 30 40 50<br />

X 1<br />

P 1<br />

constant<br />

slope<br />

Page 4 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

Comparative Static<br />

X 2<br />

I 2<br />

X 1<br />

I 1<br />

X 2<br />

X 1<br />

What happens if I (income) and prices triple at the same time (inflation)?<br />

X 1<br />

= 3I<br />

3P 1<br />

− 3P 2<br />

3P 1<br />

• X 2<br />

nothing changes<br />

X 1<br />

= I P 1<br />

− P 2<br />

P 1<br />

• X 2<br />

Given U (X 1 , X 2 , X 3 ,… X U ) X i represents the<br />

goods you want with your goal being <strong>to</strong><br />

maximize U within your budget constraint.<br />

I 1<br />

I 2<br />

I 3<br />

. I = money available, referred <strong>to</strong> as income.<br />

. Each good has a price; P i for good X i.<br />

N<br />

I = P 1 X 1 + P 2 X 2 +… ; E i = P i X i or ∑ xi p i<br />

=budget constraint<br />

i =1<br />

Lagrange (L)<br />

(L)=U(X 1<br />

, X 2<br />

, X 3<br />

… X u<br />

) − λ(I − P 1<br />

X 1<br />

− P 2<br />

X 2<br />

−…P i<br />

X i<br />

)<br />

. take derivatives with respect <strong>to</strong> each X i<br />

Page 5 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

. they are partial derivatives because we do not let other variables ¨<br />

Why can’t indifference curves slope upward?<br />

By axiom “more preferred <strong>to</strong> less” we disprove upward sloping in difference<br />

curves.<br />

Y<br />

U 0 = U(Y 0 ,X 0 )<br />

U 1 = U(Y 0 ,2X 0 )<br />

U 1 > U 0 & U 1 = U 0<br />

Y 0<br />

X 0<br />

2X 0<br />

X<br />

Y<br />

Y 0<br />

Why can we not, as consumers, choose point<br />

A for consumption with the given budget<br />

constraint?<br />

X 0<br />

X<br />

What combination exhausts the opportunity <strong>to</strong> improve?<br />

Y<br />

I<br />

P y<br />

*what axiom does this indifference<br />

curve violate? Under what<br />

circumstances, if any,<br />

is this indifference curve possible?<br />

I<br />

X<br />

P x<br />

Page 6 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5


Microeconomics<br />

Dr. Dmitri M. Medvedovski<br />

Y<br />

(hat)<br />

What does this say about Y? Does more X<br />

make us happier? Does this graph have any<br />

conflict with one <strong>of</strong> the axiom?<br />

X 1<br />

0<br />

X 1<br />

I<br />

X 1<br />

II<br />

X 1<br />

III<br />

X<br />

(right shoes)<br />

<strong>Consumer</strong> choice:<br />

. must be located on the budget constraint.<br />

. Must give consumer the most preferred combinations <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />

services.<br />

Y<br />

MRS= P 1<br />

P 2<br />

means satisfaction ∆X 2<br />

∆X 1<br />

is maximized, given budget constraint P 1<br />

P 2<br />

What does this say about X?<br />

X<br />

Page 7 out <strong>of</strong> 7 Lec. 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!