17.11.2012 Views

Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission

Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission

Adrian Palmer - Independent Police Complaints Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mr <strong>Adrian</strong> James <strong>Palmer</strong><br />

she should have further liaised with CPS to outline the areas that<br />

had not been covered within the investigation. CPS cites one of the<br />

reasons for taking no further action was the complete absence of any<br />

medical evidence. Officer A was fully aware that no medical<br />

examination had taken place in relation to <strong>Adrian</strong>. She could have at<br />

this opportunity discussed with CPS that no medical examination had<br />

taken place and organised for one to take place as soon as possible.<br />

Whilst it is accepted that a medical examination may not have<br />

provided any evidence to improve the prospect of conviction, the fact<br />

that it did not take place is a missed opportunity to gather potential<br />

evidence. The medical examination should have taken place as<br />

soon as possible after the allegation was made. This is a failing of<br />

Officer A.<br />

224. Again, where CPS make reference to no corroborative evidence to<br />

assist a prosecution for rape, there is no evidence that Officer A<br />

attempted to obtain this. No enquiries were made with family<br />

members in respect of <strong>Adrian</strong> and his behaviour in the lead up to his<br />

allegation. No enquiries were made about ***** background, other<br />

than obtaining some incident logs. The list of names that Officer A<br />

provided to CPS could have given further evidence to the rape<br />

investigation, either for or against a conviction. Of the eight people<br />

on the handwritten list, only two provided statements to the<br />

investigation, neither of whom gave evidence regarding a rape<br />

allegation. Other, more significant witnesses were listed, such as<br />

***** and *****. ***** was the first person that <strong>Adrian</strong> informed of the<br />

rape allegation. Had ***** been spoken to, she could have provided<br />

other names of whom <strong>Adrian</strong> had informed, such as *****. This is a<br />

failing of Officer A.<br />

225. The evidence provided by Officer A regarding her dealings with CPS<br />

is different to that provided by ***** of the CPS. *****, as discussed<br />

in her evidence, has said that she believed potential lines of enquiry<br />

Redacted Version 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!