Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission
Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission
Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mr <strong>Adrian</strong> James <strong>Palmer</strong><br />
she should have further liaised with CPS to outline the areas that<br />
had not been covered within the investigation. CPS cites one of the<br />
reasons for taking no further action was the complete absence of any<br />
medical evidence. Officer A was fully aware that no medical<br />
examination had taken place in relation to <strong>Adrian</strong>. She could have at<br />
this opportunity discussed with CPS that no medical examination had<br />
taken place and organised for one to take place as soon as possible.<br />
Whilst it is accepted that a medical examination may not have<br />
provided any evidence to improve the prospect of conviction, the fact<br />
that it did not take place is a missed opportunity to gather potential<br />
evidence. The medical examination should have taken place as<br />
soon as possible after the allegation was made. This is a failing of<br />
Officer A.<br />
224. Again, where CPS make reference to no corroborative evidence to<br />
assist a prosecution for rape, there is no evidence that Officer A<br />
attempted to obtain this. No enquiries were made with family<br />
members in respect of <strong>Adrian</strong> and his behaviour in the lead up to his<br />
allegation. No enquiries were made about ***** background, other<br />
than obtaining some incident logs. The list of names that Officer A<br />
provided to CPS could have given further evidence to the rape<br />
investigation, either for or against a conviction. Of the eight people<br />
on the handwritten list, only two provided statements to the<br />
investigation, neither of whom gave evidence regarding a rape<br />
allegation. Other, more significant witnesses were listed, such as<br />
***** and *****. ***** was the first person that <strong>Adrian</strong> informed of the<br />
rape allegation. Had ***** been spoken to, she could have provided<br />
other names of whom <strong>Adrian</strong> had informed, such as *****. This is a<br />
failing of Officer A.<br />
225. The evidence provided by Officer A regarding her dealings with CPS<br />
is different to that provided by ***** of the CPS. *****, as discussed<br />
in her evidence, has said that she believed potential lines of enquiry<br />
Redacted Version 42