10.06.2015 Views

S1000D-compliant illustrations - ISTC

S1000D-compliant illustrations - ISTC

S1000D-compliant illustrations - ISTC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 Indexing<br />

The finishing touch<br />

Bill Johncocks launches his regular indexing page by<br />

explaining how a good index makes a manual fully usable.<br />

Manning an IT helpdesk can be pretty<br />

soul-destroying and a really clueless<br />

caller can provoke the staff to intone<br />

‘RTFM’, an acronym where three of the<br />

letters stand for Read The Manual. It<br />

seems nobody can win in a helpdesk<br />

interaction, because every contact grows<br />

out of an initial failure. Certainly users<br />

who psyche themselves up to make a<br />

long and humiliating call must first have<br />

felt at least equal frustration. They know<br />

the solution is at their fingertips; they just<br />

can’t find it using the index, and that’s<br />

because user manuals have some of the<br />

most unusable indexes in the world.<br />

Why is this? After all, most manuals<br />

are painstakingly compiled by<br />

intelligent, dedicated professional<br />

communicators — people just like you<br />

and people, presumably, not too unlike<br />

professional indexers. So why are so<br />

many of their indexes dire? I think<br />

the answer is simple: most technical<br />

communicators still omit the first,<br />

crucial stage of constructing a usable<br />

index, which is to imagine yourself in<br />

the reader’s shoes.<br />

Thinking like your readers<br />

A book index may serve two readerships:<br />

those who have read the book and are<br />

looking for something they recall seeing,<br />

and those who haven’t, but want to<br />

find a relevant section (and, where that<br />

section addresses an urgent problem,<br />

as in a book on dealing with household<br />

emergencies, the index must be<br />

efficient). We know nobody wants to read<br />

an entire manual — they’d even rather<br />

call a helpdesk — so the second role<br />

must be important for manuals too, but<br />

their indexes often address just the first,<br />

assuming a familiarity with specialised<br />

vocabulary that the first-time reader<br />

can’t possibly have attained. Precise<br />

and consistent wording is a virtue in<br />

section headings and captions but transferring<br />

these terms without thought can<br />

produce a completely unusable index.<br />

Most manuals start by naming components,<br />

then go on to describe how things<br />

work. Often though, readers won’t know<br />

those names or want that explanation:<br />

their approach is use-centred, arising<br />

from a real-world need, and they expect<br />

to be guided quickly to its solution. They<br />

Communicator Spring 2006<br />

might look for ‘Punctures’ not for ‘Wheel<br />

changing’, say, or for ‘Starting’ not for<br />

‘Ignition subsystem’.<br />

Full-time indexers try to approach<br />

documents from the likely reader’s<br />

viewpoint, whereas even authors with<br />

good indexing skills can grow so used<br />

to their chosen terminology that they<br />

risk being trapped within it. Full-time<br />

technical writers, retained to document<br />

a specific project, presumably start<br />

out with a detached view too, but may<br />

quickly find themselves becoming<br />

‘institutionalised’.<br />

Special problems with consumer guides<br />

Paradoxically, it’s not the most<br />

technical material that causes the worst<br />

problems: it’s in indexes to consumer<br />

product guides where the disparity<br />

in knowledge and vocabulary yawns<br />

widest. The author of a textbook on<br />

semiconductor theory will write at a<br />

level suiting its intended readership: the<br />

author-indexer of a short user guide for<br />

a digital camera actually has a harder<br />

job and one needing more imagination.<br />

After living with the product and<br />

becoming steeped in its jargon, he or<br />

she may already speak a quite different<br />

language from its purchasers.<br />

Worse, manual authors sometimes have<br />

to aim at a moving target. Because good<br />

technical writing educates and informs, a<br />

reader who starts out knowing no more<br />

than that the product is recommended<br />

by the guy down at the pub or by Which?<br />

magazine should, after a few pages,<br />

be familiar with the control layout,<br />

the meaning of any error messages or<br />

warning lights and the names of key<br />

components and operations. This calls<br />

for real subtlety in separating low-level<br />

information from the more advanced, and<br />

indexing both appropriately, although a<br />

well-designed manual’s structure should<br />

reflect this progressive acquisition of<br />

expertise and so provide clues.<br />

Usability testing<br />

A good book index might just swing<br />

purchasing choices in bookshops but<br />

manuals aren’t often available before<br />

purchase so, where user documentation<br />

is concerned, customers have to buy a pig<br />

in a poke. But get it right and (assuming<br />

the product also does its job) customer<br />

satisfaction and brand loyalty should<br />

be guaranteed. Really good technical<br />

indexing is a rare skill but an author<br />

who recognises indexing as a separate<br />

problem has already taken the key step.<br />

Might drafting an outline of each<br />

new project in users’ language,<br />

before you immerse yourself in the<br />

specialised vocabulary needed for its<br />

documentation, be time well spent? And,<br />

on completion, don’t just get your work<br />

approved by the in-house development<br />

and marketing teams: why not test it on<br />

colleagues uninvolved with the project<br />

or (if commercial confidentiality allows)<br />

on friends or relatives with similar<br />

backgrounds to the intended users? If<br />

your in-laws find your instructions for<br />

connecting up a new DVD player hard<br />

to follow, they probably won’t be alone.<br />

Nor will they if they look in the index<br />

for terms you didn’t expect. Those they<br />

do look for might be good candidates<br />

for index entries.<br />

Getting help<br />

Whether you index technical publications<br />

yourself or find a specialist through the<br />

Society of Indexers, do take it seriously.<br />

Most of us only read enough of a manual<br />

for our immediate needs, then return<br />

to it when we meet new challenges, so<br />

nothing you write should be read more<br />

than once. If it was understood the first<br />

time, it has done its job but, if your<br />

readers have to scan pages again, looking<br />

for things they can’t find in the index,<br />

you’ve failed as a communicator no<br />

matter how clear your text and diagrams.<br />

And, while a rare skill, indexing needn’t<br />

be a big chore: training is available through<br />

the Society, common sense is fully<br />

applicable and future articles on this page<br />

should help you produce indexes that<br />

take readers straight to solutions, without<br />

needing to make any telephone calls. C<br />

Bill Johncocks is a freelance Accredited<br />

Indexer living on the Isle of Skye, who<br />

specialises in embedded indexing of<br />

technical documents.<br />

E: bill.johncocks@btconnect.com<br />

W: www.technicalindexing.com<br />

Society of Indexers: www.indexers.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!