More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 8. Grain and milling yields and agronomic performance of entries in the 2009 Preliminary Yield Trial, CLPY Group 8, Crowley, LA. 43 ENT PEDIGREE VIG 1 HDT HTE YIELD RATOON TOTAL YIELD WHOLE TOTAL 197 9502008-A//AR 1188/CCDR/3/WELLS/CFX-18 6 76 31 7748 1881 9628 64.6 71.3 178 9502008-A/DREW//CL131 6 77 32 8509 1523 10032 67.1 72.2 177 9502008-A/DREW//CL131 6 80 33 8079 2134 10213 66.7 71.6 180 9502008-A/DREW//CL131 5 76 31 7992 2387 10379 65.2 72.2 176 9502008-A/DREW//CFX-24 5 80 34 8199 2183 10382 67.6 71.5 184 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 76 34 8786 1653 10439 62.4 70.4 179 9502008-A/DREW//CL131 5 76 31 8369 2097 10467 66.0 72.3 188 TACAURI//KBNT/LCSN/3/WELLS/CFX-18 4 76 33 8782 1791 10574 62.6 70.9 198 9502008-A//AR 1188/CCDR/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 33 8383 2276 10659 67.7 72.1 196 CCDR/4/CPRS/3/MBLE//LMNT/…/5/CFX-18//… 4 78 32 8552 2133 10685 65.9 71.5 182 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/3/WELLS/CFX-18 4 77 35 9212 1511 10723 62.7 71.3 195 CCDR/4/CPRS/3/MBLE//LMNT/…/5/CFX-18//… 6 78 32 8791 2099 10890 66.9 71.9 181 9502008-A/DREW//CL131 4 77 33 8891 2254 11145 67.1 72.2 186 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//… 5 77 32 8948 2202 11150 64.8 71.8 183 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/3/WELLS/CFX-18 4 75 33 9325 1839 11165 63.8 71.0 193 CCDR/4/CPRS/3/MBLE//LMNT/…/5/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 33 9258 2006 11263 65.5 71.6 199 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 33 9051 2228 11279 65.0 71.8 187 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//… 5 77 30 9204 2216 11420 63.8 71.3 191 CCDR//LGRU/LCSN/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//…/4/CFX-18 5 80 33 9084 2430 11514 63.6 72.2 200 CL151 5 77 36 9694 1857 11551 64.6 71.7 190 CCDR/9770532DH2/3/CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2 5 76 33 9199 2536 11735 64.8 71.8 185 9502008-A//AR 1142/MBLE/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//… 5 77 32 9725 2147 11872 62.1 71.3 189 CCDR/9770532DH2/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//…/4/CFX-18 4 77 32 10169 2033 12202 65.2 72.3 194 CCDR/4/CPRS/3/MBLE//LMNT/…/5/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 35 9468 2854 12322 67.6 72.4 192 CCDR//LGRU/LCSN/5/AR 1179/3/CPRS//…/4/CFX-18 5 76 31 10163 2272 12434 64.1 72.3 CV 13.0 1.2 4.5 6.1 2.4 0.6 LSD 1.3 2.0 3.0 1128 3.2 0.8 1 Subjective rating 0 to 9, where 0 = excellent, 9 = poor.
Table 9. Grain and milling yields and agronomic performance of entries in the 2009 Preliminary Yield Trial, CLPY Group 9, Crowley, LA. 44 ENT PEDIGREE VIG 1 HDT HTE YIELD RATOON TOTAL YIELD WHOLE TOTAL 211 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-26 4 76 34 9065 3163 12229 68.6 72.1 206 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CL131 4 78 33 9842 2264 12106 65.6 71.4 212 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 37 9616 2477 12094 66.0 71.9 202 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-29//AR 1142/… 4 80 38 9622 2462 12085 68.9 72.3 222 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/CFX-18//CCDR/… 4 78 34 9093 2946 12039 68.3 72.3 207 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CL131 4 76 34 9714 2292 12005 66.5 71.1 220 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/CL131 5 77 34 9758 2180 11938 66.7 72.2 225 CL161 5 80 37 9535 2084 11619 68.3 72.1 204 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-18//CCDR/… 4 81 36 9412 2207 11619 66.9 72.4 201 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 79 37 9623 1968 11591 66.8 72.0 218 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/DREW/CFX-18 5 81 33 9260 2320 11580 68.6 72.1 209 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-26 5 77 32 9226 2319 11545 67.8 72.1 217 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/DREW/CFX-18 5 80 35 9196 2267 11462 67.9 72.1 221 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/CL131 5 80 34 9061 2323 11384 68.4 72.3 203 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-26/9702128 4 79 35 9227 2154 11381 68.1 72.2 213 DREW/JEFF//CFX-18/3/TRNS 6 77 31 9278 2072 11350 66.9 71.4 205 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CL131 5 80 33 8921 2385 11306 66.4 71.5 216 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/DREW/CFX-18 5 81 34 8098 3169 11268 68.9 72.4 208 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/9502008//KATY/… 6 80 36 8704 2479 11183 67.9 72.0 224 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 77 33 8688 2425 11113 68.2 72.3 219 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/CL131 6 77 29 8821 2273 11094 63.5 71.6 215 DREW/JEFF//CFX-18/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 80 32 8713 2257 10970 68.2 71.8 210 CFX-18//CCDR/9770532 DH2/3/CFX-26 4 77 31 8120 2820 10940 67.3 71.5 223 CFX-29//AR 1142/LA 2031/3/CFX-18//CCDR/… 4 77 33 8999 1918 10917 66.5 72.1 214 DREW/JEFF//CFX-18/3/WELLS/CFX-18 5 81 34 8495 2403 10898 68.3 72.0 CV 12.1 1.8 5.0 5.0 2.0 0.4 LSD 1.1 3.0 3.4 928 2.1 0.7 1 Subjective rating 0 to 9, where 0 = excellent, 9 = poor.
Page 2 and 3: 101 st Annual Research Report RICE
Page 4 and 5: Page RICE AGRONOMY (Continued) ....
Page 6 and 7: INTRODUCTION Research at the Rice R
Page 8 and 9: RICE BREEDING GENETIC IMPROVEMENT O
Page 10 and 11: Table 1. Grain and milling yields a
Page 20 and 21: COMMERCIAL-ADVANCED YIELD TRIALS Th
Page 24 and 25: Table 3. Grain and milling yields,
Page 30 and 31: PRELIMINARY YIELD TRIALS The prelim
Page 36 and 37: Table 5. Continued. ENT PEDIGREE VI
Page 38 and 39: Table 5. Continued. ENT PEDIGREE VI
Page 40 and 41: CLEARFIELD EXPERIMENTAL LINES S.D.
Page 50 and 51: Table 10. Grain and milling yields
Page 52 and 53: Table 12. Grain and milling yields
Page 58 and 59: DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED LONG-GRAIN
Page 60 and 61: Table 2. Agronomic and milling perf
Page 66 and 67: Table 6. Continued. 61 Entry Pedigr
Page 68 and 69: Table 6. Continued. 63 Entry Pedigr
Page 70 and 71: Table 8. Yield, milling, and agrono
Page 72 and 73: Table 9. Yield, milling, and agrono
Page 74 and 75: DEVELOPMENT OF HYBRID RICE FOR LOUI
Page 76 and 77: RICE GENETICS AND GERMPLASM DEVELOP
Page 78 and 79: MARKER-ASSISTED BREEDING AND GENETI
Page 80 and 81: Table 2. 2009 Field performance of
Page 82 and 83: Table 5. Mini-core rice accessions
Page 84 and 85: RICE NUTRITION ENHANCEMENT PROJECT:
Page 86 and 87: Table 1. Continued. ENTRY COCODRIE-
Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Continued. ENTRY CYPRESS-D
Page 94 and 95: Table 2. Continued. ENTRY CYPRESS-D
Page 96 and 97: Table 5. Improvement in essential a
Page 98 and 99:
Table 1. Common abbreviations used
Page 100 and 101:
RICE NUTRITION RESEARCH D.L. Harrel
Page 102 and 103:
Rice Variety by Nitrogen Experiment
Page 104 and 105:
Table 2. Determine the agronomic re
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Table 11. Determine the agronomic r
Page 116 and 117:
111 Table 13. Determine the agronom
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Table 27. Evaluation the response o
Page 134 and 135:
Evaluation of Biagro Products Nutri
Page 136 and 137:
Determine the Effect of N Source, R
Page 138 and 139:
Ratoon Response of Rice Varieties t
Page 140 and 141:
Evaluation and Comparison of the Ag
Page 142 and 143:
Evaluation of Nondestructive Measur
Page 144 and 145:
139 Table 34. Evaluation of nondest
Page 146 and 147:
141 Table 35. Evaluation of nondest
Page 148 and 149:
143 Table 36. Nitrogen uptake model
Page 150 and 151:
Evaluation of Zinc Fertilization an
Page 152 and 153:
Table 37. Continued Crop Name Rice
Page 154 and 155:
Table 37. Continued. Crop Name Rice
Page 156 and 157:
Determine the Influence of Zinc Fer
Page 158 and 159:
Table 38. Continued. Crop Name Rice
Page 160 and 161:
CULTURAL MANAGEMENT RESEARCH D.L. H
Page 162 and 163:
157 Table 1. Evaluation of the opti
Page 164 and 165:
Table 2. Evaluation of the optimum
Page 166 and 167:
Evaluation of the Interaction of Se
Page 168 and 169:
Table 4. Evaluation of the interact
Page 170 and 171:
165 Table 5. Evaluation of DERMACOR
Page 172 and 173:
Evaluation of Nutrient Losses from
Page 174 and 175:
Table 6. Evaluation of nutrient los
Page 176 and 177:
Table 6. Continued. Description Flu
Page 178 and 179:
Table 6. Continued. Description BOD
Page 180 and 181:
Agronomic Results for the Main Effe
Page 182 and 183:
Table 9. Selected physical and chem
Page 184 and 185:
Table 11. Main effect results for M
Page 186 and 187:
Evaluation of Multiple Fungicides o
Page 188 and 189:
Evaluation of Two Sweet Sorghum Var
Page 190 and 191:
185 Table 2. Continued. Description
Page 192 and 193:
Table 3. Multi-state, multi-locatio
Page 194 and 195:
Seedbed preparation of foundation f
Page 196 and 197:
191 Table 1. Annual environmental c
Page 198 and 199:
EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTAL STOCKING OF
Page 200 and 201:
Parameters: Crawfish (and aquatic p
Page 202 and 203:
Table 5. Average number of crawfish
Page 204 and 205:
Feed: Objective A: A commercial sin
Page 206 and 207:
Table 1. Mean results for several o
Page 208 and 209:
Burrows Flagged: June 16 to July 13
Page 210 and 211:
EVALUATION OF A NEW MARKING TECHNIQ
Page 212 and 213:
While the cause for the missing cra
Page 214 and 215:
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS OF CAPTURE
Page 216 and 217:
Figure 1. Representation of the sha
Page 218 and 219:
Y=129.67 * Ln (X) + 26.50 R 2 =0.28
Page 220 and 221:
Release Events: Releases occurred i
Page 222 and 223:
A-1 B-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 L a t e r a
Page 224 and 225:
Table 3. Recapture rates of marked
Page 226 and 227:
are analyzed and used by rice breed
Page 228 and 229:
Table 2. Disease reaction of variou
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
2009 Sheath Blight Fungicide Trial
Page 238 and 239:
2009 Sheath Blight Fungicide Trial
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11. Effect of various fungici
Page 242 and 243:
Table12. Effect of varietal resista
Page 244 and 245:
Table 13. Effect of varietal resist
Page 246 and 247:
Table 14. Effect of varietal resist
Page 248 and 249:
Table 15. Effect of fungicide appli
Page 250 and 251:
Table 16. Effect of various fungici
Page 252 and 253:
Table 1. Estimated Rice Breakeven P
Page 254 and 255:
RICE INSECTS RESEARCH RICE INSECT C
Page 256 and 257:
Results: Results of a small-plot ev
Page 258 and 259:
Sampling Dates: July 15 (22 dpf), J
Page 260 and 261:
Treatments: 1) Untreated check 2) K
Page 262 and 263:
Results: There was an average of 11
Page 264 and 265:
Figure 1: A) Seed production plots
Page 266 and 267:
Table 1. Average yield and number o
Page 268 and 269:
Table 4. 1000-seed weight of PolyC1
Page 270 and 271:
LOUISIANA RICE RESEARCH VERIFICATIO
Page 272 and 273:
Table 1. 2009 Louisiana Rice Resear
Page 274 and 275:
ACADIA PARISH The field in Acadia P
Page 276 and 277:
AVOYELLES PARISH The field in Avoye
Page 278 and 279:
CALCASIEU PARISH Because the field
Page 280 and 281:
CONCORDIA PARISH The field in Conco
Page 282 and 283:
EAST CARROLL PARISH This field prov
Page 284 and 285:
EVANGELINE PARISH The field in Evan
Page 286 and 287:
MADISON PARISH If we had imposed th
Page 288 and 289:
ST. LANDRY PARISH CL161 was drilled
Page 290 and 291:
VERMILION PARISH Because the grower
Page 292 and 293:
Table 3. Twelve-Year Louisiana Rice
Page 294 and 295:
Table 3. Continued. 2004 Verificati
Page 296 and 297:
Table 3. Continued. 1998 - 2009 Ver
Page 298 and 299:
SafeGuard: A Safener for Pendimetha
Page 300 and 301:
S T A T I O N P E R S O N N E L (Co
Page 302:
COOPERATING PERSONNEL (Continued) C
show all

CONTENTS

Create successful ePaper yourself

CONTENTS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?