02.06.2015 Views

Evidence-based Medicine: Time for a change? - Journal of Medical ...

Evidence-based Medicine: Time for a change? - Journal of Medical ...

Evidence-based Medicine: Time for a change? - Journal of Medical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE<br />

Among the gram negative organisms, both the<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter<br />

baumannii isolates were sensitive to Amikacin,<br />

Table 1: Number and types <strong>of</strong> bacteria from positive<br />

cultures<br />

Bacteria Organism Osteomyelitis<br />

n=19<br />

Gram positive S.aureus 13<br />

(68.3)<br />

CONS 04<br />

(21.1)<br />

Total 17<br />

(89.4)<br />

Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01<br />

(5.3)<br />

Acinetobacter baumanii 01<br />

(5.3)<br />

Total 02(10.6)<br />

*Figures in parentheses indicate the percentage<br />

Table 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern <strong>of</strong> Grampositive<br />

bacteria<br />

Antibiotics Staphylococcus CONS<br />

aureus (n=13)<br />

(n=04)<br />

S I R S I R<br />

Erythromycin 10 00 3 3 00 1<br />

(76.9) (23.1) (75) (25)<br />

Gentamicin 8 00 5 3 00 1<br />

(61.5) (38.5) (75) (25)<br />

Cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin 9 00 4 1 1 2<br />

(69.2) (30.8) (25) (25) (50)<br />

Piperacillin- 7 1 5 3 00 1<br />

tazobactam (53.8) (7.7) (38.5) (75) (25)<br />

Vancomycin 13 00 00 4 00 00<br />

(100) (100)<br />

Cefotaxime 6 03 4 1 1 2<br />

(46.1) (23.1) (30.8) (25) (25) (50)<br />

Oxacillin 00 00 13 00 00 04<br />

(100) (100)<br />

*Figures in parentheses indicate the percentage<br />

Gentamicin, Piperacillin-tazobactam.<br />

The isolates showed resistance to<br />

Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin and<br />

Co-trimoxazole.<br />

Discussion: According to Resnick D 7 , the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis is greatly<br />

influenced by the age <strong>of</strong> the patient, the<br />

specific causative organism and the presence<br />

or absence <strong>of</strong> any underlying disorder or<br />

situation. In this study, the maximum patients<br />

belong to the age group <strong>of</strong> 0-15 years. In all<br />

the age groups, males (66.7%) were<br />

predominant over the females (33.3%)<br />

comparable to a study by Waldvogel FA et al 8<br />

and Duthie and Nelson. 9<br />

The maximum number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong><br />

osteomyelitis was seen in the summer<br />

months <strong>of</strong> April to July which constituted more<br />

than half the total number <strong>of</strong> cases. A similar<br />

finding was reported by Mukhopadhyay B 10<br />

wherein it was stated that osteomyelitis was<br />

more common in summer and rainy seasons.<br />

A culture positivity rate <strong>of</strong> 52% was observed<br />

in this study, consistent with findings <strong>of</strong><br />

Vishwakarma and Lal 11 and Kundsen and<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fman 12 . In this study, majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

isolates were gram- positive organisms<br />

(89.4%). Gram-negative organisms<br />

constituted 10.6%. Mixed infection was seen<br />

in 2 cases.<br />

Staphylococcus aureus (68.3%) was the<br />

commonest isolate comparable to studies by<br />

Gupta U and Bhattacharya AN 13 Ng<br />

Brajachand et al 14 and Dhawan et al 15 .<br />

However the relative rates <strong>of</strong> Staphylococcus<br />

aureus vary from centre to centre. Classen<br />

et al 16 reported as low as 16.3%.<br />

Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus<br />

epidermidis are the 2 major pathogens<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> most cases <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis<br />

in the present study.<br />

There was no isolation <strong>of</strong> anaerobes. It could<br />

probably due to the fact that anaerobic<br />

organisms require very stringent conditions<br />

<strong>for</strong> isolation and transportation which could<br />

not always be maintained.<br />

Consistent susceptibility (100%) to<br />

Vancomycin is retained in this study. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the isolates <strong>of</strong> Staphylococcus were sensitive<br />

to Erythromycin. All the Staphylococcal<br />

isolates showed resistance to methicillin.<br />

Onche I and Adedeji O 17 also reported<br />

Staphylococcus aureus completely resistant<br />

to oxacillin in a hospital setting and inferred<br />

that this was not unconnected with abuse <strong>of</strong><br />

antibiotics by the populace related to over the<br />

counter selling <strong>of</strong> antibiotics.<br />

44 JMS * JMS Vol 25 * Vol * No. 25 3 * No. * September, 1 * June, 2010 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!