21.05.2015 Views

what are the advantages of church planting movements over against ...

what are the advantages of church planting movements over against ...

what are the advantages of church planting movements over against ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

St Francis Magazine Vol 6, No 6 | December 2010<br />

“outside” <strong>the</strong> sphere within which Christ’s full salvation blessing is<br />

experienced – <strong>the</strong> local <strong>church</strong>.<br />

5 Conclusion<br />

The distinguishing factor between CPMs, as described by Garrison,<br />

and IMs, described by Lewis, is <strong>the</strong>ir approach to non-Christian religions.<br />

CPMs break free: 120 IMs remain inside. 121<br />

This makes IMs biblically impermissible. By excluding visible<br />

Christian fellowship, IMs withdraw vital spiritual support from<br />

young believers struggling <strong>against</strong> evil, demonic forces which would<br />

snatch away <strong>the</strong> gospel seed, cripple <strong>the</strong>ir walk with Christ and snuff<br />

out <strong>the</strong>ir Christian witness. By reducing faith to a merely private<br />

inner expression, IMs hamper believers from living lives <strong>of</strong> integrity,<br />

expressing <strong>the</strong>ir distinctive faith in distinctively Christian works <strong>of</strong><br />

love before <strong>the</strong>ir watching community and <strong>the</strong>ir Lord. Worst <strong>of</strong> all,<br />

by dabbling with false religions, IMs implicate <strong>the</strong>mselves in idolatry,<br />

and provoke God’s righteous indignation.<br />

Perhaps Lewis does not see <strong>the</strong>se problems because she, selfconfessedly,<br />

bases her missiology on observation, not <strong>the</strong> Bible. 122<br />

Methodologically, Garrison is <strong>the</strong> same. 123 Never<strong>the</strong>less, CPMs<br />

120 Garrison, ‘Church Planting Movements vs. Insider Movements’, p. 154.<br />

121 Lewis, ‘Insider Movements’, p. 16.<br />

122 “My opinion is that missiology must be based on seeing <strong>what</strong> God seems to be<br />

doing and evaluating that in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> scripture (copying <strong>the</strong> apostolic process in<br />

Acts 15).” Lewis in Dick Brogden, ‘Inside Out: Probing Presuppositions among<br />

Insider Movements’, in IJFM 27:1 (2010), p. 36.<br />

Cf: ‘The earliest insider <strong>movements</strong> out <strong>the</strong>re did not start because someone had a<br />

great missiological idea and said “Let’s try starting an insider movement.” As usual,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory is following observation. As in <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles in<br />

Acts, God is moving this way and we <strong>are</strong> trying to catch up by analysing <strong>the</strong> phenomenon.’<br />

Lewis in Corwin, ‘A Humble Appeal’, p. 8.<br />

123 Garrison begins from <strong>the</strong> assumption that CPMs <strong>are</strong> a ‘divinely produced phenomenon’<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n attempts to ‘reverse engineer’ <strong>the</strong>m to disc<strong>over</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> Creator’s de-<br />

906<br />

St Francis Magazine is published by Interserve and Arab Vision

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!