07.06.2015 Views

COMPONENT SEPARATION - Department of Surgery at SUNY ...

COMPONENT SEPARATION - Department of Surgery at SUNY ...

COMPONENT SEPARATION - Department of Surgery at SUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management <strong>of</strong> Difficult<br />

Perfor<strong>at</strong>ed Peptic Ulcers<br />

Marilyn Ng, MD<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Surgery</strong> M&M Conference<br />

Downst<strong>at</strong>e Medical Center<br />

April 11, 2013


Case Present<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ 58 yo F with PMHx <strong>of</strong> HTN<br />

‣ SHx: C – section & SocHx: neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

‣ 9-mo hx abd distention & pain<br />

‣ Non - bilious emesis several days<br />

‣ BIBEMS for altered mental st<strong>at</strong>us


ED Physical Exam<br />

‣ BP 221/123 HR 110 RR 25 S<strong>at</strong> 99% RA<br />

‣ Gen: AAO x 2<br />

‣ Abd: s<strong>of</strong>t, abd distention, diffuse<br />

tenderness, lower midline scar


ED Lab Results<br />

‣ CBC: 7.6 > 15.1 / 43.6 < 293 N 80%<br />

‣ BMP: 141 / 3.2 / 92 / 34 / 0.16 < 120<br />

‣ Coag: normal<br />

‣ VBG: 7.48 / 30 / 44 / 32 / 58% / +8


A Long Prelude to the OR<br />

‣ HD#1: Admitted for GOO<br />

‣ IVF resuscit<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ PPI drip & broad-spectrum abx<br />

‣ Refused NGT & central line placement<br />

‣ HD#2: Tachycardic, normal BP,<br />

worsening abd pain & WBC 13.9


Three Days L<strong>at</strong>er . . .<br />

‣ HD#3: Tachycardia, 7 L IVF<br />

‣ Portable CXR: no free air<br />

‣ Bandemia 58%, Cr 2.3, Lact<strong>at</strong>e 2.3<br />

‣ ABG: 7.37/28/100/16/17/97%/-7.7<br />

‣ Repe<strong>at</strong> CT abd/pelvis


Explor<strong>at</strong>ory Laparotomy<br />

‣ Drainage 3 L gastric fluid<br />

‣ Perfor<strong>at</strong>ed giant pre-pyloric ulcer (4 cm)<br />

‣ Distal gastrectomy, truncal vagotomy,<br />

gastrojejunostomy, tube duodenostomy,<br />

repair <strong>of</strong> esophageal injury, wide<br />

drainage


Post – Oper<strong>at</strong>ive Course<br />

‣ POD#0: ICU; intub<strong>at</strong>ed, IVF, PPI, Abx<br />

‣ POD#3: Extub<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

‣ POD#4: Normalized Cr; ICU transfer<br />

‣ POD#11: Gastrografin swallow neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

for leak or stricture clear liquids


Post – Oper<strong>at</strong>ive Course<br />

‣ POD#12: Full liquids; Blake drain D/C’ed<br />

‣ POD#15: Duodenostomy tube clamped<br />

‣ POD#16: JP drains removed<br />

‣ POD#19: Post – gastrectomy diet<br />

‣ POD#24: Discharged home


P<strong>at</strong>hology<br />

‣ Both vagus nerves transected<br />

‣ Neg<strong>at</strong>ive for malignancy<br />

‣ Chronic gastric mucosal inflamm<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ H. pylori neg<strong>at</strong>ive


Management <strong>of</strong> Difficult<br />

Perfor<strong>at</strong>ed Peptic Ulcers<br />

‣ Epidemiology<br />

‣ Etiology<br />

‣ Immedi<strong>at</strong>e Concerns<br />

‣ Oper<strong>at</strong>ive Principles<br />

‣ Difficult Perfor<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Peptic Ulcers (PPU)


Epidemiology<br />

‣ 300,000 new PUD cases per year<br />

‣ 2% U.S. prevalence<br />

‣ 10% lifetime cumul<strong>at</strong>ive prevalence<br />

‣ 50% world popul<strong>at</strong>ion has H. pylori<br />

‣ Only 10-15% will develop PUD


Etiology<br />

‣ Focal mucosal defects th<strong>at</strong> extend into<br />

submucosa or deeper<br />

‣ H. pylori in 70-90% DU & 30-60% GU


Complic<strong>at</strong>ion: Perfor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ Acute perfor<strong>at</strong>ions in 2 -<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> PUD<br />

‣ <strong>Surgery</strong> almost always<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

‣ 6 - 30% risk <strong>of</strong> mortality<br />

‣ Conserv<strong>at</strong>ive tre<strong>at</strong>ment<br />

with contained<br />

perfor<strong>at</strong>ion Lee and Sarosi. Surg Clin N Am, 2011


Immedi<strong>at</strong>e Concern: Sepsis<br />

‣ Large bore IV<br />

‣ IV fluid resuscit<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ Broad - spectrum<br />

antibiotics & PPI<br />

‣ Invasive monitoring<br />

‣ Monitor urine output


Clincal Stages <strong>of</strong> PPU<br />

Stage<br />

First<br />

< 2 hrs<br />

Second<br />

2-12 hrs<br />

Third<br />

> 12 hrs<br />

Present<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Abrupt onset abd pain, epigastric<br />

generalized<br />

Rigidity, RLQ tenderness from<br />

drainage <strong>of</strong> succus<br />

Abd distention, fever,<br />

hypovolemia, abdominal distention<br />

Lee and Sarosi. Surg Clin N Am, 2011


Oper<strong>at</strong>ive Principle<br />

Do only wh<strong>at</strong><br />

is necessary<br />

in an unstable<br />

pt in an<br />

emergency


Graham, Graham, Graham


Modified Johnson Classific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Billroth I<br />

Billroth II


Type IV PPU<br />

Newman NA, et al. Cameron’s Current Surgical Therapy, 10 th Ed.


Types <strong>of</strong> Vagotomy


PPI Shifting the Paradigm<br />

‣ 1980s: elective PU<br />

cases dropped >70%<br />

‣ 80% <strong>of</strong> cases were<br />

emergent surgeries<br />

Newman NA, et al. Cameron’s Current Surgical Therapy, 10 th Ed.


Difficult PPU: Wh<strong>at</strong> to Do?


Graham P<strong>at</strong>ch, Anyone ?


Thal Serosal P<strong>at</strong>ch<br />

Sorour M et al. Egyptian J Surg, 2012


Pyloric Exclusion


Pyloroplasty<br />

‣ Full-thickness<br />

incision 2 cm<br />

proximal & distal to<br />

pyloric ring<br />

‣ Incision closed<br />

vertically


Jaboulay Pyloroplasty<br />

‣ Parallel incisions<br />

‣ Drainage<br />

bypassing the<br />

pyloric channel<br />

ulcer


Finney Pyloroplasty<br />

‣ Inverted U-shaped<br />

incision<br />

‣ Indic<strong>at</strong>ed for<br />

“scarred down”<br />

duodenum


Nissen’s Procedure<br />

‣ Posterior DU<br />

perfor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

‣ Scar tissue<br />

‣ Chronic<br />

inflamm<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Maher JW and Chikunguwo SM. Fischer’s Mastery <strong>of</strong> <strong>Surgery</strong>, 2012


Tube Duodenstomy<br />

Lee and Sarosi. Surg Clin N Am, 2011


Summary<br />

‣ Up to 10% PUD perfor<strong>at</strong>e<br />

‣ Do ONLY wh<strong>at</strong> is necessary to manage<br />

‣ Often Graham p<strong>at</strong>ch repair<br />

‣ Giant ulcers may require Thal p<strong>at</strong>ch<br />

‣ Pyloric exclusion & drainage procedure<br />

‣ Tube duodenostomy for the difficult<br />

duodenum


Which type <strong>of</strong> gastric ulcer corresponds<br />

with the correct an<strong>at</strong>omic loc<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />

A. Type I – prepyloric region<br />

B. Type II – lesser curv<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stomach near the GE junction<br />

C. Type III – body <strong>of</strong> the stomach along<br />

the lesser curv<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

D. Type IV – lesser curv<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stomach near the GE junction<br />

E. Type IV – prepyloric region


A 75-yo man taking NSAIDS for arthritis has an<br />

acute abdomen and free air. His symptoms<br />

are 6 hrs old and his vital signs are stable<br />

after 1 L <strong>of</strong> NS. A perfor<strong>at</strong>ed duodenal ulcer<br />

is identified, which is the best required<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion:<br />

A. Suture closure <strong>of</strong> the perfor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

B. Omental p<strong>at</strong>ch <strong>of</strong> the perfor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

C. Repair <strong>of</strong> the perfor<strong>at</strong>ion and HSV<br />

D. Repair <strong>of</strong> the perfor<strong>at</strong>ion and truncal<br />

vagotomy<br />

E. Repair <strong>of</strong> the perfor<strong>at</strong>ion and gastric<br />

resection


Which oper<strong>at</strong>ion for duodenal ulcer is<br />

least likely to produce undesirable<br />

postoper<strong>at</strong>ive symptoms :<br />

A. Subtotal gastrectomy<br />

B. Truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty<br />

C. Truncal vagotomy and antrectomy<br />

D. Selective vagotomy<br />

E. Highly selective vagotomy


References<br />

‣ Dempsey DT. Chapter 26. Stomach. Schwartz's Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Surgery</strong>. 9th<br />

ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

‣ Lee CW and Sarosi Jr GA. Emergency ulcer surgery. Surg Clin N Am.<br />

2011; 91:1001-1013.<br />

‣ Hermansson M et al. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic<br />

ulcer perfor<strong>at</strong>ion. Eur J Surg. 1999; 165: 566.<br />

‣ Sorour M et al. Study <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> jejunal serosal p<strong>at</strong>ch in the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> large gastroduodenal perfor<strong>at</strong>ions. Egyptian J Surg. 2012;<br />

31(3): 116-122.<br />

‣ Mulholland MW and Simeone DM. Benign gastric disorders. Maingot’s<br />

Abdominal Oper<strong>at</strong>ions. 11 th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

‣ Newman NA, et al. Benign gastric ulcer. Cameron’s Current Surgical<br />

Therapy. 10 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier.<br />

‣ Maher JW and Chikunguwo SM. Fischer’s Mastery <strong>of</strong> <strong>Surgery</strong> 6 th ed.<br />

Philadelphia: Lippincott

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!