13.06.2015 Views

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

Quantum Gravity : Mathematical Models and Experimental Bounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong><br />

B. Fauser, J. Tolksdorf <strong>and</strong> E. Zeidler, Eds., 1–13<br />

c○ 2006 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> — A Short Overview<br />

Claus Kiefer<br />

Abstract. The main problems in constructing a quantum theory of gravity<br />

as well as some recent developments are briefly discussed on a non-technical<br />

level.<br />

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). Primary 83-02; Secondary 83C45;<br />

83C47; 83F05; 83E05; 83E30.<br />

Keywords. <strong>Quantum</strong> gravity, string theory, quantum geometrodynamics, loop<br />

quantum gravity, black holes, quantum cosmology, experimental tests.<br />

1. Why do we need quantum gravity?<br />

The task to formulate a consistent quantum theory of gravity has occupied physicists<br />

since the first attempts by Léon Rosenfeld in 1930. Despite much work it is<br />

fair to say that this goal has not yet been reached. In this short contribution I shall<br />

attempt to give a concise summary of the situation in 2005 from my point of view.<br />

The questions to be addressed are: Why is this problem of interest? What are the<br />

main difficulties? And where do we st<strong>and</strong>? A comprehensive technical treatment<br />

can be found in my monograph [1] as well as in the Proceedings volumes [2] <strong>and</strong><br />

[3]. A more detailed review with focus on recent developments is presented in [4].<br />

The reader is referred to these sources for details <strong>and</strong> references.<br />

Why should one be interested in developing a quantum theory of the gravitational<br />

field? The main reasons are conceptual. The famous singularity theorems<br />

show that the classical theory of general relativity is incomplete: Under very general<br />

conditions, singularities are unavoidable. Such singularities can be rather mild,<br />

that is, of a purely topological nature, but they can also consist of diverging curvatures<br />

<strong>and</strong> energy densities. In fact, the latter situation seems to be realized in<br />

two important physical cases: The Big Bang <strong>and</strong> black holes. The presence of<br />

the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation indicates that a Big Bang has<br />

happened in the past. Curvature singularities seem to lurk inside the event horizon<br />

of black holes. One thus needs a more comprehensive theory to underst<strong>and</strong> these<br />

I thank Bertfried Fauser <strong>and</strong> Jürgen Tolksdorf for inviting me to this stimulating workshop.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!