11.06.2015 Views

I. Ordering Paul's Epistles 1 - Hope of the Glory

I. Ordering Paul's Epistles 1 - Hope of the Glory

I. Ordering Paul's Epistles 1 - Hope of the Glory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Some interesting differences pointed out by Charles Baker 47<br />

PAUL Went by special revelation.<br />

LUKE The church sent <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

PAUL Accompanied by Barnabas and Titus<br />

LUKE Titus not mentioned<br />

PAUL Opposed by false brethren who slipped in LUKE Opposed by believers who were Pharisees<br />

secretly to spy.<br />

PAUL O<strong>the</strong>r apostles added nothing to Paul.<br />

LUKE No mention.<br />

PAUL Mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uncircumcision and LUKE No mention.<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> circumcision.<br />

PAUL Agreement reached for Paul to go to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles LUKE No mention.<br />

and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r apostles to <strong>the</strong> Jews.<br />

PAUL No mention.<br />

LUKE Peter's speech about being <strong>the</strong> first to preach to<br />

Gentiles and how God put no difference between Jews<br />

and Gentiles.<br />

PAUL No mention. LUKE Discourse by James on Amos 9.<br />

PAUL No mention.<br />

LUKE Letter written freeing Gentiles from Mosaic law<br />

and a disclaimer <strong>the</strong>y had sent <strong>the</strong>se men to Antioch<br />

who were insisting on circumcision for Gentiles.<br />

PAUL Mentioned as second visit to Jerusalem.<br />

LUKE Mentioned as <strong>Paul's</strong> third visit to Jerusalem.<br />

1. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, some have thought that <strong>the</strong>re were two such visits<br />

2. I do not consider <strong>the</strong> evidence strong enough to have two nearly identical events with<br />

nei<strong>the</strong>r source mentioning both.<br />

3. We note <strong>the</strong> following about Paul’s ‘first’ visit to Galatia 48<br />

“We know Paul went to cities in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> province on his first missionary journey, but Luke<br />

does not mention Paul going into Galatia until his second missionary journey (Acts 16:6), where Phrygia, to which<br />

Paul went on his first journey, is distinguished from Galatia. Luke uses Galatia in <strong>the</strong> same way in Acts 18:23.<br />

Thus Luke limits Galatia to <strong>the</strong> original small territory to which Paul did not go until his second journey. Now, if<br />

Paul uses Galatia in this same sense, he must be addressing his letter to churches he established on his second<br />

journey. But <strong>the</strong> problem is that Luke gives no record <strong>of</strong> Paul establishing even one church in Galatia. But if Paul<br />

uses Galatia in this epistle in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enlarged province, <strong>the</strong>n we know <strong>the</strong> churches addressed were in<br />

Antioch in Pisidia, Iconium, Lystra, and Derbe. This problem has led to two <strong>the</strong>ories, <strong>the</strong> North Galatian Theory,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> South Galatian Theory. The former supposes <strong>the</strong> churches addressed were in <strong>the</strong> chief cities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> north,<br />

Ancyra (modern Ankara), Pessinus, and Tavium, even though <strong>the</strong>se cities are not mentioned in <strong>the</strong> Bible. The<br />

maps <strong>of</strong> Asia minor in many Bibles and Bible atlases follow <strong>the</strong> North Galatian view.”<br />

Since Paul did not visit this nor<strong>the</strong>rn section <strong>of</strong> Galatia until his second missionary journey it is evident,<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn view, that Galatians must have been written after that journey, and perhaps while he<br />

was on his third journey. And since Luke is silent about Paul having established any churches in this nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

region <strong>the</strong>re is no way <strong>of</strong> knowing in what cities <strong>the</strong>y were located or who <strong>the</strong> people were. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, if<br />

<strong>the</strong> South Galatian hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is correct, <strong>the</strong> churches …<br />

B. An interesting timeline, also from Baker’s book on Galatians (remember that most put <strong>the</strong> Birth <strong>of</strong><br />

Christ at 4 BC<br />

30 A.D. Pentecost<br />

35 A.D. Saul's conversion<br />

38 A.D. Saul's first visit to Jerusalem (Gal. 1:18; Acts 9:26).<br />

38 - 45 A.D. Saul preaches in Syria and Cilicia (Gal. 1:21; Acts 9:30).<br />

40 A.D. Cornelius converted (Acts 10:32-48).<br />

45 A.D. Reception <strong>of</strong> Gentile converts into Jewish church at Antioch. Barnabas brings Saul from<br />

Tarsus to minister at Antioch (Acts 11:19-26).<br />

46 A.D. Barnabas and Saul sent to Jerusalem with famine relief (Acts 11:27-30; 12:25).<br />

47 - 48 A.D. Saul and Barnabas on first missionary journey (Acts 13:1-14:25).<br />

49 A.D. Paul goes to Jerusalem to meet with Jewish apostles (Acts 15:1-29; Gal. 2:1-10). This is his<br />

second visit according to Paul and his third according to Luke. This is not a contradiction. Luke<br />

47 Charles Baker, ibid, p.15<br />

48 Charles Baker, ibid, p. 8<br />

Galatians Page 40 November 22, 2008 10:05

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!